An assessment of the temporal dynamics of moral decisions

Judgment and Decision Making

Volumn 8, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 527-539

  Koop, Gregory J ^a,b  

^a MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Dual systems models; Methodology; Moral decision making; Process models

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884964265     PISSN: 19302975     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/s1930297500003636     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Baron, J., Gürçay, B., Moore, A. B., & Starcke, K. (2012). Use of a Rasch model to predict response times to utilitarianmoral dilemmas. Synthese, 189 (1S), 107-117.
2. Busemeyer, J. R., & Townsend, J. T. (1993). Decision Field-Theory-A dynamic cognitive approach to decision-making in an uncertain environment. Psychological Review, 100, 432-459.
3. Conway, P. & Gawronski, B. (2013). Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making: A process dissociation approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 216-235.
4. Cushman, F. A., Young, L., & Hauser, M. D. (2006). The role of reasoning and intuition in moral judgments: Testing three principles of harm. Psychological Science, 17, 1082-1089.
5. Dale, R., Kehoe, C. E. & Spivey, M. J. (2007). Graded motor responses in the time course of categorizing atypical exemplars. Memory and Cognition, 35, 15-28.
6. Dale, R., Roche, J., Snyder, K., McCall, R. (2008). Exploring Action Dynamics as an Index of Paired-Associate Learning. PLoS ONE 3(3): e1728. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001728.
7. Evans, J. St. B. T. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255-278.
8. Farmer, T. A., Anderson, S. E., & Spivey, M. J. (2007). Gradiency and visual context in syntactic gardenpaths. Journal ofMemory and Language, 57, 570-595.
9. Freeman, J. B. & Ambady, N. (2009). Motions of the hand expose the partial and parallel activation of stereotypes. Psychological Science, 20, 1183-1188.
10. Gigerenzer, G. (2010). Moral satisficing: Rethinking moral behavioral as bounded rationality. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2, 528-554.
11. Gilbert, D. T., Tafarodi, R. W., & Malone, P. S. (1993). You can't not believe everything you read. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 221-233.
12. Greene, J. D. (2009). Dual-process morality and the personal/impersonal distinction: A reply to McGuire, Langdon, Coltheart, andMackenzie. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 581-584.
13. Greene, J. D., Cushman, F. A., Stewart, L. E., Lowenberg, K., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2009). Pushing moral buttons: The interaction between personal force and intention in moral judgment. Cognition, 111, 364-371.
14. Greene, J. D., Morelli, S. A., Lowenberg, K., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2008). Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment. Cognition, 107, 1144-1154.
15. Greene, J. D., Nystrom, L. E., Engell, A. D., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, 44, 389-400.
16. Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293, 2105-2108.
17. Gürçay, B., & Baron, J. (n.d.). New challenges for the two-systems model in moral judgment: Do two-systems models explain what is really going on? Manuscript in preparation.
18. Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social-intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814-834.
19. Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis on moral psychology. Science, 316, 998-1002.
20. Huebner, B., Dwyer, S., & Hauser, M. (2009). The role of emotion in moral psychology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 1-6.
21. Johnson, E.J., Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M., & Willemsen, M. C. (2008). Process models deserve process data: Comment on Brandstätter, Gigerenzer, and Hertwig (2006). Psychological Review, 115, 263-272.
22. Kahane, G. (2012). On the wrong track: Process and content in moral psychology. Mind and Language, 25, 519-545.
23. Kahane, G., Wiech, K., Shackel, N., Farias, M., Savulescu, J., Tracey, I. (2012). The neural basis of intuitive and counterintuitive moral judgment. Social, Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7, 393-402.
24. Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. Cambridge University Press, New York.
25. Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory-Analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
26. Koenigs, M., Young, L., Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., Cushman, F., Hauser, M., & Damasio, A. (2007). Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarianmoral judgments. Nature, 446, 908-911.
27. Kohlberg, L., (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitivedevelopmental approach to socialization. In D.A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 347-480). Chicago: Rand McNally.
28. Koop, G. J. & Johnson, J. G. (2011). Response dynamics: A new window on the decision process. Judgment and Decision Making, 6, 749-757.
29. Koop, G. J. & Johnson, J. G. (in press). The response dynamics of preferential choice. Cognitive Psychology.
30. Loewenstein, G., Rick, S., & Cohen, J. D. (2008). Neuroeconomics. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 647-672.
31. McGuire, J., Langdon, R., Coltheart, M., Mackenzie, C. (2009). A reanalysis of the personal/impersonal distinction in moral psychology research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 577-580.
32. McKinstry, C., Dale, R., & Spivey, M. J. (2008). Action dynamics reveal parallel competition in decision making. Psychological Science, 19, 22-24.
33. Mendez, M. F. (2009). The neurobiology of moral behavior: Review and neuropsychiatric implications. CNS Spectrums, 14, 608-620.
34. Mendez, M. F., Anderson, E., & Shapira, J. S. (2005). An investigation of moral judgment in frontotemporal dementia. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, 18, 193-197.
35. Moore, A. B., Clark, B. A., & Kane, M. J. (2008). Who shalt not kill? Individual differences in working memory capacity, executive control, and moral judgment. Psychological Science, 19, 549-557.
36. Moore, A. B., Lee, N. Y. L., Clark, B. A. M., Conway, A. R. A. (2011). In defense of the personal/impersonal distinction in moral psychology research: Crosscultural validation of the dual process model of moral judgment. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(1), 186-195.
37. Neary, D., Snowden, J., Gustafson, L, Passant, U., Stuss, D., Black, S., Freedman, M., Kertesz, A., Robert, P. H., Albert, M., Boone, K., Miller, B. L., Cummings, J., & Benson, D. F. (1998). Frontotemporal lobar degeneration-A consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria. Neurology, 51, 1546-1554.
38. Payne, J.W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge University Press.
39. Papesh, M. H. & Goldinger, S. D. (2012). Memory in motion: Movement dynamics reveal memory strength. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 906-913.
40. Ratcliff, R., & Rouder, J. N. (1998). Modeling response times for two-choice decisions. Psychological Science, 9, 347-356.
41. Resulaj, A., Kiani, R., Wolpert, D. M., & Shadlen, M. N. (2009). Changes of mind in decision-making. Nature, 461, 263-266.
42. Spivey, M. J., Grosjean, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005). Continuous attraction toward phonological competitors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 10393-10398.
43. Suter, R. S. & Hertwig, R. (2011). Time and moral judgment. Cognition, 119, 454-458.
44. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.
45. Usher, M., and McClelland, J. L. (2001). On the time course of perceptual choice: The leaky competing accumulator model. Psychological Review, 108, 550-592.