Network approaches for expert decisions in sports

Human Movement Science

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 318-333

  Glöckner, Andreas ^a   Heinen, Thomas ^b   Johnson, Joseph G ^c   Raab, Markus ^b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH ON COLLECTIVE GOODS   (Germany)

^b GERMAN SPORT UNIVERSITY COLOGNE   (Germany)

^c MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Accumulator model; Decision making; Expertise; Handball; Parallel constraint satisfaction

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; ATHLETE; ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; GAZE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PARALLEL CONSTRAINT SATISFACTION; SIMULATION; SPORT; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ALGORITHMS; ATHLETIC PERFORMANCE; BIOMECHANICS; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION MAKING; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); ORIENTATION; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; SPORTS; VIDEO RECORDING; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84861341775     PISSN: 01679457     EISSN: 18727646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2010.11.002     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Armel K.C., Beaumel A., Rangel A. Biasing simple choices by manipulating relative visual attention. Judgment and Decision Making Journal 2008, 3:396-403.
2. BioMed Jena GmbH (2003). Handbuch für das biovision eye-tracking [Handbook of biovision eye-tracking] Version 2.0. Jena, Germany: Eigenverlag.
3. Betsch T., Glöckner A. Intuition in judgment and decision making: Extensive thinking without effort. Psychological Inquiry 2010, 21:279-294.
4. Brisson T. Player's perspective: Therese Brisson. Experts performance in sports: Advances in research on sport expertise 2003, 216-218. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL. J.L. Starkes, K.A. Ericsson (Eds.).
5. Browne M.W. Cross-validation methods. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 2000, 44:108-132.
6. Busemeyer J.R., Johnson J.G. Computational models of decision making. Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making 2004, 133-154. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA. D.J. Koehler, N. Harvey (Eds.).
7. Busemeyer J., Jessup R., Johnson J., Townsend J. Building bridges between neural models and complex decision making behaviour. Neural Networks 2006, 19:1047-1058.
8. Evans J.S.B.T. Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 2008, 59:255-278.
9. Farrow D., Raab M. A recipe for expert decision making. Developing sport expertise. Researchers and coaches put theory into practice 2008, 137-154. Routledge, London & New York. D. Farrow, J. Baker, C. MacMahon (Eds.).
10. Geman S., Bienenstock E., Doursat R. Neural networks and the bias/variance dilemma. Neural Computation 1992, 4:1-58.
11. Gettys C.F., Pliske R.M., Manning C., Casey J.T. An evaluation of human act generation performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1987, 39:23-51.
12. Glaholt M.G., Reingold E.M. The time course of gaze bias in visual decision tasks. Visual Cognition 2009, 17:1228-1243.
13. Glöckner A., Betsch T. Modeling option and strategy choices with connectionist networks: Towards an integrative model of automatic and deliberate decision making. Judgment and Decision Making 2008, 3:215-228.
14. Glöckner A., Betsch T. Multiple-reason decision making based on automatic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2008, 34:1055-1075.
15. Glöckner A., Betsch T. Do people make decisions under risk based on ignorance? An empirical test of the Priority Heuristic against Cumulative Prospect Theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2008, 107:75-95.
16. Glöckner, A., & Ebert, I. D. (in press). Legal intuition and expertise. In M. Sinclair (Ed.), Handbook of intuition research. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
17. Glöckner A., Herbold A.-K. An eye-tracking study on information processing in risky decisions: Evidence for compensatory strategies based on automatic processes. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2011, 24:71-98.
18. Glöckner, A., & Hodges, S. D. (in press). Parallel constraint satisfaction in memory-based decisions. Experimental Psychology.
19. Glöckner A., Betsch T., Schindler N. Coherence shifts in probabilistic inference tasks. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2010, 23:439-462.
20. Glöckner A. Investigating intuitive and deliberate processes statistically: The Multiple-Measure Maximum Likelihood strategy classification method. Judgment and Decision Making 2009, 4:186-199.
21. Glöckner, A., & Bröder, A. (in press). Processing of recognition information and additional cues: A model-based analysis of choice, confidence, and response time. Judgment and Decision Making.
22. Glöckner, A., & Hochman, G. (in press). The interplay of experience-based affective and probabilistic cues in decision making: Arousal increases when experience and additional cues conflict. Experimental Psychology.
23. Glöckner A., Witteman C.L.M. Beyond dual-process models: A categorization of processes underlying intuitive judgment and decision making. Thinking & Reasoning 2010, 16:1-25.
24. Gobet F. A pattern-recognition theory of search in expert problem solving. Thinking and Reasoning 1997, 3:291-313.
25. Gold J., Shadlen M. Representation of a perceptual decision in developing oculomotor commands. Nature 2000, 404:390-394.
26. Herbig, B., & Glöckner, A. (2009). Experts and decision making: First steps towards a unifying theory of decision making in novices, intermediates and experts. MPI Collective Goods Preprint, No. 2009/2. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1337449.
27. Hochman G., Ayal S., Glöckner A. Physiological arousal in processing recognition information: Ignoring or integrating cognitive cues?. Judgment and Decision Making 2010, 5:285-299.
28. Holyoak K. Symbolic connectionism: Toward third-generation theories of expertise. Toward a general theory of expertise 1991, 301-336. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. K.A. Ericsson, J. Smith (Eds.).
29. Holyoak K.J., Simon D. Bidirectional reasoning in decision making by constraint satisfaction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1999, 128:3-31.
30. Innocenti A., Rufa A., Semmoloni J. Overconfident behavior in informational cascades: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics 2010, 3:74-82.
31. Johnson J.G. Cognitive modeling of decision making in sports. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 2006, 7:631-652.
32. Johnson J.G., Raab M. Take the first: Option generation and resulting choices. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2003, 91:215-229.
33. Klein G.A. A recognition-primed decision (RPD) model of rapid decision making. Decision making in action: Models and methods 1993, 138-147. Ablex Publishing, Westport, CT. G.A. Klein, J. Orasanu, R. Calderwood, C.E. Zsambok (Eds.).
34. Laming D. Information theory of choice-reaction times 1968, Academic Press, New York.
35. Link S., Heath R. A sequential theory of psychological discrimination. Psychometrika 1975, 40:77-105.
36. McClelland J.L., Rumelhart D.E. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review 1981, 88:375-407.
37. Memmert D., Perl J. Analysis and simulation of creativity learning by means of artificial neural networks. Human Movement Science 2009, 28:263-282.
38. Mosier C. The need and means of cross validation. I. Problems and designs of cross-validation. Educational and Psychological Measurement 1951, 11:5-11.
39. Raab M. T-ECHO: Model of decision making to explain behavior in experiments and simulations under time pressure. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 2001, 3:151-171.
40. Raab M., Johnson J. Expertise-based differences in search and option-generation strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 2007, 13:158-170.
41. Rayner K. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin 1998, 124:372-422.
42. Ratcliff R., Smith P. A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time. Psychological Review 2004, 111:333-367.
43. Ratcliff R., Cherian A., Segraves M. A comparison of macaque behavior and superior colliculus neuronal activity to predictions from models of two-choice decisions. Journal of Neurophysiology 2003, 90:1392-1407.
44. Read S.J., Miller L.C. On the dynamic construction of meaning: An interactive activation and competition model of social perception. Connectionist models of social reasoning and social behavior 1998, 27-68. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, NJ. S.J. Read, L.C. Miller (Eds.).
45. Read S.J., Vanman E.J., Miller L.C. Connectionism, parallel constraint satisfaction processes, and gestalt principles: (Re)introducing cognitive dynamics to social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review 1997, 1:26-53.
46. Reisen N., Hoffrage U., Mast F.W. Identifying decision strategies in a consumer choice situation. Judgment and Decision Making 2008, 3:641-658.
47. Roe R., Busemeyer J., Townsend J. Multiattribute decision field theory: A dynamic, connectionist model of decision making. Psychological Review 2001, 108:370-392.
48. Rogers W.H. Regression standard errors in clustered samples. Stata Technical Bulletin 1993, 13:19-23.
49. Shimojo S., Simion C., Shimojo E., Scheier C. Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference. Nature Neuroscience 2003, 6:1317-1322.
50. Simon D., Krawczyk D.C., Holyoak K.J. Construction of preferences by constraint satisfaction. Psychological Science 2004, 15:331-336.
51. Simon D. A third view of the black box: Cognitive coherence in legal decision making. University of Chicago Law Review 2004, 71:511-586.
52. Spellman B.A. Judges, expertise, and analogy. The psychology of judicial decision making 2010, 149-163. Oxford University Press, Oxford. D. Klein, G. Mitchell (Eds.).
53. Thagard P. Explanatory coherence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1989, 12:435-502.
54. Thagard P., Millgram E. Inference to the best plan: A coherence theory of decision. Goal-driven learning 1995, 439-454. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. A. Ram, D.B. Leake (Eds.).
55. Thomas L.E., Lleras A. Moving eyes and moving thought: On the spatial compatibility between eye movements and cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2007, 14:663-668.
56. Vickers J.N. Perception, cognition, and decision training. The quiet eye in action 2007, Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL.
57. Williams A.M., Janelle C.M., Davids K. Constraints on the search for visual information in sport. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 2004, 2:301-318.