The functional significance of stereopsis

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 51, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 2019-2023

  O'Connor, Anna R ^a   Birch, Eileen E ^b   Anderson, Susan ^c   Draper, Hayley ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b RETINA FOUNDATION OF THE SOUTHWEST   (United States)

^c ALDER HEY CHILDREN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; AMBLYOPIA; ARTICLE; BEAD TASK; BINOCULAR VISION; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE DURATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MONOCULAR VISION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; OPHTHALMOLOGY; PEGBOARD TASK; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHOOL CHILD; STEREOACUITY TEST; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; STRABISMUS; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL ADAPTATION; WATER POURING TASK; DEPTH PERCEPTION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; VISION TEST; VISUAL DISORDER;

ADAPTATION, OCULAR; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AMBLYOPIA; CHILD; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMANS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; STRABISMUS; VISION DISORDERS; VISION TESTS; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISUAL ACUITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77951246830     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.09-4434     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Morris H, O'Connor AR, Stephenson G, Mitchell M, Price GJ, Anderson S. Clinical assessment of stereopsis and its functional significance. Br Irish Orthop J. 2005;2:8-14.
2. Wright KW, Edelman PM, McVey JH, Terry AP, Lin M. High-grade stereo acuity after early surgery for congenital esotropia. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;112:913-919.
3. Buckley EG. Correcting esotropia: time is of the essence! J AAPOS. 2002;6:1-2.
4. Birch EE, Fawcett S, Stager DR. Why does early surgical alignment improve stereoacuity outcomes in infantile esotropia. J AAPOS. 2000;4:10-14.
5. O'Connor AR, Fawcett S, Stager DR, Birch EE. Factors influencing sensory outcome following surgical correction of infantile esotropia. Am Orthop J. 2002;52:69-74.
6. Ing MR. Outcome study of surgical alignment before six months of age for congenital esotropia. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:2041-2045.
7. Ing MR. The timing of surgical alignment for congenital (infantile) esotropia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1999;36:61-68.
8. Elliott S, Shafiq A. Interventions for infantile esotropia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;CD004917.
9. Simonsz HJ, Kolling GH, Unnebrink K. Final report of the early vs. late infantile strabismus surgery study (ELISSS), a controlled, prospective, multicenter study. Strabismus. 2005;13:169-199.
10. Birch EE, Stager DR Sr, Berry P, Leffler J. Stereopsis and long-term stability of alignment in esotropia. J AAPOS. 2004;8:146-150.
11. Beauchamp GR, Black BC, Coats DK, et al. The management of strabismus in adults, III: the effects on disability. J AAPOS. 2005; 9:455-459.
12. Fielder AR, Moseley MJ. Does stereopsis matter in humans? Eye. 1996;10:233-238.
13. Gardner RA, Broman M. The Purdue pegboard: normative data on 1334 school children. J Clin Child Psychol. 1979;8:156-162.
14. Williams S, Simpson A, Silva PA. Stereoacuity levels and vision problems in children from 7 to 11 years. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1988;8:386-389.
15. Ohlsson J, Villarreal G, Abrahamsson M, Cavazos H, Sjostrom A, Sjostrand J. Screening merits of the Lang II, Frisby, Randot, Titmus, and TNO stereo tests. J AAPOS. 2001;5:316-322.
16. Simons K. A comparison of the Frisby, Random-Dot E, TNO, and Randot circles stereotests in screening and office use. Arch Ophthalmol. 1981;99:446-452.
17. Birch E, Williams C, Drover J, et al. Randot Preschool Stereoacuity Test: normative data and validity. J AAPOS. 2008;12:23-26.
18. Birch EE, Cheng C, Stager DR Jr, Weakley DR Jr, Stager DR Sr. The critical period for surgical treatment of dense congenital bilateral cataracts. J AAPOS. 2009;13:67-71.
19. Brown KC, Buckley D. Do we really need binocular single vision? Br Irish Orthop J. 2004;1:46-51.
20. Joy S, Davis H, Buckley D. Is stereopsis linked to hand-eye coordination? Br Orthop J. 2001;58:38-41.
21. Melmoth DR, Grant S. Advantages of binocular vision for the control of reaching and grasping. Exp Brain Res. 2006;171:371-388.
22. Sheedy JE, Bailey IL, Buri M, Bass E. Binocular vs. monocular task performance. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1986;63:839-846.
23. Jones RK, Lee DN. Why two eyes are better than one: the two views of binocular vision. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1981;7:30-40.
24. Kulp MT, Schmidt PP. Visual predictors of reading performance in kindergarten and first grade children. Optom Vis Sci. 1996;73:255-262.
25. Kulp MT, Schmidt PP. A pilot study. Depth perception and near stereoacuity: is it related to academic performance in young children? Binocul Vis Strabismus Q. 2002;17:129-134, discussion 133.
26. Mazyn LI, Lenoir M, Montagne G, Savelsbergh GJ. The contribution of stereo vision to one-handed catching. Exp Brain Res. 2004;157: 83-390.
27. Grant S, Melmoth DR, Morgan MJ, Finlay AL. Prehension deficits in amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:1139-1148.
28. Hrisos S, Clarke MP, Kelly T, Henderson J, Wright CM. Unilateral visual impairment and neurodevelopmental performance in preschool children. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:836-838.
29. Webber AL, Wood JM, Gole GA, Brown B. The effect of amblyopia on fine motor skills in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008; 49:594-603.
30. Voller J, Griffiths PG. Inconsistency of stereo-acuity results using the Frisby stereotest. Br Orthop J. 1988;45:26-29.
31. Fawcett SL. An evaluation of the agreement between contourbased circles and random dot-based near stereoacuity tests. J AAPOS. 2005;9:572-578.