Perceptual Aspects of Two-dimensional and Stereoscopic Display Techniques in Endoscopic Surgery: Review and Current Problems

Surgical Innovation

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 12-24

  Hofmeister, Jörg ^a   Cuschieri, Alfred ^a   Wade, Nicholas J ^a   Frank, Timothy G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

2 D video systems; Depth cues; Depth perception; Endoscopy; Stereopsis; Stereoscopic video systems

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR; BIOENGINEERING; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LAPAROSCOPY; METHODOLOGY; REVIEW; VIDEORECORDING;

DATA DISPLAY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN ENGINEERING; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; SPATIAL BEHAVIOR; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 0035290820     PISSN: 15533506     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/155335060100800103     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Pastoor S., Woepking M: 3-D displays: A review of current technologies. Display 17:100-110, 1997
2. Goldstein E.B. : Sensation & Perception. Pacific Grove, Brooks / Cole, 1999
3. Wade N.J., Swanston M.: An introduction to visual perception. London, Routledge, 1991
4. Coren S., Ward L.M. Enns J.T.: Sensation and Perception (ed 5). Fort Worth, Harcourt Brace, 1999
5. Howard I.P., Rogers B.J.: Binocular Vision and Stereopsis. New York, Oxford University Press, 1995
6. Morrison J.D., Whiteside Tcd: Binocular cues in the perception of distance of a point source of light. Perception 13:555-566,1984
7. Gillam B.: The perception of spatial layout from static optical information, in Epstein W., Rogers S. (eds): Perception of space and motion, Academic Press, San Diego, 1995, pp 23-67
8. Patterson R., Martin W.L.: Human stereopsis. Human Factors 34:669-692, 1992
9. Rogers B.J., Graham M.E.: Similarities between motion parallax and stereopsis in human depth perception. Vision Res 22:216-270, 1982
10. Gogel W.C.: Equidistance tendency and its consequences. Psychol Bull 64:153-163, 1965
11. Schlosberg H.: Stereoscopic depth from single pictures. Am J Psychol 54:601-605, 1941
12. Koenderink J.J., van Doorn A.J., Kapers Aml: On so-called paradoxical monocular stereoscopy. Perception 23:583-594, 1994
13. Hagen M.A., Jones R.K.: Plane surface information as a determinant of pictorial perception, in Long J. (ed): Attention and Performance IX, Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum, 1981, pp 117-134
14. Eby D.W., Braunstein M.L.: The perceptual flattening of three-dimensional scenes enclosed by a frame. Perception 24:981-993, 1995
15. Servos P., Goodale M.A., Jakobson L.S.: The role of binocular vision in prehension: A kinematic analysis. Vision Res 32:1513-1521, 1992
16. Becker H., Melzer A., Schurr M.O., Buess G.: 3-D video techniques in endoscopic surgery. Endosc Surg 1:40-46, 1993
17. Birkett D.H., Josephs L.G., Este-McDonald, Jso: A new 3-D laparoscope in gastrointestinal surgery. Surg Endosc 8:1448-1451, 1994
18. Chan A., Chung S., Yim A., et al: Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 11:438-440, 1997
19. Crosthwaite G., Chung T., Dunkley P., Shimi S., Cuschieri A.: Comparison of direct vision and electronic two- and three-dimensional display systems on surgical task efficiency in endoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 82:849-851, 1995
20. Dion Y.M., Gaillard F.: Visual integration of data and basic motor skills under laparoscopy. Influence of 2-D and 3-D video-camera systems. Surg Endosc 11:995-1000, 1997
21. Hanna G.B., Shimi S.M., Cuschieri A.: Randomised study of influence of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional imaging on performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Lancet 351:248-251, 1998
22. Jones D., Brewer J., Soper N.: The influence of three-dimensional video systems on laparoscopic task performance. Surg Laparosc Endosc 6:191-197, 1996
23. McDougall E.M., Soble J.J., Wolf J.S., et al: Comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional laparoscopic video systems. Endoscopy 10:371-374, 1996
24. Mueller M.D., Camartin C., Dreher E., et al: Three-dimensional laparoscopy. Gadget or process? A randomised trial on the efficacy of three-dimensional laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 13:469-472, 1999
25. Peitgen K., Walz M.V., Holtmann G., et al: A prospective randomised experimental evaluation of three-dimensional imaging in laparoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 44: 262-267, 1996
26. Prietrabissa A., Sarcello E., Carobbi A., Mosca F.: Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional video system for the trained endoscopic surgeon and the beginner. Endosc Surg 2:315-317, 1994
27. Taffinder N., Smith Sgt, Huber J., et al: The effect of a second generation 3D endoscope on the laparoscopic precision of novices and experienced surgeons. Surg Endosc 13:1087-1092, 1999
28. van Bergen P., Kunert W., Benell J., Buess G.: Comparative study of two-D and three-D vision systems for minimally invasive surgery. Surg Endosc 12:948-954, 1998
29. von Pichler C., Rademacher K., Rau G.: The state of 3-D technology and evaluation. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 5:419-426, 1996
30. Wenzl R., Lehner R., Vry U., et al: Three-dimensional video-endoscopy: Clinical use in gynaecological laparoscopy. Lancet 344:1621-1622, 1994
31. Reinhardt-Rutland A.H.: Remote operation: A selective review of research into visual depth perception. J Gen Psychol 123:237-248, 1996
32. Wade N.J.: Frames of reference in vision. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 5:435-439, 1996
33. Crothers I.R., Galagher A.G., Cowrie R., et al: Laparoscopic performance is predicted by a test of pictorial perception: Three replications, using novices and experienced surgeons. Perception 28:103, 1999 (suppl)
34. Holden J., Frank T.G., Cuschieri A.: Developing technology for suspended imaging for minimal access surgery. Semin Laparosc Surg 4:74-79, 1997
35. Hanna G.B., Shimi S.M., Cuschieri A.: Task performance in endoscopic surgery is influenced by location of the image display. Ann Surg 227:481-484, 1998