Remote operation: A selective review of research into visual depth perception

Journal of General Psychology

Volumn 123, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 237-248

  Reinhardt Rutland, Anthony H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULSTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BINOCULAR VISION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; RESEARCH; REVIEW;

DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMANS; RESEARCH; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR;

EID: 0030179907     PISSN: 00221309     EISSN: 19400888     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00221309.1996.9921276     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Antia, N. H. (1994). Keyhole surgery. Lancet, 344, 596-597.
2. Coghlan, A. (1995). Keyhole surgeons enter new dimension. New Scientist, 148:2007, 21.
3. Cole, H. A. (1988). Understanding nuclear power. Aldershot. England: Gower.
4. Collewijn, H., & Erkelens, C. J. (1990). Binocular eye movements and the perception of depth. In E. Kowler (Ed.), Eye movements and their role in visual and cognitive processes (pp. 213-261). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
5. Crombie, N. A.-M., & Graves, R. J. (1996). Ergonomics of keyhole surgical instruments- patient friendly, hut surgeon unfriendly? In S. A. Robsertson (Ed.), Contemporary ergonomics 1996 (pp. 385-390). London: Taylor & Francis.
6. Deziel, D. J., Millikan, K. W., Economou, S. G., Doolas, A., Sung-Tao, K., & Airan, M. C. (1993). Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A national survey of 4292 hospitals and an analysis of 77604 cases. American Journal of Surge 165, 9-14.
7. Edgar, G. K., Pope, J. C. D., & Craig, I. R. (1994). Visual accommodation problems with head-up and helmet-mounted displays? Displays, 15, 68-75.
8. Eriksson, E. S. (1974). Movement parallax during locomotion. Perception and Psychophysics. 16, 197-200.
9. Foley, J. M. (1978). Primary depth cues. In R. Held, H. W. Leibowitz, and H. L. Teuber (Eds.). Handbook of sensory physiology: Volume S. Perception (pp. 181-213). Berlin: Springer.
10. Gehringer, W. L., & Engel, E. (1986). Effect of ecological viewing conditions on the Ames' distorted room illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance; 12, 181-185.
11. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
12. Gogel, W. C. (1956). The tendency to see objects as equidistant and its inverse relation to lateral separation. Psychological Monographs, 70 (Whole No. 411).
13. Gogel, W. C. (1965). Equidistance tendency and its consequences. Psychological Bulletin, 64, 153-163.
14. Gregory, R. L. (1970). The intelligent eye. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
15. Hell, W. (1978). Movement parallax: An asymptotic function of amplitude and velocity of head motion. Vision Research, 18, 629-635.
16. Hell, W. (1981). Research on monocular depth perception between 1884 and 1914: Influence of the German Unfallversicherungsgesetz and of the jurisdiction of the Reichsversicherungsamt. Perception, 10, 683-694.
17. Hell, W., & Freeman, R. B. (1977). Detectability of motion as a factor in depth perception by monocular movement parallax. Perception and Psychophysics, 22, 526-530.
18. Hills, B. L. (1980). Vision, visibility, and perception in driving. Perception, 9, 183-216.
19. Hunter, J. G., & Sackier, J. M. (1993). Minimally invasive surgen. New York: McGraw-Hill.
20. Ittleson, W. (1952). The Ames demonstrations in perception. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21. Julesz, B. (1971). Foundations of Cyclopean perception. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
22. Logvinenko, A. D., & Belopolskii, V. I. (1994). Convergence as a cue for distance. Perception, 23. 207-217.
23. Marotta, J. J., Perrot, T. S., Nicolle, D., Servos, P., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). Adapting to monocular vision: Grasping with one eye. Experimental Brain Research, 104, 107-114.
24. McKnight, A. J., Shinar, D., & Hilbum, B. (1991). The visual and driving performance of monocular and binocular heavy-duty truck drivers. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 23. 225-237.
25. Ono, M. E., Rivest, J., & Ono, H. (1986). Depth perception as a function of motion parallax and absolute-distance information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12. 331-337.
26. Patkin, M., & Isabel, L. (1993). In J. N. Gräber, L. S. Schultz, J. J. Pietrafuta, & D. F. Hickok (Eds.), Laparoscopic abdominal surgery (pp. 83-88). New York: McGraw-Hill.
27. Pilewski, J. L., & Martin, B. A. (1991). Effects of monocular versus binocular viewing in the Ames distorted-room illusion. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 72, 306.
28. Predebon, J. (1994). Convergence responses to monocularly viewed objects: Implications for distance perception. Perception. 23, 303-319.
29. Regan, E. C., & Price, K. R. (1994). Some side effects of immersion virtual reality. Aviation. Space and Environmental Medicine. 65, 527-530.
30. Reinhardt-Rutland, A. H. (1988). Induced movement in the visual modality: An overview. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 57-71.
31. Reinhardt-Rutland, A. H. (1989). Relative motion of objects in visual perception: Theoretical and applied implications. The Psychologist: Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 1, 9-11.
32. Reinhardt-Rutland, A. H. (1990). Detecting orientation of a surface: The rectangularity postulate and primary depth cues. The Journal of General Psychology, 119. 391-401.
33. Reinhardt-Rutland, A. H. (1992). Primary depth cues and background pattern in the portrayal of slant. The Journal of General Psychology. 119, 29-35.
34. Reinhardt-Rutland, A. H. (1993). Perceiving surface orientation: Pictorial information based on rectangularity can be overriden during observer motion. Perception. 22, 335-341.
35. Reinhardt-Rutland, A. H. (1995). Perceiving the orientation in depth of real surfaces: Background pattern affects motion and pictorial information. Perception. 24, 405-414.
36. Reinhardt-Rutland, A. H. (1996a). Depth judgments of triangular surfaces during moving monocular viewing. Perception, 25. 27-35.
37. Reinhardt-Rutland, A. H. (1996b). Perceiving the orientation-in-depth of triangular surfaces: Static-monocular, moving-monocular, and static-binocular viewing. The Journal of General Psychology, 123, 19-28.
38. Reinhardt-Rutland, A. H., & Ehrenstein, W. H. (1996). Depth perception and stereoscopic systems for minimally invasive surgery. In S. A. Robertson (Ed). Contemporary ergonomics 1996 (pp. 391-396). London: Taylor & Francis.
39. Rogers, B., & Collett, T. S. (1989). The appearance of surfaces specified by motion parallax and binocular disparity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 697-717.
40. Rogers, B., & Graham, M. (1979). Motion parallax as an independent cue for depth perception. Perception. 8, 125-134.
41. Rogers, B., & Graham, M. (1982). Similarities between motion parallax and stereopsis in human depth perception. Vision Research, 22, 261-270.
42. Rogers, S., & Rogers, B. (1992). Visual and nonvisual information disambiguate surfaces specified by motion parallax. Perception and Psychophysics, 52, 446-452.
43. Runeson, S. (1988). The distorted room illusion, equivalent configuration, and the specificity of static optic arrays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 14, 295-304.
44. Sachsenweger, M., & Sachsenweger, U. (1991). Stereoscopic acuity in ocular pursuit of moving objects. Documenta Opthalnwlogica, 78(1-2), 1-133.
45. Simpson, W. A. (1993). Optic low and depth perception. Spatial Vision, 7, 35-75.
46. Stevens, K. A., & Brookes, A. (1988). Integrating stereopsis with monocular interpretations of planar surfaces. Vision Research, 28, 371-386.
47. Treacy, P. J., & Johnson, A. G. (1995). Is the laparoscopic bubble bursting? Lancet, 346. 23.
48. Wenzl, R., Lehner, R., Vry, U., Pateisky, N., Sevelda, P., & Husslein, P. (1994). Three-dimensional video-endoscopy: Clinical use in gynaecological laparoscopy. Lancet, 344, 1621-1622.
49. Wheatstone, C. (1852). On some remarkable and hitherto unobserved phenomena of binocular vision. Philosophical Magazine, 4. 504-523.
50. Wills, C. 1993. The runaway brain. London: Harper-Collins.