Robust dynamic experimental identification of robots with set membership uncertainty

IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 253-256

  Ramdani, Nacim ^a   Poignet, Philippe ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS EST CRÉTEIL   (France)

^b LIRMM   (France)

Author keywords

Bounded error context; Ellipsoidal approximation; Experimental robot dynamics; Parallelotopic approximation; Set membership identification

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; APPROXIMATION THEORY; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); IDENTIFICATION (CONTROL SYSTEMS); MATHEMATICAL MODELS; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS); UNCERTAIN SYSTEMS;

BOUNDED ERROR CONTEXT; ELLIPSOIDAL APPROXIMATION; EXPERIMENTAL ROBOT DYNAMICS; PARALLELOTOPIC APPROXIMATION; SET MEMBERSHIP IDENTIFICATION;

ROBOTICS;

EID: 18844374520     PISSN: 10834435     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TMECH.2005.844703     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. M. Gautier and P. Poignet, "Extended Kalman filtering and weighted least squares dynamic identification of robot," Control Eng. Practice, vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 1361-1372, 2001.
2. M. M. Olsen and H. G. Petersen, "A new method for estimating parameters of a dynamic robot model," IEEE Trans. Robot. Automat., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 95-100, Feb. 2001.
3. J. Swevers, C. Ganseman, D. B. Tükel, J. D. Schutter, and H. Van Brussel, "Optimal robot excitation and identification," IEEE Trans. Robot. Automat., vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 730-740, Oct. 1997.
4. G. Califiore and M. Indri, "Robust calibration and control of robotic manipulators," in Proc. American Control Conf., 2000, pp. 2003-2007.
5. B. Jagadeesh and K. K. Issac, "Identification for the robust control of robot manipulators," Int. J. Adapt. Control Signal Process, vol. 15, pp. 1-13, 2001.
6. M. Milanese, J. Norton, H. Piet-Lahanier, and E. Walter, Bounding Approaches to System Identification. New York: Plenum, 1996.
7. C. C. de Wit, B. Siciliano, and G. Bastin, Eds., Theory of Robot Control. London, U.K.: Springer, 1996.
8. K. Kozlowski, Modeling and Identification in Robotics. London, U.K.: Springer, 1998.
9. W. Khalil and E. Dombre, Modeling, Identification and Control of Robots. London, U.K.: Hermes Penton Science, 2002.
10. M. Gautier and W. Khalil, "Exciting trajectories for the identification of the inertial parameters of robots," Int. J. Robotic Res., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 362-375, 1996.
11. E. Walter and L. Pronzato, Identification of Parametric Models from Experimental Data. London, U.K.: Springer, 1997.
12. C. Durieu, E. Walter, and B. Polyak, "Set membership estimation with the trace criterion made simpler than with the determinant criterion," in System Identification, A Proceedings Volume from the 12th IFAC SYSID2000. New York: Elsevier, 2001, pp. 1007-1012.
13. S. Lesecq and A. Barraud, "Une approche factorisée plus simple et numériquement stable pour l'estimation ensembliste ellipsoïdale," APPI-JESA, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 505-518, 2002.
14. A. Vicino and G. Zappa, "Sequential approximation of feasible parameter sets for identification with set membership uncertainty," IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 774-785, Jun. 1996.
15. D. G. Maksarov and Z. S. Chalabi, "Computing bounds on green-house energy requirements using bounded error approach," Control Eng. Practice, vol. 6, pp. 947-955, 1998.
16. E. W. Bai, H. Cho, R. Tempo, and Y. Ye, "Optimization with few violated constraints for linear bounded error parameter estimation," IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. 47, no. 7, pp. 1067-1077, Jul. 2002.
17. G. Belforte, B. Bona, and V. Cerone, "Parameter estimation algorithms for a set-membership description of uncertainty," Automatica, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 887-898, 1990.