Modelling reading development through phonological decoding and self-teaching: Implications for dyslexia

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 369, Issue 1634, 2014, Pages

  Ziegler, Johannes C ^a   Perry, Conrad ^b   Zorzi, Marco ^c,d  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^d IRCCS SAN CAMILLO HOSPITAL   (Italy)

Author keywords

Computational modelling; Developmental dyslexia; Phonological decoding; Reading development

Indexed keywords

CHILD; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; NERVOUS SYSTEM DISORDER; SOCIAL THEORY; TEACHING;

ARTICLE; CHILD; COMPUTATIONAL MODELLING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEVELOPMENTAL DYSLEXIA; DYSLEXIA; HUMAN; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; LEARNING; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHONOLOGICAL DECODING; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; READING; READING DEVELOPMENT; RECOGNITION;

COMPUTATIONAL MODELLING; DEVELOPMENTAL DYSLEXIA; PHONOLOGICAL DECODING; READING DEVELOPMENT;

CHILD; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DYSLEXIA; HUMANS; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; READING; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); VERBAL LEARNING;

EID: 84889830341     PISSN: 09628436     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0397     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ziegler JC, Goswami U. 2005 Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: a psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychol. Bull. 131, 3-29. (doi:10.1037/0033-2909. 131.1.3)
2. Share DL. 1995 Phonological recoding and self-teaching: sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition 55, 151-218. (doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2)
3. Grainger J, Ziegler JC. 2011 A dual-route approach to orthographic processing. Front. Psychol. 2, 54. (doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00054)
4. Ehri LC. 1992 Reconceptualizing the development of sight word reading and its relationship to recoding. In Reading acquisition (eds PB Gough, LE Ehri, R Treiman), pp. 105-143. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
5. Share DL. 1999 Phonological recoding and orthographic learning: a direct test of the self- teaching hypothesis. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 72, 95-129.(doi:10.1006/jecp.1998.2481)
6. Harm MW, Seidenberg MS. 1999 Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: insights from connectionist models. Psychol. Rev. 106, 491-528.(doi:10.1037/0033-295X.106.3.491)
7. Perry C, Ziegler JC, Zorzi M. 2007 Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: the CDP+ model of reading aloud. Psychol. Rev. 114, 273-315. (doi:10.1037/0033-295X.114.2.273)
8. Plaut DC, McClelland JL, Seidenberg MS, Patterson K. 1996 Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychol. Rev. 103, 56-115. (doi:10.1037/ 0033-295X.103.1.56)
9. Zorzi M, Houghton G, Butterworth B. 1998 Two routes or one in reading aloud? A connectionist dual-process model. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 24, 1131-1161. (doi:10.1037/0096-1523. 24.4.1131)
10. Seidenberg MS, McClelland JL. 1989 A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychol. Rev. 96, 523-568. (doi:10.1037/ 0033-295X.96.4.523)
11. Perry C, Ziegler JC, Zorzi M. 2010 Beyond single syllables: large-scale modeling of reading aloud with the connectionist dual process (CDP++) model. Cogn. Psychol. 61, 106-151.(doi:10.1016/j. cogpsych.2010.04.001)
12. Perry C, Ziegler JC, Zorzi M. 2013 A computational and empirical investigation of graphemes in reading. Cogn. Sci. 37, 800-828. (doi:10.1111/ cogs.12030)
13. Zorzi M. 2010 The connectionist dual process (CDP) approach to modelling reading aloud. Eur. J. Cogn. Psychol. 22, 836-860. (doi:10.1080/ 09541440903435621)
14. Zorzi M, Houghton G, Butterworth B. 1998 The development of spelling-sound relationships in a model of phonological reading. Lang. Cogn. Process. 13, 337-371. (doi:10.1080/016909698386555)
15. Hutzler F, Ziegler JC, Perry C, Wimmer H, Zorzi M. 2004 Do current connectionist learning models account for reading development in different languages? Cognition 91, 273-296.(doi:10.1016/j. cognition.2003.09.006)
16. Baayen RH, Milin P, Durdevic DF, Hendrix P, Marelli M. 2011 An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning. Psychol. Rev. 118, 438-481. (doi:10.1037/a0023851)
17. Sutton RS, Barto AG. 1981 Toward a modern theory of adaptive networks: expectation and prediction. Psychol. Rev. 88, 135-170. (doi:10.1037/0033-295X.88.2.135)
18. Houghton G, Zorzi M. 2003 Normal and impaired spelling in a connectionist dual-route architecture. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 20, 115-162. (doi:10.1080/ 02643290242000871)
19. Olson R, Forsberg H, Wise B, Rack J. 1994 Measurement of word recognition, orthographic, and phonological skills. In Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: new views on measurement issues (ed. GR Lyon), pp. 243-277. Baltimore, MD: Paul H Brookes Publishing.
20. Rastle K, Coltheart M. 2000 Lexical and nonlexical print-to-sound translation of disyllabic words and nonwords. J. Mem. Lang. 42, 342-364. (doi:10. 1006/jmla.1999.2687)
21. Peterson RL, Pennington BF, Olson RK. 2012 Subtypes of developmental dyslexia: testing the predictions of the dual-route and connectionist frameworks. Cognition 126, 20-38.(doi:10.1016/j. cognition.2012.08.007)
22. Adelman JS, Brown GD, Quesada JF. 2006 Contextual diversity, not word frequency, determines word-naming and lexical decision times. Psychol. Sci. 17, 814-823. (doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01787.x)
23. Bruck M. 1992 Persistence of dyslexics' phonological awareness deficits. Dev. Psychol. 28, 874-886. (doi:10.1037/0012-1649.28.5.874)
24. Swan D, Goswami U. 1997 Phonological awareness deficits in developmental dyslexia and the phonological representations hypothesis. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 66, 18-41. (doi:10.1006/jecp.1997.2375)
25. Landerl K et al. 2013 Predictors of developmental dyslexia in European orthographies with varying complexity. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 54, 686-694.(doi:10.1111/jcpp.12029)
26. Ziegler JC et al. 2010 Orthographic depth and its impact on universal predictors of reading: a cross-language investigation. Psychol. Sci. 21, 551-559.(doi:10.1177/0956797610363406)
27. Bosse ML, Tainturier MJ, Valdois S. 2007 Developmental dyslexia: the visual attention span deficit hypothesis. Cognition 104, 198-230.(doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.05.009)
28. Collis NL, Kohnen S, Kinoshita S. 2013 The role of visual spatial attention in adult developmental dyslexia. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 66, 245-260.(doi:10. 1080/17470218.2012.705305)
29. Hawelka S, Huber C, Wimmer H. 2006 Impaired visual processing of letter and digit strings in adult dyslexic readers. Vis. Res. 46, 718-723.(doi:10. 1016/j.visres.2005.09.017)
30. Ziegler JC, Pech-Georgel C, Dufau S, Grainger J. 2010 Rapid processing of letters, digits, and symbols: what purely visual-attentional deficit in developmental dyslexia? Dev. Sci. 13, F8-F14.(doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00983.x)
31. Zorzi M, Barbiero C, Facoetti A, Lonciari I, Carrozzi M, Montico M et al. 2012 Extra-large letter spacing improves reading in dyslexia. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 11455-11459.(doi:10.1073/pnas. 1205566109)
32. Facoetti A, Zorzi M, Cestnick L, Lorusso ML, Moltenia M, Paganoni P, Umiltá C, Mascetti GG. 2006 The relationship between visuospatial attention and nonword reading in developmental dyslexia. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 23, 841-855.(doi:10.1080/ 02643290500483090)
33. Franceschini S, Gori S, Ruffino M, Pedrolli K, Facoetti A. 2012 A causal link between visual spatial attention and reading acquisition. Curr. Biol. 22, 814-819. (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.03.013)
34. Kohnen S, Nickels L, Castles A, Friedmann N, McArthur G. 2012 When 'slime' becomes 'smile': developmental letter position dyslexia in English. Neuropsychologia 50, 3681-3692.(doi:10.1016/j. neuropsychologia.2012.07.016)
35. Ziegler JC, Castel C, Pech-Georgel C, George F, Alario FX, Perry C. 2008 Developmental dyslexia and the dual route model of reading: simulating individual differences and subtypes. Cognition 107, 151-178. (doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007. 09.004)
36. Rack JP, Snowling MJ, Olson RK. 1992 The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: a review. Read. Res. Q. 27, 28-53. (doi:10.2307/747832)
37. Ziegler JC, Perry C, Ma-Wyatt A, Ladner D, Schulte-Korne G. 2003 Developmental dyslexia in different languages: language-specific or universal? J. Exp. Child Psychol. 86, 169-193.(doi:10.1016/S0022-0965(03)00139-5)
38. Ziegler JC, Goswami U. 2006 Becoming literate in different languages: similar problems, different solutions. Dev. Sci. 9, 429-436.(doi:10.1111/j. 1467-7687.2006.00509.x)
39. Sibley DE, Kello CT, Seidenberg MS. 2010 Learning orthographic and phonological representation in models of monosyllabic and bisyllabic naming. Eur. J. Cogn. Psychol. 22, 650-668.(doi:10.1080/ 09541440903080583)
40. Share DL. 2008 On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: the perils of overreliance on an 'Outlier' orthography. Psychol. Bull. 134, 584-615.(doi:10.1037/0033-2909. 134.4.584)
41. Byrne B, Coventry WL, Olson RK, Hulslander J, Wadsworth S, DeFries JC, Corley R, Willcutt EG, Samuelsson S. 2008 A behaviour-genetic analysis of orthographic learning, spelling and decoding. J. Res. Read. 31, 8-21. (doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2007. 00358.x)
42. Lyytinen H et al. 2001 Developmental pathways of children with and without familial risk for dyslexia during the first years of life. Dev. Neuropsychol. 20, 535-554. (doi:10.1207/S15326942DN2002_5)
43. Goswami U, Ziegler JC. 2006 A developmental perspective on the neural code for written words. Trends Cogn. Sci. 10, 142-143.(doi:10.1016/j.tics. 2006.02.006)