Temporal dynamics of late second language acquisition: evidence from event-related brain potentials

Second Language Research

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 13-41

  Steinhauer, Karsten ^a,b   White, Erin J ^a   Drury, John E ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

critical period; ERPs; event related brain potentials; L2 morphosyntax; LAN; late second language acquisition; P600

Indexed keywords

EID: 67649201155     PISSN: 02676583     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0267658308098995     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Abutalebi, J., Cappa, S.F. and Perani, D. 2001: The bilingual brain as revealed by functional neuroimaging. Bilingualism 4, 179-90.
2. Bahlmann, J., Gunter, T.C. and Friederici, A.D. 2006: Hierarchical and linear sequence processing: an electrophysiological exploration of two different grammar types. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18, 1829-42.
3. Baldwin, K.B. and Kutas, M. 1997: An ERP analysis of implicit structured sequence learning. Psychophysiology 34, 74-86. (Pubitemid 27043815)
4. Birdsong, D., editor, 1999: Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Birdsong, D. and Molis, M. 2001: On the evidence for maturational constraints in second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language 44, 235-49.
6. Bley-Vroman, R. 1989: What is the logical problem of foreign language learning? In Gass, S.M. and Schacter, J., editors, Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 41-68.
7. Bowden, H.W., Sanz, C.S., Steinhauer, K. and Ullman, M.T. 2007: An ERP study of proficiency in second language. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, supplement, 170.
8. Clahsen, H. and Felser, C. 2006 a: Grammatical Processing in Language Learners. Applied Psycholinguistics 27, 3-42.
9. - 2006 b: How native-like is non-native language processing ? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10, 564-70.
10. Coulson, S., King, J.W. and Kutas, M. 1998: Expect the unexpected: event-related brain response to morphosyntactic violations. Language and Cognitive Processes 13: 21-58.
11. Dehaene, S., Dupoux, E., Mehler, J., Cohen, L., Paulesu, E., Perani, D., van de Moortele, P.F., Lehericy, S. and LeBihan, D. 1997: Anatomical variability in the cortical representation of first and second language. NeuroReport 8, 3809-15.
12. DeKeyser, R.M. 2003: Implicit and explicit learning. In Doughty, C. and Long, M.H., editors, The handbook of second language acquisition. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 313-47.
13. DeKeyser, R.M. 2005: What makes learning second-language grammar difficult? A review of issues. Language Learning 55, supplement 1, 1-25. (Pubitemid 40758913)
14. DeKeyser, R.M. and Larson-Hall, J. 2002: What does the critical period really mean? In Kroll, J.F. and De Groot, A.M.B., editors, Handbook of bilingualism: psycholinguistic approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. Doughty, C.J. and Long, M.H. 2003: The handbook of second language acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell
16. Eubank, L. and Gregg, K.R. 1999: Critical periods and (second) language acquisition: divide et impera. In Birdsong, D., editor, Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 65-99.
17. Flege, J.E. 1999: Age of learning and second language speech. In Birdsong, D., editor, Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 101-31.
18. Flege, J.E., Yeni-Komshian, G.H. and Liu, S. 1999: Age constraints on second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language 41, 78-104.
19. Friederici, A.D. 2002: Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6, 78-84. (Pubitemid 34119178)
20. Friederici, A.D., Pfeifer, E. and Hahne, A. 1993: Event-related brain potentials during natural speech processing: effects of semantic, morphological and syntactic violations. Cognitive Brain Research 1, 183-92.
21. Friederici, A.D., Steinhauer, K. and Frisch, S. 1999: Lexical integration: sequential effects of syntactic and semantic information. Memory and Cognition 27, 438-53.
22. Friederici, A.D., Steinhauer, K. and Pfeifer, E. 2002: Brain signatures of artificial language processing: evidence challenging the critical period hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99, 529-34.
23. Friederici, A.D., Bahlmann, J., Heim, S., Schubotz, R.I. and Anwander, A. 2006: The brain differentiates human and non-human grammars: functional localization and structural connectivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103 (7). 2458-63.
24. Goad, H. and White, L. 2004: Ultimate attainment of L2 inflection: effects of L1 prosodic structure. In Foster-Cohen, S., Sharwood Smith, M., Sorace, A. and Ota, M., editors, EUROSLA Yearbook 4. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 119-45.
25. - 2006: Ultimate attainment in interlanguage grammars: a prosodic approach. Second Language Research 22, 243-68.
26. Gunter, T.C., Friederici, A.D. and Schriefers, H. 2000: Syntactic gender and semantic expectancy: ERPs reveal early autonomy and late interaction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12, 556-68.
27. Hagoort, P., Wassenaar, M. and Brown, C. 2003 a: Syntax-related ERPeffects in Dutch. Cognitive Brain Research 16, 38-50.
28. - 2003 b: Real-time semantic compensation in patients with agrammatic comprehension: Electrophysiological evidence for multiple-route plasticity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100, 4340-45.
29. Hahne, A. 2001: What's different in second-language processing? Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Psycholinguistics research 30, 251-66.
30. Hahne, A. and Friederici, A.D. 1999: Electrophysiological evidence for two steps in syntactic analysis: early automatic and late controlled processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 11, 194-205. (Pubitemid 29224561)
31. Hahne, A. and Jescheniak, J. 2001: What's left if the Jabberwock gets the semantics? An ERP investigation into semantic and syntactic processes during auditory sentence comprehension. Cognitive Brain Research 11, 199-212. (Pubitemid 32245548)
32. Hahne, A., Mueller, J.L. and Clahsen, H. 2006: Morphological processing in a second language: behavioral and event-related brain potential evidence for storage and decomposition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18, 121-34.
33. Hakuta, K., Bialystok, E. and Wiley, E. 2003: Critical evidence: a test of the critical-period hypothesis for second-language acquisition. Psychological Science 14, 31-38. (Pubitemid 37283113)
34. Halgren, E., Dhond, R., Christensen, N., Van Petten, C., Marinkovic, K., Lewine, J.D. and Dale, A.M. 2002: N400-like MEG responses modulated by semantic context, word frequency, and lexical class in sentences. NeuroImage 17, 1101-16.
35. Harley, B. and Wang, W. 1997: The critical period hypothesis: where are we now? In de Groot, A.M.B. and Kroll, J.F., editors, Tutorials in bilingualism Psycholinguistic Perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 19-51.
36. Hyltenstam, K. and Abrahamsson, H. 2003: Maturational constraints in SLA. In Doughty, C. and Long, M.H., editors, The handbook of second language acquisition. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 539-88.
37. Johnson, J.S. and Newport, E.L. 1989: Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology 21, 60-99.
38. Kaan, E., Harris, A. Gibson, E. and Holcomb, P. 2000: The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty. Language and Cognitive Processes 15, 159-201. (Pubitemid 30353507)
39. Knoesche, T.R., Maess, B. and Friederici, A.D. 2000: Processing of syntactic information monitored by brain surface current density mapping based on MEG. Brain Topography 12, 75-87. (Pubitemid 30066294)
40. Krashen, S.D., Long, M. and Scarcella, R. 1979: Age, rate, and eventual attainment in second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly 13, 573-82.
41. Kubota, M., Ferrari, P. and Roberts, T.P.L. 2004: Human neuronal encoding of English syntactic violations as revealed by both L1 and L2 speakers. Neuroscience Letters 368, 235-40.
42. Kutas, M. and Hillyard, S.A. 1980: Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science 207, 203-05.
43. Long, M.H. 1990: Maturational constraints on language development. Studies in second language acquisition 12, 251-85.
44. Marchman, V.A. 1993: Constraints on plasticity in a connectionist model of the English past tense. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 5, 215-34.
45. Martin-Loeches, M., Munoz, F., Casado, P., et al. 2005: Are the anterior negativities to grammatical violations indexing working memory ? Psychophysiology 42, 508-19.
46. McLaughlin, J., Osterhout, L. and Kim, A. 2004: Neural correlates of second-language word learning: minimal instruction produces rapid change. Nature Neuroscience 7, 703-704. (Pubitemid 38859053)
47. Morgan-Short, K., Steinhauer, K., Sanz, C. and Ullman, M.T. 2007: An ERP investigation of second language processing: effects of proficiency and explicit and implicit training. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, supplement, 164.
48. Mueller, J.L. 2006: L2 in a nutshell: the investigation of second language processing in the miniature language model. Language Learning 56, 235-70.
49. Mueller, J.L., Hahne, A., Fujii, Y. and Friederici, A.D. 2005: Native and nonnative speakers' processing of a miniature version of Japanese as revealed by ERPs. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17, 1229-44.
50. Mueller, J.L., Hirotani, M. and Friederici, A.D. 2007: ERP evidence for different strategies in the processing of case markers in native speakers and non-native learners. BMC Neuroscience 8 ( 18 ).
51. Neville, H., Nicol, J.L., Barss, A., Forster, K.I. and Garrett, M.F. 1991: Syntactically based sentence processing classes: evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 3, 151-65.
52. Newport, E.L. 1993: Maturational constraints on language learning. In P. Bloom, editor, Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 543-60.
53. Ojima, S., Nakata, H. and Kakigi, R. 2005: An ERP study on second language learning after childhood: effects of proficiency. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17, 1212-28.
54. Osterhout, L. and Holcomb, P.J. 1992: Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language 31, 785-806.
55. Osterhout, L., McLaughlin, J., Pitkanen, I., Frenck-Mestre, C. and Molinaro, N. 2006: Novice learners, longitudinal designs, and event-related potentials: a means for exploring the neurocognition of second language processing. Language Learning 56, 199-230. (Pubitemid 44127830)
56. Osterhout, L. and Mobley, L.A. 1995: Event-related brain potentials elicited by failure to agree. Journal of Memory and Language 34, 739-73.
57. Pakulak, E. and Neville, H. 2004: Individual differences in online syntactic processing in monolingual adults as reflected by ERPs. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, 149. Available online at: http://www.ling.umd.edu/cuny2004/CUNY-Handbook-2004.pdf (October 2008).
58. Perani, D., Paulesu, E., Galles, N.S., Dupoux, E., Dehaene, S., Bettinardi, V., Cappa, S.F., Fazio, F. and Mehler, J. 1998: The bilingual brain: proficiency and age of acquisition of the second language. Brain 12, 1841-52.
59. Phillips, C., Kazanina, N. and Abada, S.H. 2005: ERP effects of the processing of syntactic long-distance dependencies. Cognitive Brain Research 22, 407.
60. Pinker, S. and Prince, A. 1994: Regular and irregular morphology and the psychological status of rules of grammar. In Lima, S.D., Corrigan, R.L. and Iverson, G.K., editors, The reality of linguistic rules. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
61. Reber, A.S. 1967: Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 6, 855-63.
62. Reber, P.J. and Squire, L.R. 1999: Intact learning of artificial grammars and intact category learning by patients with Parkinson's disease. Behavioral Neuroscience 113, 235-42.
63. Rossi, S., Gugler, M.F., Friederici, A.D. and Hahne, A. 2006: The impact of proficiency on syntactic second-language processing of German and Italian: evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18, 2030-48.
64. Steinhauer, K. and Connolly, J.F. 2008: Event-related potentials in the study of language. In Stemmer, B. and Whitaker, H.A., editors, Handbook of the neuroscience of language. New York: Elsevier, 91-104.
65. Steinhauer, K., White, E., Cornell, S., Genesee, F. and White, L. 2006: The neural dynamics of second language acquisition: evidence from Event-Related Potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, supplement, 99.
66. Ullman, M.T. 2001: The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: the declarative/procedural model. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 4, 105-22.
67. - 2005: A cognitive neuroscience perspective on second language acquisition: the declarative/procedural model. In Sanz, C., editor, Mind and context in adult second language acquisition: methods, theory and practice. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 141-78.
68. Van Petten, C. and Luka, B.J. 2006: Neural localization of semantic context effects in electromagnetic and hemodynamic studies. Brain and Language 97, 279-93.
69. Wartenburger, I., Heekeren, H.R., Abutalebi, J., Cappa, S.F., Villringer, A. and Perani, D. 2003: Early setting of grammatical processing in the bilingual brain. Neuron 37, 159-70.
70. Weber-Fox, C.M. and Neville, H.J. 1996: Maturational constraints on functional specializations for language processing: ERP and behavioral evidence in bilingual speakers. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 8, 231-56.
71. Weber-Fox, C., Davis, L.J. and Cuadrado, E. 2003: Event-related brain potential markers of high-language proficiency in adults. Brain and Language 85, 231-44.
72. White, E.J., Genesee, F., Drury, J.E. and Steinhauer, K. 2007: Before and after: an ERP investigation of late second language learning in an intensive language course. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, supplement, 290.
73. White, L. 2003: On the nature of the interlanguage representation: universal grammar in the second language. In Doughty, C. and Long, M.H., editors, The handbook of second language acquisition. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 19-42.
74. White, L. and Genesee, F. 1996: How native is near-native? The issue of ultimate attainment in adult second language acquisition. Second Language Research 12, 233-65.