Evolution and coexistence of pollination ecotypes in an african gladiolus (iridaceae)

Evolution

Volumn 64, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 960-972

  Anderson, Bruce ^a,b   Alexandersson, Ronny ^a,c   Johnson, Steven D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU NATAL   (South Africa)

^b STELLENBOSCH UNIVERSITY   (South Africa)

^c UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Assortative mating; Floral scent; Flowering phenology; Geographic mosaic; Hawkmoth; Phenotypic selection; Pollination ecotypes; Speciation

Indexed keywords

ALLOPATRY; ASSORTATIVE MATING; COEXISTENCE; DIVERGENCE; ECOTYPE; FLORAL TRAIT; FLOWERING; GENE FLOW; MONOCOTYLEDON; MORPHOTYPE; MOTH; PHENOLOGY; POLLINATION; POLLINATOR; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY); SYMPATRY;

SOUTH AFRICA;

GLADIOLUS; IRIDACEAE; IRIS (ANGIOSPERM); SPHINGIDAE;

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; EVOLUTION; FLOWER; GENE FLOW; GENETIC SELECTION; GEOGRAPHY; HISTOLOGY; IRIDACEAE; MOTH; NECTAR; ODOR; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; POLLINATION; SOUTH AFRICA; TONGUE;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; EVOLUTION; FLOWERS; GENE FLOW; GEOGRAPHY; IRIDACEAE; MOTHS; NECTAR; ODORS; PHENOTYPE; POLLINATION; SELECTION, GENETIC; SOUTH AFRICA; TONGUE;

EID: 77954998732     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00880.x     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Aldridge G, Campbell D R. Variation in pollinator preference between two Ipomopsis contact sites that differ in hybridization rate. Evolution 2007, 61:99-110.
2. Alexandersson R, Johnson S D. Pollinator-mediated selection on flower-tube length in a hawkmoth-pollinated Gladiolus (Iridaceae). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2002, 269:631-636.
3. Althoff D M, Segraves K A, Pellmyr O. Community context of an obligate mutualism: pollinator and frugivore effects on Yucca filamentosa. Ecology 2005, 86:905-913.
4. Amirav A, Dagan S. A direct sample introduction device for mass spectrometry studies and GC-MS analysis. Eur. J. Mass Spectrom. 1997, 3:105-111.
5. Anderson B, Johnson S D. The geographical mosaic of coevolution in a plant-pollinator mutualism. Evolution 2008, 62:220-225.
6. Anderson B, Johnson S D. Geographical covariation and local convergence of flower depth in a guild of fly-pollinated plants. New Phytol. 2009, 182:553-540.
7. Bloch D, Erhardt A. Selection toward shorter flowers by butterflies whose probosces are shorter than floral tubes. Ecology 2008, 89:2453-2460.
8. Bolten A B, Feinsinger P, Baker H G, Baker I. Calculation of sugar concentration in flower nectar. Oecologia 1979, 41:301-304.
9. Boyd A E. Breeding system of Macromeria viridiflora (Boraginaceae) and geographic variation in pollinator assemblages. Am. J. Bot. 2004, 91:1809-1813.
10. Campbell D R, Waser N M, Price M V. Mechanisms of hummingbird-mediated selection for flower width in Ipomopsis aggregata. Ecology 1996, 77:1463-1472.
11. Clarke K R, Gorley R N. Primer v6: user manual 2006, Primer-E, Plymouth, U.K
12. Coyne J A, Orr H A. Speciation 2004, Sinauer, Sunderland, MA
13. Cruden R W. Pollen grain size, stigma depth, and style length: the relationships revisited. Plant Syst. Evol. 2009, 278:223-238.
14. Cruden R W, Lyon D L. Correlations among stigma depth, style length, and pollen grain size: do they reflect function or phylogeny?. Bot. Gaz. 1985, 146:143-149.
15. Der G, Everitt B S. A handbook of statistical analyses using SAS 2002, 117-130. 2nd ed, CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, FL, pp
16. Devaux C, Lande R. Incipient allochronic speciation due to non-selective assortative mating by flowering time, mutation and genetic drift. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2008, 275:2723-2732.
17. Doebeli M, Dieckmann U. Speciation along environmental gradients. Nature 2003, 421:259-264.
18. Dötterl S, Judrgens A, Seifert K, Laube T, Weissbecker B, Schudtz S. Nursery pollination by a moth in Silene latifolia: the role of odours in eliciting antennal and behavioural responses. New Phytol. 2005, 169:707-718.
19. Ehlers B K, Olesen J M, Ågren J. Floral morphology and reproductive success in the orchid Epipactis helleborine: regional and local across-habitat variation. Plant Syst. Evol. 2002, 236:19-32.
20. Ellis A G, Weis A E, Gaut B S. Evolutionary radiation of "stone plants" in the genus Argyroderma (Aizoaceae): unraveling the effects of landscape, habitat, and flowering. Evolution 2006, 60:39-55.
21. Godsoe W, Yoder J B, Smith C I, Pellmyr O. Coevolution and divergence in the Joshua tree/yucca moth mutualism. Am. Nat. 2008, 171:816-823.
22. Goldblatt P, Manning J. Gladiolus in Southern Africa 1998, Fernwood Press, Vlaeberg, South Africa
23. Grant V, Grant K A. Flower pollination in the Phlox family 1965, Columbia Univ. Press, New York, NY
24. Hodges S A, Arnold M L. Floral and ecological isolation between Aquilegia Formosa and Aquelegia pubescens. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91:2493-2496.
25. Huber F K, Kaiser R, Sauter W, Schiestl F P. Floral scent emission and pollinator attraction in two species of Gymnadenia (Orchidaceae). Oecologia 2005, 142:564-575.
26. Johnson S D. Pollination ecotypes of Satyrium hallackii (Orchidaceae) in South Africa. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 1997, 123:225-235.
27. Johnson S D. Pollinator driven speciation in plants. Ecology and evolution of flowers 2006, 295-311. Harder L DBarrett S C H. Pp.,eds., Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, NY
28. Johnson S D, Steiner K E. Long-tongued fly pollination and evolution of floral spur length in the Disa draconis complex (Orchidaceae). Evolution 1997, 51:45-53.
29. Kaminaga Y, Schnepp J, Peel G, Kish C M, Ben-Nissan G, Weiss D, Orlova I, Lavie O, Rhodes D, Wood K. Plant phenylacetaldehyde synthase is a bifunctional homotetrameric enzyme that catalyzes phenylalanine decarboxylation and oxidation. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281:23357-23366.
30. Kondrashov A S, Kondrashov F A. Interactions among quantitative traits in the course of sympatric speciation. Nature 1999, 400:351-354.
31. Lande R, Arnold S J. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 1983, 37:1210-1226.
32. Maad J. Phenotypic selection in hawkmoth-pollinated Platanthera bifolia: targets and fitness surfaces. Evolution 2000, 54:112-123.
33. Maad J, Alexandersson R. Variable selection in Platanthera bifolia (Orchidaceae): phenotypic selection differed between sex functions in a drought year. J. Evol. Biol. 2004, 17:642-650.
34. Marques I, Rossello-Graell A, Draper D, Iriondo J M. Pollination patterns limit hybridization between two sympatric species of Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae). Am. J. Bot. 2007, 94:1352-1359.
35. Medel R, Botto-Mahan C, Kalin-Arroyo M. Pollinator-mediated selection on the nectar guide phenotype in the Andean Monkey flower, Mimulus luteus. Ecology 2003, 84:1721-1732.
36. Muchhala N. Adaptive trade-off in floral morphology mediates specialization for flowers pollinated by bats and hummingbirds. Am. Nat. 2007, 169:494-504.
37. Muchhala N, Thompson J D. Going to great lengths: selection for long corolla tubes in an extremely specialized bat-flower mutualism. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 2009, 276:2147-2152.
38. Nilsson L A. The evolution of flowers with deep corolla tubes. Nature 1988, 334:147-149.
39. Okamoto T, Kawakita A, Kato M. Interspecific variation of floral scent composition in Glochidion and ist association with host-specific pollinating seed parasite (Epicephala). J. Chem. Ecol. 2007, 33:1065-1081.
40. Olsson K, Ågren J. Latitudinal population differentiation in phenology, life history and flower morphology in the perennial herb Lythrum salicaria. J. Evol. Biol. 2002, 15:983-996.
41. Perez-Barrales R, Arroyo J, Armbruster W S. Differences in pollinator faunas may generate geographic differences in floral morphology and integration in Narcissus papyraceus (Alarcissiopapyraceris). Oikos 2007, 116:1904-1918.
42. Plepys D, Ibarra F, Löfstedt C. Volatiles from flowers of Platanthera bifolia (Orchidaceae) attractive to the silver Y moth, Autographa gamma (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Oikos 2002, 99:69-74.
43. Plitmann U, Levin D A. Pollen-pistil relationships in the Polemoniaceae. Evolution 1983, 37:957-967.
44. Raguso R A, Light D M. Electroantennogram responses of male Sphinx perelegans hawkmoths to floral and 'green-leaf volatiles'. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 1998, 86:287-293.
45. Raguso R A, Light D M, Pickersky E. Electroantennogram responses of Hyles lineata (Sphingidae: Lepidoptera) to volatile compounds from Clarkia breweri (Onagraceae) and other moth-pollinated flowers. J. Chem. Ecol. 1996, 22:1735-1766.
46. Ramsey J, Bradshaw H D, Schemske D W. Components of reproductive isolation between the monkeyflowers Mimulus lewisii and M. cardinalis (Phrymaceae). Evolution 2003, 57:1520-1534.
47. Rathcke B, Lacey E P. Phenological patterns of terrestrial plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1985, 16:179-214.
48. Rey P J, Herrera C M, Guitian J, Cerda X, Sanchez-Lafuente A M, Medrano M, Garrido J L. The geographic mosaic in predispersal interactions and selection on Helleborus foetidus (Ranunculaceae). J. Evol. Biol. 2006, 19:21-34.
49. Rice W R. Analysing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 1989, 43:223-225.
50. Robertson J L, Wyatt R. Evidence for pollination ecotypes in the yellow-fringed orchid, Platanthera ciliaris. Evolution 1990, 44:121-133.
51. Roulston T H, Cane J H, Buchmann S L. What governs protein content of pollen: pollinator preferences, pollen-pistil interactions or phylogeny?. Ecol. Monogr. 2000, 70:617-643.
52. Savolainen V, Anstett M C, Lexer C, Hutton I, Clarkson J J, Norup M V, Powell M P, Springate D, Salamin N, Baker W J. Sympatric speciation in palms on an oceanic island. Nature 2006, 441:210-213.
53. Schemske D W, Bradshaw H D. Pollinator preference and the evolution of floral traits in monkeyflowers (Mimulus). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96:11910-11915.
54. Schemske D W, Horvitz C C. Temporal variation in selection on a floral character. Evolution 1989, 43:461-465.
55. Stam P. The evolution of reproductive isolation in closely adjacent plant-populations through differential flowering time. Heredity 1983, 50:105-118.
56. Stebbins G L. Adaptive radiation of reproductive characteristics in angiosperms. 1: pollination mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst 1970, 1:307-326.
57. Waelti M O, Muhlemann J K, Widmer A, Schiestl F P. Floral odour and reproductive isolation in two species of Silene. J. Evol. Biol. 2008, 21:111-121.
58. Weis A E. Direct and indirect assortative mating: a multivariate approach to plant flowering schedules. J. Evol. Biol. 2005, 18:536-546.
59. Whittall J B, Hodges S A. Pollinator shifts drive increasingly long nectar spurs in columbine flowers. Nature 2007, 447:706-709.