Binocular cues and the control of prehension

Spatial Vision

Volumn 17, Issue 1-2, 2004, Pages 95-110

  Bradshaw, Mark F ^a   Elliott, Kathleen M ^a   Watt, Simon J ^a   Hibbard, Paul B ^a   Davies, Ian R L ^a   Simpson, P J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Binocular cues; Prehension; Vergence

Indexed keywords

CONTROL SYSTEMS; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEEDBACK; IMAGE CODING; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; KINEMATICS; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY;

BINOCULAR CUES; PREHENSION; VERGENCE;

BINOCULAR VISION;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BINOCULAR VISION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HAND GRIP; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PERCEPTION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY;

ADULT; CUES; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; MOVEMENT; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SIZE PERCEPTION; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR;

EID: 1642289783     PISSN: 01691015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/156856804322778288     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (44)

1. Bishop, P. O. (1989). Vertical disparity, egocentric distance and stereoscopic depth constancy: a new interpretation, Proc. Roy. Soc. London 237, 445-469.
2. Braddick, O., Atkinson, J. and Hood, B. (1996). Monocular vs binocular control of infants' reaching, Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 37, S290.
3. Bradshaw, M. F. and Elliot, K. M. (2002). The role of binocular information in the 'on-line' control of prehension, Spatial Vision, Special Issue.
4. Bradshaw, M. F. and Hibbard, P. B. (2003). Reaching for virtual objects: binocular disparity, retinal motion and the control of prehension, Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia 66, 53-61.
5. Bradshaw, M. F., Glennerster, A. and Rogers, B. J. (1996). The effect of display size on disparity scaling from differential perspective and vergence cues, Vision Research 36 1255-1265.
6. Bradshaw, M. F., Parton, A. D. and Glennerster, A. (2000). The task- dependant use of binocular disparity and motion parallax information, Vision Research 40, 3725-3734.
7. Campbell, F. W. and Green, D. G. (1965). Monocular versus binocular visual acuity, Nature 208, 191-192.
8. Cumming, B. G., Johnston, E. J. and Parker, A. J. (1991). Vertical disparities and perception of three-dimensional shape, Nature 349, 411-413.
9. Desmurget, M., Pelisson, D., Rossetti, Y. and Prablanc, C. (1998). From eye to hand: planning goal-directed movements, Neuroscience and Biobehavioural Reviews 22, 761-788.
10. Dijkerman, H. C., Milner, A. D. and Carey, D. P. (1996). The perception and prehension of objects oriented in the depth plane 1. Effects of visual form agnosia, Experimental Brain Research 112, 442-451.
11. Elliott, K. M. and Bradshaw M. F. (2002, submitted). The role of binocular information in the planning and the control of prehensile movements in middle childhood, Developmental Science.
12. Foley, J. M. (1980). Binocular distance perception, Psychological Review 87, 411-434.
13. Gardner, P. L. and Mon-Williams, M. (2000). Vertical gaze angle: absolute height-in-scene information for the programming of prehension, Experimental Brain Research 136, 379-385.
14. Glennerster, A., Rogers, B. J. and Bradshaw, M. F. (1996). Stereoscopic depth constancy depends on the subject's task Vision Research 36, 3441-3456.
15. Haggard, P. and Wing, A. M. (1990). Assessing and reporting the accuracy of position measurements made with optical tracking devices, J. Motor Behavior 22, 315-321.
16. Hering, E. (1861). Beitrage zur Physiologie, Volume 5. Engleman, Leipzig.
17. Hibbard, P. B. and Bradshaw, M. F. (2002). Binocular cues do not provide accurate depth information for the control of prehension, Experimental Brain Research (in press).
18. Jackson, S. R., Jones, C. A., Newport, R. and Pritchard, C. (1997). A kinematic analysis of goal-directed prehension movements executed under binocular, monocular and memory-guided viewing conditions, Visual Cognition 4, 113-142.
19. Jakobson, L. S. and Goodale, M. A. (1991). Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: a kinematic analysis of human prehension, Experimental Brain Research 86, 199-208.
20. Jeannerod, M. (1981). Intersegmental coodination during reaching at natural objects, in: Attention and Performance IX, Long, J. and Baddeley, A. (Eds). Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
21. Jeannerod, M. (1984). The timing of natural prehension movements, J. Motor Behaviour 16, 235-254.
22. Jeannerod, M. (1988). The Neural and Behavioural Organisation of Goal-directed Movements. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
23. Johnston, E. B. (1991). Systematic distortions of shape from stereopsis, Vision Research 31, 1351-1360.
24. Marotta, J. J., Behrmann, M. and Goodale, M. A. (1997). The removal of binocular cues disrupts the calibration of grasping in patients with visual form agnosia, Experimental Brain Research 116, 113-121.
25. Mon-Williams, M. and Dijkerman, H. C. (1999). The use of vergence information in the programming of prehension, Experimental Brain Research 128, 578-582.
26. Mon-Williams, M., Tresilian, J. R., McIntosh, R. D. and Milner, D. (2001). Monocular and binocular distance cues: Insights from visual form agnosia I (of III), Experimental Brain Research 139, 127-136.
27. Morgan, M. J. (1989). Vision of solid objects, Nature 339, 101-103.
28. O'Leary, A. and Wallach, H. (1980). Familiar size and linear perspective as distance cues in stereoscopic depth constancy, Perception and Psychophysics 27, 131-135.
29. Previc, F. H. (1990). Functional specialization in the lower and upper visual field in humans: Its ecological origins and neurophysiological implications, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, 519-575.
30. Rogers, B. J. and Bradshaw, M. F. (1993). Vertical disparities: differential perspective and binocular stereopsis, Nature 361, 253-255.
31. Rogers, B. J. and Bradshaw, M. F. (1995). Disparity scaling and the perception of Fronto-parallel surfaces, Perception 24, 155-179.
32. Sakata, H. and Taira, M. (1994). Parietal control of hand action, Current Opinion in Neurobiology 4, 847-856.
33. Sakata, H., Taira, M., Kusunoki, M., Murata, A. and Tanaki, Y. (1997). The parietal association cortex in depth perception and visual control of hand action, Trends in Neuroscience 20, 350-357.
34. Sakata, H., Taira, M., Kusunoki, M., Murata, A., Tanaka, Y. and Tsutsui, K. (1998). Neural coding of 3D features of objects for hand action in the parietal cortex of the monkey, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London 353, 1363-1373.
35. Servos, P. and Goodale, M. A. (1994). Binocular vision and the on-line control of human prehension, Experimental Brain Research 98, 119-127.
36. Servos, P., Goodale, M. A. and Jakobson, L. S. (1992). The role of binocular vision in prehension: akinematic analysis, Vision Research 32, 1513-1521.
37. Shikata, E., Tanaka, Y., Nakamura, H., Taira, M. and Sakata, H. (1996). Selectivity of the parietal visual neurones in 3D orientation of stereoscopic stimuli, Neuroreport 7, 2389-2394.
38. Viguier, A., Clement, G. and Trotter, Y. (2001). Distance perception within near visual space, Perception 30, 115-124.
39. Watt, S. J. and Bradshaw, M. F. (2000). Binocular cues control the grasp but not the reach in natural prehension movements, Neuropsychologia 38, 1473-1481.
40. Watt, S. J. and Bradshaw, M. F. (2002). Binocular information in the control of prehensile movements in multiple-object scenes, Spatial Vision 15, 141-156.
41. Watt, S. J. and Bradshaw, M. F. (2003). The visual control of reaching and grasping: binocular disparity and motion parallax, J. Exp. Psychol.: Human Perception and Performance 29, 404-415.
42. Wing, A. M., Turton, A. and Fraser, C. (1986). Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching, Journal of Motor Behavior 18, 245-260.
43. Woodworth, R. S. (1899). The accuracy of voluntary movement, Psychological Review 3, 1-119.
44. Yonas, A. and Granrud, C. E. (1985). Development of visual space perception in young infants, in: Neonate Cognition: Beyond the Blooming Buzzing Confusion, Mehler, J. and Fox, R. (Eds). Hillsdale, NJ.