Boardroom Diversity and its Effect on Social Performance: Conceptualization and Empirical Evidence

Journal of Business Ethics

Volumn 112, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 463-479

  Hafsi, Taïeb ^a   Turgut, Gokhan ^a  

^a HEC MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Board of directors; Boardroom diversity; Corporate social performance; Corporate social responsibility; Gender diversity; KLD; Racial diversity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84872795771     PISSN: 01674544     EISSN: 15730697     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-012-1272-z     Document Type: Article

References (130)

1. Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291-309.
2. Aguilera, R. V., & Jackson, G. (2010). Comparative and international corporate governance. The Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 485-556.
3. Alexander, J. A., Fennell, M. L., & Halpern, M. T. (1993). Leadership instability in hospitals: The influence of board-CEO relations and organizational growth and decline. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(1), 74-99.
4. Barnea, A., & Rubin, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1), 71-86.
5. Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2), 207-221.
6. Bebchuk, L., Cohen, A., & Ferrell, A. (2009). What matters in corporate governance? Review of Financial Studies, 22(2), 783.
7. Bekiroglu, C., Erdil, O., & Alpkan, L. (2011). Variables perceived by managers as antecedents to environmental management: An empirical study in the Turkish construction sector. Journal of Global Strategic Management, 9, 157-175.
8. BenAmar, W., Francoeur, C., Hafsi, T., & Labelle, R. (2011). What makes better boards: A closer look at diversity and ownership. British Journal of Management. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467-8551. 2011. 00789. x.
9. Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S., & Jones, T. M. (1999). Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 488-506.
10. Bhagat, S., & Black, B. (2001). The non-correlation between board independence and long-term firm performance. Journal of Corporation Law, 27, 231-273.
11. Bilimoria, D., & Piderit, S. K. (1994). Qualifications of corporate board committee members. Group & Organization Management, 19(3), 334.
12. Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social responsibilities of the businessman. New York: Harper and Row.
13. Brown, B., & Perry, S. (1994). Removing the financial performance halo from fortune's "most admired" companies. Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), 1347-1359.
14. Burgess, Z., & Tharenou, P. (2002). Women board directors: Characteristics of the few. Journal of Business Ethics, 37(1), 39-49.
15. Byrne, D. E. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
16. Carpenter, M. A., Geletkanycz, M. A., & Sanders, W. (2004). Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. Journal of Management, 30(6), 749.
17. Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 44, 497-505.
18. Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2005). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm performance. The Financial Review, 38, 33-53.
19. Chatterjee, S., Hadi, A., & Price, B. (2000). The use of regression analysis by example. New York: Wiley.
20. Chatterji, A. K., Levine, D. I., & Toffel, M. W. (2009). How well do social ratings actually measure corporate social responsibility? Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 18(1), 125-169.
21. Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corpora. Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92.
22. Coffey, B. S., & Fryxell, G. E. (1991). Institutional ownership of stock and dimensions of corporate social performance: An empirical examination. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(6), 437-444.
23. Coffey, B. S., & Wang, J. (1998). Board diversity and managerial control as predictors of corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(14), 1595-1603.
24. Cox, T. H., Lobel, S. A., & McLeod, P. L. (1991). Effects of ethnic group cultural differences on cooperative and competitive behavior on a group task. Academy of Management Journal, 34(4), 827-847.
25. Daily, C. M., Certo, S. T., & Dalton, D. R. (1999). A decade of corporate women: Some progress in the boardroom, none in the executive suite. Strategic Management Journal, 20(1), 93-99.
26. Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (2003). Women in the boardroom: A business imperative. Journal of Business Strategy, 24(5), 8-10.
27. Daily, C. M., Dalton, D. R., Albert, A., & Cannella, J. (2003). Corporate governance: Decades of dialogue and data. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 371.
28. Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Ellstrand, A. E., & Johnson, J. L. (1998). Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), 269-290.
29. Dalton, D. R., Hitt, M. A., Certo, S. T., & Dalton, C. M. (2007). The fundamental agency problem and its mitigation: Independence, equity, and the market for corporate control. In J. P. Walsh & A. P. Brief (Eds.), The academy of management annals (pp. 1-64). New York: Taylor & Francis.
30. Davis, G. F., & Cobb, J. A. (2010). Resource dependence theory: Past and future. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 28, 21-42.
31. Deza, M. M., & Deza, E. (2009). Encyclopedia of distances. Heidelberg: Springer.
32. Dittmar, A., & Mahrt-Smith, J. (2007). Corporate governance and the value of cash holdings. Journal of Financial Economics, 83(3), 599-634.
33. Ellstrand, A. E., Tihanyi, L., & Johnson, J. L. (2002). Board structure and international political risk. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 769-777.
34. Erhardt, N. L., Werbel, J. D., & Shrader, C. B. (2003). Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(2), 102-111.
35. Fama, E., & Jensen, M. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301.
36. Finkelstein, S., Cannella, B., & Hambrick, D. C. (2008). Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37. Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1988). Chief executive compensation: A synthesis and reconciliation. Strategic Management Journal, 9(6), 543-558.
38. Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D. C., & Cannella, A. A. (2009). Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. New York: Oxford University Press.
39. Forbes, D. P., & Milliken, F. J. (1999). Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 489-505.
40. Francoeur, C., Labelle, R., & Sinclair-desgagné, B. (2008). Gender diversity in corporate governance and top management. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(1), 83.
41. Friedman, M., & Friedman, R. D. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42. Geletkanycz, M. A., & Hambrick, D. C. (1997). The external ties of top executives: Implications for strategic choice and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(4), 654-681.
43. Gompers, P., Ishii, J., & Metrick, A. (2003). Corporate governance and equity prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 107-155.
44. Gond, J. P., & Crane, A. (2010). Corporate social performance disoriented: Saving the lost paradigm? Business & Society, 49(4), 677-703.
45. Goodstein, J., Gautam, K., & Boeker, W. (1994). The effects of board size and diversity on strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 15(3), 241-250.
46. Graves, S. B., & Waddock, S. A. (1994). Institutional owners and corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 1034-1046.
47. Griffin, J. J., & Mahon, J. F. (1997). The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate. Business & Society, 36(1), 5-31.
48. Guthrie, J. P., & Datta, D. K. (1997). Contextual influences on executive selection: Firm characteristics and CEO experience. Journal of Management Studies, 34(4), 537-560.
49. Hambrick, D. C. (2005). Upper echelons theory: Origins, twists and turns, and lessons learned. In K. G. Smith & M. A. Hitt (Eds.), Great minds in management: The process of theory development (pp. 109-127). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
50. Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193-206.
51. Hambrick, D. C., Werder, A., & Zajac, E. J. (2008). New directions in corporate governance research. Organization Science, 19(3), 381-385.
52. Han, J., Kamber, M., & Pei, J. (2011). Data mining concepts and techniques. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
53. Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007). What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1199-1228.
54. Haslam, S. A., Ryan, M. K., Kulich, C., Trojanowski, G., & Atkins, C. (2010). Investing with prejudice: The relationship between women's presence on company boards and objective and subjective measures of company performance. British Journal of Management, 21(2), 484-497.
55. Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383-396.
56. Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What's the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 125-139.
57. Hillman, A. J., Keim, G. D., & Luce, R. A. (2001). Board composition and stakeholder performance: Do stakeholder directors make a difference? Business and Society, 40(3), 295.
58. Hillman, A. J., Shropshire, C., & Cannella, A. A. (2007). Organizational predictors of women on corporate boards. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 941-952.
59. Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2009). Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1404-1427.
60. Hitt, M. A., & Tyler, B. B. (1991). Strategic decision models: Integrating different perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 327-351.
61. Hoskisson, R. E., Johnson, R. A., & Moesel, D. D. (1994). Corporate divestiture intensity in restructuring firms: Effects of governance, strategy, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1207-1251.
62. Ibrahim, N. A., Howard, D. P., & Angelidis, J. P. (2003). Board members in the service industry: An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility orientation and directorial type. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(4), 393-401.
63. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
64. Johnson, R. A., & Greening, D. W. (1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 564-576.
65. Johnson, R. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Hitt, M. A. (1993). Board of director involvement in restructuring: The effects of board versus managerial controls and characteristics. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 33-50.
66. Judge, W. Q., Jr., & Zeithaml, C. P. (1992). Institutional and strategic choice perspectives on board involvement in the strategic decision process. Academy of Management Journal, 35(4), 766-794.
67. Kesner, I. F. (1988). Directors' characteristics and committee membership: An investigation of type, occupation, tenure, and gender. Academy of Management Journal, 31(1), 66-84.
68. Kets de Vries, M. F. R., & Miller, D. (1984). The neurotic organization. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
69. Kosnik, R. D. (1990). Effects of board demography and directors incentives on corporate greenmail decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 33(1), 129-150.
70. Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J., Neter, J., & Li, W. (2004). Applied linear statistical models (5th ed.). Irwin: McGraw-Hill.
71. Leblanc, R., & Gillies, J. M. (2005). Inside the boardroom: How boards really work and the coming revolution in corporate governance. Mississauga: Wiley Canada.
72. Lorsch, J. W., & MacIver, E. (1989). Pawns or potentates: The reality of America's corporate boards. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
73. Luoma, P., & Goodstein, J. (1999). Stakeholders and corporate boards: Institutional influences on board composition and structure. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 553-563.
74. Luthar, H. K., DiBattista, R. A., & Gautschi, T. (1997). Perception of what the ethical climate is and what it should be: The role of gender, academic status, and ethical education. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(2), 205-217.
75. Manzoni, J. F., Strebel, P., & Barsoux, J. L. (2010, January and 25). Why Diversity Can Backfire On Company Boards. Wall Street Journal.
76. Mattingly, J. E., & Berman, S. L. (2006). Measurement of corporate social action. Business & Society, 45(1), 20-46.
77. McDonald, M. L., & Westphal, J. D. (2003). Getting by with the advice of their friends: CEOs' advice networks and firms' strategic responses to poor performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1), 1-32.
78. McDonald, M. L., & Westphal, J. D. (2010). A little help here? Board control, CEO identification with the corporate elite, and strategic help provided to CEOs at other firms. The Academy of Management Journal (AMJ), 53(2), 343-370.
79. McGuire, J., Dow, S., & Argheyd, K. (2003). CEO incentives and corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(4), 341-359.
80. McLeod, P., & Lobel, S. (1992). The effects of ethnic diversity on idea generation in small groups. Academy of management best paper proceedings, 22, 227-231.
81. Milliken, F. J., & Martins, L. L. (1996). Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 21(2), 402-433.
82. Mintzberg, H. (1983). Power in and around organizations. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
83. Molz, R. (1995). The theory of pluralism in corporate governance: A conceptual framework and empirical test. Journal of Business Ethics, 14(10), 789.
84. Pearce, J. A., & Zahra, S. A. (1992). Board composition from a strategic contingency perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 29(4), 411-438.
85. Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 1-28.
86. Peterson, C. A., Philpot, J., & O'Shaughnessy, K. (2007). African American diversity in the boardrooms of the US fortune 500: Director presence, expertise and committee membership. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(4), 558-575.
87. Pfeffer, J. (1972). Size and composition of corporate boards of directors: The organization and its environment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 218-228.
88. Pfeffer, J. (1973). Size, composition, and function of hospital boards of directors: A study of organization-environment linkage. Administrative Science Quarterly., 18, 349-364.
89. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper& Row.
90. Porter, M. E. (1996). What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, 74(6), 61-78.
91. Post, C., Rahman, N., & Rubow, E. (2011). Green governance: Boards of directors' composition and environmental corporate social responsibility. Business & Society, 50(1), 189-223.
92. Powell, G. N. (1999). Handbook of gender & work. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
93. Provan, K. G. (1980). Board power and organizational effectiveness among human service agencies. Academy of Management Journal, 23(2), 221-236.
94. Raatikainen, P. (2002). Contributions of multiculturalism to the competitive advantage of an organisation. Singapore Management Review, 24(1), 81-85.
95. Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2012). Measurement issues in environmental corporate social responsibility (ECSR): Toward a transparent, reliable, and construct valid instrument. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(3), 307-319.
96. Rhodes, S. R. (1983). Age-related differences in work attitudes and behavior: A review and conceptual analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 93(2), 328-367.
97. Robinson, G., & Dechant, K. (1997). Building a business case for diversity. The Academy of Management Executive, 11(3), 21-31.
98. Roth, K., & O'Donnell, S. (1996). Foreign subsidiary compensation strategy: An agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 678-703.
99. Rowley, T., & Berman, S. (2000). A brand new brand of corporate social performance. Business & Society, 39(4), 397-419.
100. Sharfman, M. (1996). The construct validity of the Kinder, Lydenberg & Domini social performance ratings data. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(3), 287-296.
101. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737-783.
102. Shrader, C. B., Blackburn, V. L., & Iles, P. (1997). Women in management and firm financial performance: An exploratory study. Journal of Managerial Issues, 9, 355-372.
103. Siciliano, J. I. (1996). The relationship of board member diversity to organizational performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(12), 1313.
104. Simpson, W. G., & Kohers, T. (2002). The link between corporate social and financial performance: Evidence from the banking industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 35(2), 97-109.
105. Sutcliffe, K. M., & Huber, G. P. (1998). Firm and industry as determinants of executive perceptions of the environment. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 793-807.
106. Thatcher, S. M. B., Jehn, K. A., & Zanutto, E. (2003). Cracks in diversity research: The effects of diversity faultlines on conflict and performance. Group Decision and Negotiation, 12(3), 217-241.
107. Thomas, D. A., & Ely, R. J. (1996). Making differences matter. Harvard business review, 74(5), 79-90.
108. Tsui, A. S., Egan, T. D., & O'Reilly, C. A., I. I. I. (1992). Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 549-579.
109. Tsui, A. S., & Gutek, B. A. (1999). Demographic differences in organizations: Current research and future directions. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
110. Useem, M. (1986). The inner circle: Large corporations and the rise of business political activity in the US and UK. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
111. Vafeas, N. (2003). Length of board tenure and outside director independence. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 30(7 8), 1043-1064.
112. van Knippenberg, D., Haslam, S. A., & Platow, M. J. (2007). Unity through diversity: Value-in-diversity beliefs, work group diversity, and group identification. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 11(3), 207-222.
113. Waddock, S. (2003). Myths and realities of social investing. Organization & environment, 16(3), 369-380.
114. Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303-319.
115. Walls, J. L., Berrone, P., & Phan, P. H. (2012). Corporate governance and environmental performance: Is there really a link? Strategic Management Journal. doi: 10. 1002/smj. 1952.
116. Wang, J., & Coffey, B. S. (1992). Board composition and corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(10), 771-778.
117. Wang, J., & Dewhirst, H. D. (1992). Boards of directors and stakeholder orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(2), 115-123.
118. Wartick, S. L., & Cochran, P. L. (1985). The evolution of the corporate social performance model. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 758-769.
119. Westphal, J. D., & Fredrickson, J. W. (2001). Who directs strategic change? Director experience, the selection of new CEOs, and change in corporate strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 22(12), 1113-1137.
120. Westphal, J., & Milton, L. (2000). How experience and network ties affect the influence of demographic minorities on corporate boards. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(2), 366-398.
121. Westphal, J. D., & Zajac, E. J. (1995). Who shall govern? CEO/board power, demographic similarity, and new director selection. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(1), 60-83.
122. Westphal, J. D., & Zajac, E. J. (1997). Defections from the inner circle: Social exchange, reciprocity, and the diffusion of board independence in US corporations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 161-183.
123. White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 48, 817-838.
124. Williams, R. (2003). Women on corporate boards of directors and their influence on corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 42(1), 1-10.
125. Williams, K. Y., & O'Reilly, C. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. In B. Staw & R. Sutton (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 20, pp. 77-140). Greenwich: JAI Press.
126. Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691-718.
127. Zahra, S., & Pearce, J. (1989). Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model. Journal of Management, 15(2), 291-334.
128. Zajac, E., & Westphal, J. (1996a). Director reputation, CEO-board power, and the dynamics of board interlocks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(3), 507-529.
129. Zajac, E. J., & Westphal, J. D. (1996b). Who shall succeed? How CEO/board preferences and power affect the choice of new CEOs. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 64-90.
130. Zelechowski, D. D., & Bilimoria, D. (2004). Characteristics of women and men corporate inside directors in the US. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(3), 337-342.