The SUMO isopeptidase Ulp2p is required to prevent recombination-induced chromosome segregation lethality following DNA replication stress

PLoS Genetics

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2011, Pages

  Lee, Ming Ta ^a   Bakir, Abla A ^a   Nguyen, Kristen N ^a   Bachant, Jeff ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FUNGAL ENZYME; MESYLIC ACID METHYL ESTER; SUMO PROTEIN; ULP2P PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; HELICASE; HPR5 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; ISOPEPTIDASE; LYASE; PROTEINASE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; ULP2 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE;

ARTICLE; CELL DEATH; CELLULAR STRESS SIGNAL; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; CHROMOSOME REARRANGEMENT; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DAMAGE; DNA RECOMBINATION; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME MECHANISM; FUNGUS MUTANT; GENE INTERACTION; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; LETHALITY; PHENOTYPIC VARIATION; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SISTER CHROMATID EXCHANGE; SUMOYLATION; SURVIVAL RATE; WILD TYPE; YEAST CELL; DRUG EFFECT; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MUTATION; PHENOTYPE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

CARBON-NITROGEN LYASES; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; DNA HELICASES; DNA REPLICATION; ENDOPEPTIDASES; METHYL METHANESULFONATE; MUTATION; PHENOTYPE; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SUMOYLATION;

EID: 79953753596     PISSN: 15537390     EISSN: 15537404     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001355     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Broomfield S, Hryciw T, Xiao W, (2001) DNA postreplication repair and mutagenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat Res 486: 167-184.
2. San Filippo J, Sung P, Klein H, (2008) Mechanism of eukaryotic homologous recombination. Annu Rev Biochem 77: 229-257.
3. Branzei D, Foiani M, (2010) Maintaining genome stability at the replication fork. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11: 208-219.
4. Johnson ES, (2004) Protein modification by SUMO. Annu Rev Biochem 73: 355-382.
5. Hoege C, Pfander B, Moldovan GL, Pyrowolakis G, Jentsch S, (2002) RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO. Nature 419: 135-141.
6. Pfander B, Moldovan GL, Sacher M, Hoege C, Jentsch S, (2005) SUMO-modified PCNA recruits Srs2 to prevent recombination during S phase. Nature 436: 428-433.
7. Papouli E, Chen S, Davies AA, Huttner D, Krejci L, et al. (2005) Crosstalk between SUMO and ubiquitin on PCNA is mediated by recruitment of the helicase Srs2p. Mol Cell 19: 123-133.
8. Krejci L, Van Komen S, Li Y, Villemain J, Reddy MS, et al. (2003) DNA helicase Srs2 disrupts the Rad51 presynaptic filament. Nature 423: 305-309.
9. Veaute X, Jeusset J, Soustelle C, Kowalczykowski SC, Le Cam E, et al. (2003) The Srs2 helicase prevents recombination by disrupting Rad51 nucleoprotein filaments. Nature 423: 309-312.
10. Antony E, Tomko EJ, Xiao Q, Krejci L, Lohman TM, et al. (2009) Srs2 disassembles Rad51 filaments by a protein-protein interaction triggering ATP turnover and dissociation of Rad51 from DNA. Mol Cell 35: 105-115.
11. Stelter P, Ulrich HD, (2003) Control of spontaneous and damage-induced mutagenesis by SUMO and ubiquitin conjugation. Nature 425: 188-191.
12. Haracska L, Torres-Ramos CA, Johnson RE, Prakash S, Prakash L, (2004) Opposing effects of ubiquitin conjugation and SUMO modification of PCNA on replicational bypass of DNA lesions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 24: 4267-4274.
13. Kannouche PL, Wing J, Lehmann AR, (2004) Interaction of human DNA polymerase eta with monoubiquitinated PCNA: a possible mechanism for the polymerase switch in response to DNA damage. Mol Cell 14: 491-500.
14. Maeda D, Seki M, Onoda F, Branzei D, Kawabe Y, et al. (2004) Ubc9 is required for damage-tolerance and damage-induced interchromosomal homologous recombination in S. cerevisiae. DNA Repair (Amst) 3: 335-341.
15. Andrews EA, Palecek J, Sergeant J, Taylor E, Lehmann AR, et al. (2005) Nse2, a component of the Smc5-6 complex, is a SUMO ligase required for the response to DNA damage. Mol Cell Biol 25: 185-196.
16. Zhao X, Blobel G, (2005) A SUMO ligase is part of a nuclear multiprotein complex that affects DNA repair and chromosomal organization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 4777-4782.
17. Branzei D, Sollier J, Liberi G, Zhao X, Maeda D, et al. (2006) Ubc9- and mms21-mediated sumoylation counteracts recombinogenic events at damaged replication forks. Cell 127: 509-522.
18. van Waardenburg RC, Duda DM, Lancaster CS, Schulman BA, Bjornsti MA, (2006) Distinct functional domains of Ubc9 dictate cell survival and resistance to genotoxic stress. Mol Cell Biol 26: 4958-4969.
19. Branzei D, Vanoli F, Foiani M, (2008) SUMOylation regulates Rad18-mediated template switch. Nature 456: 915-920.
20. Onoda F, Takeda M, Seki M, Maeda D, Tajima J, et al. (2004) SMC6 is required for MMS-induced interchromosomal and sister chromatid recombinations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Repair (Amst) 3: 429-439.
21. Torres-Rosell J, Machin F, Farmer S, Jarmuz A, Eydmann T, et al. (2005) SMC5 and SMC6 genes are required for the segregation of repetitive chromosome regions. Nat Cell Biol 7: 412-419.
22. Ampatzidou E, Irmisch A, O'Connell MJ, Murray JM, (2006) Smc5/6 is required for repair at collapsed replication forks. Mol Cell Biol 26: 9387-9401.
23. Sollier J, Driscoll R, Castellucci F, Foiani M, Jackson SP, et al. (2009) The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Esc2 and Smc5-6 proteins promote sister chromatid junction-mediated intra-S repair. Mol Biol Cell 20: 1671-1682.
24. Karow JK, Constantinou A, Li JL, West SC, Hickson ID, (2000) The Bloom's syndrome gene product promotes branch migration of holliday junctions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97: 6504-6508.
25. Liberi G, Maffioletti G, Lucca C, Chiolo I, Baryshnikova A, et al. (2005) Rad51-dependent DNA structures accumulate at damaged replication forks in sgs1 mutants defective in the yeast ortholog of BLM RecQ helicase. Genes Dev 19: 339-350.
26. Plank JL, Wu J, Hsieh TS, (2006) Topoisomerase IIIalpha and Bloom's helicase can resolve a mobile double Holliday junction substrate through convergent branch migration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 11118-11123.
27. Mankouri HW, Ngo HP, Hickson ID, (2007) Shu proteins promote the formation of homologous recombination intermediates that are processed by Sgs1-Rmi1-Top3. Mol Biol Cell 18: 4062-4073.
28. Li SJ, Hochstrasser M, (1999) A new protease required for cell-cycle progression in yeast. Nature 398: 246-251.
29. Li SJ, Hochstrasser M, (2000) The yeast ULP2 (SMT4) gene encodes a novel protease specific for the ubiquitin-like Smt3 protein. Mol Cell Biol 20: 2367-2377.
30. Schwienhorst I, Johnson ES, Dohmen RJ, (2000) SUMO conjugation and deconjugation. Mol Gen Genet 263: 771-786.
31. Li SJ, Hochstrasser M, (2003) The Ulp1 SUMO isopeptidase: distinct domains required for viability, nuclear envelope localization, and substrate specificity. J Cell Biol 160: 1069-1081.
32. Panse VG, Kuster B, Gerstberger T, Hurt E, (2003) Unconventional tethering of Ulp1 to the transport channel of the nuclear pore complex by karyopherins. Nat Cell Biol 5: 21-27.
33. Kroetz MB, Su D, Hochstrasser M, (2009) Essential role of nuclear localization for yeast Ulp2 SUMO protease function. Mol Biol Cell 20: 2196-2206.
34. Meluh PB, Koshland D, (1995) Evidence that the MIF2 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae encodes a centromere protein with homology to the mammalian centromere protein CENP-C. Mol Biol Cell 6: 793-807.
35. Strunnikov AV, Aravind L, Koonin EV, (2001) Saccharomyces cerevisiae SMT4 encodes an evolutionarily conserved protease with a role in chromosome condensation regulation. Genetics 158: 95-107.
36. Bachant J, Alcasabas A, Blat Y, Kleckner N, Elledge SJ, (2002) The SUMO-1 isopeptidase Smt4 is linked to centromeric cohesion through SUMO-1 modification of DNA topoisomerase II. Mol Cell 9: 1169-1182.
37. Stead K, Aguilar C, Hartman T, Drexel M, Meluh P, et al. (2003) Pds5p regulates the maintenance of sister chromatid cohesion and is sumoylated to promote the dissolution of cohesion. J Cell Biol 163: 729-741.
38. D'Amours D, Stegmeier F, Amon A, (2004) Cdc14 and condensin control the dissolution of cohesin-independent chromosome linkages at repeated DNA. Cell 117: 455-469.
39. Bachant J, Jessen SR, Kavanaugh SE, Fielding CS, (2005) The yeast S phase checkpoint enables replicating chromosomes to bi-orient and restrain spindle extension during S phase distress. J Cell Biol 168: 999-1012.
40. Takahashi Y, Yong-Gonzalez V, Kikuchi Y, Strunnikov A, (2006) SIZ1/SIZ2 control of chromosome transmission fidelity is mediated by the sumoylation of topoisomerase II. Genetics 172: 783-794.
41. Schwartz DC, Felberbaum R, Hochstrasser M, (2007) The Ulp2 SUMO protease is required for cell division following termination of the DNA damage checkpoint. Mol Cell Biol 27: 6948-6961.
42. Baldwin ML, Julius JA, Tang X, Wang Y, Bachant J, (2009) The yeast SUMO isopeptidase Smt4/Ulp2 and the polo kinase Cdc5 act in an opposing fashion to regulate sumoylation in mitosis and cohesion at centromeres. Cell Cycle 8: 3406-3419.
43. Bylebyl GR, Belichenko I, Johnson ES, (2003) The SUMO isopeptidase Ulp2 prevents accumulation of SUMO chains in yeast. J Biol Chem 278: 44113-44120.
44. Uzunova K, Gottsche K, Miteva M, Weisshaar SR, Glanemann C, et al. (2007) Ubiquitin-dependent proteolytic control of SUMO conjugates. J Biol Chem 282: 34167-34175.
45. Tatham MH, Geoffroy MC, Shen L, Plechanovova A, Hattersley N, et al. (2008) RNF4 is a poly-SUMO-specific E3 ubiquitin ligase required for arsenic-induced PML degradation. Nat Cell Biol 10: 538-546.
46. Mullen JR, Brill SJ, (2008) Activation of the Slx5-Slx8 ubiquitin ligase by poly-small ubiquitin-like modifier conjugates. J Biol Chem 283: 19912-19921.
47. Soustelle C, Vernis L, Freon K, Reynaud-Angelin A, Chanet R, et al. (2004) A new Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain with a mutant Smt3-deconjugating Ulp1 protein is affected in DNA replication and requires Srs2 and homologous recombination for its viability. Mol Cell Biol 24: 5130-5143.
48. Felberbaum R, Hochstrasser M, (2008) Ulp2 and the DNA damage response: desumoylation enables safe passage through mitosis. Cell Cycle 7: 52-56.
49. Lisby M, Rothstein R, Mortensen UH, (2001) Rad52 forms DNA repair and recombination centers during S phase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 8276-8282.
50. Maines S, Negritto MC, Wu X, Manthey GM, Bailis AM, (1998) Novel mutations in the RAD3 and SSL1 genes perturb genome stability by stimulating recombination between short repeats in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 150: 963-976.
51. Lambert S, Watson A, Sheedy DM, Martin B, Carr AM, (2005) Gross chromosomal rearrangements and elevated recombination at an inducible site-specific replication fork barrier. Cell 121: 689-702.
52. Lemoine FJ, Degtyareva NP, Kokoska RJ, Petes TD, (2008) Reduced levels of DNA polymerase delta induce chromosome fragile site instability in yeast. Mol Cell Biol 28: 5359-5368.
53. Huang D, Koshland D, (2003) Chromosome integrity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: the interplay of DNA replication initiation factors, elongation factors, and origins. Genes Dev 17: 1741-1754.
54. Mann C, Davis RW, (1983) Instability of dicentric plasmids in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 80: 228-232.
55. Koshland D, Rutledge L, Fitzgerald-Hayes M, Hartwell LH, (1987) A genetic analysis of dicentric minichromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 48: 801-812.
56. Barlow JH, Rothstein R, (2009) Rad52 recruitment is DNA replication independent and regulated by Cdc28 and the Mec1 kinase. Embo J 28: 1121-1130.
57. Zou H, Rothstein R, (1997) Holliday junctions accumulate in replication mutants via a RecA homolog-independent mechanism. Cell 90: 87-96.
58. Lopes M, Cotta-Ramusino C, Liberi G, Foiani M, (2003) Branch migrating sister chromatid junctions form at replication origins through Rad51/Rad52-independent mechanisms. Mol Cell 12: 1499-1510.
59. Lu CY, Tsai CH, Brill SJ, Teng SC, (2010) Sumoylation of the BLM ortholog, Sgs1, promotes telomere-telomere recombination in budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 38: 488-498.
60. Sanchez Y, Desany BA, Jones WJ, Liu Q, Wang B, et al. (1996) Regulation of RAD53 by the ATM-like kinases MEC1 and TEL1 in yeast cell cycle checkpoint pathways. Science 271: 357-360.
61. Cohen-Fix O, Peters JM, Kirschner MW, Koshland D, (1996) Anaphase initiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is controlled by the APC-dependent degradation of the anaphase inhibitor Pds1p. Genes Dev 10: 3081-3093.
62. Cohen-Fix O, Koshland D, (1997) The anaphase inhibitor of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pds1p is a target of the DNA damage checkpoint pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94: 14361-14366.
63. Dupaigne P, Le Breton C, Fabre F, Gangloff S, Le Cam E, et al. (2008) The Srs2 helicase activity is stimulated by Rad51 filaments on dsDNA: implications for crossover incidence during mitotic recombination. Mol Cell 29: 243-254.
64. Prakash R, Satory D, Dray E, Papusha A, Scheller J, et al. (2009) Yeast Mph1 helicase dissociates Rad51-made D-loops: implications for crossover control in mitotic recombination. Genes Dev 23: 67-79.
65. Xiong L, Chen XL, Silver HR, Ahmed NT, Johnson ES, (2009) Deficient SUMO attachment to Flp recombinase leads to homologous recombination-dependent hyperamplification of the yeast 2 microm circle plasmid. Mol Biol Cell 20: 1241-1251.
66. Motegi A, Kuntz K, Majeed A, Smith S, Myung K, (2006) Regulation of gross chromosomal rearrangements by ubiquitin and SUMO ligases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 26: 1424-1433.
67. Fishman-Lobell J, Rudin N, Haber JE, (1992) Two alternative pathways of double-strand break repair that are kinetically separable and independently modulated. Mol Cell Biol 12: 1292-1303.
68. Paek AL, Kaochar S, Jones H, Elezaby A, Shanks L, et al. (2009) Fusion of nearby inverted repeats by a replication-based mechanism leads to formation of dicentric and acentric chromosomes that cause genome instability in budding yeast. Genes Dev 23: 2861-2875.
69. Mizuno K, Lambert S, Baldacci G, Murray JM, Carr AM, (2009) Nearby inverted repeats fuse to generate acentric and dicentric palindromic chromosomes by a replication template exchange mechanism. Genes Dev 23: 2876-2886.
70. Irmisch A, Ampatzidou E, Mizuno K, O'Connell MJ, Murray JM, (2009) Smc5/6 maintains stalled replication forks in a recombination-competent conformation. Embo J 28: 144-155.
71. Bermudez-Lopez M, Ceschia A, de Piccoli G, Colomina N, Pasero P, et al. (2010) The Smc5/6 complex is required for dissolution of DNA-mediated sister chromatid linkages. Nucleic Acids Res.
72. Saponaro M, Callahan D, Zheng X, Krejci L, Haber JE, et al. (2010) Cdk1 targets Srs2 to complete synthesis-dependent strand annealing and to promote recombinational repair. PLoS Genet 6: e1000858 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000858.
73. Sacher M, Pfander B, Hoege C, Jentsch S, (2006) Control of Rad52 recombination activity by double-strand break-induced SUMO modification. Nat Cell Biol 8: 1284-1290.
74. Torres-Rosell J, Sunjevaric I, De Piccoli G, Sacher M, Eckert-Boulet N, et al. (2007) The Smc5-Smc6 complex and SUMO modification of Rad52 regulates recombinational repair at the ribosomal gene locus. Nat Cell Biol 9: 923-931.
75. Ohuchi T, Seki M, Branzei D, Maeda D, Ui A, et al. (2008) Rad52 sumoylation and its involvement in the efficient induction of homologous recombination. DNA Repair (Amst) 7: 879-889.
76. Burgess RC, Rahman S, Lisby M, Rothstein R, Zhao X, (2007) The Slx5-Slx8 complex affects sumoylation of DNA repair proteins and negatively regulates recombination. Mol Cell Biol 27: 6153-6162.
77. Bergink S, Jentsch S, (2009) Principles of ubiquitin and SUMO modifications in DNA repair. Nature 458: 461-467.
78. Liberi G, Chiolo I, Pellicioli A, Lopes M, Plevani P, et al. (2000) Srs2 DNA helicase is involved in checkpoint response and its regulation requires a functional Mec1-dependent pathway and Cdk1 activity. Embo J 19: 5027-5038.
79. Vaze MB, Pellicioli A, Lee SE, Ira G, Liberi G, et al. (2002) Recovery from checkpoint-mediated arrest after repair of a double-strand break requires Srs2 helicase. Mol Cell 10: 373-385.
80. Wach A, Brachat A, Pohlmann R, Philippsen P, (1994) New heterologous modules for classical or PCR-based gene disruptions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 10: 1793-1808.
81. Spencer F, Hugerat Y, Simchen G, Hurko O, Connelly C, et al. (1994) Yeast kar1 mutants provide an effective method for YAC transfer to new hosts. Genomics 22: 118-126.
82. Schober-Ditmore W, Bachant J, (2000) Yeast DNA flow cytometry. In: Diamond R, DeMaggio S, editors. In Living Color: Protocols in Flow Cytometry and Cell Sorting New York Springer Lab Manuals pp. 455-460.
83. Warsi TH, Navarro MS, Bachant J, (2008) DNA topoisomerase II is a determinant of the tensile properties of yeast centromeric chromatin and the tension checkpoint. Mol Biol Cell 19: 4421-4433.
84. Christianson TW, Sikorski RS, Dante M, Shero JH, Hieter P, (1992) Multifunctional yeast high-copy-number shuttle vectors. Gene 110: 119-122.
85. Mankouri HW, Craig TJ, Morgan A, (2002) SGS1 is a multicopy suppressor of srs2: functional overlap between DNA helicases. Nucleic Acids Res 30: 1103-1113.
86. Desany BA, Alcasabas AA, Bachant JB, Elledge SJ, (1998) Recovery from DNA replicational stress is the essential function of the S-phase checkpoint pathway. Genes Dev 12: 2956-2970.