Stereoscopic 3D displays and human performance: A comprehensive review

Displays

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 18-26

  McIntire, John P ^a   Havig, Paul R ^a   Geiselman, Eric E ^a  

^a AIR FORCE RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Binocular vision; Depth perception; Human factors; S3D; Stereopsis; Three dimensional display

Indexed keywords

BINOCULAR VISION; C (PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE); DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; HUMAN ENGINEERING; STEREO IMAGE PROCESSING;

EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION; HUMAN PERFORMANCE; MARGINAL BENEFIT; PERFORMANCE BASED; STEREOPSIS; STEREOSCOPIC 3-D DISPLAY; STEREOSCOPIC DISPLAY; VIEWING CONDITIONS;

THREE DIMENSIONAL DISPLAYS;

EID: 84888582675     PISSN: 01419382     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.displa.2013.10.004     Document Type: Review

References (80)

1. American Optometric Association (2010), "3-D TV and movies look to attract viewers but not everyone can 'see' what all the hype is about". [digital press release] on May 18, 2010. < http://www.aoa.org/x15123.xml >.
2. T. Bando, A. Iijima, and S. Yano Visual fatigue caused by stereoscopic images and the search for the requirement to prevent them: a review Displays 33 2 2011 76 83
3. S.V. Bemis, J.L. Leeds, and E.A. Winer Operator performance as a function of types of display: conventional versus perspective Human Factors 30 1988 163 169
4. K.R. Boff, Critical research issues on cockpit applications of 3-D displays, in: D.J. Getty (Ed.), Three-Dimensional Displays: Perceptual Research and Applications to Military Systems. Proceedings, National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council: Committee on Human Factors, ONR technical report, A122577, 1982.
5. M.F. Bradshaw, K.M. Elliott, S.J. Watt, P.B. Hibbard, I.R. Davies, and P.J. Simpson Binocular cues and the control of prehension Spatial Vision 17 1-2 2004 95 110
6. M.E. Brown, and J.J. Gallimore Visualization of three-dimensional structure during computer-aided design International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 7 1 1995 37 56
7. J.Y.C. Chen, E.C. Haas, and M.J. Barnes Human performance issues and user interface design for teleoperated robots IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, & Cybernetics - Part C: Applications and Reviews 37 6 2007 1231 1245 (Pubitemid 350130715)
8. E.G. Conlon, W.J. Lovegrove, E. Chekaluk, and P.E. Pattison Measuring visual discomfort Visual Cognition 6 1999 637 663
9. J.E. Cutting, and P.M. Vishton Perceiving layout and knowing distances: the integration, relative potency, and contextual use of different information about depth W. Epstein, S. Rogers, Handbook of Perception and Cognition, vol. 5: Perception of Space and Motion 1995 Academic Press San Diego, CA 69 117
10. S.C. de Vries, and P. Padmos Steering a simulated unmanned aerial vehicle using a head-slaved camera and HMD Proceedings of SPIE 3058 1997 24 33
11. S.C. de Vries, and P. Padmos Steering a simulated unmanned aerial vehicle using a head-slaved camera and HMD: Effects of HMD quality, visible vehicle references and extended stereos cueing Proceedings of SPIE 3362 1998 80 91 (Pubitemid 34963164)
12. S. Dixon, E. Fitzhugh, and D. Aleva Human factors guidelines for applications of 3D perspectives: a literature review Proceedings of SPIE 7327 2009 73270K-1
13. J.V. Draper, S. Handel, C.C. Hood, and C.T. Kring Three experiments with stereoscopic television: when it works and why Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Decision Aiding for Complex Systems - Systems, Man, & Cybernetics 2 1991 1047 1052
14. D. Drasic, Skill acquisition and task performance in teleoperation using monoscopic and stereoscopic video remote viewing, in: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting, 1991, pp. 1367-1371.
15. D. Drasic, and J.J. Grodski Using stereoscopic video for defence teleoperation Proceedings of SPIE 1915 1993 58 69
16. A.R. Fielder, and M.J. Moseley Does stereopsis matter in humans? Eye 10 1996 233 238 (Pubitemid 26159664)
17. J.J. Gallimore, and M.E. Brown Visualization of 3-D computer-aided design objects International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 5 4 1993 361 382
18. D.J. Getty, Three-dimensional displays: perceptual research and applications to military systems, in: Proceedings, National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council: Committee on Human Factors, ONR technical report, A122577, 1982.
19. D.J. Getty, and P.J. Green Clinical applications for stereoscopic 3-D displays Journal of the Society for Information Display 15 6 2007 377 384
20. V.S. Grinberg, G. Podnar, M.W. Siegel, Geometry of binocular imaging, in: Proceedings of the IST/SPIE Symposium on Electronic Imaging, Stereoscopic Displays and Applications, 1994, pp. 2177.
21. I.D. Haskell, and C.D. Wickens Two- and three-dimensional displays for aviation: a theoretical and empirical comparison International Journal of Aviation Psychology 3 1 1993 87 109
22. M. Hayhoe, B. Gillam, K. Chajka, and E. Vecellio The role of binocular vision in walking Visual Neuroscience 26 1 2009 73 80
23. R.T. Held, and T.T. Hui A guide to stereoscopic 3D displays in medicine Academic Radiology 18 8 2011 1035 1048
24. J. Hofmeister, T.G. Frank, A. Cuschieri, and N.J. Wade Perceptual aspects of two-dimensional and stereoscopic display techniques in endoscopic surgery: review and current problems Seminars in Laparoscopic Surgery 8 1 2001 12 24 (Pubitemid 33760566)
25. N. Holliman 3D display systems Handbook of optoelectronics 2005 IOP Press London < http://www.dur.ac.uk/n.s.holliman/Presentations/3dv3-0.pdf >
26. P.A. Howarth Potential hazards of viewing 3-D stereoscopic television, cinema and computer games: a review Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 31 2011 111 122
27. J. Hsu, Z. Pizlo, D.M. Chelberg, C.F. Babbs, and E.J. Delp Issues in the design of studies to test the effectiveness of stereo imaging IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans 26 6 1996 810 819 (Pubitemid 126782449)
28. W.A. IJsselsteijn, P.J.H. Seuntiëns, and L.M.J. Meesters Human factors of 3D Displays. Chapter 12 Schreer Kauff Sikora 3D Videocommunication: Algorithms, Concepts, and Real-Time Systems in Human Centered Communication 2006 Wiley & Sons, Ltd. (doi: 10.1002/0470022736.ch12)
29. R.K. Jones, and D.N. Lee Why two eyes are better than one: the two views of binocular vision Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 7 1 1981 30 40
30. G. Jones, D. Lee, N. Holliman, and D. Ezra Controlling perceived depth in stereoscopic images Proceedings of SPIE 4297 2001 42 53 (Pubitemid 32794388)
31. R.S. Kennedy, N.E. Lane, K.S. Berbaum, and Lilienthal Simulator sickness questionnaire: an enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness International Journal of Aviation Psychology 3 3 1993 203 220
32. D. Kim, S. Choi, and K. Sohn Depth adjustment for stereoscopic images and subjective preference evaluation Journal of Electronic Imaging 20 3 2011 033011-1
33. W.S. Kim, F. Tendick, and L.W. Stark Visual enhancements in pick-and-place tasks: human operators controlling a simulated cylindrical manipulator IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation RA-3 5 1987 418 425 (Pubitemid 18568087)
34. A. Kulshreshth, J. Schild, J.J. LaViola, Evaluating user performance in 3D stereo and motion enabled video games, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games (FDG '12), 2012, pp. 33-40.
35. M.T.M. Lambooij, W.A. IJsselsteijn, and I. Heyndrickx Visual discomfort in stereoscopic displays: a review Journal of Imaging Science and Technology 53 3 2007 30201-1
36. M.S. Landy, L.T. Maloney, E.B. Johnston, and M. Young Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion Vision Research 35 3 1995 389 412
37. J.M. Lee, J. MacLachlan, and W.A. Wallace The effects of 3D imagery on managerial data interpretation MIS Quarterly 10 3 1986 257 269
38. D.M. Litynski, M. Grabowski, and W.A. Wallace The relationship between three-dimensional imaging and group decision making: an exploratory study IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans 27 4 1997 402 411 (Pubitemid 127770710)
39. A. Loftus, P. Servos, M.A. Goodale, N. Mendarozqueta, and M. Mon-Williams When two eyes are better than one in prehension: monocular viewing and end-point variance Experimental Brain Research 158 3 2004 317 327 (Pubitemid 39304297)
40. J.P. McIntire, P.R. Havig, and E.E. Geiselman What is 3D good for? A review of human performance on stereoscopic 3D displays Proceedings of SPIE 8383 2012 83830X-1
41. S.P. McKee, S.N.J. Watamaniuk, J.M. Harris, H.S. Smallman, and D.G. Taylor Is stereopsis effective in breaking camouflage for moving targets? Vision Research 37 15 1997 2047 2055 (Pubitemid 27342945)
42. D.R. Melmoth, and S. Grant Advantages of binocular vision for the control of reaching and grasping Experimental Brain Research 171 3 2006 371 388 (Pubitemid 43780110)
43. D.R. Melmoth, A.L. Finlay, M.J. Morgan, and S. Grant Grasping deficits and adaptations in adults with stereo vision losses Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 50 8 2009 3711 3720
44. F. Miksicek, Causes of visual fatigue and its improvements in stereoscopy, Technical Report DCSE/TR-2006-04, Department of Computer Sciences and Engineering, University of West Bohemia, Czech Republic, 2006.
45. R.R. Mourant, L. Parsi, Training in a virtual stereoscopic environment, in: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 46th Annual Meeting, 2002, pp. 2206-2209.
46. N. Naikar, Perspective displays: a review of human factors issues, Aeronautical and Maritime Research Laboratory, Defense Science & Technology Organisation, Australia; technical report DSTO-TR-0630, 1998.
47. A.C. Neubauer, S. Bergner, and M. Schatz Two- vs. three-dimensional presentation of mental rotation tasks: sex differences and effects of training on performance and brain activation Intelligence 38 5 2010 529 539
48. C.A. Ntuen, M. Goings, M. Reddin, and K. Holmes Comparison between 2-D & 3-D using an autostereoscopic display: the effects of viewing field and illumination on performance and visual fatigue International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 39 2 2008 388 395
49. A.R. O'Connor, E.E. Birch, S. Anderson, H. Draper, and The FSOS Research Group The functional significance of stereopsis Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 51 4 2010 2019 2023
50. A.E. Patla, E. Niechwiej, V. Racco, and M.A. Goodale Understanding the contribution of binocular vision to the control of adaptive locomotion Experimental Brain Research 142 4 2002 551 561 (Pubitemid 34169842)
51. R. Patterson Human factors of 3-D displays Journal of the Society for Information Display 15 2007 861 871
52. R. Patterson Review paper: human factors of stereo displays: an update Journal of the Society for Information Display 17 2009 987 996
53. R. Patterson, and W.L. Martin Human stereopsis Human Factors 34 6 1992 669 692 (Pubitemid 23121390)
54. R. Patterson, and A. Silzars Immersive stereo displays, intuitive reasoning, and cognitive engineering Journal of the Society for Information Display 17 2009 443 448
55. S. Pastoor Human factors of 3D displays in advanced image communications Displays 14 3 1993 150 157
56. S. Pastoor, and M. Wöpking 3-D displays: a review of current technologies Displays 17 1997 100 110 (Pubitemid 127423466)
57. E. Peinsipp-Byma, N. Rehfeld, and R. Eck Evaluation of stereoscopic 3D displays for image analysis tasks Proceedings of SPIE 7237 2009 72370L
58. A.H. Reinhardt-Rutland Remote operation: a selective review of research into visual depth perception Journal of General Psychology 123 3 1996 237 248 (Pubitemid 126418465)
59. J.M. Reising, and K.M. Mazur 3-D displays for cockpits: where they payoff Proceedings of SPIE 1256 1990 35 43
60. R. Rosenthal The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results Psychological Bulletin 86 3 1979 638 641
61. M. Rouse, E. Borsting, G.L. Mitchell, S.A. Cotter, M. Kulp, M. Scheiman, C. Barnhardt, A. Bade, and T. Yamada Validity of the convergence insufficiency symptom survey: a confirmatory study Optometry and Vision Science 86 2009 357 363
62. P. Servos, M.A. Goodale, and L.S. Jakobson The role of binocular vision in prehension: a kinematic analysis Vision Research 32 8 1992 1513 1521
63. M.J. Singer, J. Ehrlich, S. Cinq-Mars, J.-P. Papin, Task performance in virtual environments: stereoscopic versus monoscopic displays and head-coupling. U.S. Army Research Institute, Technical Report 1034, 1995.
64. H.S. Smallman, and M. St. John Naïve realism: misplaced faith in realistic displays Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications 13 3 2005 6 13 (Pubitemid 44756577)
65. M. St. John, M.B. Cowen, H.S. Smallman, and H.M. Oonk The use of 2D and 3D displays for shape-understanding versus relative-position tasks Human Factors 43 1 2001 79 98 (Pubitemid 32656534)
66. B.A. Steiner, D.A. Dotson, The use of 3-D stereo display of tactical information, in: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, October, vol. 34, No. (1), 1990, pp. 36-40.
67. W.J. Tam, F. Speranza, S. Yano, K. Shimono, and H. Ono Stereoscopic 3D-TV: visual comfort IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting 57 2 2011 335 346
68. K. Ukai Human factors for stereoscopic images IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo 2006 1697 1700 (Pubitemid 46680061)
69. M.H.P.H. van Beurden, G. van Hoey, H. Hatzakis, and W.A. IJsselsteijn Stereoscopic displays in medical domains: a review of perception and performance effects Proceedings of SPIE 7240 2009 72400A-1
70. K. Votanopoulos, F.C. Brunicardi, J. Thornby, and C.F. Bellows Impact of three-dimensional vision in laparoscopic training World Journal of Surgery 32 2008 110 118 (Pubitemid 50002072)
71. J.P. Wann, S. Rushton, and M. Mon-Williams Natural problems for stereoscopic depth perception in virtual environments Vision Research 35 19 1995 2731 2736
72. C. Ware, C. Gobrecht, and M.A. Paton Dynamic adjustment of stereo display parameters IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans 28 1 1998 56 65 (Pubitemid 128748055)
73. S.J. Watt, and M.F. Bradshaw The visual control of reaching and grasping: binocular disparity and motion parallax Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 29 2 2003 404 415 (Pubitemid 37189353)
74. G. Westheimer Three-dimensional displays and stereo vision Proceedings of the Royal Society B 278 2011 2241 2248
75. C. Wickens, The when and how of using 2D and 3D displays for operational tasks, in: Proceedings of the IEA 2000/HFES 2000 Congress, 2000, pp. 3-403-3-406.
76. S. Wilkinson, 3D Sickness Explained?" Home Theater [web article], 25 January 2011. < http://www.hometheater.com/content/3d-sickness-explained >.
77. P. Willemsen, A.A. Gooch, W.B. Thompsen, and S.H. Creem-Regehr Effects of stereo viewing conditions on distance perception in virtual environments Presence 17 1 2008 91 101
78. S.P. Williams, and R.V. Parrish New computational control techniques and increased understanding for stereo 3-D displays Proceedings of SPIE 1256 1990 73 82
79. A. Woods, T. Docherty, and R. Koch Image distortions in stereoscopic video systems Proceedings of the SPIE, Stereoscopic Displays and Applications 1993 1915
80. J. Zeidner, R. Sadacca, A.I. Schwartz, Human factors studies in image interpretation: the value of stereoscopic viewing, Adjutant General's Office (Army) Washington, D.C., technical report, June 1961.