A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo

Political Psychology

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 881-919

  Jost, John T ^a   Banaji, Mahzarin R ^b   Nosek, Brian A ^c  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Ideology; Implicit bias; Intergroup relations; System justification

Indexed keywords

EID: 4043130757     PISSN: 0162895X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (142)

1. Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (Eds.) (1990). Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances. New York: Springer-Verlag.
2. Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.
3. Allen, V. L., & Wilder, D. A. (1975). Categorization, belief similarity, and group discrimination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 971-977.
4. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
5. Altemeyer, R. A. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.
6. Altemeyer, R. A. (1998). The other "authoritarian personality. " Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 47-92.
7. Ashburn-Nardo, L., Knowles, M. L., & Monteith, M. J. (2003). Black Americans' implicit racial associations and their implications for intergroup judgment. Social Cognition, 21, 61-87.
8. Banaji, M. R., Greenwald, A. G., & Rosier, M. (1997). Implicit esteem: When collectives shape individuals. Paper presented at the Self & Identity Preconference, Toronto.
9. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Anchor.
10. Blanton, H., George, G., & Crocker, J. (2001). Contexts of system justification and system evaluation: Exploring the social comparison strategies of the (not yet) contented female worker. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 4, 127-138.
11. Bobo, L. (1988). Group conflict, prejudice and the paradox of contemporary racial attitudes. In P. A. Katz & D. A. Taylor (Eds.), Eliminating racism: Profiles in controversy (pp. 85-116). New York: Plenum.
12. Brewer, M. B. (1979). Ingroup bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307-324.
13. Brewer, M. B., & Campbell, D. T. (1976). Ethnocentrism and intergroup attitudes. New York: Wiley.
14. Brewer, M. B., & Miller, N. (1996). Intergroup relations. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
15. Brooks, D. (2003, 12 January). The triumph of hope over self-interest. New York Times, Section 4, p. 15.
16. Brown, R. (1988). Group processes: Dynamics within and between groups (1st ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
17. Brown, R. (2000a). Social identity theory: Past achievements, current problems and future challenges. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 745-778.
18. Brown, R. (2000b). Group processes: Dynamics within and between groups (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
19. Centers, R. (1949). The psychology of social classes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20. Chanley, V. A. (2002). Trust in government in the aftermath of 9/11: Determinants and consequences. Political Psychology, 23, 469-483.
21. Chen, E. S., & Tyler, T. R. (2001). Cloaking power: Legitimizing myths and the psychology of the advantaged. In A. Y. Lee-Chai & J. Bargh (Eds.), The use and abuse of power: Multiple perspectives on the causes of corruption (pp. 241-261). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
22. Cialdini, R. B., Borden, R. J., Thorne, A., Walker, M. R., Freeman, S., & Sloan, L. R. (1976). Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) field studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 406-415.
23. Correll, J., Park, B., Judd, C. M., & Wittenbrink, B. (2002). The police officer's dilemma: Using ethnicity to disambiguate potentially threatening individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1314-1329.
24. Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive justice. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
25. Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (Eds.) (1986). Prejudice, discrimination, and racism. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
26. Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
27. Ellemers, N., Wilke, H., & van Knippenberg, A. (1993). Effects of the legitimacy of low group or individual status on individual and collective status-enhancement strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 766-778.
28. Fiske, S. T. (1993). Controlling other people. American Psychologist, 48, 621-628.
29. Fong, C. (2001). Social preferences, self-interest, and the demand for redistribution. Journal of Public Economics, 82, 225-246.
30. Gilbert, D. T., Pinel, E. C., Wilson, T. D., Blumberg, S. J., & Wheatley, T. (1998). Immune neglect: A source of durability bias in affective forecasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 617-638.
31. Gilens, M. (1999). Why Americans hate welfare: Race, media, and the politics of antipoverty policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109-118.
33. Goodwin, S., & Devos, T. (2002). American identity under siege: National and racial identities in the wake of the September 11th attack. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Experimental Social Psychology, Columbus, OH.
34. Greenwald, A. G. (1980). The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history. American Psychologist, 35, 603-618.
35. Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4-27.
36. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
37. Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197-216.
38. Gurr, T. R. (1970). Why men rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39. Haines, E. L., & Jost, J. T. (2000). Placating the powerless: Effects of legitimate and illegitimate explanation on affect, memory, and stereotyping. Social Justice Research, 13, 219-236.
40. Havel, V. (1991). The power of the powerless. In Open letters: Selected writings 1965-1990 (pp. 125-214). London: Faber & Faber.
41. Hewstone, M., & Jaspars, J. (1984). Social dimensions of attribution. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), The social dimension: European developments in social psychology (vol. 2, pp. 379-404). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. Hewstone, M., & Ward, C. (1985). Ethnocentrism and causal attribution in southeast Asia. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 614-623.
43. Hill, M. E. (2002). Skin color and the perception of attractiveness among African Americans: Does gender make a difference? Social Psychology Quarterly, 65, 77-91.
44. Hinkle, S., & Brown, R. (1990). Intergroup comparisons and social identity: Some links and lacunae. In D. Abrams & M A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances (pp. 48-70). New York: Springer-Verlag.
45. Hirschman. A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
46. Hofstede, G. (1997). Cultures and organizations. New York: McGraw-Hill.
47. Hornsey, M. J., Spears, R., Cremers, I., & Hogg, M. A. (2003). Relations between high and low power groups: The importance of legitimacy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 216-227.
48. Huddy, L. (2004). Contrasting theoretical approaches to intergroup relations. Political Psychology, 25, 947-967.
49. Huddy, L., Feldman, S., Capelos, T., & Provost, C. (2002). The consequences of terrorism: Disentangling the effects of personal and national threat. Political Psychology, 23, 485-509.
50. Hunt, M. O. (2000). Status, religion, and the "belief in a just world": Comparing African Americans, Latinos, and whites. Social Science Quarterly, 81, 325-343.
51. Jackman, M. R. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
52. Jackman, M. R., & Senter, M. S. (1983). Different, therefore unequal: Beliefs about trait differences between groups of unequal status. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 2, 309-335.
53. Jost, J. T. (1997). An experimental replication of the depressed entitlement effect among women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 387-393.
54. Jost, J. T. (2001). Outgroup favoritism and the theory of system justification: An experimental paradigm for investigating the effects of socio-economic success on stereotype content. In G. Moskowitz (Ed.). Cognitive social psychology: The Princeton symposium on the legacy and future of social cognition (pp. 89-102). Mahwah. NJ: Erlbaum.
55. Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1-27.
56. Jost, J. T., & Burgess, D. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence and the conflict between group and system justification motives in low status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 293-305.
57. Jost, J. T., Burgess, D., & Mosso, C. (2001). Conflicts of legitimation among self, group, and system: The integrative potential of system justification theory. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 363-388). New York: Cambridge University Press.
58. Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. (2003a). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339-375.
59. Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. (2003b). Exceptions that prove the rule: Using a theory of motivated social cognition to account for ideological incongruities and political anomalies. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 383-393.
60. Jost, J. T., & Hunyady, O. (2002). The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology. European Review of Social Psychology, 13, 111-153.
61. Jost, J. T., & Kay, A. C. (in press). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, forthcoming.
62. Jost, J. T., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2002). The estrangement of social constructionism and experimental social psychology: History of the rift and prospects for reconciliation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 168-187.
63. Jost, J. T., Pelham, B. W., & Carvallo, M. (2002). Non-conscious forms of system justification: Cognitive, affective, and behavioral preferences for higher status groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 586-602.
64. Jost, J. T., Pelham, B. W., Sheldon, O., & Sullivan, B. N. (2003). Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system: Evidence of enhanced system justification among the disadvantaged. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 13-36.
65. Jost, J. T., & Thompson, E. P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209-232.
66. Kappen, D., & Branscombe, N. R. (2001). The effects of reasons given for ineligibility on perceived gender discrimination and feelings of injustice. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 295-313.
67. Kay, A., Jimenez, M. C., & Jost, J. T. (2002). Sour grapes, sweet lemons, and the anticipatory rationalization of the status quo. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1300-1312.
68. Kay, A. C., & Jost, J. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of "poor but happy" and "poor but honest" stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823-837.
69. Kilianski, S. E., & Rudman, L. A. (1998). Wanting it both ways: Do women approve of benevolent sexism? Sex Roles, 39, 333-352.
70. Kluegel, J. R., & Smith, E. R. (1986). Beliefs without inequality: Americans' view of what is and what ought to be. Hawthorne, NJ: Aldine de Gruyter.
71. Lane, K. A., Mitchell, J. P., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Implicit group evaluation: Ingroup preference, outgroup preference, and the rapid creation of implicit attitudes. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University.
72. Lane, R. E. (2004). The fear of equality. In J. T. Jost & J. Sidanius (Eds.), Political psychology: Key readings. New York: Psychology Press/Taylor & Francis. (Original work published 1959)
73. Leach, C. W., Spears, R., Branscombe, N. R., & Doosje, B. (2003). Malicious pleasure: Schadenfreude at the suffering of another group. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 932-943.
74. Levin, S., Sidanius, J., Rabinowitz, J. L., & Federico, C. (1998). Ethnic identity, legitimizing ideologies, and social status: A matter of ideological asymmetry. Political Psychology, 19, 373-404.
75. Levy, B., & Banaji, M. R. (2002). Implicit ageism. In T. Nelson (Ed.), Ageism: Stereotyping and prejudice against older persons (pp. 49-75). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
76. Lipset, S. M. (1981). Working-class authoritarianism. In Political man: The social bases of politics (expanded ed., pp. 87-126). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
77. Livingston, R. W. (2002). The role of perceived negativity in the moderation of African Americans' implicit and explicit racial attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 405-413.
78. Major, B. (1994). From social inequality to personal entitlement: The role of social comparisons, legitimacy appraisals, and group memberships. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 293-355.
79. Major, B., Gramzow, R. H., McCoy, S. K., Levin, S., Schmader, T., & Sidanius, J. (2002). Perceiving personal discrimination: The role of group status and legitimizing ideology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 269-282.
80. McGuire, W. J. (1997). Creative hypothesis generating in psychology: Some useful heuristics. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 1-30.
81. McGuire, W. J., & McGuire, C. V. (1991). The content, structure, and operation of thought systems. Advances in Social Cognition, 4, 1-78.
82. Miller, D. T. (1999). The norm of self-interest. American Psychologist, 54, 1-8.
83. Miller, D. T., & Ratner, R. K. (1998). The disparity between the actual and assumed power of self-interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 53-62.
84. Moore, D. W. (2001, 9 October). Bush support rides wave of anti-terrorism: Ratings on job performance, personal characteristics soar (Poll analyses, Gallup Organization). Retrieved 12 July 2004 from http://www.gallup.com/content/login.aspx?ci=4975.
85. Mullen, B., Brown, R., & Smith, C. (1992). Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 103-122.
86. Newman, K. (2002). No shame: The view from the left bank. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 1577-1599.
87. Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002a). Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration website. Group Dynamics, 6, 101-115.
88. Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002b). eReseareh: Ethics, security, design, and control in psychological research on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 161-176.
89. Oakes, P. J., Haslam, A., & Turner, J. C. (1994). Stereotyping and social reality. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
90. Olson, M. (1971). The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
91. Overbeck, J., Jost, J. T., Mosso, C., & Flizik, A. (2004). Resistant vs. acquiescent responses to ingroup inferiority as a function of social dominance orientation in the USA and Italy. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 7, 35-54.
92. Pelham, B. W., & Hetts, J. J. (2001). Underworked and overpaid: Elevated entitlement in men's selfpay. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 93-103.
93. Pettigrew, T (1982). Prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
94. Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763.
95. Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., & Greenberg, J. (2003). In the wake of 9/11: The psychology of terror. Washington, DC: APA Press.
96. Ratner, R. K., & Miller, D. T. (2001). The norm of self-interest and its effects on social action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 5-16.
97. Reicher, S. (2004). The context of social identity: Domination, resistance, and change. Political Psychology, 25, 921-945.
98. Reicher, S., & Levine, M. (1994). Deindividuation, power relations between groups and the expression of social identity: The effects of visibility to the out-group. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 145-163.
99. Rubin, M., & Hewstone, M. (2004). Commentary on Reicher, Jost et al., and Sidanius et al. Political Psychology, 25, 823-844.
100. Rudman, L. A., Feinherg, J., & Fairchild, K. (2002). Minority members' implicit attitudes: Automatic ingroup bias as a function of group status. Social Cognition, 20, 294-320.
101. Saad, L. (2003, 25 March). Iraq war triggers major rally effect: Falls just short of 1991 surge in public attitudes (Poll analyses, Gallup Organization). Retrieved 12 July 2004 from http://www.gallup.com/content/login.aspx?ci=8074.
102. Scheepers, D., Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (2002). The emergence and effects of deviants in low and high status groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 611-617.
103. Schmader, T., Major, B., Eccleston, C. P., & McCoy, S. K. (2001). Devaluing domains in response to threatening intergroup comparisons: Perceived legitimacy and the status value asymmetry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 782-796.
104. Schmitt, M. T., Branscombe, N. R., & Kappen, D. M. (2003). Attitudes toward group-based inequality: Social dominance or social identity? British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 161-186.
105. Scott, J. (1990). Domination and the arts of resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
106. Sears, D., & Funk, C. (1991). The role of self-interest in social and political attitudes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 1-92.
107. Sedikides, C., Schopler, J., & Insko, C. A. (Eds.) (1998). Intergroup cognition and intergroup behavior. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
108. Sherif, M. (1967). Group conflict and co-operation. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
109. Sidanius, J. (1993). The psychology of group conflict and the dynamics of oppression: A social dominance perspective. In S. Iyengar & W. J. McGuire (Eds.), Explorations in political psychology (pp. 183-219). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
110. Sidanius, J., & Ekehammar, B. (1979). Political socialization: A multivariate analysis of Swedish political attitude and preference data. European Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 265-279.
111. Sidanius, J., Levin, S., Federico, C., & Pratto, F. (2001). Legitimizing ideologies: The social dominance approach. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 307-331). New York: Cambridge University Press.
112. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1993). The inevitability of oppression and the dynamics of social dominance. In P. Sniderman, P. E. Tetlock, & E. G. Carmines (Eds.), Prejudice, politics, and the American dilemma (pp. 173-211). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
113. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
114. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (2003). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of inequality: A reply to Schmitt, Branscombe, & Kappen and Wilson & Liu. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 207-213.
115. Sidanius, J., Singh, P., Hetts, J. J., & Federico, C. (2000). It's not affirmative action, it's the blacks: The continuing relevance of race in American politics. In D. O. Sears, J. Sidanius, & L. Bobo (Eds.), Racialized politics: The debate about racism in America (pp. 191-235). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
116. Smith, E. R., & Mackie, D. M. (2002). Commentary. In D. M. Mackie & E. R. Smith (Eds.), From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups (pp. 285-299). New York: Psychology Press.
117. Sniderman, P., Crosby, G., & Howell, W. (2000). The politics of race. In D. O. Sears, J. Sidanius, & L. Bobo (Eds.), Racialized politics: The debate about racism in America (pp. 236-279). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
118. Sniderman, P., & Piazza, T. (1993). The scar of race. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
119. Spears, R., Jetten, J., & Doosje, B. (2001). The (il)legitimacy of ingroup bias: From social reality to social resistance. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 332-362). New York: Cambridge University Press.
120. Spears, R., Oakes, P., Ellemers, N., & Haslam, S. A. (Eds.) (1997). The social psychology of stereotyping and group life. Oxford: Blackwell.
121. Spicer, C. V., & Monteith, M. J. (2001). Implicit outgroup favoritism among blacks and vulnerability to stereotype threat. Unpublished manuscript, University of Kentucky.
122. Stacey, B. G., & Green, R. T. (1971). Working-class conservatism: A review and an empirical study. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 10, 10-26.
123. Stangor, C., & Jost, J. T. (1997). Individual, group, and system levels of analysis and their relevance for stereotyping and intergroup relations. In R. Spears, P. Oakes, N. Ellemers, & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 336-358). Oxford: Blackwell.
124. Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, W. S. (1996). Intergroup relations. Boulder, CO: Westview.
125. Sumner, W. G. (1906). Folkways. New York: Ginn.
126. Tajfel, H. (1975). The exit of social mobility and the voice of social change: Notes on the social psychology of intergroup relations. Social Science Information, 14, 101-118.
127. Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
128. Tajfel, H. (Ed.) (1984). The social dimension: European developments in social psychology (vols. 1-2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
129. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), The psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
130. Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1994). Theories of intergroup relations: International social psychological perspectives (2nd ed.). New York: Praeger.
131. Tsui, A. S., Egan, T. D., & O'Reilly, C. A. (1992). Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 549-579.
132. Turner, J. C., & Brown, R. (1978). Social status, cognitive alternatives, and intergroup relations. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 201-234). London: Academic Press.
133. Turner, J. C., & Giles, H. (Eds.) (1981). Intergroup behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
134. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
135. Turner, J. C., & Reynolds, K. (2003). Why social dominance theory has been falsified. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 199-206.
136. Uhlmann, E., Dasgupta, N., Elgueta, A., Greenwald, A. G., & Swanson, J. (2002). Subgroup prejudice based on skin color among Hispanics in the United States and Latin America. Social Cognition, 20, 198-225.
137. Walker, I., & Smith, H. J. (Eds.) (2002). Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
138. Wicklund, R. A., & Brehm, J. W. (1976). Perspectives on cognitive dissonance. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
139. Wilson, G. D. (Ed.) (1973). The psychology of conservatism. London: Academic Press.
140. Wilson, T. D., Wheatley, T., Kurtz, J., Dunn, E., & Gilbert, D. T. (2004). When to fire: Anticipatory versus post-event reconstrual of uncontrollable events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 340-351.
141. Wright, S. C., Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 994-1003.
142. Zinn, H. (1968). Disobedience and democracy: Nine fallacies on law and order. New York: Vintage.