Ceilings, cliffs and labyrinths: Exploring metaphors for workplace gender discrimination

The SAGE Handbook of Gender and Psychology

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 450-464

  Bruckmüller, Susanne ^a   Ryan, Michelle K ^b,c   Haslam, S Alexander ^d   Peters, Kim ^b  

^a University of Exeter ^*

^b UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892472921     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781446269930.n27     Document Type: Chapter

References (93)

1. Adler, N. (2000). An international perspective on the barriers to the advancement of women managers. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 42, 289-300.
2. Agars, M. D. (2004). Reconsidering the impact of gender stereotypes on the advancement of women in organizations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 103-111.
3. Altmann, Y., Simpson, R., Baruch, Y., & Burke, R. J. (2005). Reframing the 'glass ceiling' debate. In R. J.Burke & M. C.Mattis (Eds.), Supporting women's career advancement: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 58-81). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
4. Arulampalam, W., Booth, A. L., & Bryan, M. L. (2006). Is there a glass ceiling over Europe? Exploring the gender pay gap across the wage distribution. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 60, 163-186.
5. Ashby, J., Ryan, M. K., & Haslam, S. A. (2007). Legal work and the glass cliff: Evidence that women are preferentially selected to lead problematic cases. William and Mary Journal of Women and the Law, 13, 775-794.
6. Bagilhole, B. (2006). Family-friendly policies and equal opportunities: A contradiction in terms? British Journal of Guidance and Counseling, 34, 327-343.
7. Barreto, M., Ryan, M. K., & Schmitt, M. T. (Eds.) (2009). The glass ceiling in the 21st century: Understanding barriers to gender equality. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
8. Bell, E. L. J., & Nkomo, S. M. (2001). Our separate ways: Black and white women and the struggle for professional identity. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
9. Bendl, R., & Schmidt, A. (2010). From glass ceilings to firewalls-different metaphors for describing discrimination. Gender, Work and Organization, 17, 612-634.
10. Berryman, S. E. (1983). Who will do science?New York: Rockefeller Foundation.
11. Bianchi, S. M., Milkie, M. A., Sayer, L. C., & Robinson, J. P. (2000). Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces, 79, 191-228.
12. Bicchieri, C. (1988). Should a scientist abstain from metaphor? In A.Klamer, D.McCloskey, & R.Solow (Eds.), The consequences of economic rhetoric (pp. 100-116). New York: Cambridge University Press.
13. Blau, F. D., & DeVaro, J. (2007). New evidence on gender differences in promotion rates: An empirical analysis of a sample of new hires. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 46, 511-550.
14. Blau, F. D., & Kahn, L. M. (2000). Gender differences in pay. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14, 75-99.
15. Blickenstaff, J. C. (2005). Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and Education, 17, 369-386.
16. Branscombe, N. R. (1998). Thinking about one's gender group's privileges or disadvantages: Consequences for well-being in women and men. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 167-184.
17. Booth, A. L., Francesconi, M., & Frank, J. (2003). A sticky floors model of promotion, pay and gender, European Economic Review 47, 295-322.
18. Brown, E. R., Diekman, A. B., & Schneider, M. C. (2011). A change will do us good: Threats diminish typical preferences for male leaders. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 930-941.
19. Bruckmüller, S. (2013). Singled out as the effect to be explained: Implications for collective self-esteem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 237-249.
20. Bruckmüller, S., & Abele, A. E. (2010). Comparison focus in intergroup comparisons: Who we compare to whom influences who we see as powerful and agentic. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1424-1435.
21. Bruckmüller, S., & Branscombe, N. R. (2010). The glass cliff: When and why women are selected as leaders in crisis contexts. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 433-451.
22. Bruckmüller, S., Hegarty, P., & Abele, A. E. (2012). Framing gender differences: Linguistic normativity affects perceptions of power and gender stereotypes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 210-218.
23. Bruckmüller, S., Ryan, M. K., Rink, F., & Haslam, S. A. (in press). The glass cliff: Examining why women occupy leadership positions in precarious circumstances. In S.Kumra, R.Simpson, & R.Burke, (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of gender in organizations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24. Catalyst (2000). Breaking the Barriers: Women in Senior Management in the UK. Retrieved from www.catalyst.org/publication/65/breaking-the-barriers-women-in-senior-management-in-the-uk (3 July 2012).
25. Catalyst (2009). 2008 Catalyst census of women corporate officers and top earners of the FP500. Retrieved from www.catalyst.org/publication/295/2008-catalyst-census-of-womencorporate-officers-and-top-earners-of-the-fp500 (28 June 2012).
26. Cikara, M., & Fiske, S. T. (2009). Warmth, competence, and ambivalent sexism: Vertical assault and collateral damage. In M.Barreto, M. K.Ryan, & M. T.Schmitt (Eds.), The glass ceiling in the 21st century: Understanding barriers to gender equality (pp. 73-96). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
27. Cornelissen, J. P. (2006). Metaphor and the dynamics of knowledge in organization theory: A case study of the organizational identity metaphor. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 683-709.
28. Cornelissen, J. P., & Kafouros, M. (2008). Metaphors and theory building in organization theory: What determines the impact of a metaphor on theory? British Journal of Management, 19, 365-379.
29. Crosby, F. J., Biernat, M., & Williams, J. (2004). The maternal wall: Introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 675-682.
30. Crosby, L., & Sabattini, F. J. (2009). Ceilings and walls: Work-life and 'family-friendly' policies. In M.Barreto, M. K.Ryan, & M. T.Schmitt (Eds.), The glass ceiling in the 21st century: Understanding barriers to gender equality (pp. 201-223). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
31. Czyzselska, J. (2000). The pink ceiling. The Guardian, 1 March 2000. Retrieved from www.guardian.co.uk/money/2000/mar/01/workandcareers.madeleinebunting (26 June 2012).
32. Dasgupta, N., & Stout, J. G. (2012). Contemporary discrimination in the lab and field: Benefits and obstacles of full-cycle social psychology. Journal of Social Issues, 68, 399-412.
33. Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. (2007). Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.
35. Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573-598.
36. Eagly, A. H., & Szcesny, S. (2009). Stereotypes about women, men, and leaders: Have times changed? In M.Barreto, M. K.Ryan, & M. T.Schmitt (Eds.), The glass ceiling in the 21st century: Understanding barriers to gender equality (pp. 21-47). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
37. Eaton, S. C. (2003). If you can use them: Flexibility policies, organizational commitment and perceived performance. Industrial Relations, 42, 145-167.
38. European Commission (2010). More women in senior positions: Key to economic stability and growth. Retrieved from ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=4746&langId=en (19 July 2012).
39. Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1998). Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science, 22, 133-187.
40. Federal Glass Ceiling Commission (1987). The glass ceiling: In D.Dunn (Ed.), Workplace/Women's place: An anthology (pp. 226-233). Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.
41. Fiske, S. T., Bersoff, D. N., Borgida, E., Deaux, K., & Heilman, M. E. (1991). Social science research on trial: Use of sex stereotyping research in Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins. American Psychologist, 46, 1049-1060.
42. Frenkiel, N. (1984, March). The up-and-comer: Bryant takes aim at the settlers-in. Adweek. Special Report: Magazine World.
43. Fuegen, K., Biernat, M., Haines, E., & Deaux, K. (2004). Mothers and fathers in the workplace: How gender and parental status influence judgments of job-related competence. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 737-754.
44. Haslam, S. A., & Ryan, M. K. (2008). The road to the glass cliff: Differences in the perceived suitability of men and women for leadership positions in succeeding and failing organizations. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 530-546.
45. Haslam, S. A., Ryan, M. K., Kulich, C., Trojanowski, G., & Atkins, C. (2010). Investing with prejudice: The relationship between women's presence on company boards and objective and subjective measures of company performance. British Journal of Management, 21, 484-497.
46. Health and Safety Executive (2005). Tackling stress: The management standards approach. London: HSE.
47. Hegarty, P. J., & Bruckmüller, S. (2013). Asymmetric explanations of group differences: Experimental evidence of Foucault's disciplinary power in social psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 176-186.
48. Hegarty, P. J, & Buechel, C. (2006). Androcentric reporting of gender differences in APA journals: 1965-2004. Review of General Psychology, 10, 377-389.
49. Hegarty, P. J., & Pratto, F. (2001). The effects of social category norms and stereotypes on explanations for intergroup differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 723-735.
50. Hymowitz, C., & Schellhardt, T. D. (1986). The corporate woman (A Special Report): The glass ceiling: Why women can't seem to break the invisible barrier that blocks them from the top jobs. The Wall Street Journal, 24 March.
51. Ibarra, H. W. (1993). Personal networks of women and minorities in management: A conceptual framework. Academy of Management Review, 18, 56-87.
52. Iskra, D. M. (2008). Breaking through the brass ceiling: Strategies of success for elite military women. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag.
53. Ivie, R. & Nies Ray, K. (2005). Women in physics and astronomy, 2005. American Institute of Physics publication number R-430.02. Retrieved from www.aip.org/statistics/trends/reports/women05.pdf (2 August 2012).
54. Iyer, A. (2009). Increasing the representation and status of women in employment: The effectiveness of affirmative action. In M.Barreto, M. K.Ryan, & M. T.Schmitt (Eds.), The glass ceiling in the 21st century: Understanding barriers to gender equality (pp. 257-280). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
55. Kulich, C., Trojanowski, G., Ryan, M. K., Haslam, S. A., & Renneboog, L. D. R. (2011). Who gets the carrot and who gets the stick? Evidence of gender disparities in executive remuneration. Strategic Management Journal, 32, 301-321.
56. Landau, M. J., Meier, B. P., & Keefer, L. A. (2010). A metaphor-enriched social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 1045-1067.
57. Lauzen, M. (2006). The celluloid ceiling: Behind-the-scenes employment of women in the top 250 films of 2005. Retrieved from www.nywift.org/article.aspx?id=79 (26 May 2012).
58. Marshall, J. A. (2008). Escape from the pipeline: Women using physics outside academia. The Physics Teacher, 46, 20-24.
59. Meyerson, D. E., & Fletcher, J. K. (2000). A modest manifesto for shattering the glass ceiling. Harvard Business Review, 78, 127-136.
60. Miller, W., Kerr, B., & Reid, M. (1999). A national study of gender-based occupational segregation in municipal bureaucracies: Persistence of glass walls? Public Administration Review, 59, 218-229.
61. Miller, D., Taylor, B., & Buck, M. L. (1991). Gender gaps: Who needs to be explained? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 5-12.
62. Miree, C. E., & Frieze, I. H. (1999). Children and careers: A longitudinal study of the impact of young children on critical career outcomes of MBAs. Sex Roles, 41, 787-808.
63. Moore, G. (1988). Women in elite positions: Insiders or outsiders? Sociological Forum, 3, 566-585.
64. Morgan, G. (1997). Images of organization (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
65. National Science Foundation (2007). Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering. Arlington, VA: NSF.
66. Noble, B. (1992). At work; and now the 'sticky floor'. New York Times, 22 November. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/1992/11/22/business/at-work-and-now-the-sticky-floor.html (26 June 2012).
67. Pratto, F., Hegarty, P. J., & Korchmaros, J. D. (2007). How communication practices and category norms lead people to stereotype particular people and groups. In Y.Kashima, K.Fiedler, & P.Freytag (Eds.), Stereotype dynamics: language based approaches to the formation, maintenance, and transformation of stereotypes (pp. 293-313). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
68. Pratto, F., Korchmaros, J. D., & Hegarty, P. J. (2007). When race and gender go without saying. Social Cognition, 25, 241-247.
69. Ragins, B. R., Cotton, J. L. & Miller, J. S. (2000). Marginal mentoring: The effects of type of mentor, quality of relationship, and program design on work and career attitudes. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 1177-1194.
70. Ridgeway, C. L., & Correll, S. J. (2004). Motherhood as a status characteristic. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 683-700.
71. Rink, F., Ryan, M. K., & Stoker, J. I. (2012). The precariousness of the glass cliff: How gender stereotypes affect leader evaluations. Best paper proceedings of the 71st Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, San Antonio, TX, August 2011.
72. Rudman, L. A., & Heppen, J. (2003). Implicit romantic phantasies and women's interest in personal power: A glass slipper effect? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1357-1370.
73. Ryan, M. K., & Haslam, S. A. (2005). The glass cliff: Evidence that women are over-represented in precarious leadership positions. British Journal of Management, 16, 81-90.
74. Ryan, M. K. & Haslam, S. A. (2007). The glass cliff: Exploring the dynamics surrounding women's appointment to precarious leadership positions. Academy of Management Review, 32, 549-572.
75. Ryan, M. K., Haslam, S. A., Hersby, M. D., & Bongiorno, R. (2011). Think crisis-think female: Glass cliffs and contextual variation in the think manager-think male stereotype. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 470-484.
76. Ryan, M. K., Haslam, S. A., Hersby, M. D., Kulich, C., & Wilson-Kovacs, M. D. (2009). The stress of working on the edge: Implications of glass cliffs for both women and organizations. In M.Barreto, M. K.Ryan, & M. T.Schmitt (Eds.), The glass ceiling in the 21st century: Understanding barriers to gender equality (pp. 153-169). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
77. Ryan, M. K., Haslam, S. A., & Kulich, C. (2010). Politics and the glass cliff: Evidence that women are preferentially selected to contest hard-to-win seats Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 56-64.
78. Ryan, M. K., Haslam, S. A., & Postmes, T. (2007). Reactions to the glass cliff: Gender differences in the explanations for the precariousness of women's leadership positions. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 20, 182-197.
79. Schein, V. E. (1973). The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 95-105.
80. Schiebinger, L. (1999). Has feminism changed science?Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
81. Schmitt, M. T., Ellemers, N., & Branscombe, N. R. (2003). Perceiving and responding to gender discrimination in organizations. In S. A.Haslam, D.Van Knippenberg, M. J.Platow, & N.Ellemers (Eds.), Social identity at work: Developing theory for organizational practice (pp. 277-292). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
82. Schmitt, M. T., Spoor, J. R., Danaher, K., & Branscombe, N. R. (2009). Rose-colored glasses: How tokenism and comparisons with the past reduce the visibility of gender inequality. In M.Barreto, M.Ryan, & M. T.Schmitt (Eds.), The glass ceiling in the 21st century: Understanding barriers to gender inequality (pp. 49-71). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
83. Sealy, R., & Vinnicombe, S. (2012). The female FTSE board report. Retrieved from www.som.cranfield.ac.uk/som/ftse (1 March 2013).
84. Shambaugh, R. (2008). It's not a glass ceiling, it's a sticky floor: Free yourself from the hidden behaviors sabotaging your career success. New York: McGraw-Hill.
85. Thompson, C. A., Beauvais, L. L., & Lyness, K. S. (1999). When work-family benefits are not enough: The influence of work-family culture on benefit utilization, organizational attachment, and work-family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54, 392-415.
86. US Department of Commerce (2011). Women in STEM: A gender gap to innovation. Washington, DC. Retrieved from www.esa.doc.gov/sites/default/files/reports/documents/womeninstemagaptoinnovation8311.pdf (2 August 2012).
87. US Department of Labor (1991). A report on the glass ceiling initiative. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
88. US Government Accountability Office (2003). Women's earnings: Work patterns partially explain difference between men's and women's earnings (GAO-04-35). http://gao.gov/new.items/d0435.pdf.
89. Weick, K. E. (1997). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
90. Wellington, S., Kropf, M. B., & Gerkovich, P. (2003). What's holding women back? Harvard Business Review, 81, 18-19.
91. Williams, C. L. (1992). The glass escalator: Hidden advantages for men in the 'female' professions. Social Problems, 39, 253-267.
92. Williams, J. (2001). Unbending gender: Why work and family conflict and what to do about it. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
93. Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1990). Measuring sex stereotypes: A multination study. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.