Graded motor responses in the time course of categorizing atypical exemplars

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 15-28

  Dale, Rick ^a,b   Kehoe, Caitlin ^a   Spivey, Michael J ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^b University of Memphis   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED MUSCLE RESPONSE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MOTOR ACTIVITY; NORMAL HUMAN; PHOTOGRAPHY; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

EID: 34247626256     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03195938     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. ABRAMS, R., & BALOTA, D. (1991). Mental chronometry: Beyond reaction time. Psychological Science, 2, 153-157.
2. ALLOPENNA, P. D., MAGNUSON, J. S., & TANENHAUS, M. K. (1998). Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory & Language, 38, 419-439.
3. ASHBY, F. G., BOYNTON, G., & LEE, W. W. (1994). Categorization response time with multidimensional stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 11-27.
4. BRUNER, J. S., GOODNOW, J. J., & AUSTIN, G. A. (1956). A study of thinking. New York: Wiley.
5. BURNETT, R. C., MEDIN, D. L., ROSS, N. O., & BLOK, S. V. (2005). Ideal is typical. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 3-10.
6. COHEN, J., MACWHINNEY, B., FLATT, M., & PROVOST, J. (1993). Psy-Scope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 257-271.
7. COLES, M. G. H., GRATTON, G., BASHORE, T. R., ERIKSEN, C. W., & DONCHIN, E. (1985). A psychophysiological investigation of the continuous flow model of human information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 11, 529-553.
8. COLLINS, A. M., & QUILLIAN, M. R. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 8, 240-247.
9. CREE, G. S., MCRAE, K., & MCNORGAN, C. (1999). An attractor model of lexical conceptual processing: Simulating semantic priming. Cognitive Science, 23, 371-414.
10. DALE, R., & SPIVEY, M. J. (2005). From apples and oranges to symbolic dynamics: A framework for conciliating notions of cognitive representations. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 17, 317-342.
11. DIETRICH, E., & MARKMAN, A. B. (2003). Discrete thoughts: Why cognition must use discrete representations. Mind & Language, 18, 95-119.
12. DOYLE, M., & WALKER, R., (2001). Curved saccade trajectories: Voluntary and reflexive saccades curve away from irrelevant distractors. Experimental Brain Research, 139, 333-344.
13. EFRON, B., & TIBSHIRANI, R. J. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall.
14. ELMAN, J. L., BATES, E. A., JOHNSON, M. H., KARMILOFF-SMITH, A., PARISI, D., & PLUNKETT, K. (1996). Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. ESTES, Z. (2003). Domain differences in the structure of artifactual and natural categories. Memory & Cognition, 31, 199-214.
16. FELDMAN, D. P., & CRUTCHFIELD, J. P. (1998). Measures of statistical complexity: Why? Physics Letters A, 238, 244-252.
17. FODOR, J. A. (2000). The mind doesn't work that way: The scope and limits of computational psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.
18. GARROD, S., & SANFORD, A. (1977). Interpreting anaphoric relations: The integration of semantic information while reading. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 16, 77-90.
19. GOLD, J. I., & SHADLEN, M. N. (2000). Representation of a perceptual decision in developing oculomotor commands. Nature, 404, 390-394.
20. GOLD, J. I., & SHADLEN, M. N. (2001). Neural computations that underlie decisions about sensory stimuli. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 10-16.
21. GOLDBERGER, A. L., AMARAL, L. A. N., GLASS, L., HAUSDORFF, J. M., IVANOV, P. C., MARK, R. G., ET AL. (2000). PhysioBank, PhysioToolkit, and PhysioNet: Components of a new research resource for complex physiologic signals. Circulation, 101, e215-e220.
22. GOODALE, M. A., PÉLISSON, D., & P4, C. (1986). Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement. Nature, 320, 748-750.
23. HEIT, E. (1994). Models of the effects of prior knowledge on category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, & Cognition, 20, 1264-1282.
24. HINTON, G. E., & SHALLICE, T. (1991). Lesioning an attractor network: Investigations of acquired dyslexia. Psychological Review, 98, 74-95.
25. JOB, R., RUMIATI, R., & LOTTO, L. (1992). The picture superiority effect in categorization: Visual or semantic? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, & Cognition, 18, 1019-1028.
26. LAKE, D. E., RICHMAN, J. S., GRIFFIN, M. P., & MOORMAN, J. R. (2002). Sample entropy analysis of neonatal heart rate variability. American Journal of Physiology, 283, R789-R797.
27. LAMBERTS, K. (1995). Categorization under time pressure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 161-180.
28. LAMBERTS, K. (2000). Information-accumulation theory of speeded categorization. Psychological Review, 107, 227-260.
29. LAMBERTS, K. (2002). Feature sampling in categorization and recognition of objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 141-154.
30. LYNCH, E. B., COLEY, J. D., & MEDIN, D. L. (2000). Tall is typical: Central tendency, ideal dimensions, and graded category structure among tree experts and novices. Memory & Cognition, 28, 41-50.
31. MAGNUSON, J. S. (2005). Moving hand reveals dynamics of thought: Commentary on Spivey, Grosjean, & Knoblich (2005). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 9995-9996.
32. MARCUS, G. F. (2001). The algebraic mind: Integrating connectionism and cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.
33. MASSARO, D. W. (1989). Testing between the TRACE model and the fuzzy logical model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 398-421.
34. MASSARO, D. W. (1998). Perceiving talking faces: From speech perception to a behavioral principle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.
35. MCCLOSKEY, M. E., & GLUCKSBERG, S. (1978). Natural categories: Well defined or fuzzy sets? Memory & Cognition, 6, 462-472.
36. MCMURRAY, B., & SPIVEY, M. (2000). The categorical perception of consonants: The interaction of learning and processing. Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistics Society, 34, 205-220.
37. MCMURRAY, B., TANENHAUS, M. K., ASLIN, R. N., & SPIVEY, M. J. (2003). Probabilistic constraint satisfaction at the lexical/phonetic interface: Evidence for gradient effects of within-category VOT on lexical access. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32, 77-97.
38. MCRAE, K., DE SA, V. R., & SEIDENBERG, M. S. (1997). On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 99-130.
39. MEDIN, D. L. (1989). Concepts and conceptual structure. American Psychologist, 44, 1469-1481.
40. MEDIN, D. L., & ROSS, B. H. (1989). The specific character of abstract thought: Categorization, problem solving, and induction. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 5, pp. 189-223). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
41. MEDIN, D. L., & SCHAFFER, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 85, 207-238.
42. MILLER, J. (1982). Discrete versus continuous stage models of human information processing: In search of partial output. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 8, 273-296.
43. MILLER, J., & ULRICH, R. (2003). Simple reaction time and statistical facilitation: A parallel grains model. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 101-151.
44. MURPHY, G. L. (2002). The big book of concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.
45. MURPHY, G. L., & MEDIN, D. L. (1985). The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychological Review, 92, 289-316.
46. MURPHY, G. L., & ROSS, B. H. (2005). The two faces of typicality in category-based induction. Cognition, 95, 175-200.
47. NEDERHOUSER, M., & SPIVEY, M. J. (2004). Eye-tracking and simulating the temporal dynamics of categorization. In K. Forbus, D. Gentner, & T. Reiger (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (p. 1612). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
48. NOSOFSKY, R. M. (1988). Similarity, frequency, and category representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 14, 54-65.
49. NOSOFSKY, R. M. (1992). Exemplars, prototypes and similarity rules. In A. F. Healy, S. M. Kosslyn, & R. M. Shiffrin (Eds.), From learning theory to connectionist theory: Essays in honor of W. K. Estes (Vol. 1, pp. 149-168). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
50. NOSOFSKY, R. M., & PALMERI, T. J. (1997). An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification. Psychological Review, 104, 266-300.
51. OP DE BEECK, H., & WAGEMANS, J. (2002). Visual object categorisation at distinct levels of abstraction: A new stimulus set. Perception, 30, 1337-1361.
52. PAIVIO, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45, 255-287.
53. PINKER, S. (1997). How the mind works. New York: Norton.
54. PORT, R. F., & VAN GELDER, T. (1995). Mind as motion: Explorations in the dynamics of cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
55. REED, S. K. (1972). Pattern recognition and categorization. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 382-407.
56. REHDER, B., & HOFFMAN, A. B. (2005). Thirty-something categorization results explained: Selective attention, eyetracking, and models of category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, & Cognition, 31, 811-829.
57. RICHARDSON, D. C., DALE, R., & SPIVEY, M. J. (2007). Eye movements in language and cognition: A brief introduction. In M. Gonzalez-Marquez, I. Mittelberg, S. Coulson, & M. J. Spivey (Eds.), Methods in cognitive linguistics (pp. 323-344). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
58. RICHMAN, J. S., & MOORMAN, J. R. (2000). Physiological time-series analysis using approximate entropy and sample entropy. American Journal of Physiology, 278, H2039-H2049.
59. RIPS, L. J., SHOBEN, E. J., & SMITH, E. E. (1973). Semantic distance and the verification of semantic relations. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 12, 1-20.
60. ROSCH, E. H. (1973). Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 328-350.
61. ROSCH, E. [H.] (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 192-233.
62. ROSCH, E. [H.], & MERVIS, C. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573-605.
63. RUECKL, J. G. (2002). The dynamics of visual word recognition. Ecological Psychology, 14, 5-19.
64. RUMELHART, D. E., & MCCLELLAND, J. L. (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.
65. SHIN, J. C., & ROSENBAUM, D. A. (2002). Reaching while calculating: Scheduling of cognitive and perceptual-motor processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 206-219.
66. SMITH, J. D. (2002). Exemplar theory's predicted typicality gradient can be tested and disconfirmed. Psychological Science, 13, 437-442.
67. SNODGRASS, J. G. (1984). Concepts and their surface representations. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 23, 3-22.
68. SNODGRASS, J. G., & MCCULLOUGH, B. (1986). The role of visual similarity in picture categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, & Cognition, 12, 147-154.
69. SPIVEY, M. J., & DALE, R. (2004). The continuity of mind: Toward a dynamical account of cognition. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 45, pp. 85-142). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
70. SPIVEY, M. J., GROSJEAN, M., & KNOBLICH, G. (2005). Continuous attraction toward phonological competitors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 10393-10398.
71. STORMS, G. (2005). Exemplar models in the study of natural language concepts. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 45, pp. 1-39). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
72. SUN, R. (1997). Learning, action and consciousness: A hybrid approach toward modeling consciousness. Neural Networks, 10, 1317-1331.
73. VERBEEMEN, T., STORMS, G., & VERGUTS, T. (2003). Determinants of speeded categorization in natural concepts. Psychologica Belgica, 43, 139-151.
74. VISWANATHAN, M., & CHILDERS, T. L. (2003). An enquiry into the processing of categorization of pictures and words. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 96, 267-287.
75. YOUNG, R. M., & LEWIS, R. L. (1999). The Soar cognitive architecture and human working memory. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 224-256). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.