Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny

Language Learning

Volumn 59, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 249-306

  Abrahamsson, Niclas ^a   Hyltenstam, Kenneth ^a  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Adult second language acquisition; Age of onset; Critical period hypothesis (CPH); L1 Spanish; L2 Swedish; Listener perception; Maturational constraints; Multiple task design; Nativelikeness; Near nativeness

Indexed keywords

EID: 65649142205     PISSN: 00238333     EISSN: 14679922     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00507.x     Document Type: Article

References (97)

1. Abrahamsson, N., Hyltenstam, K. (2008). The robustness of aptitude effects in near-native second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30 (4 481 509.
2. Abrahamsson, N., Stölten, K., Hyltenstam, K. (in press). Effects of age on voice onset time: The production of voiceless stops by near-native L2 speakers. In S. Haberzettl (Ed Processes and outcomes: Explaining achievement in language learning. Berlin : Mouton de Gruyter.
3. Asher, J., García, G. (1969). The optimal age to learn a foreign language. Modern Language Journal, 38, 334 341.
4. Bialystok, E. (1997). The structure of age: In search of barriers of second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 13, 116 137.
5. Bialystok, E., Hakuta, K. (1999). Confounded age: Linguistic and cognitive factors in age differences for second language acquisition. In D. Birdsong (Ed Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis (pp. 161 181). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Bialystok, E., Miller, B. (1999). The problem of age in second-language acquisition: Influences from language, structure, and task. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2, 127 145.
7. Birdsong, D. (1992). Ultimate attainment in second language acquisition. Language, 68, 706 755.
8. Birdsong, D. (1999). Introduction: Whys and why nots of the critical period hypothesis for second language acquisition. In D. Birdsong (Ed Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis (pp. 1 22). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
9. Birdsong, D. (2004). Second language acquisition and ultimate attainment. In A. Davies & C. Elder (Eds Handbook of applied linguistics. London : Blackwell.
10. Birdsong, D. (2005a). Interpreting age effects in second language acquisition. In J. Kroll & A. De Groot (Eds Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 109 127). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
11. Birdsong, D. (2005b). Nativelikeness and non-nativelikeness in L2A research. IRAL, 43, 319 328.
12. Birdsong, D. (2006). Age and second language acquisition and processing: A selective overview. Language Learning, 56, 9 49.
13. Birdsong, D. (2007). Nativelike pronunciation among late learners of French as a second language. In O.-S. Bohn & M. Munro (Eds Second language speech learning: The role of language experience in speech perception and production (pp. 99 116). Amsterdam : Benjamins.
14. Birdsong, D., Molis, M. (2001). On the evidence for maturational constraints in second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 235 249.
15. Bley-Vroman, R. (1989). What is the logical problem of foreign language learning? In S. Gass & J. Schachter (Eds Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 41 68). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
16. Bongaerts, T., Mennen, S., van der Slik, F. (2000). Authenticity of pronunciation in naturalistic second language acquisition: The case of very advanced late learners of Dutch as a second language. Studia Linguistica 54 (2 298 308.
17. Bongaerts, T., Planken, B., Schils, E. (1995). Can late learners attain a native accent in a foreign language? A test of the critical period hypothesis. In D. Singleton & Z. Lengyel (Eds The age factor in second language acquisition (pp. 30 50). Clevedon : Multilingual Matters.
18. Bongaerts, T., Planken, B., Schils, E. (1997). Age and ultimate attainment in the pronunciation of a foreign language. Second Language Research, 19, 447 465.
19. Bongaerts, T. (1999). Ultimate attainment in L2 pronunciation: The case of very advanced late L2 learners. In D. Birdsong (Ed Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis (pp. 133 159). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
20. Bradlow, A. R., Bent, T. (2002). The clear speech effect for non-native listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112, 272 284.
21. Butler, Y. G. (2000). The age effect in second language acquisition: Is it too late to acquire native-level competence in a second language after the age of seven? In Y. Oshima-Takane, Y. Shirai, & H. Sirai (Eds. Studies in language sciences 1 (pp. 159 169). Tokyo : The Japanese Society for Language Sciences.
22. th conference on the acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as first and second languages (pp. 59 73). Somerville, MA : Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
23. Cook, V. (1999). Going beyond the native speaker in language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 33, 185 209.
24. Coppieters, R. (1987). Competence differences between natives and near-native speakers. Language, 63, 544 573.
25. Cranshaw, A. (1997). A study of Anglophone native and near-native linguistic and metalinguistic performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Montreal, Canada.
26. Cunningham-Andersson, U., Engstrand, O. (1989). Perceived strength and identity of foreign accent in Swedish. Phonetica, 46, 138 154.
27. Davies, A. (2003). The native speaker: Myth and reality. Clevedon, UK : Multilingual Matters.
28. DeKeyser, R. M. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 499 533.
29. Ekberg, L. (2004). Grammatik och lexikon I svenska som andraspråk på nästan infödd nivå. In K. Hyltenstam & I. Lindberg (Ed Svenska som andraspråk - i forskning, undervisning och samhälle (pp. 221 258). Lund : Studentlitteratur.
30. Epstein, S., Flynn, S., Martohardjano, G. (1996). Second language acquisition: Theoretical and experimental issues in contemporary research. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 677 758.
31. Eubank, L., Gregg, K. R. (1999). Critical periods and (second) language acquisition: Divide et impera. In D. Birdsong (Ed Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis (pp. 65 99). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
32. Flege, J. E. (1984). The detection of French accent by American listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76, 692 707.
33. Flege, J. E. (1999). Age of learning and second language speech. In D. Birdsong (Ed Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis (pp. 101 132). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
34. Flege, J. E., Frieda, E. M., Nozawa, T. (1997). Amount of native-language (L1) use affects the pronunciation of an L2. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 169 186.
35. Flege, J. E., Munro, M. J., MacKay, I. R. A. (1995). Factors affecting degree of perceived foreign accent in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 3125 3134.
36. Flege, J. E., Yeni-Komshian, G. H., Liu, S. (1999). Age constraints on second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 78 104.
37. Gregg, K. R. (1996). The logical and developmental problems of second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 49 81). San Diego : Academic Press.
38. Harley, B., Wang, W. (1997). The critical period hypothesis: Where are we now? In de A. Groot & J. Kroll (Eds Tutorials in bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 19 51). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
39. Hyltenstam, K. (1992). Non-native features of near-native speakers. On the ultimate attainment of childhood L2 learners. In R. J. Harris (Ed. Cognitive processing in bilinguals (pp. 351 368). Amsterdam : Elsevier Science.
40. Hyltenstam, K., Abrahamsson, N. (2000). Who can become native-like in a second language? All, some, or none? On the maturational constraints controversy in second language acquisition. Studia Linguistica, 54 (2 150 166.
41. Hyltenstam, K., Abrahamsson, N. (2001). Age and L2 learning: The hazards of matching practical "implications" with theoretical "facts." (Comments on Stefka H. Marinova-Todd, D. Bradford Marshall, and Catherine E. Snow's "Three misconceptions about age and L2 learning"). TESOL Quarterly, 35 (1 151 170.
42. Hyltenstam, K., Abrahamsson, N. (2003a). Age of onset and ultimate attainment in near-native speakers of Swedish. In K. Fraurud & K. Hyltenstam (Eds Multilingualism in global and local perspectives. Selected papers from the 8th Nordic conference on bilingualism, November 1-3, 2001, Stockholm Rinkeby (pp. 319 340). Stockholm : Centre for Research on Bilingualism, Stockholm University, and Rinkeby Institute of Multilingual Research.
43. Hyltenstam, K., Abrahamsson, N. (2003b). Maturational constraints in SLA. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 539 588). Oxford : Blackwell.
44. Ioup, G. (1989). Immigrant children who have failed to acquire native English. In S. Gass, C. Madden, D. Preston, & L. Selinker (Eds Variation in second language acquisition: Vol. 2. Psycholinguistic issues (pp. 160 175). Clevedon, UK : Multilingual Matters.
45. Ioup, G., Boustagui, E., El Tigi, M., Moselle, M. (1994). Reexamining the critical period hypothesis: A case study in a naturalistic environment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 73 98.
46. Johnson, J. S., Newport, E. L. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 60 99.
47. Lee, B., Guion, S. G., Harada, T. (2006). Acoustic analysis of the production of unstressed English vowels by early and late Korean and Japanese bilinguals. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 487 513.
48. Lenneberg, E. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York : Wiley.
49. Lisker, L., Abramson, A. (1964). A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word, 20, 384 422.
50. Liu, Y.-T. (2006). Specifying the norms of successful L2 users for developing theories on the learning potential in SLA. Teachers College, Columbia University Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics, 6 (1). Retrieved March 26, 2006, from http://journals.tc-library.org/index.php/tesol/article/ view/164/162
51. Long, M. H. (1990). Maturational constraints on language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 251 285.
52. Long, M. H. (1993). Second language acquisition as a function of age: Research findings and methodological issues. In K. Hyltenstam & Å. Viberg (Eds Progression and regression in language (pp. 196 221). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
53. Long, M. H. (2005). Problems with supposed counter-evidence to the Critical Period Hypothesis. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 43, 287 317.
54. Long, M. H., Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 16 41). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
55. MacKay, I. R. A., Flege, J. E., Imai, S. (2006). Evaluating the effects of chronological age and sentence duration on degree of perceived foreign accent. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 157 183.
56. Marinis, T. (2003). Psycholinguistic techniques in second language acquisition research. Second Language Research, 19, 144 161.
57. Marinova-Todd, S. H. (2003). Comprehensive analysis of ultimate attainment in adult second language acquisition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Massachusetts.
58. Markham, D. (1997). Phonetic imitation, accent, and the learner. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Lund : Lund University Press.
59. McAllister, R. (1997). Perceptual foreign accent: L2 users' comprehension ability. In A. James & J. Leather (Eds Second-language speech: Structure and process (pp. 119 132). Berlin : Mouton deGruyter.
60. McAllister, R., Brodda, B. (2002). Development of a new speech comprehension test with a phonological distance metric. Proceedings of Fonetik 2002, the XVth Swedish Phonetics Conference, Stockholm, May 29-31, 2002. Quarterly Progress and Status Report (Dept of Speech, Music and Hearing and Centre for Speech Technology, KTH, Stockholm) 44 (1 149 151.
61. McDonald, J. L. (2000). Grammaticality judgments in a second language: Influences of age of acquisition and native language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 395 423.
62. McDonald, J. L. (2006). Beyond the critical period: Processing-based explanation for poor grammaticality judgment performance by late second language learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 381 401.
63. McNamara, T. (2000). Language testing. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
64. Montrul, S., Slabakova, R. (2003). Competence similarities between native and near-native speakers. An investigation of the preterite-imperfect contrast in Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 351 398.
65. Moyer, A. (1999). Ultimate attainment in L2 phonology: The critical factors of age, motivation and instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 81 108.
66. Munro, M., Mann, V. (2005). Age of immersion as a predictor of foreign accent. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 311 341.
67. Neufeld, G. (1979). Towards a theory of language learning ability. Language Learning, 29, 227 241.
68. Neufeld, G. (2001). Non-foreign-accented speech in adult second language learners: Does it exist and what does it signify? ITL Review of Applied Linguistics, 133-134, 185 206.
69. Obler, L. K. (1989). Exceptional second language learners. In S. Gass, C. Madden, D. Preston, & L. Selinker (Eds Variation in second language acquisition (pp. 141 149). Clevedon, UK : Multilingual Matters.
70. Oyama, S. (1976). A sensitive period for the acquisition of a nonnative phonological system. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 5, 261 285.
71. Oyama, S. (1978). The sensitive period and comprehension of speech. Working Papers on Bilingualism, 16, 1 17.
72. Patkowski, M. (1980). The sensitive period for the acquisition of syntax in a second language. Language Learning, 30, 449 472.
73. Piller, I. (2002). Passing for a native speaker: Identity and success in second language learning. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 6, 179 206.
74. Piske, T., MacKay, I. R. A., Flege, J. E. (2001). Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics, 29, 191 215.
75. Platzack, C. (1973). Språket och läsbarheten. Lund : GWK Gleerup.
76. Schachter, J. (1989). Testing a proposed universal. In S. Gass & J. Schachter (Eds Linguistic Perspectives On Second Language Acquisition (pp. 73 88). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
77. Schneider, W., Eschman, A., Zuccolotto, A. (2002a). E-Prime user's guide. Pittsburgh : Psychology Software Tools, Inc.
78. Schneider, W., Eschman, A., Zuccolotto, A. (2002b). E-Prime reference guide. Pittsburgh : Psychology Software Tools, Inc.
79. Scovel, T. (1988). A time to speak: A psycholinguistic inquiry into the critical period for human speech. New York : Newbury House.
80. Seliger, H. W. (1978). Implications of a multiple critical periods hypothesis for second language learning. In W. C. Ritchie (Ed Second language acquisition research: Issues and implications (pp. 11 19). New York : Academic Press.
81. Seliger, H., Krashen, S., Ladefoged, P. (1975). Maturational constraints in the acquisition of second languages. Language Sciences, 38, 20 22.
82. Selinker, L. (1969). Language transfer. General Linguistics, 9, 67 92.
83. Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. IRAL, 10, 209 231.
84. Sorace, A. (1993). Incomplete and divergent representations of unaccusativity in nonnative grammars of Italian. Second Language Research, 9, 22 48.
85. Sorace, A. (2003). Near-nativeness. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds. The handbook of second language acquisition. Oxford : Blackwell.
86. Sorace, A., Robertson, D. (2001). Measuring development and ultimate attainment in non-native grammars. In C. Elder, A. Brown, E. Grove, K. Hill, N. Iwashita, T. Lumley, et al. (Eds.), Experimenting with uncertainty. Essays in honour of Alan Davies (pp. 264 274). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
87. Spolsky, B., Sigurd, B., Sato, M., Walker, E., Arterburn, C. (1968). Preliminary studies in the development of techniques for testing overall second language proficiency. In J. A. Upshur & J. Fata (Eds Problems in foreign language testing. Language Learning Special Issue (No. 3, pp. 79 98). Ann Arbor, Mich. : Research Club in Language Learning.
88. Stevens, G. (2006). The age-length-onset problem in research on second language acquisition among immigrants. Language Learning, 56, 671 692.
89. Stölten, K. (2005). Effects of age of learning on VOT in voiceless stops produced by near-native L2 speakers. In A. Eriksson & J. Lindh (Eds Proceedings FONETIK 2005. The XVIII Swedish phonetics conference, May 25-27 2005 (pp. 91 94). Göteborg : Department of Linguistics, Göteborg University.
90. Stölten, K. (2006). Effects of age on VOT: Categorical perception of Swedish stops by near-native L2 speakers. In G. Ambrazaitis & S. Schötz (Eds Proceedings from FONETIK 2006, Lund, June 7-9 2006 (pp. 125 128). Lund : Centre for Languages and Literature, (General Linguistics and Phonetics).
91. Taylor, W. L. (1953). Cloze procedure: A new tool for measuring readability. Journalism Quarterly, 30, 414 438.
92. Tsukada, K., Birdsong, D., Bialystok, E., Mack, M., Sung, H., Flege, J. (2005). A developmental study of English vowel production and perception by native Korean adults and children. Journal of Phonetics, 33, 263 290.
93. van Boxtel, S 2005). Can the late bird catch the worm? Ultimate attainment in L2 syntax. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen, Utrecht.
94. van Boxtel, S., Bongaerts, T., Coppen, P.-A. (2005). Native-like attainment of dummy subjects in Dutch and the role of the L1. IRAL, 43, 355 380.
95. Van Wuijtswinkel, K 1994). Critical period effects in the acquisition of grammatical competence in a second language. Nijmegen, The Netherlands : University of Nijmegen.
96. White, L., Genesee, F. (1996). How native is near-native? The issue of ultimate attainment in adult second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 12, 233 265.
97. Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.