In faint praise of folly: A critical review of native/non-native speaker comparisons, with examples from native and bilingual processing of french complex syntax

LIA Language, Interaction and Acquisition

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 107-133

  Birdsong, David ^a   Gertken, Libby M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Bilingualism; Comparative methods; French; Native speaker; Psycholinguistics; Second language acquisition; Second language user

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890894236     PISSN: 18797865     EISSN: 18797873     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/lia.4.2.01bir     Document Type: Article

References (102)

1. Abrahamsson, N. & Hyltenstam, K. (2009). Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning 59, 249-306.
2. Abutalebi J. (2008). Neural processing of second language representation and control. Acta Psychologica 128, 466-478.
3. Adams, R. & Ross-Feldman, L. (2003). An investigation of determinacy in the grammar of NS and end-state NNS. Paper presented at Georgetown University Roundtable on Languages and Linguistics (GURT), Georgetown, DC; February 2003.
4. Babcock, L., Stowe, J.C., Maloof, C.J., Brovetto, C. & Ulmann, M.T. (2012). The storage and composition of inflected forms in adult-learned second language: A study of the influence of length of residence, age of arrival, sex, and other factors. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 15, 820-840.
5. Bialystok, E. (2009). Bilingualism: The good, the bad, and the indifferent. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 12, 3-11.
6. Birdsong, D. (2005a). Nativelikeness and non-nativelikeness in L2A research. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 43, 319-328.
7. Birdsong, D. (2005b). Why not fossilization. In Z. Han & T. Odlin (eds.), Studies of fossilization in second language acquisition (173-188). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
8. Birdsong, D. (2005c). Interpreting age effects in second language acquisition. In J.F. Kroll & A.M.B De Groot (eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives (109-127). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Birdsong, D. (submitted). Dominance and age of acquisition in bilingualism.
10. Birdsong, D., Gertken, L.M. & Amengual, M. (2012). Bilingual language profile: An easy-to-use instrument to assess bilingualism. COERLL, The University of Texas at Austin. Available online at: https://sites.la.utexas.edu/ bilingual/.
11. Bley-Vroman, R. (1983). The comparative fallacy in interlanguage studies: The case of systematicity. Language Learning 33, 1-17.
12. Bley-Vroman, R. (1989). What is the logical problem of foreign language learning? In S.M. Gass & J. Schachter (eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (41-68). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Blommaert, J. & Backus, A. (2011). Repertoires revisited: Knowing language in superdiversity. Working papers in urban language and literacies 67, Kings College University, London.
14. Bybee, J.L. (2010). Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Carreiras, M. & Clifton, C. (1999). Another word on parsing relative clauses: Eyetracking evidence from Spanish and English. Memory & cognition 27, 826-833.
16. Christianson, K., Luke, S.G. & Ferreira, F. (2010). Effects of plausibility on structural priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 36, 538-544.
17. Clahsen, H. & Felser, C. (2006a). How native-like is non-native language processing? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10, 564-570.
18. Clahsen, H. & Felser, C. (2006b). Grammatical processing in language learners. (Keynote article). Applied Psycholinguistics 27, 3-42.
19. Cook, V.J. (1997). Monolingual bias in second language acquisition research. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 34, 35-29.
20. Cook, V.J. (1999). Going beyond the native speaker in language teaching. TESOL Quarterly 33, 185-209.
21. Cook, V.J. (2003). Effects of the second language on the first. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
22. Cook V.J. (2007) Multi-competence: Black hole or wormhole for second language acquisition research? In Z. Han (ed.), Understanding second language process (16-26). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
23. Cuetos, F. & Mitchell, D.C. (1988). Cross-linguistic difference in parsing: Restrictions on the late-closure strategy in Spanish. Cognition 30, 73-105.
24. Dabrowska, E. (2012a). Different speakers, different grammars: Individual differences in native language attainment. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 2, 219-253.
25. Davies, A. (2003). The native speaker: myth and reality. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
26. Davies, A. (2004). The native speaker in applied linguistics. In A. Davies & C. Elder (eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics (431-450). Oxford: Blackwell.
27. DeKeyser, R. (2012). Individual differences in native language attainment and their implications for research on second language acquisition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 2, 260-263.
28. DeKeyser, R. & Larson-Hall, J. (2005). What does the critical period mean? In J.F. Kroll & A.M.B. De Groot (eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives (88-108). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Dekydtspotter, L., Schwartz, B. & Sprouse, R. (2006). The comparative fallacy in L2 processing research. In M.G. O'Brien, C. Shea & J. Archibald (eds.), Proceedings of the 8th generative approaches to second language acquisition (33-40). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
30. Dussias, P.E. & Piñar, P. (2009). Sentence parsing in L2 learners: Linguistic and experiencebased factors. In W. Ritchie & T. Bathia (eds.), The new handbook of second language acquisition (296-313). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
31. Erasmus, D. (1511). In praise of folly. In Betty Radice. (trans.) (1971). Praise of folly. (1993 reprint). London: Penguin Books; Clarence H. Miller. (trans.) (1979). Praise of folly. New Haven/London: Yale University Press; Leonard F. Dean. (trans.) (1959). The praise of folly. New York: Hendricks House.
32. Erasmus, D. (1877). The apophthegmes of Erasmus. Nicholas Udall (Trans). Lincolnshire: Robert Roberts. Available online at: http://openlibrary.org. (Last accessed, 12 Sept. 2013).
33. Felser, C., Cunnings, I., Batterham, C. & Clahsen, H. (2012). The timing of island effects in nonnative sentence processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 34, 67-98.
34. Ferreira, F. (2003). The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology 47, 164-203.
35. Ferreira, F., Ferraro, V. & Bailey, K.G.D. (2002). Good-enough representations in language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science 11, 11-15.
36. Ferreira, F. & Patson, N. (2007). The 'good enough' approach to language comprehension. Language and Linguistics Compass 1, 71-83.
37. Fowler, C.A., Sramko, V., Ostry, D.J., Rowland, S.A. & Hallé, P. (2008). Cross language phonetic influences on the speech of French-English bilinguals. Journal of Phonology 36, 649-663.
38. Gambi, C. & Caramelli, N. (2012). Off-line resolution of adjunct ambiguity in a structural priming paradigm: Implications for the production-comprehension parallel hypothesis. In G. Mininni & A. Manuti (ed.), Applied psycholinguistics: Positive effects and ethical perspectives, vol. 2 (75-80). Milan: FrancoAngeli.
39. Gatenby, E.V. (1948). Reasons for failure to learn a foreign language. ELT Journal 2, 102-106.
40. Gertken, L.M. (2013). Priming of relative clause attachment during comprehension in French as a first and second language. Doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
41. Gillon Dowens, M., Vergara, M., Barber, H.A. & Carreiras, M. (2010). Morphosyntactic processing in late second-language learners. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 22, 1870-1887.
42. Green, D.W., Crinion, J. & Price, C.J. (2006). Convergence, degeneracy, and control. In M. Gullberg & P. Indefrey (eds.), The cognitive neuroscience of second language acquisition (99-125). London: Blackwell.
43. Greenwald, A. (1975). Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin 82, 1-20.
44. Grosjean, F. (1989). Neurolinguists, beware! The bilingual is not two monolinguals in one person. Brain and Language 36, 3-15.
45. Hardy, T. (1878). The Return of the Native. N.p.: n.p. Avaialable online at: http://www.gutenberg.org. (Last accessed, 12 Sept. 2013).
46. Hardy, T. (1904-1908). The Dynasts. N.p.: n.p. Avaialable online at: http://www.gutenberg.org. (Last accessed, 12 Sept. 2013).
47. Havik, E., Roberts, L., van Hout, R., Schreuder, R. & Haverkort, M. (2009). Processing subjectobject ambiguities in the L2: A self-paced reading study with German L2 learners of Dutch. Language Learning 59, 73-112.
48. Hawkins, R. & Chan, C.Y. (1997). The partial availability of universal grammar in second language acquisition: The failed functional features hypothesis. Second Language Research 13, 186-226.
49. Hyltenstam, K. (2011). The native speaker as a methodological instrument - are there alternatives? Paper presented at EUROSLA 21, Stockholm; September 2011.
50. Hyltenstam, K. & Abrahamsson, N. (2012). Introduction: High-level L2 acquisition, learning and use. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 34, 177-186.
51. Hymes, D. (1972). Models of the interaction of language and social life. In J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (eds), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (35-71). London: Blackwell.
52. Indefrey, P. (2006). It is time to work toward explicit processing models for native and second language speakers. Applied Psycholinguistics 27, 66-69.
53. Indefrey, P. & Davidson, D.J. (2009). Second language acquisition. In L.R. Squire (ed.), Encyclopedia of Neuroscience (517-523). London: Academic Press.
54. Ioup, G., Boustagui, E., El Tigi, M. & Moselle, M. (1994). Reexamining the critical period hypothesis: A case study of successful adult SLA in a naturalistic environment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16, 73-98.
55. Jarvis, S. (2011). On the value of monolinguals and native speakers to transfer research. Paper presented at the Second Language Research Forum (SLRF), Ames, IA; October 2011.
56. Juffs, A. (2006). Grammar and parsing and transition theory. Applied Psycholinguistics 27, 69-71.
57. Kim, J.H. & Christianson, K. (2013). Sentence complexity and working memory effects in ambiguity resolution. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 42(5), 393-411.
58. Klein, W. (1998). The contribution of second language acquisition research. Language Learning 48, 527-550.
59. Klein, W. & Perdue, C. (1997). The basic variety (or: Couldn't natural languages be much simpler?). Second Language Research 13, 301-347.
60. Langdon, H., Wiig, E.H. & Nielsen, N.P. (2005). Dual dimension naming speed and languagedominance ratings by bilingual Hispanic adults. Bilingual Research Journal 29, 319-336.
61. Long, M. (1990). Maturational constraints on language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 12, 251-285.
62. Long, M. (2005). Problems with supposed counter-evidence to the critical period hypothesis. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 43, 287-317.
63. Mack, M. (1997). The monolingual native speaker: Not a norm, but still a necessity. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 27, 113-146.
64. Magnusson, J.E. & Stroud, C. (2012). High proficiency in markets of performance: A sociocultural approach to nativelikeness. In N. Abrahamsson & K. Hyltenstam (eds.), Studies in Second Language Acquisition 34, 321-345.
65. Marinis, T., Roberts, L., Felser, C. & Clahsen, H. (2005). Gaps in second language sentence processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27, 53-78.
66. Marinova-Todd, S.H. (2003). Comprehensive analysis of ultimate attainment in adult second language acquisition. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.
67. May, S. (2011). The disciplinary constraints of SLA and TESOL: Additive bilingualism and second language acquisition, teaching and learning. Linguistics and Education 22, 233-247.
68. May, S. (ed.) (in press). The multilingual turn: Implications for SLA, TESOL and bilingual education. New York: Routledge.
69. Meisel, J.M., Elsig, M. & Bonnesen, M. (2011). Delayed grammatical acquisition in first language development: Subject-verb inversion and subject clitics in French interrogatives. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 1, 347-390.
70. Morgan-Short, K., Finger, I., Grey, S. & Ullman, M.T. (2012). Second language processing shows increased native-like neural responses after months of no exposure. PLoS ONE 7(3): e32974. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0032974.
71. Moyer, A. (2013). Foreign accent: The phenomenon of non-native speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
72. Muñoz, C. & Singleton, D. (2011). A critical review of age-related research on L2 ultimate attainment. Language Teaching 44, 1-35.
73. Ortega, L. (2009). Understanding second language acquisition. London: Hodder.
74. Ortega, L. (2013). SLA for the 21st century: Disciplinary progress, transdisciplinary relevance, and the bi-multilingual turn. Language Learning 63, 1-24.
75. Ortega, L. (2014). Ways forward for a bi/multilingual turn in SLA. In S. May (ed.), The multilingual turn: Implications for SLA, TESOL and bilingual education (32-53). New York: Routledge.
76. Pedhazur, E. & Schmelkin, L. (1991). Measurement, design and analysis: An integrated approach. New York & Hove: Psychology Press.
77. Pickering, M.J. & Ferreira, V. (2008). Structural priming: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin 134, 427-459.
78. Piller, I. (2001). Who, if anyone, is a native speaker? Anglistik: Mitteilungen des Verbandes Deutscher Anglisten 12, 109-121.
79. Piller, I. (2002). Passing for a native speaker: Identity and success in second language learning. Journal of Sociolinguistics 6, 179-206.
80. Reichle, R.V. (2010). Near-nativelike processing of contrastive focus in L2 French. In B. VanPatten & J. Jegerski (eds.), Research in second language processing and parsing (321- 344). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
81. Reichle, R.V. & Birdsong, D. (in press). Processing focus structure in L1 and L2 French: L2 proficiency effects on ERP's. Studies in Second Language Acquisition.
82. Roberts, L. & Felser, C. (2011). Plausibility and recovery from garden paths in L2 sentence processing. Applied Psycholinguistics 32, 299-311.
83. Rossi, S., Gugler, M.F., Friederici, A.D. & Hahne, A. (2006). The impact of proficiency on syntactic second-language processing of German and Italian: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18, 2030-2048.
84. Rothman, J. (2008). Linguistic epistemology and the notion of monolingualism. Sociolinguistic Studies 2, 441-457.
85. Rothman, J. (2011). On the comparative fallacy of comparisons and why SLA is bilingualism. Paper presented at the 2011 Second language research forum (SLRF), Ames, IA; October 2011.
86. Rothman, J. (submitted). A prolegomenon to the construct of the native speaker: Heritage speaker bilinguals are natives too!.
87. Sagarra, N. & Herschensohn, J. (2010). The role of proficiency and working memory in gender and number agreement processing in L1 and L2 Spanish. Lingua 120, 2022-2039.
88. Sharwood Smith, M. (2011). Is the native speaker a psycholinguistic impossibility? Paper presented at EUROSLA 21, Stockholm; September 2011.
89. Singleton, D. (2003). Critical period or general factor(s)? In M.P. Garcia Mayo & M.L. Garcia Lecumberri (eds.), Age and the acquisition of English as a foreign language (3-22). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
90. Slabakova, R. (2011). The bilingual/multilingual native control. Paper presented at the Second Language Research Forum (SLRF), Ames, IA; October 2011.
91. Slabakova, R. (2013). Adult second language acquisition: A selective overview with a focus on the learner linguistic system. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 13, 48-72.
92. Sorace, A. (1996). The use of acceptability judgment in second language acquisition research. In W.C. Ritchie & T.K. Bhatia (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (375-409). San Diego: Academic Press.
93. Sorace, A. (2011). The bilingual native speaker. Paper presented at EUROSLA 21, Stockholm; September 2011.
94. Steinhauer, K., White, E.J. & Drury, J.E. (2009). Temporal dynamics of late second language acquisition: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Second Language Research 25, 13-41.
95. Szmalec, A., Brysbaert, M., & Duyck, W. (2012) Working memory and second language processing. In J. Altarriba & L. Isurin (eds.), Memory, language, and bilingualism: Theoretical and applied approaches (74-94). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
96. Thomason, S.G. (2008). Contact as a source of language change. In B.D. Joseph & R.D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics (687-712). Oxford: Blackwell.
97. van Hell, J.G. & Tanner, D. (2012). Second language proficiency and cross-language lexical activation. Language Learning 62, 148-171.
98. van Hell, J. & Tokowicz, N. (2010). Event-related brain potentials and second language learning: Syntactic processing in late L2 learners at different L2 proficiency levels. Second Language Research 26, 43-74.
99. van Herten, M., Chwilla, D.J. & Kolk, H.H.J. (2006). When heuristics clash with parsing routines: ERP evidence for conflict monitoring in sentence perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18, 1181-1197.
100. White, L. (2003). On the nature of interlanguage representation: Universal Grammar in the second language. In C.J. Doughty & M.H. Long (eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (19-42). Oxford: Blackwell.
101. Whitley, B. & Kite, M. (2012). Principles of research in behavioral science: Third edition. New York & Hove: Routledge.
102. Wiig, E.H., Nielsen, N.P., Minthon, L. & Warkentin, S. (2002). AQT: A quick test of cognitive speed. San Antonio, TX: PsychCorp.