A Guide to Stereoscopic 3D Displays in Medicine

Academic Radiology

Volumn 18, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1035-1048

  Held, Robert T ^a   Hui, Tiffany T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Diagnostic imaging; Display technology; Human factors; Stereoscopic displays

Indexed keywords

BINOCULAR VISION; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FATIGUE; HEADACHE; HUMAN; IMAGE DISPLAY; LAPAROSCOPY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MONOCULAR VISION; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SPECTRAL SENSITIVITY; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; SURGEON; TELESURGERY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TREATMENT PLANNING; VIRTUAL REALITY;

CUES; DATA DISPLAY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; GENERAL SURGERY; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; SPACE PERCEPTION; STEREOTAXIC TECHNIQUES; TELEMEDICINE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 79959709353     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: 18784046     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2011.04.005     Document Type: Review

References (96)

1. Lipton L. Foundations of the stereoscopic cinema: a study in depth 1982, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY.
2. Chan H.P., Goodsitt M.M., Helvie M.A., et al. ROC study of the effect of stereoscopic imaging on assessment of breast lesions. Med Phys 2005, 32:1001-1009.
3. Fröhlich B., Barrass S., Zehner B., et al. Exploring geo-scientific data in virtual environments. In: VIS '99: Proceedings of the conference on Visualization '99 1999, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, p. 169-173.
4. Palmer S. Vision science: from photos to phenomenology 1999, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
5. Sun J., Perona P. Where is the sun?. Nat Neurosci 1998, 1:183-184.
6. O'Shea JP, Banks MS, Agrawala M. The assumed light direction for perceiving shape from shading. In: APGV '08: Proceedings of the 5th symposium on Applied perception in graphics and visualization. New York, NY. p. 135-142.
7. Simons K. Stereoacuity norms in young children. Arch Ophthalmol-Chic 1981, 99:439-445.
8. Ahmed J., Ward T., Bursell S., et al. The sensitivity and specificity of nonmydriatic digital stereoscopic retinal imaging in detecting diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care 2006, 29:2205-2209.
9. Abramoff M., Alward W., Greenlee, et al. Automated segmentation of the optic disc from stereo color photographs using physiologically plausible features. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007, 48:1665-1673.
10. Bergua A., Mardin C.Y., Horn F.K. Tele-transmission of stereoscopic images of the optic nerve head in glaucoma via internet. Telemed e-Health 2009, 15:439-444.
11. Getty D., D'Orsi C., Pickett R. Stereoscopic digital mammography: Improved accuracy of lesion detection in breast cancer screening. Lecture Notes Comp Sci 2008, 5116:74-79.
12. Hernandez A., Basset O., Bremond A., et al. Stereoscopic visualization of three-dimensional ultrasonic data applied to breast tumours. Eur J ultrasound 1998, 8:51-65.
13. Tanaka C., Fujii H., Ikeda T., et al. Stereoscopic scintigraphic imaging of breast cancer sentinel lymph nodes. Breast Cancer 2007, 14:92-99.
14. Nelson T., Ji E., Lee J., et al. Stereoscopic evaluation of fetal bony structures. J Ultrasound Med 2008, 27:15-24.
15. Sollenberger R., Milgram P. Effects of stereoscopic and rotational displays in a three-dimensional path-tracing task. Human Factors J Human Factors Ergon Soc 1993, 3:483-499.
16. Serra L, Hern N, Choon C, et al. Interactive vessel tracing in volume data. SI3D '97: Proceedings of the 1997 Symposium on Interactive 3D graphics 1997.
17. Sun Z., Squelch A., Bartlett A., et al. 3D stereoscopic visualization of fenestrated stent grafts. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2009, 32:1053-1058.
18. Zhou L., Wang Y., Goh L., et al. Stereoscopic visualization and editing of automatic abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) measurements for stent graft planning. Proc SPIE 2006, 6055:57-65.
19. Sun Z., Lawrence-Brown M. CT virtual endoscopy and 3D stereoscopic visualisation in the evaluation of coronary stenting. Biomed Imaging Intervention J 2009, 5:1-6.
20. Moll T., Douek P., Finet G., et al. Clinical assessment of a new stereoscopic digital angiography system. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1998, 21:11-16.
21. Sekiguchi R., Satake M., Oyama H., et al. Stereoscopic visualization system for clinical angiography. Studies Health Technol Informatics 1996, 29:690-693.
22. Kickuth R., Hartung G., Laufer U., et al. Stereoscopic 3D CT vs standard 3D CT in the classification of acetabular fractures: an experimental study. Br J Radiol 2002, 75:422.
23. Luursema J., Verwey W., Kommers P., et al. Optimizing conditions for computer-assisted anatomical learning. Interacting Computers 2006, 18:1123-1138.
24. Nicholson D., Chalk C., Funnell W., et al. Can virtual reality improve anatomy education? A randomised controlled study of a computer-generated three-dimensional anatomical ear model. Med Educ 2006, 40:1081.
25. Luursema J., Verwey W., Kommers P., et al. The role of stereopsis in virtual anatomical learning. Interacting Computers 2008, 20:455-460.
26. Tendick F., Downes M., Cavusoglu M., et al. Development of virtual environments for training skills and reducing errors in laparoscopic surgery. Proc SPIE Int Symp Biol Optics (BIOS'98) 1998, 36-44.
27. Wong G., Zhu C., Ahuja A., et al. Craniotomy and clipping of intracranial aneurysm in a stereoscopic virtual reality environment. Neurosurgery 2007, 61:564.
28. Pieper S., Delp S., Rosen J., et al. Virtual environment system for simulation of leg surgery. Pro SPIE 1991, 1457:188.
29. Tuggy M.L. Virtual reality flexible sigmoidoscopy simulator training: impact on resident performance. J Amer Bd Family Practice/Amer Bd Family Practice 1998, 11:426-433.
30. Taffinder N., Smith S.G., Huber J., et al. The effect of a second-generation 3D endoscope on the laparoscopic precision of novices and experienced surgeons. Surg Endosc 1999, 13:1087-1092.
31. Patel H., Ribal M., Arya M., et al. Is it worth revisiting laparoscopic three-dimensional visualization? A validated assessment. Urology 2007, 70:47-49.
32. Tevaearai H.T., Mueller X.M., von Segesser L.K. 3-D vision improves performance in a pelvic trainer. Endoscopy 2000, 32:464-468.
33. Ilgner J., Park J., Labbé D., et al. Using a high-definition stereoscopic video system to teach microscopic surgery. Proc SPIE-IS&T Electron Imaging 2007, 6490:81-87.
34. Prystowsky J., Regehr G., Rogers D., et al. A virtual reality module for intravenous catheter placement. Am J Surg 1999, 177:171-175.
35. Johnson W., Rickel J., Stiles R., et al. Integrating pedagogical agents into virtual environments. Presence 1998, 7:523-546.
36. Hu Y. The role of three-dimensional visualization in surgical planning of treating lung cancer. Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2005 IEEE-EMBS 2005 27th Annual International Conference of the 2005; 646-649.
37. Fishman E., Kuszyk B., Heath D., et al. Surgical planning for liver resection. Computer 1996, 29:64-72.
38. Wigmore S., Redhead D., Yan X., et al. Virtual hepatic resection using three-dimensional reconstruction of helical computed tomography angioportograms. Ann Surg 2001, 23:221-226.
39. Hemminger B.M., Molina P.L., Egan T.M., et al. Assessment of real-time 3D visualization for cardiothoracic diagnostic evaluation and surgery planning. J Digital Imaging 2005, 18:145-153.
40. Lee S., Shinohara H., Matsuki M., et al. Preoperative simulation of vascular anatomy by three-dimensional computed tomography imaging in laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery. J Amer Coll Surg 2003, 197:927-936.
41. Xia J., Ip H.H., Samman N., et al. Computer-assisted three-dimensional surgical planning and simulation: 3D virtual osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Surg 2000, 29:11-17.
42. Kikinis R., Gleason P., Moriarty T., et al. Computer-assisted interactive three-dimensional planning for neurosurgical procedures. Neurosurgery 1996, 38:640-651.
43. Gering D., Nabavi A., Kikinis R., et al. An integrated visualization system for surgical planning and guidance using image fusion and interventional imaging. J Magnetic Reson Imaging 2001, 13:967-975.
44. Kockro R., Serra L., Tseng-Tsai Y., et al. Planning and simulation of neurosurgery in a virtual reality environment. Neurosurgery 2000, 46:118-135.
45. Hernes T., Ommedal S., Lie T. Stereoscopic navigation-controlled display of preoperative MRI and intraoperative 3D ultrasound in planning and guidance of neurosurgery: new technology for minimally invasive image-guided surgery approaches. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2003, 46:129-137.
46. Ng I., Hwang P.Y.K., Kumar D., et al. Surgical planning for microsurgical excision of cerebral arterio-venous malformations using virtual reality technology. Acta Neurochir 2009, 151:453-463.
47. Rosahl S., Gharabaghi A., Hubbe U., et al. Virtual reality augmentation in skull base surgery. Skull Base 2006, 16:59-66.
48. Burt D. Virtual reality in anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 1995, 75:472-480.
49. Tendick F., Downes M., Goktekin T., et al. A virtual environment testbed for training laparoscopic surgical skills. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 2000, 9:236-255.
50. Hofmeister J., Frank T., Cuschieri A., et al. Perceptual aspects of two-dimensional and stereoscopic display techniques in endoscopic surgery: review and current problems. Surg Innovation 2001, 8:12-24.
51. Crosthwaite G., Chung T., Dunkley P., et al. Comparison of direct vision and electronic two-and three-dimensional display systems on surgical task efficiency in endoscopic surgery. Brit J Surg 1995, 82:849-851.
52. Hanna G., Shimi S., Cuschieri A. Randomised study of influence of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional imaging on performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Lancet 1998, 351:248-251.
53. McDougall E.M., Soble J.J., Wolf J.S., et al. Comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional laparoscopic video systems. J Endourol 1996, 10:371-374.
54. Blavier A., Nyssen A.S. Influence of 2D and 3D view on performance and time estimation in minimal invasive surgery. Ergonomics 2009, 52:1342-1349.
55. Mueller-Richter U., Limberger A., Weber P. Comparison between three-dimensional presentation of endoscopic procedures with polarization glasses and an autostereoscopic display. Surg Endosc 2003, 17:1432-2218.
56. Jourdan I., Dutson E., Garcia A., et al. Stereoscopic vision provides a significant advantage for precision robotic laparoscopy. Br J Surg 2004, 91:879-885.
57. Pietrabissa A., Scarcello E., Carobbi A., et al. Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional video system for the trained endoscopic surgeon and the beginner. Endoscopic Surg Allied Technol 1994, 2:315-317.
58. Blavier A., Gaudissart Q., Cadiere G., et al. Impact of 2D and 3D vision on performance of novice subjects using da Vinci robotic system. Acta Chir Belgica 2006, 106:662-664.
59. Byrn J., Schluender S., Divino C., et al. Three-dimensional imaging improves surgical performance for both novice and experienced operators using the da Vinci robot system. The Amer J Surg 2007, 193:519-522.
60. Maurer C.J., Sauer F., Hu B., et al. Augmented reality visualization of brain structures with stereo and kinetic depth cues: system description and initial evaluation with head phantom. Proc SPIE: Medical Imaging 2001, 6:445-456.
61. Nikou C., Digioia A., Blackwell M., et al. Augmented reality imaging technology for orthopaedic surgery. Operative Techniques Orthopaed 2000, 10:82-86.
62. Wendt M., Sauer F., Khamene A., et al. A head-mounted display system for augmented reality: Initial evaluation for interventional MRI. RöFo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 2003, 3:418-421.
63. Rosenthal M., State A., Lee J., et al. Augmented reality guidance for needle biopsies: an initial randomized, controlled trial in phantoms. Med Image Anal 2002, 6:313-320.
64. Wacker F., Vogt S., Khamene A., et al. An augmented reality system for MR image-guided needle biopsy: initial results in a swine model. Radiology 2006, 238:497-504.
65. Edwards P., Johnson L., Hawkes D., et al. Clinical experience and perception in stereo augmented reality surgical navigation. Proc Intl Workshop on Med Imaging and Augmented Reality 2004, 3150:369-376.
66. Bajura M, Fuchs H, Ohbuchi R. Merging virtual objects with the real world: seeing ultrasound imagery within the patient. Proc 19th Annu Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques 1992; 203-210.
67. Fuchs H, Livingston M, Raskar R, et al. Augmented reality visualization for laparoscopic surgery. Proc First Intl Conf on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention 1998; 934-943.
68. Zhai S., Buxton W., Milgram P. The partial-occlusion effect: Utilizing semitransparency in 3D human-computer interaction. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 1996, 3:254-284.
69. Chan H., Goodsitt M., Hadjiiski L., et al. Effects of magnification and zooming on depth perception in digital stereomammography: an observer performance study. Phys Med Biol 2003, 48:3721-3734.
70. Goodsitt M., Chan H., Hadjiiski L. Stereomammography: evaluation of depth perception using a virtual 3d cursor. Med Phys 2000, 27:1305.
71. Novotny P, Kettler D, Jordan P, et al. Stereo display of 3D ultrasound images for surgical robot guidance. IEEE Intl Conf of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, New York, NY 2006.
72. van Bergen P., Kunert W., Bessell J., et al. Comparative study of two-dimensional and three-dimensional vision systems for minimally invasive surgery. Surg Endosc 1998, 12:948-954.
73. Hu T., Allen P., Nadkarni T., et al. Insertable stereoscopic 3D surgical imaging device with pan and tilt. Intl J Robotics Res 2009, 28:1373-1386.
74. Matusik W., Pfister H. 3D TV: a scalable system for real-time acquisition, transmission, and autostereoscopic display of dynamic scenes. ACM Transactions on Graphics 2004, 23:814-824.
75. Maidment A.D.A., Bakic P.R., Albert M. Effects of quantum noise and binocular summation on dose requirements in stereoradiography. Med Phys 2003, 30:3061-3071.
76. Ilgner J.F.R., Kawai T., Shibata T., et al. Evaluation of stereoscopic medical video content on an autostereoscopic display for undergraduate medical education. Pro SPIE 2006, 6055:605506.
77. Lambooij M., IJsselsteijn W., Fortuin M., et al. Visual discomfort and visual fatigue of stereoscopic displays: a review. J Imaging Sci Technol 2009, 53:030201. p. 14.
78. Martens T.G., Ogle K.N. Observations on accommodative convergence; especially its nonlinear relationships. Amer J Ophthalmol 1959, 47:455-463.
79. Hoffman D.M., Girshick A.R., Akeley K., et al. Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue. J Vision 2008, 8:33.
80. Vishwanath D., Girshick A.R., Banks M.S. Why pictures look right when viewed from the wrong place. Nature Neurosci 2005, 8:1401-1410.
81. Woods A.J., Docherty T., Koch R. Image distortions in stereoscopic video systems. SPIE: Stereoscopic Displays and Applications IV 1993, 1915:36-48.
82. Held RT, Banks MS. Misperceptions in stereoscopic displays: a vision-science perspective. In: APGV '08: Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization. New York, NY, 2008, p. 23-32.
83. Getty D., Green P. Clinical applications for stereoscopic 3-D displays. J SID 2007, 15:377-384.
84. Bernstein J. The five senses of man: 91 woodcuts. London: Harry S. King & Co., 1876.
85. Balassy C., Prokop M., Weber M., et al. Flat-panel display (LCD) versus high-resolution gray-scale display (CRT) for chest radiography: an observer preference study. AJR Amer J Roentgenol 2005, 184:752-756.
86. Pisano E.D., Seibert J.A., Andriole K.P., et al. Practice guideline for determinants of image quality in digital mammography 2007, American College of Radiology, Reston, VA.
87. Watt S.J., Akeley K., Ernst M.O., et al. Focus cues affect perceived depth. J Vis 2005, 5:834-862.
88. Love G., Hoffman D., Hands P., et al. High-speed switchable lens enables the development of a volumetric stereoscopic display. Optics Express 2009, 17:15716-15725.
89. Cole F., DeCarlo D., Finkelstein A., et al. Directing gaze in 3D models with stylized focus. Eurographics Symp Rendering 2006, 377-387.
90. DiPaola S., Riebe C., Enns J. Rembrandt's textural agency: a shared perspective in visual art and science. Leonardo 2010, 4:145-151.
91. Hillaire S, Lécuyer A, Cozot R, et al. Depth-of-field blur effects for first-person navigation in virtual environments. In: VRST '07: Proceedings of the 2007 ACM symposium on Virtual reality software and technology. 2007; 203-206.
92. Hillaire S., Lecuyer A., Cozot R., et al. Using an eye-tracking system to improve camera motions and depth-of-field blur effects in virtual environments. Virtual Reality Conference, 2008 VR '08 IEEE 2008, 47-50.
93. Held R.T., Cooper E.A., O'Brien J.F., et al. Using blur to affect perceived distance and size. ACM Transactions on Graphics 2010, 29:1-16.
94. Mountney P., Stoyanov D., Yang G. Three-dimensional tissue deformation recovery and tracking. Signal Proc Magazine IEEE 2010, 27:14-24.
95. Lorensen WE. Marching through the visible man. In: Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Visualization '95; VIS '95. Washington, DC.
96. Ackerman M. The visible human project. Proc IEEE 1998, 86:504-511.