Effects of Plausibility on Structural Priming

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 538-544

  Christianson, Kiel ^a   Luke, Steven G ^a   Ferreira, Fernanda ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

good enough language processing; language comprehension; plausibility; structural priming; syntactic parsing

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COMPREHENSION; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; METHODOLOGY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; STUDENT; UNIVERSITY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; COMPREHENSION; HUMANS; LINGUISTICS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; STUDENTS; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 77649213122     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0018027     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Baayen H.R. Analyzing linguistic data (2008), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom
2. Bock K. Meaning, sound, and syntax: Lexical priming in sentence production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 12 (1986) 575-586
3. Boersma P., and Weenink D. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 4.3.14) [Computer program] (2005). http://www.praat.org/ Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/
4. Bornkessel I., and Schlesewsky M. The extended argument dependency model: A neurocognitive approach to sentence comprehension across languages. Psychological Review 113 (2006) 787-821
5. Chang F., Bock K., and Goldberg A.E. Can thematic roles leave traces of their places?. Cognition 90 (2003) 29-49
6. Christianson, K. (2002). Sentence processing in a 'nonconfigurational' language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
7. Christianson K., and Cho H.-Y. Interpreting null pronouns (pro) in isolated sentences. Lingua 119 (2009) 989-1008
8. Christianson K., and Ferreira F. Conceptual accessibility and sentence production in a free word-order language (Odawa). Cognition 98 (2005) 105-135
9. Christianson K., Hollingworth A., Halliwell J.F., and Ferreira F. Thematic roles assigned along the garden path linger. Cognitive Psychology 42 (2001) 368-407
10. Christianson K., Williams C.C., Zacks R.T., and Ferreira F. Misinterpretations of garden-path sentences by older and younger adults. Discourse Processes 42 (2006) 205-238
11. Clahsen H., and Felser C. Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics 27 (2006) 3-42
12. Ferreira F. The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology 47 (2003) 164-203
13. Ferreira F., Bailey K.G.D., and Ferraro V. Good-enough representations in language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science 11 (2002) 11-15
14. Ferreira F., Christianson K., and Hollingworth A. Misinterpretations of garden-path sentences: Implications for models of sentence processing and reanalysis. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 30 1 (2001) 3-20
15. Ferreira F., and Patson N.D. The "good enough" approach to language comprehension. Language and Linguistics Compass 1 (2007) 71-83
16. Griffin Z.M., and Bock K. What the eyes say about speaking. Psychological Science 11 (2000) 274-279
17. Jackendoff R. A parallel architecture perspective on language processing. Brain Research 1146 (2007) 2-22
18. Jaeger T.F. Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language 59 (2008) 434-446
19. Kim A., and Osterhout L. The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Memory and Language 52 (2005) 205-225
20. Kolk H.H.J., Chwilla D.J., van Herten M., and Oor P.J.W. Structure and limited capacity in verbal working memory: A study with event-related potentials. Brain and Language 85 (2003) 1-36
21. Kuperberg G.R. Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax. Brain Research 1146 (2007) 23-49
22. Kuperberg G.R., Caplan D., Sitnikova T., Eddy M., and Holcomb P. Neural correlates of processing syntactic, semantic and thematic relationships in sentences. Language and Cognitive Processes 21 (2006) 489-530
23. Kuperberg G.R., Kreher D.A., Sitnikova T., Caplan D., and Holcomb P.J. The role of animacy and thematic relationships in processing active English sentences: Evidence from event-related potentials. Brain and Language 100 (2007) 223-238
24. Loebell H., and Bock J.K. Structural priming across languages. Linguistics 41 (2003) 791-824
25. Pickering M.J., and Ferreira V.S. Structural priming: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin 134 (2008) 427-459
26. R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing (2008), R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria
27. Schlesewsky M., and Bornkessel I. Context-sensitive neural responses to conflict resolution: Electrophysiological evidence from subject-object ambiguities in language comprehension. Brain Research 1098 (2006) 139-152
28. Shin J.-A., and Christianson K. Syntactic processing in Korean-English bilinguals: Evidence from cross-linguistic structural priming. Cognition 112 (2009) 175-180
29. Sturt P. Semantic re-interpretation and garden-path recovery. Cognition 105 (2007) 477-488
30. Swets B., Desmet T., Clifton Jr. C., and Ferreira F. Underspecification of syntactic ambiguities: Evidence from self-paced reading. Memory & Cognition 36 (2008) 201-216
31. Tabor W., Galantucci B., and Richardson D. Effects of merely local syntactic coherence on sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language 50 (2004) 355-370
32. van Herten M., Chwilla D.J., and Kolk H.H.J. When heuristics clash with parsing routines: ERP evidence for conflict monitoring in sentence perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18 (2006) 1181-1197