The action dynamics of overcoming the truth

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 486-491

  Duran, Nicholas D ^a   Dale, Rick ^a   McNamara, Danielle S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BEHAVIOR; DECEPTION; FEMALE; FORENSIC MEDICINE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; THINKING;

ATTENTION; DECEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTENTION; LIE DETECTION; MALE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; THINKING; TRUTH DISCLOSURE;

EID: 77957287174     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PBR.17.4.486     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Dale, R., Kehoe, C., & Spivey, M. J. (2007). Graded motor responses in the time course of categorizing atypical exemplars. Memory & Cognition, 35, 15-28.
2. Dale, R., Roche, J., Snyder, K., & McCall, R. (2008). Exploring action dynamics as an index of paired-associate learning. PLoS ONE, 3, e1728. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001728.
3. DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74-118.
4. Ekman, P. (1997). Lying and deception. In N. L. Stein, P. A. Ornstein, B. Tversky, & C. Brainerd (Eds.), Memory for everyday and emotional events (pp. 333-348). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Farmer, T. A., Cargill, S. A., Hindy, N. C., Dale, R., & Spivey, M. J. (2007). Tracking the continuity of language comprehension: Computer mouse trajectories suggest parallel syntactic processing. Cognitive Science, 31, 889-909.
6. Gilbert, D. T. (1991). How mental systems believe. American Psychologist, 46, 107-119.
7. Gilbert, D. T., Tafarodi, R. W., & Malone, P. S. (1993). You can't not believe everything you read. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 65, 221-233.
8. Gregg, A. P. (2007). When vying reveals lying: The timed antagonistic response alethiometer. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 621-647.
9. Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., & Woolley, J. D. (1982). Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 228-238.
10. McKinstry, C., Dale, R., & Spivey, M. J. (2008). Action dynamics reveal parallel competition in decision making. Psychological Science, 19, 22-24.
11. Monrose, F., & Rubin, A. D. (2000). Keystroke dynamics as a biometric for authentication. Future Generation Computer Systems, 16, 351-359.
12. Sartori, G., Agosta, S., Zogmaister, C., Ferrara, S. D., & Castiello, U. (2008). How to accurately assess autobiographical events. Psychological Science, 19, 772-780.
13. Spence, S. A., Hunter, M. D., Farrow, T. F. D., Green, R. D., Leung, D. H., Hughes, C. J., & Venkatasubramanian, G. (2004). A cognitive neurobiological account of deception: Evidence from functional neuroimaging. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 359, 1755-1762.
14. Spivey, M. J., Grosjean, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005). Continuous attraction toward phonological competitors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 10393-10398.
15. Vendemia, J. M., & Buzan, R. F. (2004). Neuronal mechanisms of deception and response congruity in a visual two-stimulus paradigm involving autobiographical information. Psychophysiology, 40, 25-36.
16. Vrij, A. (2001). Detecting lies and deceit: The psychology of lying and the implications for professional practice. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.
17. Walczyk, J. J., Mahoney, K. T., Doverspike, D., & Griffith-Ross, D. A. (2009). Cognitive lie detection: Response time and consistency of answers as cues to deception. Journal of Business & Psychology, 24, 33-49.
18. Walczyk, J. J., Schwartz, J. P., Clifton, R., Adams, B., Wei, M., & Zha, P. (2005). Lying person-to-person about life events: A cognitive framework for lie detection. Personnel Psychology, 58, 141-170.