Different speakers, different grammars: Individual differences in native language attainment

Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 219-253

  Dąbrowska, Ewa ^a  

^a NORTHUMBRIA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Academic achievement; First language acquisition; Individual differences; Inflectional morphology; Passive; Quantifier; Second language acquisition; Subordination; Ultimate attainment

Indexed keywords

EID: 84989395498     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18799264     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/lab.2.3.01dab     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Ambridge, B., Theakston, A.L., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2006). The distributed learning effect for children’s acquisition of an abstract grammatical construction. Cognitive Development, 21, p. 74-193.
2. Bever, T.G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In J. R. Hayes (Ed.), Cognition and the development of language (pp. 279-362). New York, NY: Wiley.
3. Bielec, D. (1998). Polish: An essential grammar. London: Rutledge.
4. Birdsong, D. (1992). Ultimate attainment in second language acquisition. Language, 68, p. 706-755.
5. Birdsong, D. (2004). Second language acquisition and ultimate attainment. In A. Davies & C. Elder (Eds.), Handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 82-105). London: Blackwell.
6. Birdsong, D. (2006). Age and second language acquisition and processing. A selective overview. Language Learning, 56, p. 9-46.
7. Birdsong, D., & Molis, M. (2001). On the evidence for maturational constraints in second language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, p. 235-249.
8. Bley-Vroman, R. (1990). The logical problem of foreign language learning. Linguistic Analysis, 20, p. 3-49.
9. Bley-Vroman, R. (2009). The evolving context of the fundamental difference hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, p. 175-198.
10. Brooks, P.J., & Sekerina, I.A. (2005-2006). Shortcuts to quantifier interpretation in children and adults. Language Acquisition, 13, p. 177-206.
11. Brooks, P.J., & Sekerina, I.A. (2006). Shallow processing of universal quantification: A comparison of monolingual and bilingual adults. Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2450).
12. Bybee, J. (1995). Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, p. 425-455.
13. Bybee, J. (2001). Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Cacioppo, J.T., Petty, R.E., & Kao, C.F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, p. 306-307.
15. Cattell, R.B., & Cattell, H.E. P. (1973). Measuring intelligence with the culture-fair tests. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
16. Chipere, N. (2001). Native speaker variations in syntactic competence: Implications for first language teaching. Language Awareness, 10, p. 107-124.
17. Coppieters, R. (1987). Competence differences between native and near-native speakers. Language, 63, p. 544-573.
18. Cowart, W. (1997). Experimental syntax: Applying objective methods to sentence judgements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
19. Crain, S., & Lillo-Martin, D. (1999). An introduction to linguistic theory and language acquisition. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
20. Crain, S., Thornton, R., Boster, C., Conway, L., Lillo-Martin, D., & Woodams, E. (1996). Quantification without qualification. Language Acquisition, 5, p. 83-153.
21. Dabrowska, E. (1997). The LAD goes to school: A cautionary tale for nativists. Linguistics, 35, p. 735-766.
22. Dabrowska, E. (2001). Learning a morphological system without a default: The Polish genitive. Journal of Child Language, 28, p. 545-574.
23. Dabrowska, E. (2004). Language, mind and brain: Some psychological and neurological constraints on theories of grammar. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
24. Dabrowska, E. (2008a). The later development of an early-emerging system: The curious case of the Polish genitive. Linguistics, 46, p. 629-650.
25. Dabrowska, E. (2008b). The effects of frequency and neighbourhood density on adult speakers’ productivity with Polish case inflections: An empirical test of usage-based approaches to morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, p. 931-951.
26. Dabrowska, E. (2009). Constructing a second language: Some final thoughts. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7, p. 277-290.
27. Dabrowska, E., & Street, J. (2006). Individual differences in language attainment: Comprehension of passive sentences by native and non-native English speakers. Language Sciences, 28, p. 604-615.
28. Dabrowska, E., Farmer, T. A., & Street, J. (in progress). (Non)Convergence in L1 and L2 acquisition.
29. Dabrowska, E., & Szczerbinski, M. (2006). Polish children’s productivity with case marking: the role of regularity, type frequency, and phonological coherence. Journal of Child Language, 33, p. 559-597.
30. Farmer, T.A., Misyak, J.B., & Christiansen, M.H. (in press). Individual differences in sentence processing. In M. Spivey, M. Joannisse, & K. McRae (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of psycholinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Ferreira, F. (2003). The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 47, p. 164-203.
32. Ferreira, F., Bailey K.G.D., & Ferraro, V. (2002). Good-enough representations in language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, p. 11-15.
33. Ferreira, F., & Patson N.D. (2007). The ‘good enough’ approach to language comprehension. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1, p. 71-83.
34. Flege, J.E., Yeni-Komshian, G.H., & Liu, S. (1999). Age constraints on second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, p. 78-104.
35. Gathercole, S., Pickering, S., Knight, C., & Stegmann, Z. (2004). Working memory skills and educational attainment: Evidence from national curriculum assessments at 7 and 14 years of age. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, p. 1-16.
36. Geurts, B. (2003). Quantifying kids. Language Acquisition, 11, p. 197-218.
37. Ginsborg, J. (2006). The effects of socio-economic status on children’s language acquisition and use. In J. Clegg & J. Ginsborg (Eds.), Language and social disadvantage (pp. 9-27). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
38. Gordon, P., & Chafetz, J. (1990). Verb-based versus class-based accounts of actionality effects in children’s comprehension of passives. Cognition, 36, p. 227-254.
39. Gries, S. Th., & Stefanowitsch, A. (2004). Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on ‘alternations’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9, p. 97-129.
40. Hart, B., & Risley, R.R. (1999). The social world of children learning to talk. Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes.
41. Hart, B., & Risley, T.R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Paul Brooks.
42. Herschensohn, J. (2009). Fundamental and gradient differences in language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, p. 259-289.
43. Huttenlocher, J., Vasilyeva, M., Cymerman, E., & Levine, S. (2002). Language input and child syntax. Cognitive Psychology, 45, p. 337-374.
44. Johnson, J., & Newport, E. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21, p. 60-99.
45. Just, M.A., & Carpenter, P.A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, p. 122-149.
46. King, J., & Just, M.A. (1991). Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, p. 580-602.
47. Lidz, J., & Williams, A. (2009). Constructions on holiday. Cognitive Linguistics, 20, p. 177-189.
48. Locke, A., & Ginsborg, J. (2003). Spoken language in the early years: the cognitive and linguistic development of three- to five-year-old children from socio-economically deprived backgrounds. Educational and Child Psychology, 20, p. 68-79.
49. MacDonald, M.C., & Christiansen, M.H. (2002). Reassessing working memory: Comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996). Psychological Review, 109, p. 35-54.
50. Maratsos, M., Fox, D.E.C., Becker, J.A., & Chalkley, M.A. (1985). Some restrictions on children’s passives. Cognition, 19, p. 167-191.
51. Montrul, S. (2008). Incomplete acquisition in bilingualism: Re-examining the age factor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
52. Nowak, M.A., Komarova, N.L., & Niyogi, P. (2001). Evolution of Universal Grammar. Science, 291, p. 114-118.
53. O’grady, W, Lee, O.-S., & Lee, J.-H. (2011). Practical and theoretical issues in the study of language acquisition. Heritage Language Journal, 8, p. 23-40.
54. Orzechowska, A. (1998). Rzeczownik. In R. Grzegorczykowa, R. Laskowski, & H. Wrobel (Eds.), Gramatyka wspotczesnego jgzykapolskiego: Morfologia (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 270-332). Warszawa: PWN.
55. Otwinowska-Kaszelanic, A. (2000). Korpus jgzyka mowionege mtodego pokolenia Polakow. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Akademickie DIALOG.
56. Pakulak, E., & Neville, H. (2011). Maturational constraints on the recruitment of early processes for syntactic processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, p. 2752-2765.
57. Pearlmutter, N.J., & MacDonald, M.C. (1995.) Individual differences and probabilistic constraints in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, p. 521-542.
58. Perfetti, C.A., & McCutchen, D. (1987). Schooled language competence: Linguistic abilities in reading and writing. In S. Rosenberg (Ed.), Advances in applied psycholinguistics: Reading, writing, and language learning (Vol. 2, pp. 105-141). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59. Pinker, S., Lebeaux D.S., & Frost, L.A. (1987). Productivity and constraints in the acquisition of the passive. Cognition, 26, p. 195-267.
60. Ross, J.R. (1979). Where’s English? In C. J. Fillmore, D. Kempler, & W. S.-Y. Wang (Eds.), Individual differences in language ability and language behavior (pp. 127-163). New York, NY: Academic Press.
61. Schmidt, R.W (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, p. 129-158.
62. Schütze, C.T. (1996). The Empirical Base of Linguistics: Grammaticality Judgments and Linguistic Methodology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
63. Seidenberg, M.S. (1997). Language acquisition and use: learning and applying probabilistic constraints. Science, 275, p. 1599-1603.
64. Skehan, P. (1989). Individual differences in second-language learning. London: Edward Arnold.
65. Smoczynska, M. (1985). The acquisition of Polish. In D. I. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition: The data (Vol. 1, pp. 595-683). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
66. Sorace, A. (1993). Incomplete vs divergent representations of unaccusativity in non-native grammars of Italian. Second Language Research, 9, p. 22-47.
67. Street, J., & Dabrowska, E., 2010. More individual differences in language attainment: How much do adult native speakers of English know about passives and quantifiers? Lingua 120, p. 2080-2094.
68. Street, J., & Dabrowska, E. (in press). Lexically specific knowledge and individual differences in adult native speakers’ processing of the English passive. Applied Psycholinguistics.
69. Swets, B., Desmet, T., Hambrick D.Z., & Ferreira, F. (2007). The role of working memory in syntactic ambiguity resolution: A psychometric approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, p. 64-81.
70. Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of child language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
71. Townsend, D.J., & Bever, T.G. (2001). Sentence comprehension: Theintegration of habits and rules. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
72. Waters, G.S., & Caplan, D. (1996). The measurement of verbal working memory capacity and its relation to reading comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, p. 51-79.
73. Wells, J.B., Christiansen, M.H., Race, D.S., Acheson, D.J., & MacDonald, M.C. (2009). Experience and sentence processing: Statistical learning and relative clause comprehension. Cognitive Psychology, 58, p. 250-271.