Chromosome missegregation rate predicts whether aneuploidy will promote or suppress tumors

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 110, Issue 44, 2013, Pages

  Silk, Alain D ^a,b,c   Zasadil, Lauren M ^b,d   Holland, Andrew J ^a   Vitre, Benjamin ^a   Cleveland, Don W ^a   Weaver, Beth A ^b,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Department of Dermatology ^*  (United States)

^c OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Molecular Pharmacology Training Program   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CENTROMERE PROTEIN E; PROTEIN MAD2; PROTEIN MLH1;

ANEUPLOIDY; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CARCINOGENESIS; CELL DEATH; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; M PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; MICROSATELLITE INSTABILITY; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ARF; CIN; MAD2; SPINDLE ASSEMBLY CHECKPOINT;

ANEUPLOIDY; ANIMALS; CELL DEATH; CELLS, CULTURED; CHROMOSOMAL INSTABILITY; CHROMOSOMAL PROTEINS, NON-HISTONE; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; FLUORESCENT ANTIBODY TECHNIQUE; MAD2 PROTEINS; MICE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NEOPLASMS; TIME-LAPSE IMAGING;

EID: 84887040158     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1317042110     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. von Hansemann D (1890) Ueber asymmetrische Zelltheilung in Epithelkrebsen und deren biologische Bedeutung. Virchow's Arch. Path. Anat.119:299-326.
2. Boveri T (1902) Ueber mehrpolige Mitosen als Mittel zur Analyse des Zellkerns [On multipolar mitosis as a means of analysis of the cell nucleus]. Vehr. d. phys. med. Ges. zu Wurzburg, N.F. German. Available at http://8e.devbio.com/article.php?ch=4&id=24.
3. Boveri T (1914) The Origin of Malignant Tumors; trans Boveri M (1929). (Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore).
4. Kops GJ, Foltz DR, Cleveland DW (2004) Lethality to human cancer cells through massive chromosome loss by inhibition of the mitotic checkpoint. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(23):8699-8704.
5. Michel L, et al. (2004) Complete loss of the tumor suppressor MAD2 causes premature cyclin B degradation and mitotic failure in human somatic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(13):4459-4464.
6. Ganem NJ, Godinho SA, Pellman D (2009) A mechanism linking extra centrosomes to chromosomal instability. Nature 460(7252):278-282.
7. Kim Y, Heuser JE, Waterman CM, Cleveland DW (2008) CENP-E combines a slow, processive motor and a flexible coiled coil to produce an essential motile kinetochore tether. J Cell Biol 181(3):411-419.
8. Wood KW, Sakowicz R, Goldstein LS, Cleveland DW (1997) CENP-E is a plus enddirected kinetochore motor required for metaphase chromosome alignment. Cell 91(3):357-366.
9. Brown KD, Coulson RM, Yen TJ, Cleveland DW (1994) Cyclin-like accumulation and loss of the putative kinetochore motor CENP-E results from coupling continuous synthesis with specific degradation at the end of mitosis. J Cell Biol 125(6): 1303-1312.
10. McEwen BF, et al. (2001) CENP-E is essential for reliable bioriented spindle attachment, but chromosome alignment can be achieved via redundant mechanisms in mammalian cells. Mol Biol Cell 12(9):2776-2789.
11. Putkey FR, et al. (2002) Unstable kinetochore-microtubule capture and chromosomal instability following deletion of CENP-E. Dev Cell 3(3):351-365.
12. Gudimchuk N, et al. (2013) Kinetochore kinesin CENP-E facilitates end-on microtubule attachment. Nat Cell Biol 15(9):1079-1088.
13. Weaver BA, Silk AD, Montagna C, Verdier-Pinard P, Cleveland DW (2007) Aneuploidy acts both oncogenically and as a tumor suppressor. Cancer Cell 11(1):25-36.
14. Abrieu A, Kahana JA, Wood KW, Cleveland DW (2000) CENP-E as an essential component of the mitotic checkpoint in vitro. Cell 102(6):817-826.
15. Weaver BA, et al. (2003) Centromere-associated protein-E is essential for the mammalian mitotic checkpoint to prevent aneuploidy due to single chromosome loss. J Cell Biol 162(4):551-563.
16. Rieder CL, Schultz A, Cole R, Sluder G (1994) Anaphase onset in vertebrate somatic cells is controlled by a checkpoint that monitors sister kinetochore attachment to the spindle. J Cell Biol 127(5):1301-1310.
17. Rieder CL, Cole RW, Khodjakov A, Sluder G (1995) The checkpoint delaying anaphase in response to chromosome monoorientation is mediated by an inhibitory signal produced by unattached kinetochores. J Cell Biol 130(4):941-948.
18. Fu Z, et al. (2009) Deficiencies in Chfr and Mlh1 synergistically enhance tumor susceptibility in mice. J Clin Invest 119(9):2714-2724.
19. Shoemaker AR, et al. (2000) Mlh1 deficiency enhances several phenotypes of Apc (Min)/+ mice. Oncogene 19(23):2774-2779.
20. de Wind N, Dekker M, van Rossum A, van der Valk M, te Riele H (1998) Mouse models for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Cancer Res 58(2):248-255.
21. Duncan AW, et al. (2010) The ploidy conveyor of mature hepatocytes as a source of genetic variation. Nature 467(7316):707-710.
22. Duncan AW, et al. (2012) Frequent aneuploidy among normal human hepatocytes. Gastroenterology 142(1):25-28.
23. Han J-S, et al. (2013) Catalytic assembly of the mitotic checkpoint inhibitor BubR1- Cdc20 by a Mad2-induced functional switch in Cdc20. Mol Cell 51(1):92-104.
24. Dobles M, Liberal V, Scott ML, Benezra R, Sorger PK (2000) Chromosome missegregation and apoptosis in mice lacking the mitotic checkpoint protein Mad2. Cell 101(6):635-645.
25. Michel LS, et al. (2001) MAD2 haplo-insufficiency causes premature anaphase and chromosome instability in mammalian cells. Nature 409(6818):355-359.
26. Sherr CJ (2001) Parsing Ink4a/Arf: "Pure" p16-null mice. Cell 106(5):531-534.
27. Hernando E, et al. (2004) Rb inactivation promotes genomic instability by uncoupling cell cycle progression from mitotic control. Nature 430(7001):797-802.
28. Lentini L, Pipitone L, Di Leonardo A (2002) Functional inactivation of pRB results in aneuploid mammalian cells after release from a mitotic block. Neoplasia 4(5): 380-387.
29. Piboonniyom SO, et al. (2003) Abrogation of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor checkpoint during keratinocyte immortalization is not sufficient for induction of centrosome-mediated genomic instability. Cancer Res 63(2):476-483.
30. Baker DJ, et al. (2008) Opposing roles for p16Ink4a and p19Arf in senescence and ageing caused by BubR1 insufficiency. Nat Cell Biol 10(7):825-836.
31. Lengauer C, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B (1997) Genetic instability in colorectal cancers. Nature 386(6625):623-627.
32. Söreide K, Janssen EA, Söiland H, Körner H, Baak JP (2006) Microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 93(4):395-406.
33. Rowland BD, Peeper DS (2006) KLF4, p21 and context-dependent opposing forces in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 6(1):11-23.
34. Serrano M, Lin AW, McCurrach ME, Beach D, Lowe SW (1997) Oncogenic ras provokes premature cell senescence associated with accumulation of p53 and p16INK4a. Cell 88(5):593-602.
35. Evan GI, et al. (1992) Induction of apoptosis in fibroblasts by c-myc protein. Cell 69(1): 119-128.
36. Bringold F, Serrano M (2000) Tumor suppressors and oncogenes in cellular senescence. Exp Gerontol 35(3):317-329.
37. Baker DJ, et al. (2004) BubR1 insufficiency causes early onset of aging-associated phenotypes and infertility in mice. Nat Genet 36(7):744-749.
38. Janssen A, Kops GJ, Medema RH (2009) Elevating the frequency of chromosome missegregation as a strategy to kill tumor cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(45): 19108-19113.
39. Hardy K, Handyside AH, Winston RM (1989) The human blastocyst: Cell number, death and allocation during late preimplantation development in vitro. Development 107(3):597-604.
40. Fuchs Y, Steller H (2011) Programmed cell death in animal development and disease. Cell 147(4):742-758.
41. Penaloza C, Lin L, Lockshin RA, Zakeri Z (2006) Cell death in development: Shaping the embryo. Histochem Cell Biol 126(2):149-158.
42. Jeganathan K, Malureanu L, Baker DJ, Abraham SC, van Deursen JM (2007) Bub1 mediates cell death in response to chromosome missegregation and acts to suppress spontaneous tumorigenesis. J Cell Biol 179(2):255-267.
43. Iwanaga Y, et al. (2007) Heterozygous deletion of mitotic arrest-deficient protein 1 (MAD1) increases the incidence of tumors in mice. Cancer Res 67(1):160-166.
44. Baker DJ, Jin F, Jeganathan KB, van Deursen JM (2009) Whole chromosome instability caused by Bub1 insufficiency drives tumorigenesis through tumor suppressor gene loss of heterozygosity. Cancer Cell 16(6):475-486.
45. Li M, et al. (2010) The ATM-p53 pathway suppresses aneuploidy-induced tumorigenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(32):14188-14193.
46. Chi YH, Ward JM, Cheng LI, Yasunaga J, Jeang KT (2009) Spindle assembly checkpoint and p53 deficiencies cooperate for tumorigenesis in mice. Int J Cancer 124(6): 1483-1489.
47. Ricke RM, van Ree JH, van Deursen JM (2008) Whole chromosome instability and cancer: A complex relationship. Trends Genet 24(9):457-466.
48. Holland AJ, Cleveland DW (2009) Boveri revisited: Chromosomal instability, aneuploidy and tumorigenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10(7):478-487.
49. Ricke RM, Jeganathan KB, Malureanu L, Harrison AM, van Deursen JM (2012) Bub1 kinase activity drives error correction and mitotic checkpoint control but not tumor suppression. J Cell Biol 199(6):931-949.
50. Malureanu L, et al. (2010) Cdc20 hypomorphic mice fail to counteract de novo synthesis of cyclin B1 in mitosis. J Cell Biol 191(2):313-329.
51. Baker DJ, et al. (2006) Early aging-associated phenotypes in Bub3/Rae1 haploinsufficient mice. J Cell Biol 172(4):529-540.
52. Mukherjee M, et al. (2011) Separase loss of function cooperates with the loss of p53 in the initiation and progression of T- and B-cell lymphoma, leukemia and aneuploidy in mice. PLoS ONE 6(7):e22167.
53. Wood KW, et al. (2010) Antitumor activity of an allosteric inhibitor of centromereassociated protein-E. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(13):5839-5844.
54. Parrinello S, et al. (2003) Oxygen sensitivity severely limits the replicative lifespan of murine fibroblasts. Nat Cell Biol 5(8):741-747.
55. Blose SH, Meltzer DI, Feramisco JR (1984) 10-nm filaments are induced to collapse in living cells microinjected with monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies against tubulin. J Cell Biol 98(3):847-858.