Pollen-specific, but not sperm-specific, genes show stronger purifying selection and higher rates of positive selection than sporophytic genes in capsella grandiflora

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 30, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 2475-2486

  Arunkumar, Ramesh ^a   Josephs, Emily B ^a   Williamson, Robert J ^a   Wright, Stephen I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Adaptive evolution; Capsella; Distribution of fitness effects; Gametophytic selection; Haploid; Pollen competition

Indexed keywords

TRANSCRIPTOME;

ARTICLE; CAPSELLA; CAPSELLA GRANDIFLORA; ENDOSPERM; GAMETOPHYTE; GENE EXPRESSION; HAPLOIDY; INTRASPECIFIC COMPETITION; MALE GAMETOPHYTE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; OUTCROSSING; PLANT GENE; POLLEN; PURIFYING SELECTION; SEEDLING; SEXUAL SELECTION; SILIQUE; SPOROPHYTE; TISSUE SPECIFICITY;

ADAPTIVE EVOLUTION; CAPSELLA; DISTRIBUTION OF FITNESS EFFECTS; GAMETOPHYTIC SELECTION; HAPLOID; POLLEN COMPETITION;

CAPSELLA; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; GENES, PLANT; GENETIC FITNESS; GENOME, PLANT; GERM CELLS, PLANT; HAPLOIDY; ORGAN SPECIFICITY; OVULE; POLLEN; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84888618647     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/mst149     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Andolfatto P. 2007. Hitchhiking effects of recurrent beneficial amino acid substitutions in Drosophila melanogaster. Genome Res. 17: 1755-1762.
2. Bachtrog D, Andolfatto P. 2006. Selection, recombination and demographic history in Drosophila miranda. Genetics 174:2045-2059.
3. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B. 57:289-300.
4. Berger F, Hamamura Y, Ingouff M, Higashiyama T. 2008. Double fertilization-caught in the act. Trends Plant Sci.. 13:437-443.
5. Bierne N, Eyre-Walker A. 2004. The genomic rate of adaptive amino acid substitution in Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol. 21:1350-1360.
6. Bock KW, Honys D, Ward JM, Padmanaban S, Nawrocki EP, Hirschi KD, Twell D, Sze H. 2006. Integrating membrane transport with mal gametophyte development and function through transcriptomics. Plant Physiol. 140:1151-1168.
7. Boivin K, Acarkan A, Mbulu RS, Clarenz O, Schmidt R. 2004. The Arabidopsis genome sequence as a tool for genome analysis in Brassicaceae. A comparison of the Arabidopsis and Capsella rubella genomes. Plant Physiol. 135:735-744.
8. Bomblies K, Yant L, Laitinen RA, Kim ST, Hollister JD, Warthmann N, Joffrey F, Weigel D. 2010. Local-scale patterns of genetic variability, outcrossing, and spatial structure in natural stands of Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet. 6:e1000890.
9. Borg M, Brownfield L, Twell D. 2009. Male gametophyte development: A molecular perspective. J Exp Bot. 60:1465-1478.
10. Borges F, Gomes G, Gardner R, Moreno N, McCormick S, Feijó JA, Becker JD. 2008. Comparative transcriptomics of Arabidopsis sperm cells. Plant Physiol. 148:1168-1181.
11. Bower FO. 1908. The origin of a land flora, a theory based upon the facts of alternation. London: Macmillan.
12. Calarco JP, Borges F, Donoghue MT, et al. (11 co-authors). 2012. Reprogramming of DNA methylation in pollen guides epigenetic inheritance via small RNA. Cell 151:194-205.
13. Camiolo S, Farina L, Porceddu A. 2012. The relation of codon bias to tissue-specific gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 192: 641-649.
14. Charlesworth D, Wright SI. 2001. Breeding systems and genome evolution. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 11:685-690.
15. deFolter S, Busscher J, Colombo L, Losa A, Angenent GC. 2004. Transcript profiling of transcription factor genes during silique development in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol Biol. 56:351-366.
16. Delph LF, Havens K. 1998. Pollen competition in flowering plants. In: Birkhead T, Møller A, editors. Sperm competition and sexual selection. San Diego (CA): Academic Press. p. 149-173.
17. DePristo M, Banks E, Poplin R, et al. (18 co-authors). 2011. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat Genet. 43:491-498.
18. Dresselhaus T, Sprunck S. 2012. Plant fertilization: maximizing reproductive success. Curr Biol. 22:R487-R489.
19. Drummond DA, Wilke CO. 2008. Mistranslation-induced protein misfolding as a dominant constraint on coding-sequence evolution. Cell 134:341-352.
20. Du Z, Zhou X, Ling Y, Zhang Z, Su Z. 2010. agriGO: A GO analysis toolkit for the agricultural community. Nucleic Acids Res. 38:W64-W70.
21. Duret L, Mouchiroud D. 2000. Determinants of substitution rates in mammalian genes: expression pattern affects selection intensity but not mutation rate. Mol Biol Evol. 17:68-74.
22. Ellegren H, Parsch J. 2007. The evolution of sex-biased genes and sex-biased gene expression. Nat Rev Genet. 8:689-698.
23. Eyre-Walker A, Knightly PD. 2009. Estimating the rate of adaptive molecular evolution in the presence of slightly deleterious mutations and population size change. Mol Biol Evol. 26:2097-2108.
24. Fay JC, Wyckoff GJ, Wu CI. 2001. Positive and negative selection on the human genome. Genetics 158:1227-1234.
25. Fiebig A, Kimport R, Preuss D. 2004. Comparisons of pollen coat genes across Brassicaceae species reveal rapid evolution by repeat expansion and diversification. Proc Natl Acad Sci. U S A. 101:3286-3291.
26. Gerstein AC, Otto SP. 2009. Ploidy and the causes of genomic evolution. J Hered. 100:571-581.
27. Glémin S, Bazin E, Charlesworth D. 2006. Impact of mating systems on patterns of sequence polymorphism in flowering plants. Proc R Soc Biol Sci. B. 273:3011-3019.
28. Gossmann TI, Song BH, Windsor AJ, Mitchell-Olds T, Dixon CJ, Kapralov MV, Filatov DA, Eyre-Walker A. 2010. Genome wide analyses reveal little evidence for adaptive evolution in many plant species. Mol Biol Evol. 27:1822-1832.
29. Haddrill PR, Bachtrog D, Andolfatto P. 2008. Positive and negative selection on noncoding DNA in Drosophila simulans. Mol Biol Evol. 25: 1825-1834.
30. Haudry A, Platts AE, Vello E, et al. (29 co-authors). 2013. An atlas of over 90, 000 conserved noncoding sequences provides insight into crucifer regulatory regions. Nat Genet. 45:891-898.
31. Hennig L, Gruissem W, Grossniklaus U, Köhler C. 2004. Transcriptional programs of early reproductive stages in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 135:1765-1775.
32. Heslop-Harrison J. 1987. Pollen germination and pollen-tube growth. Int Rev Cytol. 107:1-78.
33. Honys D, Twell D. 2004. Transcriptome analysis of haploid male gametophyte development in Arabidopsis. Genome Biol. 5:R85.
34. Keightley PD, Eyre-Walker A. 2007. Joint inference of the distribution of fitness effects of deleterious mutations and population demography based on nucleotide polymorphism frequencies. Genetics 177: 2251-2261.
35. Keightley PD, Eyre-Walker A. 2010. What can we learn about the distribution of fitness effects of new mutations from DNA sequence data? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci.. 365:1187-1193.
36. Kousathanas A, Keightley PD. 2013. A comparison of models to infer the distribution of fitness effects of new mutations. Genetics 193: 1197-1208.
37. Liao BY, Zhang J. 2006. Low rates of expression profile divergence in highly expressed genes and tissue-specific genes during mammalian evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 23:1119-1128.
38. Lourenço JM, Glémin S, Galtier N. 2013. The rate of molecular adaptation in a changing environment. Mol Biol Evol. 30:1292-1301.
39. Louro R, Smirnova AS, Verjovski-Almeida S. 2009. Long intronic noncoding RNA transcription: expression noise or expression choice? Genomics 93:291-298.
40. Lunter G, Goodson M. 2011. Stampy: A statistical algorithm for sensitive and fast mapping of Illumina sequence reads. Genome Res. 21: 936-939.
41. Mazer SJ, Hove AA, Miller BS, Barbet-Massin M. 2010. The joint evolution of mating system and pollen performance: predictions regarding male gametophytic evolution in selfers versus outcrossers. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst. 12:31-41.
42. Messer PW, Petrov DA. 2013. Frequent adaptation and the McDonald- Kreitman test. Proc Natl Acad Sci. U S A. 110:8615-8620.
43. Miyake T, Takebayashi N, Wolf DE. 2009. Possible diversifying selection in the imprinted gene, MEDEA, in Arabidopsis. Mol Biol Evol. 26: 843-857.
44. Moore JC, Pannell JR. 2011. Sexual selection in plants. Curr Biol. 21: R176-R182.
45. Nordborg M. 2000. Linkage disequilibrium, gene trees and selfing: An ancestral recombination graph with partial self-fertilization. Genetics 154:923-929.
46. O'Connell MJ, Loughran NB, Walsh TA, Donoghue MT, Schmid KJ, Spillane C. 2010. A phylogenetic approach to test for evidence of parental conflict or gene duplications associated with proteinencoding imprinted orthologous genes in placental mammals. Mamm Genome. 21:486-498.
47. Orr H, Otto S. 1994. Does diploidy increase the rate of adaptation? Genetics 136:1475-1480.
48. Pál C, Papp B, Hurst LD. 2001. Highly expressed genes in yeast evolve slowly. Genetics 158:927-931.
49. Park C, Chen X, Yang JR, Zhang J. 2013. Differential requirements for mRNA folding partially explain why highly expressed proteins evolve slowly. Proc Natl Acad Sci. U S A. 110:E678-E686.
50. Parsch J, Ellegren H. 2013. The evolutionary causes and consequences of sex-biased gene expression. Nat Rev Genet. 14:83-87.
51. Pina C, Pinto F, Feijó JA, Becker JD. 2005. Gene family analysis of the Arabidopsis pollen transcriptome reveals biological implications for cell growth, division control, and gene expression regulation. Plant Physiol. 138:744-756.
52. R Development Core Team. 2011. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
53. Sawyer SA, Dykhuizen DE, Hartl DL. 1987. Confidence interval for the number of selectively neutral amino acid polymorphisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci. U S A. 84:6225-6228.
54. Schein M, Yang Z, Mitchell-Olds T, Schmid KJ. 2004. Rapid evolution of a pollen-specific oleosin-like gene family from Arabidopsis thaliana and closely related species. Mol Biol Evol. 21:659-669.
55. Schmidt A, Wuest SE, Vijverberg K, Baroux C, Kleen D, Grossniklaus U. 2011. Transcriptome analysis of the Arabidopsis megaspore mother cell uncovers the importance of RNA helicases for plant germline development. PLoS Biol. 9:e1001155.
56. Seoighe C, Gehring C, Hurst L. 2005. Gametophytic selection in Arabidopsis thaliana supports the selective model of intron length reduction. PLoS Genet. 1:e13.
57. Slotte T, Bataillon T, Hansen TT, Onge KS, Wright SI, Schierup MH. 2011. Genomic determinants of protein evolution and polymorphism in Arabidopsis. Genome Biol Evol. 3:1210-1219.
58. Slotte T, Foxe JP, Hazzouri KM, Wright SI. 2010. Genome-wide evidence for efficient positive and purifying selection in Capsella grandiflora, a plant species with a large effective population size.Mol Biol Evol. 27: 1813-1821.
59. Slotte T, Hazzouri KM, Ågren JA, et al. (36 co-authors). 2013. The Capsella rubella genome and the genomic consequences of rapid mating system evolution. Nat Genet. 45:831-835.
60. Smith NG, Eyre-Walker A. 2002. Adaptive protein evolution in Drosophila. Nature 415:1022-1024.
61. Spillane C, Schmid KJ, Laoueillé-Duprat S, Pien S, Escobar-Restrepo JM, Baroux C, Gagliardini V, Page DR, Wolfe KH, Grossniklaus U. 2007. Positive darwinian selection at the imprinted MEDEA locus in plants. Nature 448:349-352.
62. Subramanian AR, Kaufmann M, Morgenstern B. 2008. DIALIGN-TX: greedy and progressive approaches for segment-based multiple sequence alignment. Algorithms Mol Biol. 3:6.
63. Swanson WJ, Vacquier VD. 2002. Reproductive protein evolution. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 33:161-79.
64. Szövényi P, Ricca M, Hock Z, Shaw JA, Shimizu KK, Wagner A. 2013. Selection is no more efficient in haploid than in diploid life stages of an angiosperm and a moss. Mol Biol Evol. 30: 1929-1939.
65. Trapnell C, Williams BA, Pertea G, Mortazavi A, Kwan G, van Baren MJ, Salzberg SL, Wold BJ, Pachter L. 2010. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat Biotechnol. 28: 511-515.
66. Wakeley J. 1998. Segregating sites in Wright's island model. Theor Popul Biol. 53:166-174.
67. Wakeley J. 1999. Nonequilibrium migration in human history. Genetics 153:1863-1871.
68. Wakeley J, Lessard S. 2003. Theory of the effects of population structure and sampling on patterns of linkage disequilibrium applied to genomic data from humans. Genetics 164:1043-1053.
69. Wang Y, ZhangWZ, Song LF, Zou JJ, Su Z, Wu WH. 2008. Transcriptome analyses show changes in gene expression to accompany pollen germination and tube growth in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 148: 1201-1211.
70. Whittle CA, Malik MR, Krochko E. 2007. Gender-specific selection on codon usage in plant genomes. BMC Genomics 8:169.
71. Whittle CA, Malik MR, Li R, Krochko JE. 2010. Comparative transcript analyses of the ovule, microspore, and mature pollen in Brassica napus. Plant Mol Biol. 72:279-299.
72. Willson MF. 1979. Sexual selection in plants. Am Nat. 113:777-790.
73. Wilson AC, Carlson SS, White TJ. 1977. Biochemical evolution. Annu Rev Biochem. 46:573-639.
74. Wolff P, Weinhofer I, Seguin J, Roszak P, Beisel C, Donoghue MT, Spillane C, Nordborg M, Rehmsmeier M, Köhler C. 2011. High-resolution analysis of parent-of-origin allelic expression in the Arabidopsis Endosperm. PLoS Genet. 6:e102126.
75. Wright SI, Ness RW, Foxe JP, Barrett SCH. 2008. Genomic consequences of outcrossing and selfing in plants. Int J Plant Sci.. 169:105-118.
76. Yang Z. 2007. PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol Biol Evol. 24:1586-1591.
77. Yang L, Gaut BS. 2011. Factors that contribute to variation in evolutionary rate among Arabidopsis genes. Mol Biol Evol. 28:2359-2369.
78. Yang JR, Liao BY, Zhuang SM, Zhang J. 2012. Protein misinteraction avoidance causes highly expressed proteins to evolve slowly. Proc Natl Acad Sci. U S A. 109:E831-E840.
79. Zhang L, Li WH. 2004. Mammalian housekeeping genes evolve more slowly than tissue-specific genes. Mol Biol Evol. 21:236-239.
80. Zuckerkandl E. 1976. Evolutionary processes and evolutionary noise at the molecular level I. Functional density in proteins. J Mol Evol. 7: 167-183.