Bad but Bold: Ambivalent Attitudes Toward Men Predict Gender Inequality in 16 Nations

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volumn 86, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 713-728

  Glick, Peter ^a   Fiske, Susan T ^b   Masser, Barbara ^c   Manganelli, Anna Maria ^d   Huang, Li Li ^e   Rodríguez Castro, Yolanda ^f   Willemsen, Tineke M ^g   Six Matema, Iris ^h   Lameiras, Maria ^f   Eckes, Thomas ⁱ   Volpato, Chiara ^j,o   Pek, Jolynn C X ^k   Sakalh Uǧurlu, Nuray ^l   D'Avila Pereira, Maria Luiza ^m   Brunner, Annetje ⁿ   Wells, Robin ^a  

^a LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^e TAMKANG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^f UNIVERSITY OF VIGO   (Spain)

^g TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^h CHEMNITZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF HAGEN   (Germany)

^j UNIVERSITY OF TRIESTE   (Italy)

^k NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^l MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^m FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PARANÁ   (Brazil)

ⁿ De Werkschuur ^*  (Netherlands)

^o UNIVERSITY OF MILANO BICOCCA   (Italy)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND; BENEFICENCE; CULTURAL FACTOR; EUROPE; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HOSTILITY; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MIDDLE EAST; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; SOUTH AND CENTRAL AMERICA; STUDENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTITUDE; AUSTRALASIA; BENEFICENCE; CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; CULTURAL CHARACTERISTICS; DATA COLLECTION; EUROPE; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HOSTILITY; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; LATIN AMERICA; MALE; MIDDLE EAST; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREJUDICE; SEX FACTORS; STEREOTYPING; STUDENTS;

EID: 2442517450     PISSN: 00223514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.5.713     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Aiken, L. R. (1987). Formulas for equating ratings on different scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 47, 51-54.
2. Ashmore, R. D., Del Boca, F. K., & Wohlers, A. J. (1986). Gender stereotypes. In R. D. Ashmore & F. K. Del Boca (Eds.), The social psychology of female-male relations (pp. 69-119). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
3. Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 155-162.
4. Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88, 354-364.
5. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
6. Eagly, A. H., & Mladinic, A. (1989). Gender stereotypes and attitudes toward women and men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 543-558.
7. Eagly, A. H., & Mladinic, A. (1994). Are people prejudiced against women? Some answers from research on attitudes, gender stereotypes and judgments of competence. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 1-35). New York: Wiley.
8. Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54, 408-423.
9. Eckes, T. (1994). Features of men, features of women: Assessing stereotypic beliefs about gender subtypes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 107-123.
10. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902.
11. Glick, P., Diebold, J., Bailey-Werner, B., & Zhu, L. (1997). The two faces of Adam: Ambivalent sexism and polarized attitudes toward women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1323-1334.
12. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512.
13. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1999). The Ambivalence Toward Men Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent beliefs about men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 519-536.
14. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). Ambivalent sexism. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 115-188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Academic Press.
15. Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J., Abrams, D., Masser, B., et al. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763-775.
16. Glick, P., Lameiras, M., & Rodríguez, Y. R. (2002). Education and Catholic religiosity as predictors of hostile and benevolent sexism toward women and men. Sex Roles, 47, 433-441.
17. Glick, P., Zion, C., & Nelson, C. (1988). What mediates sex discrimination in hiring decisions? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 178-186.
18. Hoffman, C., & Hurst, N. (1990). Gender stereotypes: Perception or rationalization? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 197-208.
19. Jackman, M. R. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Berkeley: University of California Press.
20. Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & Eagly, A. H. (2002). Another look at sex differences in preferred mate characteristics: The effects of endorsing the traditional female gender role. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 322-328.
21. Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false-consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1-27.
23. Jost, J. T., Burgess, D., & Mosso, C. O. (2001). Conflicts of legitimation among self, group, and system: The integrative potential of system justification theory. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 363-388). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
24. Jost, J. T., & Kay, A. C. (2002). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Manuscript submitted for publication.
25. Kilianski, S. E., & Rudman, L. A. (1998). Wanting it both ways: Do women approve of benevolent sexism? Sex Roles, 39, 333-352.
26. Langford, T., & Mackinnon, N. J. (2000). The affective bases for the gendering of traits: Comparing the United States and Canada. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 34-48.
27. Maccoby, E. E. (1998). The two sexes: Growing up apart, coming together. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28. Mosher, D. L., & Sirkin, M. (1984). Measuring a macho personality constellation. Journal of Research in Personality, 18, 150-163.
29. Nosek, B., & Banaji, M. B. (2002). The go/no-go association task. Social Cognition, 19, 625-664.
30. Peeters, G. (1992). Evaluative meanings of adjectives in vitro and in context: Some theoretical implications and practical consequences of positive-negative asymmetry and behavioral-adaptive concepts of evaluation. Psychologica Belgica, 32, 211-231.
31. Richeson, J. A., & Ambady, N. (2001). Who's in charge? Effects of situational roles on automatic gender bias. Sex Roles, 44, 493-512.
32. Ridgeway, C. L. (2001). The emergence of status beliefs: From structural inequality to legitimizing ideology. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 257-277). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
33. Rudman, L. A., Feinberg, J. M., & Fairchild, K. (2002). Minority members' implicit attitudes: Ingroup bias as a function of group status. Social Cognition, 20, 294-320.
34. Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (1999). Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle-managers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1004-1010.
35. Rudman, L. A., & Goodwin, S. (2003). Gender differences in automatic ingroup bias: Four explanations for an anomaly. Unpublished manuscript.
36. Rudman, L. A., & Kilianski, S. E. (2000). Implicit and explicit attitudes toward female authority. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1315-1328.
37. Runciman, W. C. (1966). Relative deprivation and social justice. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
38. Russell, D. W. (2002). In search of underlying dimensions: The use (and abuse) of factor analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1629-1646.
39. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
40. Spence, J. T. (1998). Gender-related traits and gender ideology: Evidence for a multifactorial theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 624-635.
41. Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Holahan, C. K. (1979). Negative and positive components of masculinity and femininity and their relationships to self-reports of neurotic and acting-out behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1673-1682.
42. Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Stapp, J. (1974). The Personal Attributes Questionnaire: A measure of sex-role stereotypes and masculinity and femininity. Journal Supplement Abstract Service: Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 4, 43-44.
43. Swim, J. K., Hyers, L. L., Cohen, L. L., & Ferguson, M. J. (2001). Everyday sexism: Evidence for its incidence, nature, and psychological impact from three daily diary studies. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 31-53.
44. Tajfel, H. (1981). Social identity and intergroup relations. London: Cambridge University Press.
45. Thomas, M. A. (2002). I believe in the cause, but not in the word: Women's ambivalence toward liberal feminism. Unpublished honors thesis, Lawrence University, Appleton, Wisconsin.
46. United Nations Development Programme. (2002). Human Development Report 2002. New York: Oxford University Press.
47. Weber, M. (1918/1968). Economy and society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
48. Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1990). Measuring sex stereotypes: A multination study. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
49. Wojciszke, B., Bazinska, R., & Jaworski, M. (1998). On the dominance of moral categories in impression formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1245-1257.
50. Zelditch, M., Jr. (2001). Theories of legitimacy. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 33-53). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.