Multialternative decision field theory: A dynamic connectionist model of decision making

Psychological Review

Volumn 108, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 370-392

  Roe, Robert M ^b   Busemeyer, Jerome R ^a   Townsend, James T ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DECISION THEORY; HUMAN;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; DECISION THEORY; HUMANS; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER);

EID: 85047684990     PISSN: 0033295X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.370     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Ariely, D., & Wallsten, T. S. (1995). Seeking subjective dominance in multidimensional space: An exploration of the asymmetric dominance effect. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63, 223-232.
2. Aschenbrenner, K. M., Albert, D., & Schmalhofer, F. (1984). Stochastic choice heuristics. Acta Psychologica, 56(1-3), 153-166.
3. Ashby, F. G. (1989). Stochastic general recognition theory. In D. Vickers & P. L. Smith (Eds.), Human information processing: Measures, mechanisms and models (pp. 435-457). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
4. Ashby, F. G. (1992). Multidimensional models of perception and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Ashby, F. G. (2000). A stochastic version of general recognition theory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44, 310-329.
6. Ashby, F. G., & Maddox, T. (1992). Complex decision rules in categorization: Contrasting novice and experienced performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 50-71.
7. Ashby, F. G., & Townsend, J. T. (1986). Varieties of perceptual independence. Psychological Review, 93, 154-179.
8. Batsell, R. R., & Polking, J. C. (1985). A new class of market share models. Marketing Science, 4, 177-198.
9. Bettman, J. R., Johnson, E. J., & Payne, J. W. (1991). Consumer decision making. In T. S. Robertson & H. H. Kassarjian (Eds.), Handbook of consumer behavior (pp. 50-84). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
10. Bhattacharya, R. N., & Waymire, E. C. (1990). Stochastic processes with applications. New York: Wiley.
11. Bock, R. D., & Jones, L. V. (1968). The measurement and prediction of judgment and choice. San Francisco: Holden-Day.
12. Bockenholt, U. (1992). Multivariate models of preference and choice. In F. G. Ashby (Ed.), Multidimensional Models of Perception and Cognition, pp. 89-111. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Busemeyer, J. R., & Diederich, A. (2000). Survey of decision field theory. Manuscript submitted for publication.
14. Busemeyer, J. R., & Townsend, J. T. (1992). Fundamental derivations from decision field theory. Mathematical Social Sciences, 23, 255-282.
15. Busemeyer, J. R., & Townsend. J. T. (1993). Decision field theory: A dynamic cognition approach to decision making. Psychological Review, 100, 432-459.
16. Candel, M. J. J. M. (1997). A probabilistic feature model for unfolding tested for perfect and imperfect nestings. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 41, 414-430.
17. Colonius, H. (1984). Stochastische theorien individuellen wahlverhastens [Stochastic theories of individual choice behavior]. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
18. Cornsweet, T. (1970). Visual perception. Academic Press.
19. Cox, D. R., & Miller, H. D. (1965). The theory of stochastic processes. London: Chapman & Hall.
20. De Soete, G., Feger, H., & Klauer, K. C. (Eds.). (1989). New developments in probabilistic choice modeling. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
21. Dhar, R., & Glazer, R. (1996). Similarity in context: Cognitive representations and violation of preference and perceptual invariance in consumer choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 280-293.
22. Diederich, A. (1997). Dynamic stochastic models for decision making under time constraints. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 41, 260-274.
23. Diederich, A., & Busemeyer, J. R. (1999). Conflict and the stochastic dominance principle of decision making. Psychological Science, 10, 353-359.
24. Dosher, B. A. (1984). Discriminating pre-experimental (semantic) from learned (episodic) associations: A speed accuracy study. Cognitive Psychology, 16, 519-555.
25. Dror, I. E., Busemeyer, J. R., & Basola, B. (1999). Decision making under time pressure: An independent test of sequential sampling models. Memory & Cognition, 27, 713-725.
26. Edgell, S. E., & Geisler, W. S. (1980). A set-theoretic random utility model of choice behavior. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 21(3), 265-278.
27. Fischer, G. W., Jia. J., & Luce, M. F. (2000). Attribute conflict and preference uncertainty: The RandMAU model. Management Science, 46, 669-684.
28. Gronlund, S. D., & Ratcliff, R. (1989). Time course of item and associative information: Implications for global memory models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 846-858.
29. Grossberg, S. (1982). Studies of mind and brain: Neural principles of learning, perception, development, cognition, and motor control. Hingham, MA: Reidel.
30. Grossberg, S. (1988). Neural networks and natural intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. Grossberg, S., & Gutowski, W. E. (1987). Neural dynamics of decision making under risk: Affective balance and cognitive-emotional interactions. Psychological Review, 94, 300-318.
32. Heath, R. (1984). Random-walk and accumulator models of psychophysical discrimination: A critical evaluation. Perception, 13, 57-65.
33. Heath, T. B., & Chatterjee, S. (1991). How entrants affect multiple brands: A dual attraction mechanism. Advances in Consumer Research, 18, 768-771.
34. Hintzman, D. L., & Curran, T. (1997). Comparing retrieval dynamics in recognition memory and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 228-247.
35. Huber, J., Payne, J. W., & Puto, C. (1982). Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives: Violations of regularity and the similarity hypothesis. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 90-98.
36. Huber, J., & Puto, C. (1983). Market boundaries and product choice: Illustrating attraction and substitution effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 31-44.
37. Janis, I. L., & Mann, L. (1977). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. New York: Free Press.
38. Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with multiple objectives: Preference and value tradeoffs. New York: Wiley.
39. Lehmann, D. R., & Pan, Y. (1994). Context effects, new brand entry, and consideration sets. Journal of Marketing Research, 31, 364-374.
40. Leven, S. J., & Levine, D. S. (1996). Multiattribute decision making in context: A dynamic neural network methodology. Cognitive Science, 20, 271-299.
41. Levin, I. P., & Jasper, J. D. (1995). Phased narrowing: A new process tracing method for decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 64, 1-8.
42. Link, S. W. (1992). The wave theory of difference and similarity. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Link, S. W., & Heath, R. (1975). A sequential theory of psychological discrimination. Psychometrika, 40, 77-111.
44. Luce, R. D. (1959). Individual choice behavior: A theoretical analysis. New York: Wiley.
45. MacKay, D. B., & Zinnes, J. L. (1995). Probabilistic multidimensional unfolding: An anisotropic model for preference ratio judgments. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 39, 99-111.
46. Marley, A. A. J. (1989). Random utility family that includes many of the "classical" models and has closed form choice probabilities and choice reaction times. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 42, 13-36.
47. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
48. Mellers, B. A., & Biagini, K. (1994). Similarity and choice. Psychological Review, 101, 505-518.
49. Nosofsky, R. M., & Palmeri, T. J. (1997). Comparing exemplar-retrieval and decision-bound models of speeded perceptual classification. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 1027-1048.
50. Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. New York: Cambridge University Press.
51. Payne, J. W., Braunstein, M. L., & Carroll, J. S. (1978). Exploring predecisional behavior: An alternative approach to decision research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 22, 17-44.
52. Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85, 59-108.
53. Ratcliff, R. (1980). A note on modeling accumulation of information when the rate of accumulation changes over time. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 21, 178-184.
54. Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1982). Speed and accuracy in the processing of false statements about semantic information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 16-36.
55. Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1989). Similarity information versus relational information: Differences in the time course of retrieval. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 139-155.
56. Ratcliff, R., & Rouder, J. N. (1998). Modeling response times for two-choice decisions. Psychological Science, 9, 347-356.
57. Ratcliff, R., Van Zandt, T., & McKoon, G. (1999). Connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time. Psychological Review, 106, 261-300.
58. Ratneshwar, S., Shocker, A. D., & Stewart, D. W. (1987). Toward understanding the attraction effect: The implications of product stimulus meaningfulness and familiarity. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 520-527.
59. Reed, A. V. (1973). Speed-accuracy tradeoff in recognition memory. Science, 181, 574-576.
60. Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition: Vol. 1. Foundations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
61. Russo, J. E., & Rosen, L. D. (1975). An eye fixation analysis of multialternative choice. Memory & Cognition, 3, 267-276.
62. Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, 7-59.
63. Shepard, R. N. (1964). Attention and the metric structure of the stimulus space. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1, 54-87.
64. Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 99-118.
65. Simonson, I. (1989). Choice based on reasons: The case of attraction and compromise effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 158-174.
66. Simonson, I., & Tversky, A. (1992). Choice in context: Tradeoff contrast and extremeness aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, 24, 281-295.
67. Sjoberg, L. (1977). Choice frequency and similarity. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 18, 103-115.
68. Smith, P. L. (1995). Psychophysically principled models of visual simple reaction time. Psychological Review, 102, 567-593.
69. Smith, P. L. (2000). Stochastic dynamic models of response time and accuracy: A foundational primer. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44, 408-463.
70. Takane, Y. (1989). Analysis of covariance structures and probabilistic binary choice data. In G. De Soete, H. Feger, & K. C. Klauer (Eds.), New developments in probabilistic choice modeling (pp. 139-160). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
71. Thurstone, L. L. (1959). The measurement of values. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
72. Townsend, J. T., & Busemeyer, J. R. (1995). Dynamic representation of decision-making. In R. F. Port & T. van Gelder (Eds.), Mind as motion (pp. 101-120). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
73. Tversky, A. (1969). Intransitivity of preferences. Psychological Review, 76, 31-48.
74. Tversky, A. (1972). Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. Psychological Review, 79, 281-299.
75. Tversky, A., & Simonson, I. (1993). Context dependent preferences. Management Science, 39, 1179-1189.
76. Usher, M., & Zakay, D. (1993). A neural network model for attribute-based decision processes. Cognitive Science, 17, 349-396.
77. Vickers, D. (1979). Decision processes in visual perception. New York: Academic Press.
78. Vickers, D. B. J., Smith, P., & Brown, M. (1985). Experimental paradigms emphasizing state or process limitations: I. Effects of speed-accuracy tradeoffs. Acta Psychologica, 59, 129-161.
79. Von Winterfeldt, D., & Edwards. W. (1986). Decision analysis and behavioral research. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
80. Wedell, D. H. (1991). Distinguishing among models of contextually induced preference reversals. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 17, 767-778.
81. Wedell, D. H. (1993, November). Studying effects of different decoys on choice in a within-subject design. Paper presented at the 34th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis, MO.
82. Wickelgren, W., Corbett, A., & Dosher, B. (1980). Priming and retrieval from short-term memory: A speed accuracy trade-off analysis. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 387-404.
83. Wright, P., & Barbour, F. (1977). Phased decision strategies: Sequels to an initial screening. In M. Starr & M. Zeleny (Eds.), Multiple criteria decision making: TIMS studies in the management sciences, (Chap. 6. pp. 1-10). Amsterdam: North-Holland.