Processing subject-object ambiguities in the L2: A self-paced reading study with German L2 learners of Dutch

Language Learning

Volumn 59, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 73-112

  Havik, Else ^a   Roberts, Leah ^b   Van Hout, Roeland ^a   Schreuder, Robert ^a   Haverkort, Marco ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Ambiguity; L2 processing; Reading comprehension; Working memory

Indexed keywords

EID: 61849125392     PISSN: 00238333     EISSN: 14679922     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00501.x     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Altarriba, J., Kroll, J., Sholl, A., Rayner, K. (1996). The influence of lexical and conceptual constraints on reading mixed-language sentences: Evidence from eye fixations and naming times. Memory & Cognition, 24, 477 492.
2. Altmann, G. T. M., Steedman, M. (1988). Interaction with context during human sentence processing. Cognition, 30, 191 238.
3. Bader, M., Meng, M. (1999). Subject-object ambiguities in German embedded clauses: An across-the-board comparison. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28 (2 121 143.
4. Birner, B., Ward, G. (1998). Information status and noncanonical word order in English. Amsterdam : Benjamins.
5. Bornkessel, I., Schlesewsky, M. (2006). The role of contrast in the local licensing of scrambling in German: Evidence from on-line comprehension. Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 18 (1 1 43.
6. Clahsen, H., Felser, C. (2006a). Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27 (1 3 42.
7. Clahsen, H., Felser, C. (2006b). How native-like is non-native language processing? Trends in Cognitive Science, 10 (12 564 570.
8. Clifton, C. (1993). Thematic roles in sentence parsing. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 47, 224 246.
9. Clifton, C. J., Frazier, L. (1989). Comprehending sentences with long-distance dependencies. In G. N. Carlson & M. K. Tanenhaus (Eds. Linguistic structure in language processing (pp. 273 318). Dordrecht : Kluwer.
10. Crain, S., Steedman, M. (1985). On not being led up the garden path: The use of context in the psychological syntax processor. In D. R. Dowty, L. Karttunen, & A. M. Zwicky (Eds Natural language parsing (pp. 320 358). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
11. Daneman, M., Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19 (4 450 466.
12. de Kleijn, P., Nieuwborg, E. (2001). Basiswoordenboek Nederlands. Leuven: Wolters.
13. De Vincenzi, M. (1991). Syntactic parsing strategies in Italian. Dordrecht : Kluwer.
14. Felser, C., Roberts, L. (2004, September). Plausibility and recovery from garden-paths in L2 sentence processing. Poster presented at Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing (AMLaP), Aix-en-Provence, France.
15. Felser, C., Roberts, L. (2007). Processing wh-dependencies in English as a second language: A cross-modal priming study. Second Language Research, 23, 1 28.
16. Felser, C., Roberts, L., Gross, R., Marinis, T. (2003). The processing of ambiguous sentences by first and second language learners of English. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 453 489.
17. Frazier, L. (1987). Syntactic processing: Evidence from Dutch. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 5, 519 559.
18. Frazier, L., Clifton, C. (1996). Construal. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
19. Frazier, L., Flores d'Arcais, G. (1989). Filler driven parsing: A study of gap filling in Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 331 344.
20. Frenck-Mestre, C., Pynte, J. (1997). Syntactic ambiguity resolution while reading in second and native languages. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 119 148.
21. Friederici, A. D., Steinhauer, K., Mecklinger, A., Meyer, M. (1998). Working memory constraints on syntactic ambiguity resolution as revealed by electrical brain responses. Biological Psychology, 47 (3 193 221.
22. Givón, T. (1984). Syntax: A functional-typological introduction. Amsterdam : Benjamins.
23. Gorrell, P. (1995). Syntax and parsing. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
24. Gorrell, P. (2000). The subject-before-object preference in German clauses. In B. Hemforth & L. Konieczny (Eds. German sentence processing (pp. 25 64). Dordrecht : Kluwer.
25. Harrington, M., Sawyer, M. (1992). L2 working memory capacity and L2 reading skill. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 25 38.
26. Hopp, H. (2006). Syntactic features and reanalysis in near-native processing. Second Language Research, 22 (3 369 397.
27. Indefrey, P. (2006). It is time to work toward explicit processing models for native and second language speakers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27 (1 66 69.
28. Jiang, N. (2004). Morphological insensitivity in second language processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25 (4 603 634.
29. Juffs, A. (2004). Representation, processing and working memory in a second language. Transactions of the Philological Society, 102 (2 199 225.
30. Juffs, A. (2005). The influence of first language on the processing of wh-movement in English as a second language. Second Language Research, 21, 121 151.
31. Juffs, A., Harrington, M. (1995). Parsing effects in second language sentence processing: Subject and object asymmetries in wh-extraction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 483 516.
32. Juffs, A., Harrington, M. (1996). Garden path sentences and error data in second language sentence positioning. Language Learning, 46 (2 283 232.
33. Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99 (1 122 149.
34. Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., Woolley, J. D. (1982) Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 228 238.
35. Kaan, E. (1997). Processing subject-object ambiguities in Dutch. Groningen Dissertations in Linguistics 20.
36. Kaiser, E., Trueswell, J. C. (2004). The role of discourse context in the processing of a flexible word-order language. Cognition, 94 (2 113 147.
37. King, J., Just, M. A. (1991). Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30 (5 580 602.
38. Konieczny, L., Hemforth, B., Scheepers, C., Straube, G. (1997). The role of lexical heads in parsing: Evidence from German. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 307 348.
39. Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
40. Lee, M. W. E. (2002, March). Implementing subject-verb number agreement in a non-native language. Poster presented at the 15th CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, New York.
41. MacDonald, M., Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A. (1992). Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity. Cognitive Psychology, 24 (1 56 98.
42. Mak, W. (2001). Processing relative clauses, effects of pragmatic, semantic and syntactic variables. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
43. Marinis, T., Roberts, L., Felser, C., Clahsen, H. (2005). Gaps in second language sentence processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 53 78.
44. Mecklinger, A., Schriefers, H., Steinhauer, K., Friederici, A. (1995). Processing relative clauses varying on syntactic and semantic dimensions: An analysis with event-related potentials. Memory & Cognition, 23, 477 494.
45. Papadopoulou, D., Clahsen, H. (2003). Parsing strategies in L1 and L2 sentence processing: A study of relative clause attachment in Greek. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 501 528.
46. Pearlmutter, N. J., MacDonald, M. C. (1995). Individual differences and probabilistic constraints in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 521 542.
47. Pickering, M. J., Traxler, M. J. (1998). Plausibility and recovery from garden paths: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 24 (4 940 961.
48. Prince, E. F. (1998). On the limits of syntax, with reference to Topicalization and Left-Dislocation. In P. Culicover & L. McNally (Eds. Syntax and semantics: The limits of syntax 29 (pp. 281 302). New York : Academic Press.
49. Roberts, L. (2003). Syntactic processing in L2 learners of English. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Essex, UK.
50. Robinson, P. (2002). Effects of individual differences in intelligence, aptitude and working memory on incidental SLA. In P. Robinson (Ed. Individual differences and instructed language learning. Philadelphia : Benjamins.
51. Schriefers, H., Friederici, A., Kuhn, A. (1995). The processing of locally ambiguous relative clauses in German. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 499 520.
52. Van den Noort, M. W. M. L., Bosch, M. P. C., Hugdahl, K. (2006). Foreign language proficiency and working memory capacity. European Psychologist, 11 (4 289 296.
53. van Gompel, R. (1995). The processing of subject and object relative clauses in Dutch. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
54. Vos, S. H. (1999). Verbal working memory and sentence processing: An electrophysiological investigation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
55. Williams, J. (2006). Incremental interpretation in second language sentence processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9 (1 71 88.
56. Williams, J., Möbius, P., Kim, C. (2001). Native and non-native processing of English wh-questions: Parsing strategies and plausibility constraints. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22, 509 540.