Board Age and Gender Diversity: A Test of Competing Linear and Curvilinear Predictions

Journal of Business Ethics

Volumn 125, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 497-512

  Ali, Muhammad ^a   Ng, Yin Lu ^b   Kulik, Carol T ^c  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^b HELP UNIVERSITY   (Malaysia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Age diversity; Board diversity; Competing predictions; Gender diversity; Performance

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886012745     PISSN: 01674544     EISSN: 15730697     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-013-1930-9     Document Type: Article

References (120)

1. Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics,94, 291–309.
2. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.
3. Alexander, J., Nuchols, B., Bloom, J., & Lee, S.-Y. (1995). Organizational demography and turnover: An examination of multiform and nonlinear heterogeneity. Human Relations,48, 1455–1480.
4. Ali, M., Kulik, C. T., & Metz, I. (2011). The gender diversity–performance relationship in services and manufacturing organizations. International Journal of Human Resource Management,22, 1464–1485.
5. Armstrong, J. S., Brodie, R. J., & Parsons, A. G. (2001). Hypotheses in marketing science: Literature review and publication audit. Marketing Letters,12, 171–187.
6. Australian Institute of Company Directors. (2011). What is the company directors corporate governance framework? Retrieved June 17, 2013, from http://www.companydirectors.com.au.
7. Australian Institute of Company Directors. (2012a). Appointments to Australian securities exchange 200 boards. Retrieved July 5, 2013, from http://www.companydirectors.com.au.
8. Australian Institute of Company Directors. (2012b). ASX 200 snapshot report. Retrieved July 5, 2013, from http://www.companydirectors.com.au.
9. Australian Securities Exchange. (2010). Corporate governance principles and recommendations with 2010 amendments. In ASX Corporate Governance Council (2nd ed.). Retrieved July 5, 2013, from http://www.asxgroup.com.au.
10. Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics,97, 207–221.
11. Becker, T. E. (2005). Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research: A qualitative analysis with recommendations. Organizational Research Methods,8, 274–289.
12. Bilimoria, D. (2006). The relationship between women corporate directors and women corporate officers. Journal of Managerial Issues,18, 47–61.
13. Blalock, H. M. (1967). Toward a theory of minority-group relations. New York: Wiley.
14. Blau, P. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure. New York: The Free Press.
15. Bøhren, Ø., & Strøm, R. Ø. (2010). Governance and politics: Regulating independence and diversity in the board room. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting,37, 1281–1308.
16. Bonn, I. (2004). Board structure and firm performance: Evidence from Australia. Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management,10(1), 14–24.
17. Bonn, I., Toru, Y., & Phillip, H. P. (2004). Effects of board structure on firm performance: A comparison between Japan and Australia. Asian Business and Management,3(1), 105–125.
18. Brammer, S., Millington, A., & Pavelin, S. (2007). Gender and ethnic diversity among UK corporate boards. Corporate Governance: An International Review,15, 393–403.
19. Branson, D. M. (2012). Initiatives to place women on corporate boards of directors: A global snapshot. Journal of Corporation Law,37, 793–814.
20. Brewer, M. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin,86, 307–324.
21. Brown, R. J., & Turner, J. C. (1981). Interpersonal and intergroup behaviour. In J. Turner & H. Giles (Eds.), Intergroup behaviour (pp. 33–65). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
22. Buckingham, A., & Saunders, P. (2004). The survey methods workbook. Cambridge: Polity Press.
23. Burgess, Z., & Tharenou, P. (2002). Women board directors: Characteristics of the few. Journal of Business Ethics,37, 39–49.
24. Campbell, K., & Mínguez-Vera, A. (2008). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics,83, 435–451.
25. Carroll, A. B., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2011). Business and society: Ethics, sustainability, and stakeholder management. Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.
26. Carter, D. A., D’Souza, F., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2010). The gender and ethnic diversity of US boards and board committees and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review,18, 396–414.
27. Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. The Financial Review,38(1), 33–53.
28. Chatman, J. A., & Flynn, F. J. (2001). The influence of demographic heterogeneity on the emergence and consequences of cooperative norms in work teams. Academy of Management Journal,44, 956–974.
29. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. Commonwealth of Australia. (2004). Age Discrimination Act. 2012. Retrieved July 5, 2013, from http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis.
31. Cortina, J. M., & Landis, R. S. (2009). When small effect sizes tell a big story, and when large effect sizes don’t. In C. E. Lance & R. J. Vandenberg (Eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity, and fable in the organizational and social sciences (pp. 287–308). New York: Routledge.
32. Cotter, A.-M. M. (2004). Gender injustice: An international comparative analysis of equality in employment. Hants: Ashgate.
33. Deloitte. (2011). Women in the boardroom: A global perspective. Retrieved July 5, 2013, from http://www.deloitte.com.
34. Dobbin, F., & Jung, J. (2011). Corporate board gender diversity and stock performance: The competence gap or institutional investor bias? North Carolina Law Review,89, 809–838.
35. Ellemers, N., Rink, F., Derks, B., & Ryan, M. K. (2012). Women in high places: When and why promoting women into top positions can harm them individually or as a group (and how to prevent this). Research in Organizational Behavior,32(2012), 163–187.
36. Fredette, C., Inglis, S., & Bradshaw, P. (2006). Moving to transformational inclusivity and board diversity. In Proceedings of the annual conference of the Administrative Sciences Association of Canada, Ottawa.
37. Godthelp, M., & Glunk, U. (2003). Turnover at the top: Demographic diversity as a determinant of executive turnover in The Netherlands. European Management Journal,21, 614–625.
38. Goldman Sachs. (2009). Australia’s hidden resource: The economic case for increasing female participation. Retrieved July 7, 2013, from http://www.asxgroup.com.au.
39. Graham, J. F., Stendardi, E. J., Jr., Myers, J. K., & Graham, M. J. (2002). Gender differences in investment strategies: An information processing perspective. International Journal of Bank Marketing,20, 17–26.
40. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology,75, 1360–1380.
41. Grosvold, J., Brammer, S., & Rayton, B. (2007). Board diversity in the United Kingdom and Norway: An exploratory analysis. Business Ethics: A European Review,16, 344–357.
42. Hafsi, T., & Turgut, G. (2013). Boardroom diversity and its effect on social performance: Conceptualization and empirical evidence. Journal of Business Ethics,112, 463–479.
43. Hannan, E., & Gluyas, R. (2012). Productivity gap “holding back growth” as survey ranks Australia second last. The Australian. Retrieved July 10, 2013, from http://www.theaustralian.com.au.
44. Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007). What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review,32, 1199–1228.
45. Haslam, S. A., Ryan, M. K., Kulich, C., Trojanowski, G., & Atkins, C. (2010). Investing with prejudice: The relationship between women’s presence on company boards and objective and subjective measures of company performance. British Journal of Management,21, 484–497.
46. Hatfield, S. (2002). Understanding the four generations to enhance workplace management. AFP Exchange,22, 72–74.
47. Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A., Jr., & Harris, I. C. (2002). Women and racial minorities in the boardroom: How do directors differ? Journal of Management,28, 747–763.
48. Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A., Jr., & Paetzold, R. L. (2000). The resource dependence role of corporate directors: Strategic adaptation of board composition in response to environmental change. Journal of Management Studies,37, 235–255.
49. Hillman, A. J., Shropshire, C., & Cannella, A. A., Jr. (2007). Organizational predictors of women on corporate boards. Academy of Management Journal,50, 941–952.
50. Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2009). Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management,35, 1404–1427.
51. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills: Sage.
52. Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal,38, 635–672.
53. Ibarra, H. (1992). Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly,37, 422–447.
54. Jackson, S. E., Brett, J. F., Sessa, V. I., Cooper, D. M., Julin, J. A., & Peyronnin, K. (1991). Some differences make a difference: Individual dissimilarity and group heterogeneity as correlates of recruitment, promotions, and turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology,76, 675–679.
55. Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly,44, 741–763.
56. Jhunjhunwala, S., & Mishra, R. K. (2012). Board diversity and corporate performance: The Indian evidence. IUP Journal of Corporate Governance,11(3), 71–79.
57. Kang, H., Cheng, M., & Gray, S. J. (2007). Corporate governance and board composition: Diversity and independence of Australian boards. Corporate Governance: An International Review,15(2), 194–207.
58. Knouse, S. B., & Dansby, M. R. (1999). Percentage of work-group diversity and work-group effectiveness. The Journal of Psychology,133, 486–494.
59. Konrad, A. M., Kramer, V., & Erkut, S. (2008). Critical mass: The impact of three or more women on corporate boards. Organizational Dynamics,37(2), 145–164.
60. Konrad, A. M., & Mangel, R. (2000). The impact of work-life programs on firm productivity. Strategic Management Journal,21, 1225–1237.
61. Kravitz, D. A. (2003). More women in the workplace: Is there a payoff in firm performance? Academy of Management Executive,17(3), 148–149.
62. Kurtulus, F. A., & Tomaskovic-Devey, D. (2012). Do women managers help women advance? A panel study using EEO-1 records. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,639(1), 173–197.
63. Lau, D. C., & Murnighan, J. K. (1998). Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Review,23, 325–340.
64. Lawrence, B. S. (1984). Age grading: The implicit organizational timetable. Journal of Occupational Behaviour,5, 23–35.
65. Li, J., Chu, C. W. L., Lam, K. C. K., & Liao, S. (2011). Age diversity and firm performance in an emerging economy: Implications for cross-cultural human resource management. Human Resource Management,50, 247–270.
66. Loden, M., & Rosener, J. B. (1991). Workforce America! Managing employee diversity as a vital resource. Homewood, IL: Business One Irwin.
67. Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review,21, 135–172.
68. Luthar, H. K., DiBattista, R. A., & Gautschi, T. (1997). Perception of what the ethical climate is and what it should be: The role of gender, academic status, and ethical education. Journal of Business Ethics,16, 205–217.
69. Mahadeo, J., Soobaroyen, T., & Hanuman, V. (2012). Board composition and financial performance: Uncovering the effects of diversity in an emerging economy. Journal of Business Ethics,105, 375–388.
70. Mattis, M. C. (2000). Women corporate directors in the United States. In R. J. Burke & M. C. Mattis (Eds.), Women on corporate boards of directors: International challenges and opportunities (pp. 43–56). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
71. Menard, S. (1991). Longitudinal research. Newbury Park: Sage.
72. Mercer. (2012). Workforce diversity strategies focused on gender ahead of age, ethnicity. Retrieved July 9, 2013, from http://m.mercer.com/press-releases/1463605?detail=D.
73. Miller, T., & Triana, M. D. C. (2009). Demographic diversity in the boardroom: Mediators of the board diversity–firm performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies,46, 755–786.
74. Nguyen, H., & Faff, R. (2006). Impact of board size and board diversity on firm value: Australian evidence. Corporate Ownership & Control,4, 24–32.
75. Nielsen, S., & Huse, M. (2010). The contribution of women on boards of directors: Going beyond the surface. Corporate Governance: An International Review,18, 136–148.
76. Osiris. (2012). User guide. Retrieved July 11, 2013, from https://webhelp.bvdep.com.
77. Pelled, L. H. (1996). Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervention process theory. Organization Science,7, 615–631.
78. Perry-Smith, J. E., & Blum, T. C. (2000). Work-family human resource bundles and perceived organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal,43, 1107–1117.
79. Peterson, C. A., & Philpot, J. (2007). Women’s roles on U.S. fortune 500 boards: Director expertise and committee memberships. Journal of Business Ethics,72, 177–196.
80. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource-dependence perspective. New York: Harper and Row.
81. Rhode, D. L., & Packel, A. K. (2010). Diversity on corporate boards: How much differences does difference make? Rock Center for Corporate Governance, Working Paper No. 89, Stanford University, Sept 2010.
82. Richard, O. C., Kirby, S. L., & Chadwick, K. (2013). The impact of racial and gender diversity in management on financial performance: How participative strategy making features can unleash a diversity advantage. The International Journal of Human Resource Management,24, 2571–2582.
83. Richard, O. C., Kochan, T. A., & McMillan-Capehart, A. (2002). The impact of visible diversity on organizational effectiveness: Disclosing the contents in Pandora’s black box. Journal of Business and Management,8, 265–291.
84. Richard, O. C., McMillan, A., Chadwick, K., & Dwyer, S. (2003). Employing an innovative strategy in racially diverse workforces: Effects on firm performance. Group and Organization Management,28, 107–126.
85. Richard, O. C., Murthi, B. P. S., & Ismail, K. (2007). The impact of racial diversity on intermediate and long-term performance: The moderating role of environmental context. Strategic Management Journal,28, 1213–1233.
86. Rogelberg, S. G., & Rumery, S. M. (1996). Gender diversity, team decision quality, time on task, and interpersonal cohesion. Small Group Research,27, 79–90.
87. Rowe, D. (2007). Education for a sustainable future. Science, 317(July), 323–324. Retrieved July 5, 2013, from http://shadesofgreenweb.org/dancingflames/EnvSci/Articles/EnvScipdffiles/sustainability/TeachingSustainability.pdf.
88. Schwartz-Ziv, M. (2012). Does the gender of directors matter? 1–63. Retrieved July 11, 2013, from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3.
89. Shand, F. (2012, December 18). Diversity the answer for boardrooms. The Age. Retrieved July 5, 2013, from http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/politics/.
90. Shapcott, K. M., Carron, A. V., Burke, S. M., Bradshaw, M. H., & Estabrooks, P. A. (2006). Member diversity and cohesion and performance in walking groups. Small Group Research,37, 701–720.
91. Shrader, C. B., Blackburn, V. B., & Iles, P. (1997). Women in management and firm financial performance. Journal of Managerial Issues,9, 355–372.
92. Shukeri, S. N., Ong, W. S., & Shaari, M. S. (2012). Does board of director’s characteristics affect firm performance? Evidence from Malaysian public listed companies. International Business Research,5, 120–127.
93. Siciliano, J. I. (1996). The relationship of board member diversity to organizational performance. Journal of Business Ethics,15, 1313–1320.
94. Simpson, W. G., Carter, D. A., & D’Souza, F. (2010). What do we know about women on boards? Journal of Applied Finance,20(2), 27–39.
95. South, S. J., Bonjean, C. M., Markham, W. T., & Corder, J. (1982). Social structure and intergroup interaction: Men and women of the federal bureaucracy. American Sociological Review,47, 587–599.
96. Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,87, 355–374.
97. Srinidhi, B., Gul, F. A., & Tsui, J. (2011). Female directors and earnings quality. Contemporary Accounting Research,28, 1610–1644.
98. Stendardi, E. J., Graham, J. F., & O’Reilly, M. (2006). The impact of gender on the personal financial planning process: Should financial advisors tailor their process to the gender of the client? Humanomics,22, 223–238.
99. Stephenson, C. (2004). Leveraging diversity to maximum advantage: The business case for appointing more women to boards. Ivey Business Journal,69, 1–5.
100. Strachan, G., Burgess, J., & Sullivan, A. (2004). Affirmative action or managing diversity: What is the future of equal opportunity policies in organisations? Women in Management Review,19, 196–204.
101. Strachan, G., French, E., & Burgess, J. (2010). Managing diversity in Australia: Theory and practice. Sydney: McGraw-Hill.
102. Stuart, D. (2009, July). Tapping into the fountain of youth. Company Director Magazine. Retrieved July 9, 2013, from http://www.companydirectors.com.au.
103. Sweeney, P. (2012). Doing something right: Focusing on exceptional boards. Financial Executive,28(7), 33–36.
104. Tajfel, H. (1978). Social categorization, social identity and social comparison. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 61–76). London: Academic Press.
105. Terjesen, S., Sealy, R., & Singh, V. (2009). Women directors on corporate boards: A review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review,17(3), 320–337.
106. Terjesen, S., & Singh, V. (2008). Female presence on corporate boards: A multi-country study of environmental context. Journal of Business Ethics,83, 55–63.
107. Torchia, M., Calabrò, A., & Huse, M. (2011). Women directors on corporate boards: From tokenism to critical mass. Journal of Business Ethics,102, 299–317.
108. Triandis, H. C., Kurowski, L. L., & Gelfand, M. J. (1994). Workplace diversity. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 4, pp. 769–827). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.
109. Tuggle, C. S., Sirmon, D. G., & Bierman, L. (2011). From seats at the table to voices in the discussion: Exploring the effects of proportional representation and prestige on minority directors’ participation in board meeting discussions. In Conference on corporate governance, Missouri University, Columbia.
110. Turner, J., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
111. Twenge, J. M., Campbell, S. M., Hoffman, B. J., & Lance, C. E. (2010). Generational differences in work values: Leisure and extrinsic values increasing, social and intrinsic values decreasing. Journal of Management,36, 1117–1142.
112. US Securities and Exchange Commission. (2012). Proxy disclosure enhancements. Retrieved July 9, 2013, from http://www.sec.gov/rules/final/2009/33-9089-secg.htm.
113. van der Walt, N., & Ingley, C. (2003). Board dynamics and the influence of professional background, gender and ethnic diversity of directors. Corporate Governance: An International Review,11, 218–234.
114. van Knippenberg, D., Dawson, J. F., West, M. A., & Homan, A. C. (2011). Diversity faultlines, shared objectives, and top management team performance. Human Relations,64, 307–336.
115. van Knippenberg, D., & Schippers, M. C. (2007). Work group diversity. Annual Review of Psychology,58, 515–541.
116. Wang, Y., & Clift, B. (2009). Is there a “business case” for board diversity? Pacific Accounting Review,21(2), 88–103.
117. Wang, J., & Coffey, B. S. (1992). Board composition and corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics,11, 771–778.
118. Williams, R. J. (2003). Women on corporate boards of directors and their influence on corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics,42, 1–10.
119. Workplace Gender Equality Agency. (2012a). WGE Act at a glance. Retrieved July 11, 2013, from http://www.wgea.gov.au.
120. Workplace Gender Equality Agency. (2012b). WGE Act: What reporting organisations need to know. Retrieved July 11, 2013, from http://www.wgea.gov.au.