SUMOrganization of the nucleus

Current Opinion in Cell Biology

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 350-355

  Heun, Patrick ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF IMMUNOBIOLOGY AND EPIGENETICS   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROMYELOCYTIC LEUKEMIA PROTEIN; RIBOSOME DNA; SUMO 1 PROTEIN;

CELL COMPARTMENTALIZATION; CELL NUCLEUS; CELL NUCLEUS INCLUSION BODY; CELL VIABILITY; DNA INTEGRATION; DNA STRUCTURE; EUKARYOTE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE FUNCTION; GENETIC STABILITY; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; HUMAN; NUCLEOLUS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN MODIFICATION; REVIEW; SUMOYLATION; TELOMERE;

ANIMALS; CELL NUCLEOLUS; CELL NUCLEUS; HUMANS; INTRANUCLEAR INCLUSION BODIES; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SMALL UBIQUITIN-RELATED MODIFIER PROTEINS; TELOMERE;

EUKARYOTA;

EID: 34250214907     PISSN: 09550674     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceb.2007.04.014     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. Misteli T. Concepts in nuclear architecture. Bioessays 27 (2005) 477-487
2. Hay R.T. SUMO: a history of modification. Mol Cell 18 (2005) 1-12
3. Klein H.L. A SUMOry of DNA replication: synthesis, damage, and repair. Cell 127 (2006) 455-457
4. Watts F.Z. The role of SUMO in chromosome segregation. Chromosoma 116 (2007) 15-20
5. Hietakangas V., Anckar J., Blomster H.A., Fujimoto M., Palvimo J.J., Nakai A., and Sistonen L. PDSM, a motif for phosphorylation-dependent SUMO modification. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103 (2006) 45-50. PDSM refers to the extended SUMO-consensus motif ΨKxExxSP. Serine phosphorylation is shown to enhance SUMOylation for a variety of transcription factors and provides a nice example of regulating SUMOylation at the substrate level.
6. Roscic A., Moller A., Calzado M.A., Renner F., Wimmer V.C., Gresko E., Ludi K.S., and Schmitz M.L. Phosphorylation-dependent control of Pc2 SUMO E3 ligase activity by its substrate protein HIPK2. Mol Cell 24 (2006) 77-89 An interesting example of E3-SUMO ligase regulation. DNA damage leads to phosphorylation of Pc2 by its substrate and further increases its SUMOylation activity by a positive feedback loop.
7. Bossis G., and Melchior F. Regulation of SUMOylation by reversible oxidation of SUMO conjugating enzymes. Mol Cell 21 (2006) 349-357 Unexpectedly, physiological levels of oxidative stress inhibit SUMOylation and result in activation of transcription factors that play a role in the early oxidative stress response.
8. Hayashi T., Seki M., Maeda D., Wang W., Kawabe Y., Seki T., Saitoh H., Fukagawa T., Yagi H., and Enomoto T. Ubc9 is essential for viability of higher eukaryotic cells. Exp Cell Res 280 (2002) 212-221
9. Nacerddine K., Lehembre F., Bhaumik M., Artus J., Cohen-Tannoudji M., Babinet C., Pandolfi P.P., and Dejean A. The SUMO pathway is essential for nuclear integrity and chromosome segregation in mice. Dev Cell 9 (2005) 769-779. Comprehensive analysis of mouse Ubc9 knockout cells, revealing essential functions of the SUMO pathway. Eliminating SUMO conjugation causes profound defects in many different nuclear processes and eventually leads to cell death.
10. Hari K.L., Cook K.R., and Karpen G.H. The Drosophila Su(var)2-10 locus regulates chromosome structure and function and encodes a member of the PIAS protein family. Genes Dev 15 (2001) 1334-1348
11. Di Bacco A., Ouyang J., Lee H.Y., Catic A., Ploegh H., and Gill G. The SUMO-specific protease SENP5 is required for cell division. Mol Cell Biol 26 (2006) 4489-4498
12. Gong L., and Yeh E.T. Characterization of a family of nucleolar SUMO-specific proteases with preference for SUMO-2 or SUMO-3. J Biol Chem 281 (2006) 15869-15877
13. Nishida T., Kaneko F., Kitagawa M., and Yasuda H. Characterization of a novel mammalian SUMO-1/Smt3-specific isopeptidase, a homologue of rat axam, which is an axin-binding protein promoting β-catenin degradation. J Biol Chem 276 (2001) 39060-39066
14. Ayaydin F., and Dasso M. Distinct in vivo dynamics of vertebrate SUMO paralogues. Mol Biol Cell 15 (2004) 5208-5218
15. Bailey D., and O'Hare P. Characterization of the localization and proteolytic activity of the SUMO-specific protease, SENP1. J Biol Chem 279 (2004) 692-703
16. Hang J., and Dasso M. Association of the human SUMO-1 protease SENP2 with the nuclear pore. J Biol Chem 277 (2002) 19961-19966
17. Zhao X., Wu C.Y., and Blobel G. Mlp-dependent anchorage and stabilization of a desumoylating enzyme is required to prevent clonal lethality. J Cell Biol 167 (2004) 605-611
18. Reindle A., Belichenko I., Bylebyl G.R., Chen X.L., Gandhi N., and Johnson E.S. Multiple domains in Siz SUMO ligases contribute to substrate selectivity. J Cell Sci 119 (2006) 4749-4757. Domain swapping demonstrates the importance of N- and C-termini for subcellular localization and SUMO target specificity of the two different Siz E3-ligases in budding yeast.
19. Sternsdorf T., Jensen K., and Will H. Evidence for covalent modification of the nuclear dot-associated proteins PML and Sp100 by PIC1/SUMO-1. J Cell Biol 139 (1997) 1621-1634
20. Koken M.H., Puvion-Dutilleul F., Guillemin M.C., Viron A., Linares-Cruz G., Stuurman N., de Jong L., Szostecki C., Calvo F., Chomienne C., et al. The t(15;17) translocation alters a nuclear body in a retinoic acid-reversible fashion. EMBO J 13 (1994) 1073-1083
21. Negorev D., and Maul G.G. Cellular proteins localized at and interacting within ND10/PML nuclear bodies/PODs suggest functions of a nuclear depot. Oncogene 20 (2001) 7234-7242
22. Hecker C.M., Rabiller M., Haglund K., Bayer P., and Dikic I. Specification of SUMO1- and SUMO2-interacting motifs. J Biol Chem 281 (2006) 16117-16127
23. Minty A., Dumont X., Kaghad M., and Caput D. Covalent modification of p73alpha by SUMO-1. Two-hybrid screening with p73 identifies novel SUMO-1-interacting proteins and a SUMO-1 interaction motif. J Biol Chem 275 (2000) 36316-36323
24. Song J., Durrin L.K., Wilkinson T.A., Krontiris T.G., and Chen Y. Identification of a SUMO-binding motif that recognizes SUMO-modified proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101 (2004) 14373-14378
25. Shen T.H., Lin H.K., Scaglioni P.P., Yung T.M., and Pandolfi P.P. The mechanisms of PML-nuclear body formation. Mol Cell 24 (2006) 331-339. This study represents a major advance in our understanding how PML-nuclear bodies take shape. The key finding is a SUMO-interacting motif on PML, required to bind PML-SUMO with itself and other SUMOylated proteins together to form large complexes.
26. Takahashi H., Hatakeyama S., Saitoh H., and Nakayama K.I. Noncovalent SUMO-1 binding activity of thymine DNA glycosylase (TDG) is required for its SUMO-1 modification and colocalization with the promyelocytic leukemia protein. J Biol Chem 280 (2005) 5611-5621. The affinity between SUMO-TDG and SUMO-PML led the authors to propose the existence of non-covalent binding sites on both proteins, a model later to be confirmed by other laboratories.
27. Lin D.Y., Huang Y.S., Jeng J.C., Kuo H.Y., Chang C.C., Chao T.T., Ho C.C., Chen Y.C., Lin T.P., Fang H.I., et al. Role of SUMO-interacting motif in Daxx SUMO modification, subnuclear localization, and repression of sumoylated transcription factors. Mol Cell 24 (2006) 341-354. The transcriptional co-repressor Daxx contains a SUMO-interacting motif that can either bind PML-SUMO at nuclear bodies or exert repression by binding SUMOylated transcription factors. This finding provides a mechanism for regulation of transcription involving subnuclear targeting through SUMO modification.
28. Cai S., Lee C.C., and Kohwi-Shigematsu T. SATB1 packages densely looped, transcriptionally active chromatin for coordinated expression of cytokine genes. Nat Genet 38 (2006) 1278-1288. Using RNAi, SATB1 is shown to promote chromatin loops at the cytokine locus. Loops are anchored to SATB1 at their base.
29. Kumar P.P., Bischof O., Purbey P.K., Notani D., Urlaub H., Dejean A., and Galande S. Functional interaction between PML and SATB1 regulates chromatin-loop architecture and transcription of the MHC class I locus. Nat Cell Biol 9 (2007) 45-56. The chromatin conformation capture (3C) is elegantly combined with chromatin IP to demonstrate a direct interaction of PML and SATB1 at MARs. The resulting chromatin 'loopscape' is of a dynamic nature and affects gene expression.
30. Dekker J. The three 'C's of chromosome conformation capture: controls, controls, controls. Nat Methods 3 (2006) 17-21
31. Gaszner M., and Felsenfeld G. Insulators: exploiting transcriptional and epigenetic mechanisms. Nat Rev Genet 7 (2006) 703-713
32. Capelson M., and Corces V.G. SUMO conjugation attenuates the activity of the gypsy chromatin insulator. EMBO J 25 (2006) 1906-1914. This work implicates SUMO conjugation in the regulation of chromatin loop formation and insulator function induced by the long-range interaction of chromatin insulators.
33. Capelson M., and Corces V.G. The ubiquitin ligase dTopors directs the nuclear organization of a chromatin insulator. Mol Cell 20 (2005) 105-116
34. Rasheed Z.A., Saleem A., Ravee Y., Pandolfi P.P., and Rubin E.H. The topoisomerase I-binding RING protein, topors, is associated with promyelocytic leukemia nuclear bodies. Exp Cell Res 277 (2002) 152-160
35. Kobayashi T. Strategies to maintain the stability of the ribosomal RNA gene repeats-collaboration of recombination, cohesion, and condensation. Genes Genet Syst 81 (2006) 155-161
36. D'Amours D., and Amon A. At the interface between signaling and executing anaphase-Cdc14 and the FEAR network. Genes Dev 18 (2004) 2581-2595
37. Zhao X., and Blobel G. A SUMO ligase is part of a nuclear multiprotein complex that affects DNA repair and chromosomal organization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2005)
38. Andrews E.A., Palecek J., Sergeant J., Taylor E., Lehmann A.R., and Watts F.Z. Nse2, a component of the Smc5-6 complex, is a SUMO ligase required for the response to DNA damage. Mol Cell Biol 25 (2005) 185-196
39. Xhemalce B., Riising E.M., Baumann P., Dejean A., Arcangioli B., and Seeler J.S. Role of SUMO in the dynamics of telomere maintenance in fission yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104 (2007) 893-898. This paper convincingly demonstrates that the telomere lengthening phenotype associated with a lack of SUMOylation is a consequence of increased telomerase activity rather than of telomere recombination.
40. Branzei D., Sollier J., Liberi G., Zhao X., Maeda D., Seki M., Enomoto T., Ohta K., and Foiani M. Ubc9- and mms21-mediated sumoylation counteracts recombinogenic events at damaged replication forks. Cell 127 (2006) 509-522. The SUMO pathway plays a role in preventing the accumulation of recombination intermediates, acting in parallel to the replication checkpoint.
41. Sacher M., Pfander B., Hoege C., and Jentsch S. Control of Rad52 recombination activity by double-strand break-induced SUMO modification. Nat Cell Biol 8 (2006) 1284-1290
42. Cost G.J., and Cozzarelli N.R. Smc5p promotes faithful chromosome transmission and DNA repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 172 (2006) 2185-2200
43. Torres-Rosell J., Machin F., and Aragon L. Smc5-Smc6 complex preserves nucleolar integrity in S. cerevisiae. Cell Cycle 4 (2005) 868-872
44. Torres-Rosell J., Machin F., Farmer S., Jarmuz A., Eydmann T., Dalgaard J.Z., and Aragon L. SMC5 and SMC6 genes are required for the segregation of repetitive chromosome regions. Nat Cell Biol 7 (2005) 412-419. Evidence for a role in processing recombinogenic structures is presented for the most elusive of the three SMC complexes. Chromosome linkages are not removed in smc5 and smc6 mutants and lead to segregation defects of repetitive DNA.
45. Lindroos H.B., Strom L., Itoh T., Katou Y., Shirahige K., and Sjogren C. Chromosomal association of the Smc5/6 complex reveals that it functions in differently regulated pathways. Mol Cell 22 (2006) 755-767. This work suggests a requirement for the Smc5-Smc6 complex during S-phase.
46. Straight A.F., Shou W., Dowd G.J., Turck C.W., Deshaies R.J., Johnson A.D., and Moazed D. Net1, a Sir2-associated nucleolar protein required for rDNA silencing and nucleolar integrity. Cell 97 (1999) 245-256
47. Peng J.C., and Karpen G.H. H3K9 methylation and RNA interference regulate nucleolar organization and repeated DNA stability. Nat Cell Biol 9 (2007) 25-35. This work shows the importance of organizing repeated DNA elements into a specialized chromatin structure to protect the integrity of the genome from deleterious recombination events.
48. Reuter G., and Wolff I. Isolation of dominant suppressor mutations for position-effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Gen Genet 182 (1981) 516-519
49. Shin J.A., Choi E.S., Kim H.S., Ho J.C., Watts F.Z., Park S.D., and Jang Y.K. SUMO modification is involved in the maintenance of heterochromatin stability in fission yeast. Mol Cell 19 (2005) 817-828
50. Nathan D., Ingvarsdottir K., Sterner D.E., Bylebyl G.R., Dokmanovic M., Dorsey J.A., Whelan K.A., Krsmanovic M., Lane W.S., Meluh P.B., et al. Histone sumoylation is a negative regulator in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and shows dynamic interplay with positive-acting histone modifications. Genes Dev 20 (2006) 966-976
51. Shiio Y., and Eisenman R.N. Histone sumoylation is associated with transcriptional repression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2003)