Control of nuclear activities by substrate-selective and protein-group SUMOylation

Annual Review of Genetics

Volumn 47, Issue , 2013, Pages 167-186

  Jentsch, Stefan ^a   Psakhye, Ivan ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF BIOCHEMISTRY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Homologous recombination; Nuclear assemblies; Protein modification; Ubiquitin family proteins

Indexed keywords

DOUBLE STRANDED DNA; RIBOSOME DNA; SUMO LIGASE; SUMO PROTEIN; UBIQUITIN; UBIQUITIN PROTEIN LIGASE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

BIOGENESIS; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME SPECIFICITY; ENZYME SUBSTRATE; EXCISION REPAIR; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN MODIFICATION; PROTEIN MOTIF; PROTEIN PROCESSING; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; REVIEW; RIBOSOME; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE; SUMO INTERACTION MOTIF; SUMOYLATION; TRANSACTIVATION; UBIQUITINATION; YEAST;

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASES; AMINO ACID MOTIFS; ANIMALS; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CELL NUCLEUS; DNA REPAIR; ENZYMES; HUMANS; LYSINE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEXES; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; PROLIFERATING CELL NUCLEAR ANTIGEN; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEINS; PROTEOMICS; RIBOSOMES; SUBSTRATE SPECIFICITY; SUMOYLATION; TELOMERE; TELOMERE HOMEOSTASIS; UBIQUITIN-CONJUGATING ENZYMES; UBIQUITIN-PROTEIN LIGASES; UBIQUITINATION;

EID: 84888617317     PISSN: 00664197     EISSN: 15452948     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genet-111212-133453     Document Type: Review

References (94)

1. Armstrong AA, Mohideen F, Lima CD. 2012. Recognition of SUMO-modified PCNA requires tandem receptor motifs in Srs2. Nature 483:59-63
2. Baek GH, Kim I, Rao H. 2011. The Cdc48 ATPase modulates the interaction between two proteolytic factors Ufd2 and Rad23. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108:13558-63
3. Bergink S, Ammon T, Kern M, Schermelleh L, Leonhardt H, Jentsch S. 2013. Role of Cdc48 (p97) as a SUMO-targeted segregase curbing Rad51-Rad52 interaction. Nat. Cell Biol. 15:526-32
4. Bergink S, Jentsch S. 2009. Principles of ubiquitin and SUMO modifications in DNA repair. Nature 458:461-67
5. Bernardi R, Pandolfi PP. 2007. Structure, dynamics and functions of promyelocytic leukaemia nuclear bodies. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8:1006-16
6. Bernier-Villamor V, Sampson DA, Matunis MJ, Lima CD. 2002. Structural basis for E2-mediated SUMO conjugation revealed by a complex between ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Ubc9 and RanGAP1. Cell 108:345-56
7. Bohm S, Lamberti G, Fernandez-Saiz V, Stapf C, Buchberger A. 2011. Cellular functions of Ufd2 and Ufd3 in proteasomal protein degradation depend on Cdc48 binding. Mol. Cell. Biol. 31:1528-39
8. Burkovics P, Sebesta M, Sisakova A, Plault N, Szukacsov V, et al. 2013. Srs2 mediates PCNA-SUMO-dependent inhibition of DNA repair synthesis. EMBO J. 32:742-55
9. Chelysheva L, Vezon D, Chambon A, Gendrot G, Pereira L, et al. 2012. The Arabidopsis HEI10 is a new ZMM protein related to Zip3. PLoS Genet. 8:e1002799
10. Cheng CH, Lo YH, Liang SS, Ti SC, Lin FM, et al. 2006. SUMO modifications control assembly of synaptonemal complex and polycomplex in meiosis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 20:2067-81
11. Cremona CA, Sarangi P, Yang Y, Hang LE, Rahman S, Zhao X. 2012. Extensive DNA damage-induced sumoylation contributes to replication and repair and acts in addition to the mec1 checkpoint. Mol. Cell 45:422-32
12. Dantuma NP, Hoppe T. 2012. Growing sphere of influence: Cdc48/p97 orchestrates ubiquitin-dependent extraction from chromatin. Trends Cell Biol. 22:483-91
13. Desterro JM, Rodriguez MS, Hay RT. 1998. SUMO-1 modification of IκBαinhibits NF-κB activation. Mol. Cell 2:233-39
14. Dou H, Huang C, Singh M, Carpenter PB, Yeh ETH. 2010. Regulation of DNA repair through deSUMOylation and SUMOylation of replication protein A complex. Mol. Cell 39:333-45
15. Elsasser S, Chandler-Militello D, Muller B, Hanna J, Finley D. 2004. Rad23 and Rpn10 serve as alternative ubiquitin receptors for the proteasome. J. Biol. Chem. 279:26817-22
16. Elsasser S, Gali RR, Schwickart M, Larsen CN, Leggett DS, et al. 2002. Proteasome subunit Rpn1 binds ubiquitin-like protein domains. Nat. Cell Biol. 4:725-30
17. Felberbaum R, Hochstrasser M. 2008. Ulp2 and the DNA damage response: desumoylation enables safe passage through mitosis. Cell Cycle 7:52-56
18. Ferreira HC, Luke B, Schober H, Kalck V, Lingner J, Gasser SM. 2011. The PIAS homologue Siz2 regulates perinuclear telomere position and telomerase activity in budding yeast. Nat. Cell Biol. 13:867-74
19. Finkbeiner E, Haindl M, Muller S. 2011. The SUMO system controls nucleolar partitioning of a novel mammalian ribosome biogenesis complex. EMBO J. 30:1067-78
20. Galanty Y, Belotserkovskaya R, Coates J, Jackson SP. 2012. RNF4, a SUMO-targeted ubiquitin E3 ligase, promotes DNA double-strand break repair. Genes Dev. 26:1179-95
21. Galanty Y, Belotserkovskaya R, Coates J, Polo S, Miller KM, Jackson SP. 2009. Mammalian SUMO E3-ligases PIAS1 and PIAS4 promote responses to DNA double-strand breaks. Nature 462:935-39
22. Garcia-Dominguez M, Reyes JC. 2009. SUMO association with repressor complexes, emerging routes for transcriptional control. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1789:451-59
23. Gareau JR, Lima CD. 2010. The SUMO pathway: emerging mechanisms that shape specificity, conjugation and recognition. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11:861-71
24. Geiss-Friedlander R, Melchior F. 2007. Concepts in sumoylation: a decade on. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8:947-56
25. Geoffroy MC, Hay RT. 2009. An additional role for SUMO in ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10:564-68
26. Golebiowski F, Matic I, Tatham MH, Cole C, Yin Y, et al. 2009. System-wide changes to SUMO modifications in response to heat shock. Sci. Signal. 2:ra24
27. Guzzo CM, Berndsen CE, Zhu J, Gupta V, Datta A, et al. 2012. RNF4-dependent hybrid SUMO-ubiquitin chains are signals for RAP80 and thereby mediate the recruitment of BRCA1 to sites of DNA damage. Sci. Signal. 5:ra88
28. Haindl M, Harasim T, Eick D, Muller S. 2008. The nucleolar SUMO-specific protease SENP3 reverses SUMO modification of nucleophosmin and is required for rRNA processing. EMBO Rep. 9:273-79
29. Hang LE, Liu X, Cheung I, Yang Y, Zhao X. 2011. SUMOylation regulates telomere length homeostasis by targeting Cdc13. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18:920-26
30. Hannich JT, Lewis A, Kroetz MB, LiS-J, Heide H, et al. 2005. Defining the SUMO-modified proteome by multiple approaches in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 280:4102-10
31. Heun P. 2007. SUMOrganization of the nucleus. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 19:350-55
32. Hickey CM, Wilson NR, Hochstrasser M. 2012. Function and regulation of SUMO proteases. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 13:755-66
33. Hoege C, Pfander B, Moldovan GL, Pyrowolakis G, Jentsch S. 2002. RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO. Nature 419:135-41
34. Husnjak K, Elsasser S, Zhang N, Chen X, Randles L, et al. 2008. Proteasome subunit Rpn13 is a novel ubiquitin receptor. Nature 453:481-88
35. Ishov AM, Sotnikov AG, Negorev D, Vladimirova OV, Neff N, et al. 1999. PML is critical for ND10 formation and recruits the PML-interacting protein Daxx to this nuclear structure when modified by SUMO-1. J. Cell Biol. 147:221-34
36. Jackson SP, Durocher D. 2013. Regulation of DNA damage responses by ubiquitin and SUMO. Mol. Cell 49:795-807
37. Jentsch S, Rumpf S. 2007. Cdc48 (p97): a "molecular gearbox" in the ubiquitin pathway? Trends Biochem. Sci. 32:6-11
38. Johnson ES. 2004. Protein modification by SUMO. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 73:355-82
39. Johnson ES, Blobel G. 1999. Cell cycle-regulated attachment of the ubiquitin-related protein SUMO to the yeast septins. J. Cell Biol. 147:981-94
40. Johnson ES, Gupta AA. 2001. An E3-like factor that promotes SUMO conjugation to the yeast septins. Cell 106:735-44
41. Kerscher O. 2007. SUMO junction: What's your function? New insights through SUMO-interacting motifs. EMBO Rep. 8:550-55
42. Kerscher O, Felberbaum R, Hochstrasser M. 2006. Modification of proteins by ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 22:159-80
43. Klein UR, Haindl M, Nigg EA, Muller S. 2009. RanBP2 and SENP3 function in a mitotic SUMO2/3 conjugation-deconjugation cycle on borealin. Mol. Biol. Cell 20:410-18
44. Koegl M, Hoppe T, Schlenker S, Ulrich HD, Mayer TU, Jentsch S. 1999. A novel ubiquitination factor, E4, is involved in multiubiquitin chain assembly. Cell 96:635-44 36b.
45. Kroetz MB, Su D, Hochstrasser M. 2009. Essential role of nuclear localization for yeast Ulp2 SUMO protease function. Mol. Biol. Cell 20:2196-206
46. Lallemand-Breitenbach V, Jeanne M, Benhenda S, Nasr R, Lei M, et al. 2008. Arsenic degrades PML or PML-RARαthrough a SUMO-triggered RNF4/ubiquitin-mediated pathway. Nat. Cell Biol. 10:547-55
47. Lee MT, Bakir AA, Nguyen KN, Bachant J. 2011. The SUMO isopeptidase Ulp2p is required to prevent recombination-induced chromosome segregation lethality following DNA replication stress.PLoS Genet. 7:e1001355
48. Li SJ, Hochstrasser M. 2003. The Ulp1 SUMO isopeptidase: distinct domains required for viability, nuclear envelope localization, and substrate specificity. J. Cell Biol. 160:1069-82
49. Lin DY, Huang YS, Jeng JC, Kuo HY, Chang CC, et al. 2006. Role of SUMO-interacting motif in Daxx SUMO modification, subnuclear localization, and repression of sumoylated transcription factors. Mol. Cell 24:341-54
50. Luo K, Zhang H, Wang L, Yuan J, Lou Z. 2012. Sumoylation of MDC1 is important for proper DNA damage response. EMBO J. 31:3008-19
51. Makhnevych T, Ptak C, Lusk CP, Aitchison JD, Wozniak RW. 2007. The role of karyopherins in the regulated sumoylation of septins. J. Cell Biol. 177:39-49
52. Moldovan GL, Pfander B, Jentsch S. 2006. PCNA controls establishment of sister chromatid cohesion during S phase. Mol. Cell 23:723-32
53. Morris JR, Boutell C, Keppler M, Densham R, Weekes D, et al. 2009. The SUMO modification pathway is involved in the BRCA1 response to genotoxic stress. Nature 462:886-90
54. Nagai S, Davoodi N, Gasser SM. 2011. Nuclear organization in genome stability: SUMO connections. Cell Res. 21:474-85
55. Nagai S, Dubrana K, Tsai-Pflugfelder M, Davidson MB, Roberts TM, et al. 2008. Functional targeting of DNA damage to a nuclear pore-associated SUMO-dependent ubiquitin ligase. Science 322:597-602
56. Nie M, Aslanian A, Prudden J, Heideker J, Vashisht AA, et al. 2012. Dual recruitment of Cdc48 (p97)-Ufd1-Npl4 ubiquitin-selective segregase by small ubiquitin-like modifier protein (SUMO) and ubiquitin in SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligase-mediated genome stability functions. J. Biol. Chem. 287:29610-19
57. Panse VG, Hardeland U, Werner T, Kuster B, Hurt E. 2004. A proteome-wide approach identifies sumoylated substrate proteins in yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 279:41346-51
58. Panse VG, Kressler D, Pauli A, Petfalski E, Gnadig M, et al. 2006. Formation and nuclear export of preribosomes are functionally linked to the small-ubiquitin-related modifier pathway. Traffic 7:1311-21
59. Papouli E, Chen S, Davies AA, Huttner D, Krejci L, et al. 2005. Crosstalk between SUMO and ubiquitin on PCNA is mediated by recruitment of the helicase Srs2p. Mol. Cell 19:123-33
60. Parker JL, Ulrich HD. 2012. A SUMO-interacting motif activates budding yeast ubiquitin ligase Rad18 towards SUMO-modified PCNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 40:11380-88
61. Perry JJ, Tainer JA, Boddy MN. 2008. A SIM-ultaneous role for SUMO and ubiquitin. Trends Biochem. Sci. 33:201-8
62. Pfander B, Moldovan GL, Sacher M, Hoege C, Jentsch S. 2005. SUMO-modified PCNA recruits Srs2 to prevent recombination during S phase. Nature 436:428-33
63. Potts PR. 2009. The yin and yang of the MMS21-SMC5/6 SUMO ligase complex in homologous recombination. DNA Repair 8:499-506
64. Potts PR, Yu H. 2007. The SMC5/6 complex maintains telomere length in ALT cancer cells through SUMOylation of telomere-binding proteins. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14:581-90
65. Praefcke GJ, Hofmann K, Dohmen RJ. 2012. SUMO playing tag with ubiquitin. Trends Biochem. Sci. 37:23-31
66. Psakhye I, Jentsch S. 2012. Protein group modification and synergy in the SUMO pathway as exemplified in DNA repair. Cell 151:807-20
67. Rape M, Hoppe T, Gorr I, Kalocay M, Richly H, Jentsch S. 2001. Mobilization of processed, membrane-tethered SPT23 transcription factor by CDC48(UFD1/NPL4), a ubiquitin-selective chaperone. Cell 107:667-77
68. Reindle A, Belichenko I, Bylebyl GR, Chen XL, Gandhi N, Johnson ES. 2006. Multiple domains in Siz SUMO ligases contribute to substrate selectivity. J. Cell Sci. 119:4749-57
69. Richly H, Rape M, Braun S, Rumpf S, Hoege C, Jentsch S. 2005. A series of ubiquitin binding factors connects CDC48/p97 to substrate multiubiquitylation and proteasomal targeting. Cell 120:73-84
70. Sacher M, Pfander B, Hoege C, Jentsch S. 2006. Control of Rad52 recombination activity by doublestrand break-induced SUMO modification. Nat. Cell Biol. 8:1284-90
71. Shalizi A, Gaudilliere B, Yuan Z, Stegmuller J, Shirogane T, et al. 2006. A calcium-regulated MEF2 sumoylation switch controls postsynaptic differentiation. Science 311:1012-17
72. Shen TH, Lin HK, Scaglioni PP, Yung TM, Pandolfi PP. 2006. The mechanisms of PML-nuclear body formation. Mol. Cell 24:331-39
73. Silver HR, Nissley JA, Reed SH, Hou YM, Johnson ES. 2011. A role for SUMO in nucleotide excision repair. DNA Repair 10:1243-51
74. Steinacher R, Schär P. 2005. Functionality of human thymine DNA glycosylase requires SUMO-regulated changes in protein conformation. Curr. Biol. 15:616-23
75. Strong ER, Schimenti JC. 2010. Evidence implicating CCNB1IP1, a RING domain-containing protein required for meiotic crossing over in mice, as an E3 SUMO ligase. Genes 1:440-51
76. Sydorskyy Y, Srikumar T, Jeram SM, Wheaton S, Vizeacoumar FJ, et al. 2010. A novel mechanism for SUMO system control: regulated Ulp1 nucleolar sequestration. Mol. Cell. Biol. 30:4452-62
77. Takahashi Y, Iwase M, Strunnikov AV, Kikuchi Y. 2008. Cytoplasmic sumoylation by PIAS-type Siz1-SUMO ligase. Cell Cycle 7:1738-44
78. Takahashi Y, Kikuchi Y. 2005. Yeast PIAS-type Ull1/Siz1 is composed of SUMO ligase and regulatory domains. J. Biol. Chem. 280:35822-28
79. Takahashi Y, Toh EA, Kikuchi Y. 2003. Comparative analysis of yeast PIAS-type SUMO ligases in vivo and in vitro. J. Biochem. 133:415-22
80. Tatham MH, Geoffroy MC, Shen L, Plechanovova A, Hattersley N, et al. 2008. RNF4isapoly-SUMO-specific E3 ubiquitin ligase required for arsenic-induced PML degradation. Nat. Cell Biol. 10:538-46
81. Tatham MH, Matic I, Mann M, Hay RT. 2011. Comparative proteomic analysis identifies a role for SUMO in protein quality control. Sci. Signal. 4:rs4
82. Torres-Rosell J, Sunjevaric I, De Piccoli G, Sacher M, Eckert-Boulet N, et al. 2007. The Smc5-Smc6 complex and SUMO modification of Rad52 regulates recombinational repair at the ribosomal gene locus. Nat. Cell Biol. 9:923-31
83. Ulrich HD. 2009. The SUMO system: an overview. Methods Mol. Biol. 497:3-16
84. Uzunova K, Gottsche K, Miteva M, Weisshaar SR, Glanemann C, et al. 2007. Ubiquitin-dependent proteolytic control of SUMO conjugates. J. Biol. Chem. 282:34167-75
85. Verma R, Oania R, Fang R, Smith GT, Deshaies RJ. 2011. Cdc48/p97 mediates UV-dependent turnover of RNA Pol II. Mol. Cell 41:82-92
86. Verma R, Oania R, Graumann J, Deshaies RJ. 2004. Multiubiquitin chain receptors define a layer of substrate selectivity in the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Cell 118:99-110
87. Wang K, Wang M, Tang D, Shen Y, Miao C, et al. 2012. The role of rice HEI10 in the formation of meiotic crossovers. PLoS Genet. 8:e1002809
88. *SUMO1/Ubc9 complex is a multisub-unit SUMO E3 ligase. Mol. Cell 46:287-98
89. Westman BJ, Lamond AI. 2011. A role for SUMOylation in snoRNP biogenesis revealed by quantitative proteomics. Nucleus 2:30-37
90. Westman BJ, Verheggen C, Hutten S, Lam YW, Bertrand E, Lamond AI. 2010. A proteomic screen for nucleolar SUMO targets shows SUMOylation modulates the function of Nop5/Nop58. Mol. Cell 39:618-31
91. Xie Y, Rubenstein EM, Matt T, Hochstrasser M. 2010. SUMO-independent in vivo activity of a SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligase toward a short-lived transcription factor. Genes Dev. 24:893-903
92. Yeager TR, Neumann AA, Englezou A, Huschtscha LI, Noble JR, Reddel RR. 1999. Telomerase-negative immortalized human cells contain a novel type of promyelocytic leukemia (PML) body. Cancer Res. 59:4175-79
93. Yin Y, Seifert A, Chua JS, Maure JF, Golebiowski F, Hay RT. 2012. SUMO-targeted ubiquitin E3 ligase RNF4 is required for the response of human cells to DNA damage. Genes Dev. 26:1196-208
94. Zhang ZM, Buchman AR. 1997. Identification of a member of a DNA-dependent ATPase family that causes interference with silencing. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:5461-72