A meta-analysis of the effects of face-to-face cooperative learning. Do recent studies falsify or verify earlier findings?

Educational Research Review

Volumn 10, Issue , 2013, Pages 133-149

  Kyndt, Eva ^a,b   Raes, Elisabeth ^b   Lismont, Bart ^b   Timmers, Fran ^b   Cascallar, Eduardo ^b   Dochy, Filip ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Achievement; Cooperative learning; Learning outcomes; Meta analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84887993552     PISSN: 1747938X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2013.02.002     Document Type: Review

References (114)

1. *Acar B., Tarhan L. Effect of cooperative learning strategies on students' understanding of concepts in electrochemistry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics 2007, 5:349-373. 10.1007/s10763-006-9046-7.
2. *Acar B., Tarhan L. Effects of cooperative learning on understanding of metallic bonding. Research in Science Education 2008, 38:401-420. 10.1007/s11165-007-9054-9.
3. *Adeyemi B.A. Effects of cooperative problem-solving strategies on junior secondary school students' achievement in social studies. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology 2008, 6:691-708.
4. *Almanza, T. (1997). The effects of the D.R.T.A. and cooperative learning strategies on reading comprehension (Unpublished Master's thesis). Kean College of New Jersey, USA. Retrieved on June 16th, 2011 from. http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED405565.pdf.
5. *Anderson W.L., Mitchell S.M., Osgood M.P. Comparison of student performance in cooperative learning and traditional lecture-based biochemistry classes. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 2005, 33:387-393. 10.1002/bmb.2005.49403306387.
6. *Aydin S. Effect of cooperative learning and traditional methods on students' achievements and identification of laboratory equipments in science technology laboratory course. Educational Research and Reviews 2011, 6:636-644.
7. *Bannerjee A.C., Vidyapati T.J. Effect of lecture and cooperative learning strategies on achievement in chemistry in undergraduates classes. International Journal of Science Education 1997, 19:903-910. 10.1080/0950069970190804.
8. *Bayraktar G. The effect of cooperative learning on students' approach to general gymnastics course and academic achievements. Educational Research and Review 2011, 6:62-71.
9. *Beck L.L., Chizik A.W. An experimental study of cooperative learning in CS1. Proceedings of the 39th SIGCSE technical symposium on computer science education 2008, 205-209. ACM Press, New York, USA. 10.1145/1352135.1352208.
10. *Beck L.L., Chizik A.W., McElroy A.C. Cooperative learning techniques in CS1: design and experimental evaluation. Proceedings of the 36th SIGCSE technical symposium on computer science education 2005, 470-474. ACM Press, New York, USA. 10.1145/1047344.1047495.
11. *Bilgin I., Geban O. The effect of cooperative learning approach based on conceptual change condition on students' understanding of chemical equilibrium concepts. Journal of Science Education and Technology 2006, 15:31-46. 10.1007/s10956-006-0354-z.
12. Bowen C.W. A quantitative literature review of cooperative learning effects on high school and college chemistry achievement. Journal of Chemical Education 2000, 77:116-119. 10.1021/ed077p116.
13. Bruffee K.A. Sharing our toys: Cooperative versus collaborative learning. Change 1995, 27:12-18.
14. Cooper H.M. Integrating research. A guide for literature reviews. Applied Social Research Methods Series 1989, Vol. 2. Sage Publications, London.
15. Cooper J., Prescott S., Cook L., Smith L., Mueck R. Cooperative learning and college instruction 1990, California State University, California.
16. Cox T., Lobel S., McLeod P. Effects of ethnic group cultural differences on cooperative and competitive behaviour on a group task. Academy of Management Journal 1991, 34:827-847. 10.2307/256391.
17. Decuyper S., Dochy F., Van den Bossche P. Grasping the dynamic complexity of team learning. An integrative systemic model for effective team learning. Educational Research Review 2010, 5:111-133. 10.1016/j.edurev.2010.02.002.
18. Dochy F., Segers M., Van den Bossche P., Gijbels D. Effects of problem based learning: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction 2002, 13:533-568. 10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00025-7.
19. Dochy F., Segers M., Van den Bossche P., Struyven K. Students' perceptions of a problem-based learning environment. Learning Environments Research: An International Journal 2005, 8:41-66. 10.1007/s10984-005-7948-x.
20. *Dougherty R.C., Bowen C.W., Berger T., Rees W., Mellon E.K., Pulliam E. Cooperative learning and enhanced communication: Effects on students' performance, retention, and attitudes in general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education 1995, 72:793-797. 10.1021/ed072p793.
21. *Doymus K. The effect of a cooperative learning strategy in the teaching of phase and one-component phase diagrams. Journal of Chemical Education 2007, 84:1857-1860. 10.1021/ed084p1857.
22. *Doymus K. Teaching chemical bonding through jigsaw cooperative learning. Research in Science & Technological Education 2008, 26:47-57. 10.1080/02635140701847470.
23. *Doymus K. Teaching chemical equilibrium with the jigsaw technique. Research in Science Education 2008, 38:249-260. 10.1007/s11165-007-9047-8.
24. *Durukan E. Effects of cooperative integrated reading and composition (CIRC) technique on reading-writing skills. Educational Research and Review 2011, 6:102-109.
25. Duval S., Tweedie R. Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 2000, 56:455-463.
26. Duval S., Tweedie R. A nonparametric "trim and fill" method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2000, 95:89-98.
27. Earley P.C. Social loafing and collectivism: A comparison of the United States and the People's Republic of China. Administrative Science Quarterly 1989, 34:565-581.
28. Earley P.C., Gibson C.B. Taking stock in our progress on individualism collectivism: 100years of solidarity and community. Journal of Management 1998, 24:265-304. 10.1177/014920639802400302.
29. Ellis, P. D. (2009). Effect size equations. Retrieved November 28th, 2012 from. http://www.polyu.edu.hk/mm/effectsizefaqs/effect_size_equations2.html.
30. Eysenck H.J. Systematic reviews: Meta-analysis and its problems. British Medical Journal 1994, 309:789-792. 10.1136/bmj.309.6957.789.
31. *Fernández-Santander A. Cooperative learning combined with short periods of lecturing: A good alternative in teaching biochemistry. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 2008, 36:34-38. 10.1002/bmb.20141.
32. Gall M.D., Borg W.R., Gall J.P. Educational research 1996, Longman, White Plains, NY. 6th ed.
33. *Ghaith G., El-Malak M.A. Effect of Jigsaw II on literal and higher order EFL reading comprehension. Educational Research and Education 2004, 10:105-115. 10.1076/edre.10.2.105.27906.
34. *Giraud G. Cooperative learning and statistics introduction. Journal of Statistics Education 1997, 5. Retrieved on March 12th, 2011 from www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v5n3/giraud.html.
35. *Gömleksiz M.N. Effectiveness of cooperative learning (jigsaw II) method in teaching English as a foreign language to engineering students. European Journal of Engineering Education 2007, 32:613-625. 10.1080/03043790701433343.
36. *Gonzalez G. A systematic approach to active and cooperative learning in CS1 and its effects on CS2. Proceedings of the 37th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education 2006, 133-137. ACM Press, New York, USA. 10.1145/1121341.1121386.
37. *Hänze M., Berger R. Cooperative learning, motivational effects, and student characteristics: An experimental study comparing cooperative learning and direct instruction in 12th grade physics classes. Learning and Instruction 2007, 17:29-41. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.11.004.
38. Hattie J. Visible Learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement 2009, Routledge, London.
39. Hedges L.V., Olkin I. Vote counting methods in research synthesis. Psychological Bulletin 1980, 88:359-369. 10.1037//0033-2909.88.2.359.
40. Hedges L.V., Olkin I. Statistical methods for meta-analysis 1985, Academic Press, London.
41. Higgins J.P.T. Commentary: Heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be expected and appropriately quantified. Journal of Epidemology 2008, 37:1158-1160.
42. *Ho F.F., Boo H.K. Cooperative learning: Exploring its effectiveness in the physics classroom. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching 2007, 8:1-7.
43. Hofstede G., Bond M.H. Hofstede's culture dimensions: An independent validation using Rokeach's value survey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 1984, 15:417-433. 10.1177/0022002184015004003.
44. *Hoxworth, S. L. (1999). The effects of cooperative learning on the social studies curriculum (Unpublished Master's Thesis). Johnson Bible College, Knoxville, Tenessee, USA. Retrieved on June 16th, 2011 from. http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED451102.pdf.
45. Hunter J.E., Schmidt F.L. Methods of meta-analysis. Correcting error and bias in research findings 1990, Sage Publications, California.
46. *Isik D., Tarim K. The effects of the cooperative learning method supported by multiple intelligence theory on Turkish elementary students' mathematics achievement. Asia Pacific Education Review 2009, 10:465-474. 10.1007/s12564-009-9049-5.
47. *Jalilifar A. The effects of cooperative learning techniques on college students' reading comprehension. System 2010, 38:96-108. 10.1016/j.system.2009.12.009.
48. Johnson D.W., Johnson R.T. Cooperation and competition: Theory and research 1989, Interaction Book Co, Edina, MN.
49. Johnson D.W., Johnson R.T. Making cooperative learning work. Theory into Practice 1999, 38:67-73.
50. Johnson D.W., Johnson R.T. An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher 2009, 38:365-379. 10.3102/0013189X09339057.
51. Johnson D.W., Johnson R.T., Smith K.A. Cooperative learning returns to college: What evidence is there that is works?. Change 1998, 30:26-35.
52. Johnson D.W., Johnson R.T., Smith K. The state of cooperative learning in postsecondary and professional settings. Educational Psychology Review 2007, 19:15-29. 10.1007/s10648-006-9038-8.
53. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Stanne, M. B. (2000). Cooperative learning methods: A meta-analysis. Retrieved June 16th, 2011 from. http://www.tablelearning.com/uploads/File/EXHIBIT-B.pdf.
54. Johnson D.W., Maruyama G., Johnson R.T., Nelson D., Skon L. Effects of cooperative, competitive and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 1981, 89:47-62.
55. *Johnston C.G., James R.H., Lye J.N., McDonald I.M. An evaluation of collaborative problem solving for learning economics. Journal of Economic Education 2000, 31:13-29.
56. *Jürgen-Lohmann J., Borsch F., Giesen H. Kooperatives lernen an der Hochschule: Evaluation des Gruppenpuzzles in Seminaren der Pädagogischen Psychologie [Coöperative learning at college: Evaluation of group puzzles in the seminars of educational psychology]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie 2001, 15(2):74-84.
57. *Khandker W.A., Abdulaziz E. Teaching introductory microeconomics with an in-class collaborative learning lab component. Journal of Economics 2000, 26:59-71.
58. *Kim, J. B., Cohen, A. S., Booske, J. H., & Derry, S. J. (1998). Application of cooperative learning in an introductory engineering course. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (San Diego, CA, April 13-17, 1998). Retrieved June 16th, 2011 from. http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED420218.pdf.
59. *Klinzing, H. G. (2003). Improving accuracy of decoding emotion from facial expressions by cooperative learning techniques. Two experimental studies. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Chicago, IL, April 21-25, 2003). Retrieved June 16th, 2011 from. http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED479373.pdf.
60. *Krol K., Janssen J., Veenman S., van der Linden J. Effects of a cooperative learning program on the elaborations of students working in dyads. Educational Research and Evaluation 2004, 10:205-237. 10.3102/00028312042001115.
61. *Kumar S., Harizuka S. Cooperative learning-based approach and development of learning awareness and achievement in mathematics in elementary school. Psychological Reports 1998, 82:587-591. 10.2466/PR0.82.2.587-591.
62. *Lampe J.R., Rooze G.E., Tallent-Runnels M. Effects of cooperative learning among Hispanic students. The Journal of Educational Research 1996, 89:187-191. 10.1080/00220671.1996.9941324.
63. *Law Y. Effects of cooperative learning on second graders' learning from text. Educational Psychology 2008, 28:567-582. 10.1080/01443410701880159.
64. *Leung C.D., Chung C. Student achievement in an educational technology course as enhanced by cooperative learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology 1997, 6:337-343. 10.1023/A:1022510513786.
65. Lou Y., Abrami P.C., Spence J.C., Poulson C., Chambers B., d'Apollonia S. Within-class grouping: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research 1996, 66:423-458. 10.3102/00346543066004423.
66. *Marburger D.R. Comparing student performance using cooperative learning. International Review of Economics Education 2005, 4:46-57. 10.1002/bmb.2005.49403306387.
67. Marín-Martínez F., Sánchez-Meca J. Weighting by inverse variance or by sample size in random-effects meta-analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement 2010, 70:56-73. 10.1177/0013164409344534.
68. *McDowell C., Werner L., Bullock H., Fernald J. The effects of pair programming on performance in an introductory programming course. Proceedings of the 33rd SIGCSE Technical symposium on computer science education 2002, 38-42. ACM Press, Cincinnati, KY, USA. 10.1145/563340.563353.
69. Newmann F., Thompson J.A. Effects of cooperative learning on achievement in secondary schools: a summary of research 1987, University of Wisconsin-Madison, National Center on Effective Secondary Schools, Madison, WI.
70. *Nichols J.D. The effects of cooperative learning on student achievement and motivation in a high school geometry class. Contemporary Educational Psychology 1996, 21:467-476. 10.1006/ceps.1996.0031.
71. Ollendick T., Schroeder C.S. Encyclopedia of clinical child and pediatric psychology 2003, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, NY.
72. *Onwuegbuzie A.J., DaRos-Voseles D.A. The role of cooperative learning in research methodology course: A mixed-methods analysis. Research in the Schools 2001, 8:61-75.
73. Panitz, T. (1996). A definition of collaborative vs co-operative learning. Retrieved on June 16th, 2011 from .
74. Pantic N., Wubbels T. Teacher competencies as a basis for teacher education - Views of Serbian teachers and teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education 2010, 26:694-703.
75. Parry S.R. The quest for competence. Training Magazine 1996, 8:48-56.
76. Phuong-Mai N., Terlouw C., Pilot A. Culturally appropriate pedagogy: The case of group learning in a Confucian heritage culture context. Intercultural Education 2006, 17:1-19. 10.1080/14675980500502172.
77. *Potthast M.J. Outcomes of using small-group cooperative learning experiences in introductory statistics courses. College Student Journal 1999, 33:34-42.
78. Pratkanis A.R., Breckler S.J., Greenwald A.G. Attitude, structure and function 1989, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
79. Qin Z., Johnson D.W., Johnson R.T. Cooperative versus competitive efforts and problem solving. Review of Educational Research 1995, 65:129-143. 10.3102/00346543065002129.
80. R Development Core Team R: A language and environment for statistical computing 2012, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, Retrieved on July 19th, 2012, from http://www.R-project.org/.
81. *Ross, M. C., Seaborn, A. W., & Wilson, E. K. (2002). Is cooperative learning a valuable instructional method for teaching social studies to urban African American students? Paper presented at the National Association of African and American Studies (Baton Rouge, LA). Retrieved June 16th, 2011 from. http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED480458.pdf.
82. Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments 2005, John Wiley, Chichester, UK. H.R. Rothstein, A.J. Sutton, M. Borenstein (Eds.).
83. *Sahin A. Effects of jigsaw II technique on academic achievement and attitudes to written expression course. Educational Research and Review 2010, 5:777-787.
84. *Shaaban K. An initial study of the effects of cooperative learning on reading comprehension, vocabulary acquisition, and motivation to read. Reading Psychology 2006, 27:377-403. 10.1080/02702710600846613.
85. *Shachar H., Fisher S. Cooperative learning and the achievement of motivation and perceptions of students in 11th grade chemistry classes. Learning and Instruction 2004, 14:69-87. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2003.10.003.
86. *Shibley I.A., Zimmaro D.M. The influence of collaborative learning on students' attitudes and performance in an introductory chemistry laboratory. Journal of Chemical Education 2002, 79:745-748. 10.1021/ed079p745.
87. *Singhanayok C., Hooper S. The effects of cooperative learning and learner control on students' achievement, option selections, and attitudes. Educational Technology Research and Development 1998, 46:17-36. 10.1007/BF02299787.
88. Slavin R.E. When does cooperative learning increase student achievement?. Psychological Bulletin 1983, 94:429-445.
89. Slavin R.E. Research on cooperative learning: An international perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 1989, 33:231-243.
90. Slavin R.E. Cooperative learning: Theory, research and practice 1990, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
91. Slavin R.E. Education for all 1996, Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse.
92. Sosik J.J., Jung D.I. Work-group characteristics and performance in collectivistic and individualistic cultures. The Journal of Social Psychology 2002, 142:5-23. 10.1080/00224540209603881.
93. *Souvignier E., Kronenburger J. Cooperative learning in third graders' jigsaw groups for mathematics and science with and without question training. British Journal of Educational Psychology 2007, 77:755-771. 10.1348/000709906X173297.
94. Springer L., Stanne M.E., Donovan S.S. Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research 1999, 69:21-52. 10.2307/1170643.
95. *Stevens R.J. Student team reading and writing: A cooperative learning approach to middle school literacy instruction. Educational Research and Evaluation 2003, 9:137-160. 10.1076/edre.9.2.137.14212.
96. *Stevens R.J., Slavin R.E. Effects of a cooperative learning approach in reading and writing on academically handicapped and non-handicapped students. The Elementary School Journal 1995, 95:241-262.
97. *Stevens R.J., Slavin R.E. The cooperative elementary school: Effects on students' achievement, attitudes, and social relations. American Educational Research Journal 1995, 32:321-351.
98. Struyven K., De Meyst M. Competence-based teacher education: Illusion or reality? An assessment of the implementation status in Flanders from teachers' and students' points of view. Teaching and Teacher education 2010, 26:1495-1510.
99. *Tan I.G.C., Sharan S., Lee C.K.E. Group investigation effects on achievement, motivation, and perceptions of students in Singapore. The Journal of Educational Research 2007, 100:142-154. 10.3200/JOER.100.3.142-154.
100. *Tanel Z., Erol M. Effects of cooperative learning on instructing magnetism: Analysis of an experimental teaching sequence. Latin American Journal of Physical Education 2008, 2:124-136.
101. *Tarim K., Akdeniz F. The effects of cooperative learning on Turkish elementary students' mathematics achievement and attitude against mathematics using TAI en STAD methods. Educational Studies in Mathematics 2008, 67:77-91. 10.1007/s10649-007-9088-y.
102. *Terenzini P.T., Cabrera A.F., Colbeck C.L., Parente J.M., Bjorklund S.A. Collaborative learning vs. lecture/discussion: Students' reported learning gains. Journal of Engineering Education 2001, 90:123-130.
103. Thanh P.T.H., Gillies R., Renshaw P. Cooperative learning and academic achievement of Asian students: A true story. International Education Studies 2008, 1:83-88.
104. *Thompson, M., & Pledger, L. (1998). Cooperative learning versus traditional lecture format: A preliminary study. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the National Communication Association (84th, New York, NY, November 19-24, 1998). Retrieved June 16th, 2011 from. http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED426418.pdf.
105. Triandis H.C. The self and social behavior in differing social contexts. Psychological Review 1989, 96:506-520.
106. Triandis H.C. Cross-cultural industrial and organizational psychology. Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology 1994, 103-172. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA. M.D. Dunette, L. Hough (Eds.).
107. Van den Bussche E., Van den Noortgate W., Reynvoet B. Mechanisms of masked priming: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 2009, 135:452-477. 10.1037/a0015329.
108. Van Dinther, M., Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Braeken, J. (submitted for publication). The construct validity and predictive validity of a self-efficacy measure for student teachers in competence-based education.
109. Viechtbauer W. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software 2010, 36:1-48.
110. Wageman R. Interdependence and group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly 1995, 40:145-180.
111. Wagner J.A. Studies of individualism-collectivism: Effects on cooperation in groups. Academy of Management Journal 1995, 38:152-170.
112. *Whicker K.M., Bol L., Nunnery J.A. Cooperative learning in the secondary mathematics classroom. The Journal of Educational Research 1997, 91:42-48.
113. *Wilson, C. E. (1996). The effects of cooperative learning and teaching strategies on student achievement with implications for faculty in-service education. Retrieved June 16th, 2011 from. http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED395622.pdf.
114. *Yamarik S. Does cooperative learning improve student learning outcomes. The Journal of Economic Education 2007, 38:259-277.