A generic instrumental variable approach for industrial robot identification

IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 132-145

  Janot, Alexandre ^a   Vandanjon, Pierre Olivier ^b   Gautier, Maxime ^c  

^a ONERA   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ GUSTAVE EIFFEL   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE NANTES   (France)

Author keywords

Closed loop identification; instrumental variable method; model reduction; rigid robot dynamics; statistical hypotheses testing

Indexed keywords

CLOSED LOOP IDENTIFICATION; INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLE METHODS; MODEL REDUCTION; RIGID ROBOTS; STATISTICAL HYPOTHESES TESTING;

INDUSTRIAL ROBOTS; INSTRUMENTS; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS;

DYNAMIC MODELS;

EID: 84891561471     PISSN: 10636536     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TCST.2013.2246163     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. J. Swevers, C. Ganseman, D.B. Tückel, J. D. D. Schutter, and H. V. Brussel, "Optimal robot excitation and identification," IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom., vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 730-740, Oct. 1997. (Pubitemid 127767738)
2. J. Wu, J. Wang, and Z. You, "An overview of dynamic parameter identification of robots," Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf., vol. 26, no. 5, Oct. 2010, pp. 414-419.
3. J. Swevers, W. Verdonck, and J. D. Schutter, "Dynamic model identification for industrial robots-Integrated experiment design and parameter estimation," IEEE Control Syst. Mag., vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 58-71, Oct. 2007.
4. J. Hollerbach, W. Khalil, and M. Gautier, "Model identification," Springer Handbook of Robotics, New York, USA: Springer-Verlag, 2008.
5. K. Kozlowski, Modelling and Identification in Robotics. London, U.K.: Springer Verlag, 1998.
6. M. Gautier, A. Janot, and P. O. Vandanjon. (2012, Feb.). A new closed-loop output error method for parameter identification of robot dynamics. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10. 1109/TCST.2012.2185697
7. M. Gautier and P. H. Poignet, "Extended kalman filtering and weighted least squares dynamic identification of robot," Control Eng. Pract., vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 1361-1372, Dec. 2001. (Pubitemid 34046014)
8. N. Ramdani and P. Poignet, "Robust dynamic experimental identification of robots with set membership uncertainty," IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 253-256, Apr. 2005. (Pubitemid 40679589)
9. G. Calafiore and M. Indri, "Robust Calibration and Control of Robotic Manipulators," in Proc. Amer. Control Conf., Chicago, IL, USA, pp. 2003-2007, Jun. 2000. (Pubitemid 32028309)
10. M. M. Olsen and H. G. Petersen, "A new method for estimating parameters of a dynamic robot model," IEEE Trans. Robot., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 95-100, Feb. 2001. (Pubitemid 32416249)
11. M. M. Olsen, J. Swevers, and W. Verdonck, "Maximum likelihood identification of a dynamic robot model: Implementation issues," Int. J. Robot. Res., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 89-96, Feb. 2002.
12. O. Reiersøl, "Confluence analysis by means of lag moments and other methods of confluence analysis," Econometrica, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1-23, Jan. 1941.
13. P. C. Young, Recursive estimation and time-series analysis: An introduction for the student and practitioner, 2nd ed. New York, USA: SpringerVerlag, 2011.
14. H. Garnier and L. Wang, Identification of continuous-time models from sampled data. New York, USA: Springer-Verlag, 2008.
15. T. Söderström and P. Stoica, System Identification, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall, 1989.
16. S. C. Puthenpura and N. K. Sinha, "Identification of continuous-time systems using instrumental variables with application to an industrial robot," IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 224-229, Aug. 1986.
17. K. Yoshida, N. Ikeda, and H. Mayeda, "Experimental study of the identification methods for an industrial robot manipulator," in Proc. Int. Conf. Intell. Robots Syst., Raleigh, NC, USA, Jul. 1992, pp. 263-270.
18. A. Janot, P. O. Vandanjon, and M. Gautier, "Identification of robots dynamics with the Instrumental Variable method," in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., Kobe, Japan, May 2009, pp. 1762-1767.
19. A. Janot, P.O. Vandanjon, and M. Gautier, "Identification of 6 DOF Rigid Industrial Robots with the Instrumental Variable Method," in Proc. Symp. Syst. Identificat., Brussels, Belgium, Jul. 2012, pp. 1659-1664.
20. W. Khalil and E. Dombre, "Modeling, identification and control of robots," London, U.K.: Hermes Penton, 2002
21. M. Gautier and W. Khalil, "Direct calculation of minimum set of inertial parameters of serial robots," IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 368-372, Jun. 1990.
22. H. Mayeda, K. Yoshida, and K. Osuka, "Base parameters of manipulator dynamic models," IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 312-321, Jun. 1990. (Pubitemid 20725008)
23. M. Gautier and W. Khalil, "Exciting trajectories for the identification of the inertial parameters of robots," Int. J. Robot. Res., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 362-375, Aug. 1992. (Pubitemid 23567805)
24. M. Indri, G. Calafiore, G. Legnani, F. Jatta, and A. Visioli, "Optimized dynamic calibration of a SCARA Robot," in Proc. 15th IFAC World Congr., Barcelona, Spain, Jul. 2002, pp. 882-885.
25. G. Calafiore, M. Indri, and B. Bona, "Robot dynamic calibration: Optimal excitation trajectories and experimental parameter estimation," J. Robot. Syst., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 55-68. Feb. 2001. (Pubitemid 32159539)
26. R. Davidson and J. G. MacKinnon, Estimation and inference in econometrics. New York, USA: Oxford Univ. Press, 1993.
27. A. Janot, P. O. Vandanjon, and M. Gautier, "Identification of physical parameters and instrumental variables validation with two-stage least squares estimator," IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., vol. PP, no. 99, p. 1. Jun. 2012.
28. D. Kostic, B. D. Jager, M. Steinbuch, and R. Hensen, "Modeling and identification for high-performance robot control: An RRR-robotic arm case study," IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 904-919. Nov. 2004.
29. M. Gautier, P. Vandanjon, and A. Janot, "Dynamic identification of a 6 DOF robot without joint position data," in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., Shangaï, China, May 2011, pp. 234-239.
30. J. A. Hausman, "Specification Tests in Econometrics," Econometrica, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 12510-1271, 1978.
31. S. V. Huffel and J. Vandewalle, "The total least squares problem: Computational aspects and analysis," Frontiers Appl. Math., Ser., 9. vol. 59, no. 200, pp. 1-300, Oct. 1991.
32. P. Hamon, M. Gautier, and P. Garrec, "New dry friction model with load-and velocity-dependence and dynamic identification of multi-DOF robots," in Proc. Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., Shangaï, China, May 2011, pp. 1077-1084.
33. G. H. Golub and V. Pereyra, "The Differentiation of Pseudo-Inverses and Nonlinear Least Squares Problems Whose Variables Separate," SIAM J. Numer. Anal., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 413-432, Apr. 1973.
34. S. M. Hashemi and H. Werner, "Parameter identification of a robot arm using separable least squares technique," in Proc. 10th Eur. Control Conf., Budapest, Hungary, Aug. 2009, pp. 7418-7423.
35. W. Khalil and D. Creusot, "SYMORO+: A system for the symbolic modelling of robots," Robotica, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 153-161, Mar. 1997. (Pubitemid 127623384)