The response dynamics of preferential choice

Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 67, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 151-185

  Koop, Gregory J ^a,b   Johnson, Joseph G ^a  

^a MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Computational model; Decision making; Methodology; Preference reversals; Process models; Risky decision making

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COMPUTATIONAL MODEL; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HIGH RISK BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; PREFERENCE REVERSALS; PROCESS MODELS; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; RISKY DECISION MAKING; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; VALIDATION STUDY;

COMPUTATIONAL MODEL; DECISION MAKING; METHODOLOGY; PREFERENCE REVERSALS; PROCESS MODELS; RISKY DECISION MAKING;

ADULT; ATTENTION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; RISK-TAKING;

EID: 84885351396     PISSN: 00100285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2013.09.001     Document Type: Article

References (96)

1. Birnbaum M.H. Evaluation of the priority heuristic as a descriptive model of decision making: Comment on Brandstätter, Gigerenzer, and Hertwig (2006). Psychological Review 2008, 115:253-262.
2. Brandstätter E., Gigerenzer G., Hertwig R. The priority heuristic: Making choices without trade-offs. Psychological Review 2006, 113:409-432.
3. Brandstätter E., Gigerenzer G., Hertwig R. Risky choice with heuristics: Reply to Birnbaum (2008), Johnson, Schulte-Mecklenbeck, and Willemsen (2008), and Rieger and Wang (2008). Psychological Review 2008, 115:281-290.
4. Bröder A., Schiffer S. Bayesian strategy assessment in multi-attribute decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2003, 16:193-213.
5. Busemeyer J.R., Townsend J.T. Decision field-theory - A dynamic cognitive approach to decision-making in an uncertain environment. Psychological Review 1993, 100:432-459.
6. Cisek P., Kalaska J. Neural correlates of reaching decisions in dorsal premotor cortex: Specification of multiple direction choices and final selection of action. Neuron 2005, 45:801-814.
7. Clark A. An embodied cognitive science?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1999, 3(9):345-351.
8. Criss A.H. The consequences of differentiation in episodic memory: Similarity and the strength based mirror effect. Journal of Memory & Language: Special Issue on Computational Models of Memory 2006, 55:461-478.
9. Criss A.H. The distribution of subjective memory strength: List strength and response bias. Cognitive Psychology 2009, 59:297-319.
10. Criss A.H. Differentiation and response bias in episodic memory: Evidence from reaction time distributions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 2010, 36:484-499.
11. Dale R., Kehoe C.E., Spivey M.J. Graded motor responses in the time course of categorizing atypical exemplars. Memory and Cognition 2007, 35:15-28.
12. Dale R., Roche J., Snyder K., McCall R. Exploring action dynamics as an index of paired-associate learning. PLoS One 2008, 3(3):e1728. 10.1371/journal.pone.0001728.
13. Diederich A. Dynamic stochastic models for decision making under time constraints. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 1997, 41:260-274.
14. Dshemuchadse M., Scherbaum S., Goschke T. How decisions emerge: Action dynamics in intertemporal choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2013, 142:93-100.
15. Duran N.D., Dale R., McNamara D.S. The action dynamics of overcoming the truth. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2010, 17:486-491.
16. Estes W.K. The problem of inference from curves based on group data. Psychological Bulletin 1956, 53:134-140.
17. Estes W.K., Maddox W.T. Risks of drawing inferences about cognitive processes from model fits to individual versus average performance. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2005, 12:403-408.
18. Evans J.S.B.T. Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 2008, 59:255-278.
19. Förster J., Strack F. Motor actions in retrieval of valenced information: A motor congruence effect. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1997, 85:1419-1427.
20. Franco-Watkins A.M., Johnson J.G. Decision moving window: Using interactive eye tracking to examine decision processes. Behavior Research Methods 2011, 43:853-863.
21. Freeman J.B., Ambady N. Motions of the hand expose the partial and parallel activation of stereotypes. Psychological Science 2009, 20:1183-1188.
22. Freeman J.B., Ambady N. MouseTracker: Software for studying real-time mental processing using a computer mouse-tracking method. Behavior Research Methods 2010, 42:226-241.
23. Freeman J.B., Ambady N., Midgley K.J., Holcomb P.J. The real-time link between person perception and action: Brain potential evidence for dynamic continuity. Social Neuroscience 2011, 6:139-155.
24. Friedman R.S., Förster J. The influence of approach and avoidance motor actions on creative cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2002, 38:41-55.
25. Gallagher S. How the body shapes the mind 2005, Oxford University Press.
26. Gigerenzer G., Goldstein D.G. Reasoning the fast a frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review 1996, 113:650-669.
27. Gigerenzer G., Goldstein D.G. Betting on one good reason: The take the best heuristic. Simple heuristics that make us smart 1999, Oxford University Press, New York, NY. G. Gigerenzer, P.M. Todd, The ABC Research Group (Eds.).
28. Gigerenzer G., Todd P.M. Simple heuristics that make us smart 1999, The ABC Research Group, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
29. Glimcher P. Choice: Towards a standard back-pocket model. Neuroeconomics: Decision making and the brain 2009, 503-522. Academic Press, Burlington, MA. P.W. Glimcher, C.F. Camerer, E. Fehr, R.A. Poldrack (Eds.).
30. Glöckner A., Betsch T. Modeling option and strategy choice with connectionist networks: Towards an integrative model of automatic and deliberative decision making. Judgment and Decision Making Journal 2008, 3:215-228.
31. Glöckner A., Heinen T., Johnson J., Raab M. Network approaches for expert decisions in sports. Human Movement Science 2012, 31:318-333.
32. Glöckner A., Herbold A.-K An eye-tracking study of information processing in risky decisions: Evidence for compensatory strategies based on automatic processes. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2011, 24:71-98.
33. Gold J.I., Shadlen M.N. The neural basis of decision making. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2007, 30:535-574.
34. Goldman A.I., de Vignemont F. Is social cognition embodied?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2009, 13(4).
35. Greene J.D., Morelli S.A., Lowenberg K., Cohen J.D. Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment. Cognition 2008, 107:1144-1154.
36. Greene J.D., Nystrom L.E., Engell A.D., Darley J.M., Cohen J.D. The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron 2004, 44:389-400.
37. Greene J.D., Sommerville R.B., Nystrom L.E., Darley J.M., Cohen J.D. An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science 2001, 293:2105-2108.
38. Hilbig B.E. One-reason decision making in risky choice? A closer look at the priority heuristic. Judgment and Decision Making 2008, 3:457-462.
39. Huebner B., Dwyer S., Hauser M. The role of emotion in moral psychology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2008, 13:1-6.
40. Johnson, J. G. (2009). Embodied cognition of movement decisions: A computational modeling approach. In M. Raab, J. G. Johnson, & H. Heekeren (Eds.), Mind and motion: The bidirectional link between thought and action. Progress in Brain Research, 174, 137-150.
41. Johnson E.J., Schulte-Mecklenbeck M., Willemsen M.C. Process models deserve process data: Comment on Brandstätter, Gigerenzer, and Hertwig (2006). Psychological Review 2008, 115:263-272.
42. Just M.A., Carpenter P.A. Eye fixations and cognitive processes. Cognitive Psychology 1976, 8:441-480.
43. Just M.A., Carpenter P.A. A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review 1980, 87(4):329-354.
44. Kahneman D. Thinking, fast and slow 2011, Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, New York, NY.
45. Kahneman D., Frederick S. Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment 2002, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, D. Kahneman (Eds.).
46. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory - Analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 1979, 47:263-291.
47. Koop G.J. An assessment of the temporal dynamics of moral decisions. Judgment and Decision Making 2013, 8:527-539.
48. Koop G.J., Johnson J.G. Response dynamics: A new window on the decision process. Judgment and Decision Making 2011, 6:750-758.
49. Krajbich I., Armel C., Rangel A. Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice. Nature Neuroscience 2010, 13:1292-1297.
50. Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2008). International affective picture system (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. Technical Report A-8. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
51. Loewenstein G., Rick S., Cohen J.D. Neuroeconomics. Annual Review of Psychology 2008, 59:647-672.
52. Lowenstein G.F., Weber E.U., Hsee C.K., Welch N. Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin 2001, 127:267-286.
53. McKinstry C., Dale R., Spivey M.J. Action dynamics reveal parallel competition in decision making. Psychological Science 2008, 19:22-24.
54. Process and structure in human decision making 1989, John Wiley & Sons, Oxford, England. H. Montgomery, O. Svenson (Eds.).
55. Oullier O., Basso F. Embodied economics: How bodily information shapes the social coordination dynamics of decision making. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2010, 365:219-301.
56. Papesh M.H., Goldinger S.D. Memory in motion: Movement dynamics reveal memory strength. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2012, 19:906-913.
57. Payne J.W. Task complexity and contingent processing in decision-making - Information search and protocol analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 1976, 16:366-387.
58. Payne J.W., Bettman J.R., Johnson E.J. Behavioral decision research - A constructive processing perspective. Annual Review of Psychology 1992, 43:87-131.
59. Payne J.W., Bettman J.R., Johnson E.J. The adaptive decision maker 1993, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
60. Raab M., Green N. Motion as input: A functional explanation of movement effects on cognitive processes. Perceptual and Motor Skills 2005, 100:333-348.
61. Mind and motion: The bidirectional link between thought and action 2009, Elsevier. M. Raab, J.G. Johnson, H. Heekeren (Eds.).
62. Ratcliff R., Cherian A., Segraves M. A comparison of macaque behavior and superior colliculus neuronal activity to predictions from models of two-choice decisions. Journal of Neurophysiology 2003, 90:1392-1407.
63. Ratcliff R., Van Zandt T., McKoon G. Connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time. Psychological Review 1999, 106:261-360.
64. Resulaj A., Kiani R., Wolpert D.M., Shadlen M.N. Changes of mind in decision-making. Nature 2009, 461:263-266.
65. Rieskamp J., Busemeyer J.R., Mellers B.A. Extending the bounds of rationality: Evidence and theories of preferential choice. Journal of Economic Literature 2006, 44:631-661.
66. Roe R.M., Busemeyer J.R., Townsend J.T. Multialternative decision field theory: A dynamic connectionist model of decision making. Psychological Review 2001, 108:370-392.
67. Savage L.J. The foundation of statistics 1954, John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York, NY.
68. Schall J.D. On building a bridge between brain and behavior. Annual Review of Psychology 2004, 55:23-50.
69. Shimojo S., Simion C., Shimojo E., Scheier C. Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference. Nature Neuroscience 2008, 6:1317-1322.
70. Simon H.A. Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review 1956, 63:129-138.
71. Simon D., Krawczyk D.C., Holyoak K.J. Construction of preferences by constraint satisfaction. Psychological Science 2004, 15:331-336.
72. Smith P.L., Ratcliff R. Psychology and neurobiology of simple decisions. TRENDS in Neurosciences 2004, 27:161-168.
73. Song J.H., Nakayama K. Hidden cognitive states revealed in choice reaching tasks. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2009, 13(8):360-366.
74. Spivey M.J. The continuity of mind 2008, Oxford University Press, New York.
75. Spivey M.J., Dale R. Continuous dynamics in real-time cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2006, 15(5):207-211.
76. Spivey M.J., Grosjean M., Knoblich G. Continuous attraction toward phonological competitors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2005, 102:10393-10398.
77. Stanovich K.E., West R.F. Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2000, 23:645-726.
78. Starns J.J., Ratcliff R., McKoon G. Evaluating the unequal-variance and dual-process explanations of zROC slopes with response time data and the diffusion model. Cognitive Psychology 2012, 64:1-34.
79. Stewart N., Chater N., Brown G.D.A. Decision by sampling. Cognitive Psychology 2006, 53:1-26.
80. Stott H.P. Cumulative prospect theory's functional menagerie. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 2006, 32:101-130.
81. Strack F., Martin L.L., Stepper S. Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: A non-obtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1988, 53:768-777.
82. Summerville, A., Bristow, R. E., Johnson, J. G., & Tolbert-Trask, A. R. Seeing the future in what might have been: Counterfactual thought in decision process tracing (in preparation).
83. Thomas L.E., Lleras A. Moving eyes and moving thought: On the spatial compatibility between eye movements and cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2007, 14:663-668.
84. Townsend J.T., Busemeyer J.R. Approach-avoidance: Return to dynamic decision behavior. Current issues in cognitive processes: The Tulane Flowerree symposium on cognition 1989, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. C. Izawa (Ed.).
85. Townsend J.T., Busemeyer J.R. Dynamic representation of decision making. Mind as motion: Explorations in the dynamics of cognition 1995, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. R.F. Port, T. van Gelder (Eds.).
86. Tversky A. Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. Psychological Review 1972, 79:281-299.
87. Tversky A., Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and psychology of choice. Science 1981, 211:453-458.
88. Usher M., McClelland J.L. On the time course of perceptual choice: The leaky competing accumulator model. Psychological Review 2001, 108:550-592.
89. Velichkovsky B.M., Rothert A., Koph M., Dornhöfer S.M., Joos M. Towards an express-diagnostics for level of processing and hazard perception. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behavior 2002, 5:145-156.
90. Weber E.U., Shafir S., Blais A. Risk-sensitivity in humans and lower animals: Risk as variance or coefficient of variation. Psychological Review 2004, 111:430-445.
91. Wedel M., Pieters R. Eye tracking for visual marketing 2008, Now Publishers Inc, Boston, MA.
92. Wedell D.H., Senter S.M. Looking and weighting in judgment and choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1997, 70:41-64.
93. White C.N., Ratcliff R., Starns J. Diffusion models of the flanker task: Discrete versus gradual attentional selection. Cognitive Psychology 2011, 63:210-238.
94. Wilson M. Six views of embodied cognition. Psychological Bulletin and Review 2002, 9(4):625-636.
95. Wojnowicz M.T., Ferguson M.J., Dale R., Spivey M.J. The self-organization of explicit attitudes. Psychological Science 2009, 20(11):1428-1435.
96. Yu Z., Wang F., Wang D., Bastin M. Beyond reaction times: Incorporating mouse-tracking measures into the implicit association test to examine its underlying process. Social Cognition 2012, 30:289-306.