Human factors guidelines for applications of 3D perspectives: A literature review

Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

Volumn 7327, Issue , 2009, Pages

  Dixon, Sharon ^a   Fitzhugh, Elisabeth ^b   Aleva, Denise ^a  

^a WRIGHT PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE   (United States)

^b SRA   (United States)

Author keywords

Applications; Displays; Guidelines; Human factors; Performance; Perspective; Three dimensional; Two dimensional; Visualizations

Indexed keywords

DISPLAYS; GUIDELINES; HUMAN FACTORS; PERFORMANCE; PERSPECTIVE;

AVIONICS; HUMAN ENGINEERING; LEGACY SYSTEMS; MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MILITARY APPLICATIONS; TWO DIMENSIONAL; VISUALIZATION;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

EID: 69949114475     PISSN: 0277786X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.820853     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Havig, P., McIntire, J., Dixon, S., Moore, J., & Reis, G. (2008). "Comparison of 3D Displays Using Objective Metrics." Proceedings of the SPIE Vol. 6956, p. 69560D.
2. th Annual Meeting-2005, pp. 1564-1568.
3. Andre, A. D., & Wickens, C. D. (1995). "When users want what's not best for them." Ergonomics in Design, (October), 10-14.
4. Meyer, J. (1997). "A New Look at an Old Study on Information Display: Washburne (1927) Reconsidered." Human Factors & Ergonomics Society, 39(3), 333-340.
5. Tufte, E. (1983)."The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
6. Wickens, C. & Carswell, C. (1995). "The Proximity Compatibility Principle: Its Psychological foundation and relevance to display design." Human Factors & Ergonomics Society, 37, 473-494.
7. Naikar, N. (1998). Perspective Displays: A Review of Human Factors Issues. Report No. DSTO-TR-0630. Melbourne, Victoria: Defence Science and Technology Organisation Aeronautical and Maritime Research Laboratory.
8. rd Annual Meeting-1999, pp.1318-1322.
9. Philips. (2009). "What is 3D?" Accessed online 27 February 2009 at http://www.businesssites.philips.com/3dsolutions/3dcontentinterfaceformats/ whatis3d/index.page.
10. Schowengerdt, B. & Seibel, E. (2004). "True 3D displays that allow viewers to dynamically shift accommodation, bringing objects displayed at different viewing distances into and out of focus." Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 7(6), 610-620.
11. DiVerdi, S., Rakkolainen, I. Hollerer, T., & Olwal, A. (2006). "A Novel Walk-Through 3D Display." Proceedings of the SPIE Vol. 6055 (Stereoscopic Displays and Virtual Reality Systems XIII), San Jose, CA January 15-18.
12. Wickens, C. & May, P. (1995). Terrain Representation for Air Traffic Control: A Comparison of Perspective with Plan View Displays. Report No. ARL-94-10/FAA094-2. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL: Aviation Research Laboratory Institute of Aviation.
13. Wickens, C. (2000). "The When and How of Using 2D and 3D Displays for Operational Tasks." Proceedings of the IEA 2000/HFES 2000 Congress, pp. 3-403-3-406.
14. Tittle, J., Woods, D., Roesler, A., Howard, M., & Phillips, F. (2001). "The Role of 2-D and 3-D Task Performance in the Design and Use of Visual Displays." Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45th Annual Meeting-2001, pp. 331-335.
15. St. John, M., Smallman, H. & Cowen M. (2000). "Designing for the Task: Sometimes 2-D is Just Plane Better." Proceedings of the IEA/HFES 2000 Congress, pp. 3-207.
16. st Annual Meeting-2007, pp 1317-1321.
17. Fitzhugh, E., Dixon, S., Aleva, D., Smith, E., Ghrayeb, J., & Douglas L. (in press). "Toward the Establishment of Design Guidelines for Effective 3-D Perspective Interfaces." Proceedings of the SPIE Defense, Security, & Sensing- 2009.