A geographic selection mosaic in a generalized plant-pollinator-herbivore system

Ecological Monographs

Volumn 79, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 245-263

  Gomez J M ^a   Perfectti, F ^a   Bosch, J ^b   Camacho, J P M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Corolla shape evolution; Diffuse selection; Divergent selection; Erysimum mediohispanicum; Geographic mosaic theory of coevolution; Herbivores; Multispecific systems; Pollinators; Structural equation modeling

Indexed keywords

ANTAGONISM; COEVOLUTION; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; DICOTYLEDON; DIVERGENCE; EVOLUTIONARY THEORY; FITNESS; FLORAL TRAIT; FUNCTIONAL GROUP; HERBIVORE; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; MUTUALISM; PLANT-HERBIVORE INTERACTION; PLANT-POLLINATOR INTERACTION; SELECTION; SPATIAL VARIATION; SPECIALIZATION; UNGULATE;

APOIDEA; BRASSICACEAE; COLEOPTERA; ERYSIMUM; ERYSIMUM MEDIOHISPANICUM; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; MAMMALIA; UNGULATA;

EID: 66149096222     PISSN: 00129615     EISSN: 15577015     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/08-0511.1     Document Type: Article

References (96)

1. Adams, D. C., F. J. Rohlf, and D. E. Slice. 2004. Geometric morphometrics: ten years of progress following the 'revolution.' Italian Journal of Zoology 71:5-16.
2. Adams, D. C, and M. S. Rosenberg. 1998. Partial warps, phylogeny, and ontogeny: a comment on Fink and Zelditch (1995). Systematic Biology 47:168-173.
3. Aigner, P. A. 2005. Variation in pollination performance gradients in a Dudleya species complex. Can generalization promote floral divergence? Functional Ecology 19:681-689.
4. Aigner, P. A. 2006. The evolution of specialized floral phenotype in a fine-grained pollinator environment. Pages 23-46 in N. M. Waser and J. Ollerton, editors. Plant-pollinator interactions, from specialization to generalization. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
5. Alados, C. L., and L. Escós. 1987. Relationships between movement rate, agonistic displacements and forage availability in Spanish ibexes (Capra pyrenaica). Biological Behavior 12:245-255.
6. Althoff, D. M., K. A. Segraves, and O. Pellmyr. 2005. Community context of an obligate mutualism: pollinator and florivore effects on Yucca filamentosa. Ecology 86:905-913.
7. Anderson, B., and J. D. Johnson. 2008. The geographical mosaic of coevolution in a plant-pollinator mutualism. Evolution 62:220-225.
8. Benitez-Vieyra, S., A. M. Medina, E. Glinos, and A. A. Cocucci. 2006. Pollinator-mediated selection on floral traits and size of floral display in Cyclopogon elatus, a sweat bee-pollinated orchid. Functional Ecology 20:948-957.
9. Benkman, C. W. 1999. The selection mosaic and diversifying coevolution between crossbills and lodgepole pine. American Naturalist 153: S75-S91.
10. Benkman, C. W., T. L. Parchman, A. Favis, and A. M. Siepielski. 2003. Reciprocal selection causes a coevolutionary arms race between crossbills and lodgepole pine. American Naturalist 162:182-194.
11. Bookstein, F. L. 1991. Morphometric tools for landmark data: geometry and biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
12. Boyd, A. E. 2004. Breeding system of Macromeria viridiflora (Boraginaceae) and geographic variation in pollinator assemblages. American Journal of Botany 91:1809-1813.
13. Branquart, E., and J. L. Hemptinne. 2000. Selectivity in the exploitation of floral resources by hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphinae). Ecography 23:732-742.
14. Brody, A. K. 1997. Effects of pollinators, herbivores, and seed predators on flowering phenology. Ecology 78:1624-1631.
15. Burnham, K. P., and D. R. Anderson. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical-theoretic approach. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany.
16. Campbell, D. R. 1989. Measurements of selection in a hermaphroditic plant: variation in male and female reproductive success. Evolution 43:318-334.
17. Campbell, D. R. 1991. Effects of floral traits on sequential components of fitness in Ipomopsis aggregata. American Naturalist 137:713-737.
18. Capelle, J., and C. Neema. 2005. Local adaptation and population structure at a micro-geographical scale of a fungal parasite on its host plant. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18:1445-1454.
19. Cariveau, D., R. E. Irwin, A. K. Brody, L. S. Garcia-Mayeya, and A. von der Ohe. 2004. Direct and indirect effects of pollinators and seed predators to selection on plant and floral traits. Oikos 104:15-26.
20. Colley, M. R., and J. M. Luna. 2000. Relative attractiveness of potential insectary plants to aphidophagous hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae). Environmental Entomology 29:1054-1059.
21. Colwell, R. K. 2005. EstimateS - statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 7.5. User's guide and application. (http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/estimates)
22. Conner, J. K., and R. Neumeier. 1995. Effects of black mustard population size on the taxonomic composition of pollinators. Oecologia 104:218-224.
23. Conner, J. K., and S. Rush. 1996. Effects of flower size and number on pollinator visitation to wild radish, Raphanus raphanistrum. Oecologia 105:509-516.
24. Conner, J. K., S. Rush, and P. Jennetten. 1996. Measurements of natural selection on floral traits in wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum). 1. Selection through lifetime female fitness. Evolution 50:1127-1136.
25. Dilley, J. D., P. Wilson, and M. R. Mesler. 2000. The radiation of Calochortus: generalist flowers moving through a mosaic of potential pollinators. Oikos 89:209-222.
26. Faegri, K., and L. van der Pijl. 1979. The principles of pollination ecology. Pergamon, London, UK.
27. Fenster, C. B., W. S. Armbruster, P. M. Wilson, R. Dudash, and J. D. Thompson. 2004. Pollination syndromes and floral specialization. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 35:375-404.
28. Fishbein, M., and D. L. Venable. 1996. Diversity and temporal change in the effective pollinators of Asclepias tuberosa. Ecology 77:1061-1073.
29. Fortin, M. J., and M. Dale. 2006. Spatial analysis: a guide for ecologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridege, UK.
30. Fortin, M. J., and J. Gurevitch. 2001. Mantel test: spatial structure in field experiments. Pages 308-326 in S. M. Scheiner and J. Gurevitch, editors. Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Chapman and Hall, New York, New York, USA.
31. Galen, C. 1989. Measuring pollinator-mediated selection on morphometric floral traits: bumblebees and the alpine sky pilot, Polemonium viscosum. Evolution 43:882-890.
32. Galen, C, K. A. Zimmer, and M. E. Newport. 1987. Pollination in floral scent morphs of Polemonium viscosum: a mechanism for disruptive selection on flower size. Evolution 41:599-606.
33. Gómez, J. M. 2000. Phenotypic selection and response to selection in Lobularia maritima: importance of direct and correlational components of natural selection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 13:689-699.
34. Gómez, J. M. 2003. Herbivory reduces the strength of pollinator-mediated selection in the Mediterranean herb Erysimum mediohispanicum: consequences for plant specialization. American Naturalist 162:242-256.
35. Gómez, J. M. 2005a. Ungulate effect on the performance, abundance, and spatial structure of two montane herbs: a seven-year experimental study. Ecological Monographs 75: 231-258.
36. Gómez, J. M. 2005b. Non-additive effects of pollinators and herbivores on Erysimum mediohispanicum (Cruciferae) fitness. Oecologia 143:412-418.
37. Gómez, J. M. 2007. Dispersal-mediated selection on plant height in an autochorously-dispersed herb. Plant Systematics and Evolution 268:119-130.
38. Gómez, J. M. 2008. Sequential conflicting selection due to multispecific interactions triggers evolutionary trade-offs in a monocarpic herb. Evolution 62:668-679.
39. Gómez, J. M., J. Bosch, F. Perfectti, J. Fernández, and M. Abdelaziz. 2007. Pollinator diversity affects plant reproduction and recruitment: the tradeoffs of generalization. Oecologia 153:597-605.
40. Gómez, J. M., J. Bosch, F. Perfectti, J. D. Fernández, M. Abdelaziz, and J. P. M. Camacho. 2008a. Association between floral traits and reward in Erysimum mediohispanicum (Brassicaceae). Annals of Botany 101:1413-1420.
41. Gómez, J. M., J. Bosch, F. Perfectti, J. D. Fernández, M. Abdelaziz, and J. P. M. Camacho. 2008ft. Spatial variation in selection on corolla shape in a generalist plant is promoted by the preference patterns of its local pollinators. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 275:2241-2249.
42. Gómez, J. M., F. Perfectti, and J. P. M. Camacho. 2006. Natural selection on Erysimum mediohispanicum flower shape: insights into the evolution of zygomorphy. American Naturalist 168:531-545.
43. Gómez, J. M., and R. Zamora. 1999. Generalization vs. specialization in the pollination system of Hormathophylla spinosa (Cruciferae). Ecology 80:796-805.
44. Gómez, J. M., and R. Zamora. 2000. Spatial variation in the selective scenarios of Hormathophylla spinosa (Cruciferae). American Naturalist 155:657-668.
45. Gómez, J. M., and R. Zamora. 2006. Ecological factors that promote the evolution of generalization in pollination systems. Pages 145-165 in N. M. Waser and J. Ollerton, editors. Plant-pollinator interactions, from specialization to generalization. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
46. Gomulkiewicz, R., D. M. Drown, M. F. Dybdahl, W. Godsoe, S. L. Nuismer, K. M. Pepin, B. J. Ridenhour, C. I. Smith, and J. B. Yoder. 2007. Dos and don'ts of testing the geographic mosaic theory of coevolution. Heredity 98:249-258.
47. Gomulkiewicz, R., J. N. Thompson, R. D. Holt, S. L. Nuismer, and M. E. Hochberg. 2000. Hot spots, cold spots, and the geographic mosaic theory of coevolution. American Naturalist 156:156-174.
48. Grace, J. B. 2006. Structural equation modeling and natural systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
49. Haining, R. 2002. Spatial data analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
50. Herrera, C. M. 2000. Measuring the effects of pollinators and herbivores: evidence for non-additivity in a perennial herb. Ecology 81:2170-2176.
51. Herrera, C. M., M. C. Castellanos, and M. Medrano. 2006. Geographical context of floral evolution: towards an improved research programme in floral diversification. Pages 278-294 in L. D. Harder and S. C. H. Barrett, editors. Ecology and evolution of flowers. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
52. Hoeksema, J. D., and J. N. Thompson. 2007. Geographic structure in a widespread plant-mycorrhizal interaction: pines and false truffles. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20: 1148-1163.
53. Irwin, R. E. 2006. The consequences of direct versus indirect species interactions to selection on traits: pollination and nectar robbing in Ipomopsis aggregata. American Naturalist 167:315-328.
54. Irwin, R. E., and A. K. Brody. 2000. Consequences of nectar robbing for realized male function in a hummingbird-pollinated plant. Ecology 81:2637-2643.
55. Iwao, K., and M. D. Rausher. 1997. Evolution of plant resistance to multiple herbivores: quantifying diffuse coevolution. American Naturalist 149:316-335.
56. Krupnick, G. A., and A. E. Weiss. 1999. The consequences of floral herbivory for pollinator service to Isomeris arborea. Ecology 80:125-134.
57. Kunin, W. E. 1997. Population size and density effects in pollination, pollinator foraging and plant reproductive success in experimental arrays of Brassica kaber. Journal of Ecology 85:225-234.
58. Laine, A. L. 2005. Spatial scale of local adaptation in a plant-pathogen metapopulation. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18:930-938.
59. Laine, A. L. 2006. Evolution of host resistance: looking for coevolutionary hotspots at small spatial scale. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 273:267-273.
60. Lapchin, L. 2002. Host-parasitoid association and diffuse coevolution: When to be a generalist? American Naturalist 160:245-254.
61. Legendre, P., and A. Vaudor. 2001. The R package: multidimensional analysis, spatial analysis. University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
62. Leimu, R., and J. Koricheva. 2006. A meta-analysis of genetic correlations between plant resistances to multiple enemies. American Naturalist 168: E15-E37.
63. Magurran, A. E. 2004. Ecological diversity and its measurements. Second edition. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
64. Makino, T. T., and S. Sakai. 2007. Experience changes pollinator responses to floral display size: from size-based to reward-based foraging. Functional Ecology 21:854-863.
65. Martin, N. H. 2004. Flower size preferences of the honeybee (Apis melliferd) foraging on Mimulus guttatus (Scrophula-riaceae). Evolutionary Ecology Research 6:777-782.
66. Mezquida, E. T., and C. W. Benkman. 2005. The geographic selection mosaic for squirrels, crossbills and Aleppo pine. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18:348-357.
67. Moeller, D. A. 2005. Pollinator community structure and sources of spatial variation in plant-pollinator interaction in Clarkia xantiana spp. xantiana. Oecologia 142:28-37.
68. Moeller, D. A. 2006. Geographic structure of pollinator communities, reproductive assurance, and the evolution of self pollination. Ecology 87:1510-1522.
69. Nuismer, S. L., J. N. Thompson, and R. Gomulkiewicz. 2000. Coevolutionary clines across selection mosaics. Evolution 54: 1102-1115.
70. Price, M. V., N. M. Waser, R. E. Irwin, D. R. Campbell, and A. K. Brody. 2005. Temporal and spatial variation in pollination of a montane herb: a seven-year study. Ecology 86:2106-2116.
71. Proctor, M., P. Yeo, and A. Lack. 1996. The natural history of pollination. Timber Press, Portland, Oregon, USA.
72. R Development Core Team. 2007. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. (http://www.R-project.org)
73. Rey, P. J., C. M. Herrera, J. Guitián, X. Cerdá, A. M. Sánchez-Lafuente, M. Medrano, and J. L Garrido. 2006. The geographic mosaic in predispersal interactions and selection on Helleborus foetidus (Ranunculaceae). Journal of Evolutionary Biology 19:21-34.
74. Rohlf, F. J. 2003. Bias and error in estimates of mean shape in geometric morphometrics. Journal of Human Evolution 44: 665-683.
75. Rohlf, F. J., and D. E. Slice. 1990. Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Systematic Zoology 39:40-59.
76. Roth, V. L. 1993. On three-dimensional morphometrics, and on the identification of landmark points. Pages 41-62 in L. F. Marcus, E. Bello, and A. García-Valdecasas, editors. Contributions to morphometrics. Museo de Ciencias Natu-rales, Madrid, Spain.
77. Rudgers, J. A., and S. Y. Strauss. 2004. A selection mosaic in the facultative mutualism between ants and wild cotton. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 271:2481-2488.
78. Siepielski, A. M., and C. W. Benkman. 2007. Convergen patterns in the selection mosaic for two North American bird-dispersed pines. Ecological Monographs 77:203-220.
79. Slice, D. 2001. Landmarks aligned by Procrustes analysis do not lie in Kendall's shape space. Systematic Biology 50:141-149.
80. StatSoft. 2004. STATISTICA for Windows (program manual). StatSoft, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.
81. Strauss, S. Y. 1997. Floral characters link herbivores, pollinators, and plant fitness. Ecology 78:1640-1645.
82. Strauss, S. Y., and R. E. Irwin. 2004. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of multispecies plant-animal interactions. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 35:435-466.
83. Strauss, S. Y., H. Sahli, and J. K. Conner. 2005. Toward a more trait-centered approach to diffuse (co)evolution. New Phy-tologist 165:81-90.
84. Strauss, S. Y., D. H. Siemens, M. B. Decher, and T. Mitchell-Olds. 1999. Ecological costs of plant resistance to herbivores in the currency of pollination. Evolution 53:1105-1113.
85. Strauss, S. Y., and J. B. Whittall. 2006. Non-pollinator agents of selection on floral traits. Pages 120-138 in L. D. Harder and S. C. H. Barrett, editors. The ecology and evolution of flowers. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
86. Streisfeld, M. A., and J. R. Kohn. 2007. Environment and pollinator-mediated selection on parapatric floral races of Mimulus aurantiacus. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20: 122-132.
87. Thompson, J. D. 2001. How do visitation patterns vary among pollinators in relation to floral display and floral design in a generalist pollination system? Oecologia 126:386-394.
88. Thompson, J. N. 2005. The geographic mosaic of coevolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
89. Thompson, J. N., and B. M. Cunningham. 2002. Geographic structure and dynamics of coevolutionary selection. Nature 417:735-738.
90. Thompson, J. N., and C. C. Fernández. 2006. Temporal dynamics of antagonism and mutualism in a geographically variable plant-insect interaction. Ecology 87:103-112.
91. Toju, H. 2007. Interpopulation variation in predator foraging behavior promotes the evolutionary divergence of prey. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20:1544-1533.
92. Vaughton, G., and M. Ramsey. 1998. Floral display, pollinator visitation and reproductive success in the dioecious perennial herb Wurmbea dioica (Liliaceae). Oecologia 115:93-101.
93. Walker, J. A. 2000. The ability of geometric morphometric methods to estimate a known covariance matrix. Systematic Biology 49:686-696.
94. Wilson, P., M. C. Castellanos, J. N. Hogues, J. D. Thomson, and W. S. Armbruster. 2004. A multivariate search for pollination syndrome among penstemons. Oikos 104:345-361.
95. Wilson, P., and J. D. Thomson. 1996. How do flowers diverge? Pages 88-1 lll in D. Lloyd and S. C. H. Barrett, editors. Floral biology. Chapman and Hall, New York, New York, USA.
96. Zelditch, M. L., D. L. Swiderski, H. D. Sheets, and W. L. Fink. 2004. Geometric morphometrics for biologists: a primer. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.