On objects and actions: Situating self-objectification in a system justification context

Nebraska Symposium on Motivation

Volumn 60, Issue , 2013, Pages 97-126

  Calogero, Rachel M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Collective action; Gender inequality; Gender role; Self objectification; Sexist ideology; Sexual objectification; Social justice; Social motivation; Status quo; System justification

Indexed keywords

BODY IMAGE; DEHUMANIZATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MOTIVATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REVIEW; SELF CONCEPT; SEXISM; SOCIAL CHANGE;

BODY IMAGE; DEHUMANIZATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MOTIVATION; SELF CONCEPT; SEXISM; SOCIAL CHANGE; WOMEN;

EID: 84885208813     PISSN: 01467875     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-6959-9_5     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (187)

1. Allport, G. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison Wesley.
2. American Association of University Women. (2012). The simple truth about the gender pay gap 2012 edition. Retrieved July 1, 2012, from http://www.aauw.org/learn/research/upload/simp letruthaboutpaygap1.pdf.
3. American Psychological Association [APA]. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on the sexualization of girls. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Retrieved June 10, 2008, from http://www.apa.org/pi/wpo/ sexualization-report-summary.pdf.
4. Augustus-Horvath, C.L., & Tylka, T.L. (2009). A test and extension of objectification theory as it predicts disordered eating: Does women's age matter? Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56, 253-265.
5. Barreto, M., & Ellemers, N. (2005). The burden of benevolent sexism: How it contributes to the maintenance of gender inequalities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 633-642.
6. Bartky, S. (1990). Femininity and domination. New York: Routledge.
7. Becker, J. C., & Wright, S. C. (2011). Yet another dark side of chivalry: Benevolent sexism undermines and hostile sexism motivates collective action for social change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 62-77.
8. Bem, S. L., & Bem, D. J. (1970). Case study of a nonconscious ideology: Training the woman to know her place. In D. J. Bem (Ed.), Beliefs, attitudes, and human affairs (pp. 89-99). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
9. Berger, J. (1972). Ways of seeing. London: Penguin.
10. Bernard, P., Gervais, S. J., Allen, J., Campomizzi, S., & Klein, O. (2012). Integrating sexual objectification with object versus person recognition: The sexualized-body-inversion hypothesis. Psychological Science, 23, 469-471.
11. Blanton, H., George, G., & Crocker, J. (2001). Contexts of system justification and system evaluation: Exploring the social comparison strategies of the (not yet) contented female worker. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 4, 126-137.
12. Blasi, G., & Jost, J. T. (2006). System justification theory and research: Implications for law, legal advocacy, and social justice. California Law Review, 94, 1119-1168.
13. Brandt, M. J. (2011). Sexism and gender inequality across 57 societies. Psychological Science, 22, 1413-1418.
14. Breines, J. G., Crocker, J., & Garcia, J. A. (2008). Self-objectification and well-being in women's daily lives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 583-598.
15. Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against our will: Men, women, and rape. New York: Simon & Schuster.
16. Bryant, A. (1993). Hostile hallways: The AAUW survey on sexual harassment in America's schools. Journal of School Health, 63, 355-357.
17. Buchanan, T. S., Fischer, A. R., Tokar, D. M., & Yoder, J. D. (2008). Testing a culture-specific extension of objectification theory regarding African American women's body image. The Counseling Psychologist, 36, 697-718.
18. Calogero, R. M. (2004). A test of objectification theory: Effect of the male gaze on appearance concerns in college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 16-21.
19. Calogero, R.M. (2009). Objectification processes and disordered eating in British women and men. Journal of Health Psychology, 14, 394-402.
20. Calogero, R. M. (2013a). Chivalry is dead: Self-objectification and collective action in response to a broken gender system. : Manuscript in preparation.
21. Calogero, R. M. (2013b). Objects don't object: Evidence that self-objectification disrupts women's social activism. Psychological Science, 24, 312-318.
22. Calogero, R. M., Davis, W. N., & Thompson, J. K. (2005). The role of self-objectification in the experience of women with eating disorders. Sex Roles, 52, 43-50.
23. Calogero, R. M., Grader, A., & Medrano, A. (2013a). Self-objectification and justification of gender inequality: Support for the beauty as currency hypothesis. Manuscript submitted for publication.
24. Calogero, R. M., Herbozo, S., & Thompson, J. K. (2009). Complimentary weightism: The potential costs of appearance-related commentary for women's self-objectification. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 120-132.
25. Calogero, R. M., & Jost, J. T. (2011). Self-subjugation among women: Exposure to sexist ideology, self-objectification, and the protective function of the need to avoid closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 211-228.
26. Calogero, R. M., Pina, A., Park, L. E., & Rahemtulla, Z. K. (2010). Objectification theory predicts college women's attitudes toward cosmetic surgery. Sex Roles, 63, 32-41. doi:10.1007/ s11199-010-9759-5.
27. Calogero, R. M., Pina, A., & Sutton, R. M. (2013b). Cutting words: Priming self-objectification increases the intention to pursue cosmetic surgery. Manuscript submitted for publication.
28. Calogero, R. M., Tantleff-Dunn, S., & Thompson, J. K. (2011). Self-objectification in women: Causes, consequences, and directions for research and practice. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
29. Calogero, R. M., & Thompson, J. K. (2009). Potential implications of the objectification of women's bodies for women's sexual satisfaction. Body Image, 6, 145-148.
30. Calogero, R. M., & Tylka, T. L. (2013). Disrupting the system of sexual objectification: An integrative system justification perspective. Manuscript in preparation for Journal of Social Issues
31. Carr, E. R., & Szymanski, D. M. (2011). Sexual objectification and substance abuse in young adult women. The Counseling Psychologist, 39, 39-66.
32. Choma, B. L., Foster, M. D., & Radford, E. (2007). Use of objectification theory to examine the effects of a media literacy intervention on women. Sex Roles, 56, 581-591.
33. Choma, B. L., Visser, B. A., Pozzebon, J. A., Bogaert, A. F., Busseri, M. A., & Sadava, S. W. (2010). Self-objectification, self-esteem, and gender: Testing a moderated mediation model. Sex Roles, 63, 645-656.
34. Cikara, M., Eberhardt, J. L., & Fiske, S. T. (2011). From agents to objects: Sexist attitudes and neural responses to sexualized targets. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 540-551.
35. Cikara, M., Lee, T. L., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2009). Ambivalent sexism at home and at work: How attitudes toward women in relationships foster exclusion in the public sphere. In J. T. Jost, A. C. Kay, & H. Thorisdottir (Eds.), Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification (pp. 444-462). New York: Oxford University Press.
36. Crawford, M., Lee, I., Portnoy, G., Gurung, A., Khati, D., Jha, P., et al. (2009). Objectified body consciousness in a developing country: A comparison of mothers and daughters in the US and Nepal. Sex Roles, 60, 174-185.
37. Dardenne, B., Dumont, M., & Bollier, T. (2007). Insidious dangers of benevolent sexism: Consequences for women's performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 764-779.
38. Davies, P. G., Spencer, S. J., Quinn, D. M., & Gerhardstein, R. (2002). Consuming images: How television commercials that elicit stereotype threat can restrain women academically and professionally. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1615-1628.
39. Day, M. V., Kay, A. C., Holmes, J. G., & Napier, J. L. (2011). System justification and the defense of committed relationship ideology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 291-306.
40. Dellinger, K., & Williams, C. L. (1997). Makeup at work: Negotiating appearance rules in the workplace. Gender & Society, 11, 151-177.
41. Donnerstein, E., & Hallam, J. (1978). Facilitating effects of erotica on aggression toward females. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1270-1277.
42. Dumont, M., Sarlet, M., & Dardenne, B. (2010). Be too kind to a woman, she'll feel incompetent: Benevolent sexism shifts self-construal and autobiographical memories toward incompetence. Sex Roles, 62, 545-553.
43. Eagly, A. H., Ashmore, R. D., Makhijani, M. G., & Longo, L. C. (1991a). What is beautiful is good, but A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 109-128.
44. Eagly, A. H., Mladinic, A., & Otto, S. (1991b). Are women evaluated more favorably than men? An analysis of attitudes, beliefs, and emotions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 203-216.
45. Fairchild, K., & Rudman, L. A. (2008). Everyday stranger harassment and women's objectification. Social Justice Research, 21, 338-357.
46. Fea, C. J., & Brannon, L. A. (2006). Self-objectification and compliment type: Effects on negative mood. Body Image, 3, 183-188.
47. Feygina, I., Jost, J. T., & Goldsmith, R. (2010). System justification, the denial of global warming, and the possibility of system-sanctioned change. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 326-338.
48. Fisher, A. R., Bettendorf, S. K., & Wang, Y.-W. (2011). Contextualizing sexual objectification. The Counseling Psychologist, 39, 127-139.
49. Fiske, S. T., Bersoff, D. N., Borgida, E., Deaux, K., & Heilman, M. E. (1991). Social science research on trial: Use of sex stereotyping research in Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins. American Psychologist, 46, 1049-1060.
50. Fredrickson, B. L., & Harrison, K. (2005). Throwing like a girl: Self-objectification predicts adolescent girls' motor performance. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 29, 79-101.
51. Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women's lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173-206.
52. Fredrickson, B. L., Roberts, T.-A., Noll, S. M., Quinn, D. M., & Twenge, J. M. (1998). That swimsuit becomes you: Sex differences in self-objectification, restrained eating, and math performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 269-284.
53. Gapinski, K. D., Brownell, K. D., & LaFrance, M. (2003). Body objectification and 'fat talk': Effects on emotion, motivation, and cognitive performance. Sex Roles, 48, 377-388.
54. Gardner, C. B. (1980). Passing by: Street remarks, address rights, and the urban female. Sociological Inquiry, 50, 328-356.
55. Gay, R. K., & Castano, E. (2010). My body or my mind: The impact of state and trait objectification on women's cognitive resources. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 695-703.
56. Gervais, S. J., Vescio, T. K., & Allen, J. (2011). When what you see is what you get: The consequences of the objectifying gaze for women and men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 5-17.
57. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
58. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109-118.
59. Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J., Abrams, D., Masser, B., et al. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763-775.
60. Glick, P., Lameiras, M., Fiske, S. T., Eckes, T., Masser, B., Volpato, C., et al. (2004). Bad but bold: Ambivalent attitudes toward men predict gender inequality in 16 nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 713-728.
61. Goldenberg, J. L. (2013). Immortal objects: The objectification of women as terror management. In S. J. Gervais (Ed.), Objectification and Dehumanization (pp. 73-96). New York, NY: Springer.
62. Goldenberg, J. L., Cooper, D. P., Heflick, N. A., Routledge, C., & Arndt, J. (2011). Is objectification always harmful? Reactions to objectifying images and feedback as a function of self-objectification and mortality salience. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 443-448.
63. Grabe, S., Hyde, J. S., & Lindberg, S. M. (2007). Body objectification and depression in adolescents: The role of gender, shame, and rumination. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 164-175.
64. Harrell, Z. A., Fredrickson, B. L., Pomerleau, C. S., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2006). The role of trait self-objectification in smoking among college women. Sex Roles, 54, 735-743.
65. Heflick, N. A., & Goldenberg, J. L. (2009). Objectifying Sarah Palin: Evidence that objectification causes women to be perceived as less competent and less fully human. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 598-601.
66. Henley, N. M. (1977). Body politics: Power, sex, and nonverbal communication. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
67. Henry, P. J., & Saul, A. (2006). The development of system justification in the developing world. Social Justice Research, 19, 365-378.
68. Hill, M. S., & Fischer, A. R. (2008). Examining objectification theory: Lesbian and heterosexual women's experiences with sexual and self-objectification. The Counseling Psychologist, 36, 745-776.
69. Hogue, M., & Yoder, J. D. (2003). The role of status in producing depressed entitlement in women's and men's pay allocations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 330-337.
70. Horney, K. (1937). The neurotic personality of our time. New York: Norton.
71. Impett, E. A., Schooler, D., & Tolman, D. L. (2006). To be seen and not heard: Femininity ideology and adolescent girls' sexual health. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 131-144.
72. Inter-Parliamentary Union. (2012). Parline Database on National Parliaments. Retrieved July 1, 2012, from http://www.ipu.org/parline-e/ parlinesearch.asp.
73. Jackman, M. R. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
74. Jeffreys, S. (2005). Beauty and misogyny: Harmful cultural practices in the West. New York: Routledge.
75. Johnston-Robledo, I., Fricker, J., & Pasek, L. (2007a). Indecent exposure: Self-objectification and young women's attitudes toward breastfeeding. Sex Roles, 56, 429-437.
76. Johnston-Robledo, I., Sheffield, K., Voigt, J., & Wilcox-Constantine, J. (2007b). Reproductive shame: Self-objectification and young women's attitudes toward their reproductive functioning. Women and Health, 46, 25-39.
77. Jost, J. T. (1995). Negative illusions: Conceptual clarification and psychological evidence concerning false consciousness. Political Psychology, 16, 397-424.
78. Jost, J. T. (1997). An experimental replication of the depressed-entitlement effect among women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 387-393.
79. Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. (1994). The role stereotyping in system justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 1-27.
80. Jost, J. T., Banaji, M., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and nonconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881-919.
81. Jost, J. T., Blount, S., Pfeffer, J., & Hunyady, G. (2003a). Fair market ideology: It's cognitivemotivational underpinnings. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 53-91.
82. Jost, J. T., & Burgess, D. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence and the conflict between group and system justification motives in low status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 293-305.
83. Jost, J. T., Burgess, D., & Mosso, C. (2001). Conflicts of legitimation among self, group, and system: The integrative potential of system justification theory. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 363-388). New York: Cambridge University Press.
84. Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. (2003b). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339-375.
85. Jost, J. T., & Hunyady, O. (2002). The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology. European Review of Social Psychology, 13, 111-153.
86. Jost, J. T., & Hunyady, O. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 260-265.
87. Jost, J. T., & Kay, A. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 498-509.
88. Jost, J. T., Kivetz, Y., Rubini, M., Guermandi, G., & Mosso, C. (2005). System-justifying functions of complementary regional and ethnic stereotypes: Cross-national evidence. Social Justice Research, 18, 305-333.
89. Jost, J. T., Kruglanski, A. W., & Simon, L. (1999). Effects of epistemic motivation on conservatism, intolerance, and other system-justifying attitudes. In L. L. Thompson, J. M. Levine, & D. M. Messick (Eds.), Shared cognition in organizations: The management of knowledge (pp. 91-116). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
90. Jost, J. T., Ledgerwood, A., & Hardin, C. D. (2008a). Shared reality, system justification, and the relational bias of ideological beliefs. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 171-186.
91. Jost, J. T., Napier, J. L., Thorisdottir, H., Gosling, S. D., Palfai, T. P., & Ostafin, B. (2007). Are needs to manage uncertainty and threat associated with political conservatism or ideological extremity? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 989-1007.
92. Jost, J. T., Pelham, B. W., & Carvallo, M. (2002). Non-conscious forms of system-justification: Cognitive, affective, and behavioural preferences for higher status groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 586-602.
93. Jost, J. T., Pelham, B. W., Sheldon, O., & Sullivan, B. N. (2003c). Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system: Evidence of enhanced system justification among the disadvantaged. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 13-36.
94. Jost, J. T., Pietrzak, J., Liviatan, I., Mandisodza, A. N., & Napier, J. L. (2008b). System justification as conscious and nonconscious goal pursuit. In J. Shah & W. Gardner (Eds.), Handbook of motivation science (pp. 591-605). New York: Guildford Press.
95. Jost, J. T., & Thompson, E. P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209-232.
96. Jost, J. T., & van der Toorn, J. (2011). System justification theory. In P. A. M. van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 313- 343). London: Sage.
97. Kaschak, E. (1992). Engendered lives: A new psychology of women's experience. New York: Basic Books.
98. Kay, A. C., & Friesen, J. (2011). On social stability and social change: Understanding when system justification does and does not occur. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 360-364.
99. Kay, A. C., Gaucher, D., Napier, J. L., Callan, M. J., & Laurin, K. (2008). God and the government: Testing a compensatory control mechanism for the support of external systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 18-35.
100. Kay, A.C., Jimenez, M.C., & Jimenez, J.T. (2002). Sour grapes, sweet lemons, and the anticipatory rationalization of the status quo. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1300-1312.
101. Kay, A. C., & Jost, J. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of poor but happy and poor but honest stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823-837.
102. Kay, A. C., Jost, J. T., & Young, S. (2005). Victim-derogation and victim-enhancement as alternate routes to system justification. Psychological Science, 16, 204-246.
103. Kilianski, S. E., & Rudman, L. A. (1998). Wanting it both ways: Do women approve of benevolent sexism? Sex Roles, 39, 333-352.
104. Kipnis, L., & Reeder, J. (1997). White trash girl: The interview. In M. Wray & A. Newitz (Eds.), White trash: Race and class in America (pp. 113-130). New York: Routledge.
105. Klonoff, E. A., & Landrine, H. (1995). The schedule of sexist events: A measure of lifetime and recent sexist discrimination in women's lives. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19, 439-472.
106. Kozee, H. & Tylka, T.L. (2006). A test of objectification theory with lesbian women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 348-357.
107. Kozee, H. B., Tylka, T. L., Augustus-Horvath, C. L., & Denchik, A. (2007). Development and psychometric evaluation of the interpersonal sexual objectification scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 176-189.
108. Kruglanski, A. W. (1989). Lay epistemics and human knowledge: Cognitive and motivational bases. New York: Plenum Press.
109. Kruglanski, A. W. (2006). The psychology of closed-mindedness. New York: Psychology Press.
110. Lanis, K., & Covell, K. (1995). Images of women in advertisements: Effects on attitudes related to sexual aggression. Sex Roles, 32, 639-649.
111. Laurin, K., Kay, A. C., & Shepherd, S. (2011). Self-stereotyping as a route to system justification. Social Cognition, 29, 360-375.
112. Lavine, H., Sweeney, D., & Wagner, S. (1999). Depicting women as sex objects in television advertising: Effects on body dissatisfaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1049-1058.
113. Lawless, J. L., & Fox, R. L. (2010). It still takes a candidate: Why women don't run for office. Boston, MA: Cambridge University Press.
114. Lerner, H. E. (1983). Female dependency in context: Some theoretical and technical considerations. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 53, 697-705.
115. Levy, A. (2005). Female chauvinist pigs: Women and the rise of raunch culture. New York: Free Press.
116. Liss, M., Erchull, M. J., & Ramsey, L. R. (2011). Empowering or oppressing? Development and exploration of the enjoyment of sexualization scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 55-68.
117. Loughnan, S., Haslam, N., Murnane, T., Vaes, J., Reynolds, C., & Suitner, C. (2010). Objectification leads to depersonalization: The denial of mind and moral concern to objectified others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 709-717.
118. Loya, B. N., Cowan, G., & Walters, C. (2006). The role of social comparison and body consciousness in women's hostility toward women. Sex Roles, 54, 575-583.
119. MacKinnon, C. (1989). Towards a feminist theory of the state. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
120. MacMillan, R., Nierobisz, A., & Welsh, S. (2000). Experiencing the streets: Harassment and perceptions of safety among women. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 37, 306-322.
121. Major, B. (1994). From social inequality to personal entitlement: The role of social comparisons, legitimacy appeals, and group membership. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 293-355.
122. Major, B., McFarlin, D. B., & Gagnon, D. (1984). Overworked and underpaid: On the nature of gender differences in personal entitlement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1399-1412.
123. Major, B., Spencer, S., Schmader, T., Wolfe, C., & Crocker, J. (1998). Coping with negative stereotypes about intellectual performance: The role of psychological disengagement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 34-50.
124. Martins, Y., Tiggemann, M., & Kirkbride, A. (2007). Those speedos become them: the role of self-objectification in gay and heterosexual men's body image. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 634-637.
125. McCoy, S. T., & Major, B. (2007). Priming meritocracy and the psychological justification of inequality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 341-351.
126. McKinley, N. M. (2006). The developmental and cultural contexts of objectified body consciousness: A longitudinal analysis of two cohorts of women. Developmental Psychology, 42, 679-687.
127. McKinley, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1996). The objectified body consciousness scale: Development and validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 181-215.
128. Mercurio, A. E., & Landry, L. J. (2008). Self-objectification and well-being: The impact of selfobjectification on women's overall sense of self-worth and life satisfaction. Sex Roles, 58, 458-466.
129. Moffitt, L. B., & Szymanski, D. M. (2011). Experiencing sexually objectifying environments: A qualitative study. The Counseling Psychologist, 39, 67-106.
130. Moradi, B. (2010). Addressing gender and cultural diversity in body image: Objectification theory as a framework for integrating theories and grounding research. Sex Roles, 63, 138-148.
131. Moradi, B. (2011). Objectification theory: Areas of promise and refinement. The Counseling Psychologist, 39, 153-163.
132. Moradi, B. (2013). Discrimination, objectification, and dehumanization: Toward apantheoretical framework. In S. J. Gervais (Ed.), Objectification and dehumanization (pp. 153-182). New York, NY: Springer.
133. Moradi, B., Dirks, D., & Matteson, A. (2005). Roles of sexual objectification experiences and internalization of standards of beauty in eating disorder symptomatology: A test and extension of objectification theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 420-428.
134. Moradi, B., & Huang, Y.-P. (2008). Objectification theory and psychology of women: A decade of advances and future directions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 377-398.
135. Muehlenkamp, J. J., Swanson, J. D., & Brausch, A. M. (2005). Self-objectification, risk taking, and self-harm in college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 24-32.
136. Murnen, S. K., & Smolak, L. (2000). The experience of sexual harassment among grade-school students: Early socialization of female subordination? Sex Roles, 43, 1-17.
137. Napier, J. L., & Jost, J. T. (2008). Why are conservatives happier than liberals? Psychological Science, 19, 565-572.
138. Napier, J. L., Mandisodza, A. N., Andersen, S. M., & Jost, J. T. (2006). System justification in responding to the poor and displaced in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 6, 57-73.
139. Noll, S. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). A mediational model linking self-objectification, body shame, and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 623-636.
140. Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Math=male, me=female, therefore math=me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 44-59.
141. Nowatzki, J., & Morry, M. (2009). Women's intentions regarding, and acceptance of, self-sexualizing behavior. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 95-107.
142. Nussbaum, M. C. (1995). Objectification. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 24, 249-291.
143. O'Brien, L. T., Blodorn, A., Alsbrooks, A., Dube, R., Adams, G., & Nelson, J. C. (2009). Understanding White Americans' perceptions of racism in Hurricane Katrina-related events. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12, 431-444.
144. O'Brien, L. T., & Major, B. (2005). System-justifying beliefs and psychological well-being: The roles of group status and identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1718-1729.
145. Oldmeadow, J., & Fiske, S. T. (2007). System-justifying ideologies moderate status=competence stereotypes: Roles for belief in a just world and social dominance orientation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 1135-1148.
146. Parent, M.C., & Moradi, B. (2011). His biceps become him: An application of objectification theory to understanding drive for muscularity and propensity for steroid use in college men. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 58, 246-256
147. Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763.
148. Puwar, N. (2004). Thinking about making a difference. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 6, 65-80.
149. Quinn, D. M., Kallen, R. W., Twenge, J. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2006). The disruptive effect of self-objectification on performance. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 59-64.
150. Rangel, U., & Keller, J. (2011). Essentialism goes social: belief in social determinism as a component of psychological essentialism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 1056-1078.
151. Reichert, T., & Carpenter, C. (2004). An update on sex in magazine advertising: 1983-2003. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 81, 823-837.
152. Roberts, T.-A. (2002). The woman in the body. Feminism & Psychology, 12, 324-329.
153. Roberts, T.-A. (2004). Female trouble: The menstrual self-evaluation scale and women's selfobjectification. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 22-26.
154. Rudman, L. A., & Borgida, E. (1995). The afterglow of construct accessibility: The behavioral consequences of priming men to view women as sexual objects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 87, 157-176.
155. Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2008). The social psychology of gender: How power and intimacy shape gender relations. New York: Guildford Press.
156. Rudman, L. A., & Mescher, K. (2012). Of animals and objects: Men's implicit dehumanization of women and likelihood of sexual aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 734-746.
157. Saguy, T., Quinn, D. M., Dovidio, J. F., & Pratto, F. (2010). Interacting like a body: Objectification can lead women to narrow their presence in social interactions. Psychological Science, 21, 178-182.
158. Saguy, T., Tausch, N., Dovidio, J. F., & Pratto, F. (2009). The irony of harmony: Positive intergroup contact produces false expectations for equality. Psychological Science, 20, 114-121.
159. Shepherd, M., Erchull, M. J., Rosner, A., Taubenberger, L., Queen, E. F., & McKee, J. (2011). I'll get that for you: The relationship between benevolent sexism and body self-perceptions. Sex Roles, 64, 1-8.
160. Sibley, C. G., Overall, N. C., & Duckitt, J. (2007). When women become more hostiley sexist toward their gender: The system-justifying effect of benevolent sexism. Sex Roles, 57, 743-754.
161. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
162. Stahl, T., Eek, D., & Kazemi, A. (2010). Rape victim blaming as system justification: The role of gender and activation of complementary stereotypes. Social Justice Research, 23, 239-258.
163. Stake, J. E., Roades, L., Rose, S., Ellis, L., & West, C. (1994). The women's studies experience: Impetus for feminist activism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 17-24.
164. Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat is in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613-629.
165. Steer, A., & Tiggemann, M. (2008). The role of self-objectification in women's sexual functioning. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 27, 205-225.
166. Strelan, P., & Hargreaves, D. (2005). Women who objectify other women: The vicious circle of objectification? Sex Roles, 52, 707-712.
167. Strelan, P., Mehaffey, S. J., & Tiggemann, M. (2003). Self-objectification and esteem in young women: The mediating role of reasons for exercise. Sex Roles, 48, 89-95.
168. Swim, J. K., Hyers, L. L., Cohen, L. L., & Ferguson, M. J. (2001). Everyday sexism: Evidence for its incidence, nature, and psychological impact from three daily diary studies. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 31-53.
169. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrated theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
170. Tiggeman, M., & Kuring, J. K. (2004). The role of body objectification in disordered eating and depressed mood. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 299-311.
171. Tiggemann, M. (2011). Mental health risks of self-objectification: A review of the empirical evidence for disordered eating, depressed mood, and sexual dysfunction. In R. M. Calogero, S. Tantleff-Dunn, & J. K. Thompson (Eds.), Self-objectification in women: Causes, consequences, and counteractions (pp. 139-159). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
172. Tiggemann, M., & Boundy, M. (2008). Effect of environment and appearance compliment on college women's self-objectification, mood, body shame, and cognitive performance. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 399-405.
173. Tiggemann, M., & Lynch, J. E. (2001). Body image across the life span in adult women: The role of self-objectification. Developmental Psychology, 37, 243-253. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.37.2.243.
174. Tiggemann, M., Verri, A., & Scaravaggi, S. (2005). Body dissatisfaction, disordered eating, fashion magazines, and clothes: A cross-cultural comparison between Australian and Italian young women. International Journal of Psychology, 40, 293-302.
175. Tiggemann, M., & Williams, E. (2012). The role of self-objectification in disordered eating, depressed mood, and sexual functioning among women: A comprehensive test of objectification theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36, 66-75.
176. Tylka, T. L., & Hill, M. S. (2004). Objectification theory as it relates to disordered eating among college women. Sex Roles, 51, 719-730.
177. Tylka, T. L., & Sabik, N. J. (2010). Integrating social comparison theory and self-esteem within objectification theory to predict women's disordered eating. Sex Roles, 63, 18-31.
178. Unger, R. K. (1979). Female and male. New York: Harper and Row. United Nations. (1995). Harmful traditional practices affecting the health and women of children: Fact Sheet No. 23. Geneva: United Nations.
179. United Nations. (2000). World's women 2000: Trends and statistics. New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
180. van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 504-535.
181. Wakslak, C. J., Jost, J. T., Tyler, T. R., & Chen, E. S. (2007). Moral outrage mediates the dampening effect of system justification on support for redistributive social policies. Psychological Science, 18, 267-274.
182. Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1049-1062.
183. Wolf, N. (1991). The beauty myth. New York: Morrow.
184. World Health Organization. (2005). WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence against women: Summary report of initial results on prevalence, health outcomes and women's responses. Geneva: WHO Press.
185. Wright, S. C., Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 994-1003.
186. Young, I. M. (1990). Throwing like a girl and other essays in feminist philosophy and social theory. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
187. Zurbriggen, E. L., Ramsey, L. R., & Jaworski, B. K. (2011). Self- and partner-objectification in romantic relationships: Associations with media consumption and relationship satisfaction. Sex Roles, 64, 449-462.