National research agenda for the prevention of occupational hearing loss-part 2

Seminars in Hearing

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 208-251

  Themann, Christa ^b   Suter, Aliceh ^a   Stephenson, Markr R ^b  

^a Alice Suter and Associates   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

hearing conservation; hearing loss prevention; noise exposure; Occupational hearing loss

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; HUMAN; NOISE MEASUREMENT; NOISE REDUCTION; OCCUPATIONAL DEAFNESS; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY; TINNITUS; WORKER;

EID: 84882308998     PISSN: 07340451     EISSN: 10988955     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1349352     Document Type: Article

References (252)

1. Royster L. H., Berger E. H., Royster J. D. Noise surveys and data analysis. In: Berger E. H., Royster L. H., Royster J. D., Driscoll D. P., Layne M., eds. The Noise Manual. Revised 5th ed. Fairfax, VA American Industrial Hygiene Association: 2003
2. Stephenson M. R. Noise exposure characterization via task based analysis. In: Franks J., Casali J., eds. Proceedings of the Hearing Conservation Conference III/XX. Des Moines, IA National Hearing Conservation Association: 1995; 63 72
3. Seixas N. S., Sheppard L., Neitzel R. Comparison of task-based estimates with full-shift measurements of noise exposure. AIHA J (Fairfax, VA): 2003; 64 823 829 (Pubitemid 37541863)
4. Smith R. W., Sahl J. D., Kelsh M. A., Zalinski J. Task-based exposure assessment: analytical strategies for summarizing data by occupational groups. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J: 1997; 58 402 412
5. Burks J. A., Michael K. L. A new best practice for hearing conservation: the Exposure Smart Protector (ESP). Presented at Noise-Con 2003; Cleveland, OH; 2003
6. Byrne D. C., Reeves E. R. Analysis of nonstandard noise dosimeter microphone positions. J Occup Environ Hyg: 2008; 5 197 209
7. Mulroy M. J., Henry W. R., McNeil P. L. Noise-induced transient microlesions in the cell membranes of auditory hair cells. Hear Res: 1998; 115 93 100 (Pubitemid 28062826)
8. Nordmann A. S., Bohne B. A., Harding G. W. Histopathological differences between temporary and permanent threshold shift. Hear Res: 2000; 139 13 30
9. Johnson D. L., Nixon C. W., Stephenson M. R. Long-duration exposure to intermittent noises. Aviat Space Environ Med: 1976; 47 987 990
10. Nixon C. W., Johnson D. L., Stephenson M. R. Asymptotic behavior of temporary threshold shift and recovery from 24- and 48-hour noise exposures. Aviat Space Environ Med: 1977; 48 311 315 (Pubitemid 8087859)
11. Stephenson M. R., Nixon C. W., Johnson D. L. Identification of the minimum noise level capable of producing an asymptotic temporary threshold shift. Aviat Space Environ Med: 1980; 51 391 396 (Pubitemid 10075647)
12. ACGIH TLVs and BEIs. Cincinnati, OH American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists: 2008
13. Berglund B., Hassmén P., Job R. FS. Sources and effects of low-frequency noise. J Acoust Soc Am: 1996; 99 2985 3002 (Pubitemid 26137280)
14. Pawlaczyk-Luszczyńska M. Evaluation of occupational exposure to infrasonic noise in Poland. Int J Occup Med Environ Health: 1999; 12 159 176 (Pubitemid 29309473)
15. Guest H. Inadequate standards currently applied by local authorities to determine statutory nuisance from LF and infrasound. J Low Freq Noise Vibration Active Control: 2003; 22 1 7 (Pubitemid 47457238)
16. ISO International Standard. Acoustics: Frequency-Weighting Characteristic for Infrasound Measurements. ISO 7196:1995(E). Geneva, Switzerland International Organization for Standardization: 1995
17. Asselineau M., Bockhoff M., Canetto P., et al. Noise at Work 2007: Synthesis Report from Technical Sessions. Available at: http://www.noiseatwork. eu/synthese-naw-2007-eng.pdf. Accessed March 2008
18. OSHA Occupational Noise Exposure: Hearing Conservation Amendment. Washington, DC U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration: 1983;. Fed. Reg. 48 (46): 9738-9783, 4078-4179
19. OSHA OSHA instruction CPL 2.103. Inspection documentation. In: Field Inspection Reference Manual; 1994. Available at: http://www.osha.gov/Firm-osha- data/100007.html. Accessed July 18, 2013
20. Bolt, Beranek, and Newman, Inc. Economic Impact Analysis of Proposed Noise Control Regulation. Report No. 3246. Contract no. DOL-J-9-F-6-0019 for the U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA. Cambridge, MA Bolt, Beranek, and Newman, Inc.: 1976
21. Bartholomae R. C., Parker R. P. Mining machinery noise control guidelines. In: U.S. Bureau of Mines Handbook. Publication No. 83-600114. Washington, DC Department of the Interior: 1983
22. MSHA Noise: Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, December 4, 1989. Washington, DC U.S. Department of Labor: 1989
23. MSHA Preliminary regulatory impact analysis and preliminary regulatory flexibility analysis. Proposed rule: 30 CFR Part 62. RIN 1219-AA53, 1996; available at: http://www.msha.gov/regs/rea/nflx1.htm. Accessed March 2006
24. NIOSH Proceedings for Control of Workplace Hazards for the 21st Century: Setting the Research Agenda; Conference and Workshop, March 10-12, 1998. Cincinnati, OH U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health: 1998
25. Bruce R. D., Wood E. W. The USA needs a new national policy for occupational noise. Noise Control Eng J: 2003; 51 162 165
26. IOM (Institute of Medicine), National Research Council Hearing Loss Research at NIOSH. Washington, DC National Academies Press: 2006
27. NIOSH Industrial Noise Control Manual (Revised Edition). By Jensen P, Jokel CR, Miller LN. Cincinnati, OH U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health: 1978;. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 79-117
28. NIOSH Compendium of Materials for Noise Control. By Heedon RA. Cincinnati, OH U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health: 1980;. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 80-116
29. NIOSH Noise Control in Underground Metal Mining. By Reeves ER, Randolph RF, Yantek DS, Peterson JS. Pittsburgh, PA U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health: 2009;. DHHS (NIOSH IC) Publication No. 2010-111, IC 9518
30. WorkSafe Australia. Control Guide: Management of Noise at Work. Canberra, Australia National Occupational Health and Safety Commission of Australia: 1991
31. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work Prevention of Risks from Occupational Noise in Practice. Luxemborg Office for Official Publications of the European Communities: 2005
32. Asawarungsaengkul K., Nanthavanij S. Design of optimal noise hazard control strategy with budget constraint. Int J Occup Saf Ergon: 2006; 12 355 367
33. Asawarungsaengkul K., Nanthavanij S., Chalidabhongse J. Decision support system for designing effective noise hazard prevention strategies. Int J Occup Saf Ergon: 2007; 13 451 470
34. Aluclu I., Dalgic A., Toprak Z. F. A fuzzy logic-based model for noise control at industrial workplaces. Appl Ergon: 2008; 39 368 378
35. Pawlaczyk-Luszczyńska M. Evaluation of occupational exposure to infrasonic noise in Poland. Int J Occup Med Environ Health: 1999; 12 159 176 (Pubitemid 29309473)
36. EPA Noise labeling requirements for hearing protectors. Fed Reg 44(190), 40 CFR Part 211, 56130-56147. Washington, DC U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: 1979
37. Berger E. H., Franks J. R., Lindgren F. International review of field studies of hearing protector attenuation. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on the Effects of Noise on Hearing; Gothenburg, Sweden; 1994. Available at: http://www.stormingmedia.us/49/4914/A491403.html. Accessed July 18, 2013
38. OSHA 1999; New developments in hearing protector labeling. In: OSHA technical manual. Washington, DC: OSHA Office of Science Technology and Assessment. Available at: http://www.osha.gov/dts/osta/otm/noise/hcp/ attenuation-estimation.html. Accessed July 18, 2013
39. NIOSH NIOSH Criteria for a Recommended Standard: Occupational Noise Exposure; Revised Criteria. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. 1998. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 98-126
40. Franks J. R., Murphy W. J., Johnson J. L., Harris D. A. Four earplugs in search of a rating system. Ear Hear: 2000; 21 218 226 (Pubitemid 30447885)
41. ANSI Methods for Measuring the Real-Ear Attenuation of Hearing Protectors. ANSI S12.6-2008. New York, NY American National Standards Institute, Inc.: 2008
42. EPA Product noise: labeling hearing protection devices. Fed Reg 74(149)39149-96. Washington, DC U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: 2009
43. Neitzel R., Somers S., Seixas N. Variability of real-world hearing protector attenuation measurements. Ann Occup Hyg: 2006; 50 679 691 (Pubitemid 44535992)
44. Bockstael A., Keppler H., Dhooge I., et al. Effectiveness of hearing protector devices in impulse noise verified with transiently evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Int J Audiol: 2008; 47 119 133 (Pubitemid 351322892)
45. Joseph A., Punch J., Stephenson M. R., Paneth N., Wolfe E., Murphy W. J. The effects of training format on earplug performance. Int J Audiol: 2007; 46 609 618 (Pubitemid 47542229)
46. Murphy W. J., Stephenson M. R., Byrne D. C., Witt B., Duran J. Effects of training on hearing protector attenuation. Noise Health: 2011; 13 132 141
47. NHCA/NIOSH/OSHA Alliance. Best Practices Bulletin on Individual Fit Testing for Hearing Protectors; 2009. Available at: http://nhca.affiniscape.com/ displaycommon.cfm?an=1&subarticlenbr=14. Accessed July 18, 2013
48. Arezes P. M., Miguel A. S. Hearing protectors acceptability in noisy environments. Ann Occup Hyg: 2002; 46 531 536 (Pubitemid 36554305)
49. Berger E. H. Hearing protection devices. In: Berger E. H., Royster L. H., Royster J. D., Driscoll D. P., Layne M., eds. The Noise Manual. 5th ed. Fairfax, VA American Industrial Hygiene Association: 2000; 379 454
50. European Committee for Standardization European Standard EN 458. Hearing Protectors: Selection, Use, and Maintenance. Brussels, Belgium European Committee for Standardization, Technical Committee 159: 1993
51. Williams W., Dillon H. Hearing protector performance and standard deviation. Noise Health: 2005; 7 51 60 (Pubitemid 41824760)
52. Giguère C., Laroche C., Vaillancourt V., Soli S. A predictive model of speech intelligibility in noise for normal and hearing-impaired listeners wearing hearing protectors. In: Proceedings of Inter-Noise 2009; Ottawa, Canada; 2009
53. Davis R. R. What do we know about hearing protector comfort? Noise Health: 2008; 10 83 89
54. Ivergård T. B., Nicholl A. G. User tests of ear defenders. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J: 1976; 37 139 142
55. Park M. Y., Casali J. G. An empirical study of comfort afforded by various hearing protection devices: laboratory versus field results. Appl Acoust: 1991; 34 151 179
56. Brown-Rothwell D. J. The comfort of earplugs: basis for a descriptive model [dissertation]. Southampton, UK University of Southampton: 1986
57. Casali J. G., Lam S. T., Epps B. W. Rating and ranking methods for hearing protector wearability. Sound Vibrat: 1987; 21 10 18
58. Casali J. G. Comfort: the "othero" criterion for hearing protector design and selection. In: Proceedings of the 1992 Hearing Conservation Conference. Lexington, KY University of Kentucky, OES Publications: 1992
59. Bhattacharya S. K., Tripathi S. R., Kashyap S. K. Assessment of comfort of various hearing protection devices (HPD). J Hum Ergol (Tokyo): 1993; 22 163 172
60. Hsu Y. L., Huang C. C., Yo C. Y., Chen C. J., Lien C. M. Comfort evaluation of hearing protection. Int J Ind Ergon: 2004; 33 543 551
61. Casali J. G., Grenell J. F. Noise-attenuating earmuff comfort: a brief review and investigation of band-force, cushion, and wearing-time effects. Appl Acoust: 1990; 29 117 138
62. Brammer A. J., Gongqiang Y., Peterson D. R., Bernstein E. R., Cherniack M. G. Hearing protection and communication in an age of digital signal processing: progress and prospects. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem. Foxwoods, CT International Commission on Biological Effects of Noise: 2008
63. Ray L. R., Solbeck J. A., Streeter A. D., Collier R. D. Hybrid feedforward-feedback active noise reduction for hearing protection and communication. J Acoust Soc Am: 2006; 120 2026 2036 (Pubitemid 44536129)
64. Chung K. Effective compression and noise reduction configurations for hearing protectors. J Acoust Soc Am: 2007; 121 1090 1101 (Pubitemid 46192709)
65. Hughson W., Westlake H. D. Manual for program outline for rehabilitation of aural casualties both military and civilian. Trans Am Acad Ophthal Otolaryngol Suppl: 1944; 48 1 15
66. Miltich A. J. An investigation of the feasibility of forced-response techniques employing two-decibel increments in clinical pure-tone threshold determination [dissertation]. Ann Arbor, MI University of Michigan: 1971
67. Ivarsson A., Erlandsson B., Håkanson H., Nilsson P. Advantages with a new Bekesy audiometer in the measurement of noise-induced hearing loss. In: International Symposium on Effects of Impulse Noise on Hearing. Stockholm, Sweden Almqvist and Wiksell Periodical Co.: 1980
68. Ivarsson A., Toremalm N. G., Bennrup S. Computerized audiometry-a facility to prevent hearing damages caused by noise. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl: 1988; 449 175 181 (Pubitemid 19004786)
69. West P. DB, Evans E. F. Early detection of hearing damage in young listeners resulting from exposure to amplified music. Br J Audiol: 1990; 24 89 103 (Pubitemid 20230134)
70. Zhao F., Stephens D., Meyer-Bisch C. The Audioscan: a high frequency resolution audiometric technique and its clinical applications. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci: 2002; 27 4 10 (Pubitemid 34264425)
71. NIOSH Preventing Occupational Hearing Loss: A Practical Guide. Cincinnati, OH U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health: 1996;. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 96-110
72. American Academy of Audiology Position Statement: Preventing Noise-Induced Occupational Hearing Loss; 2003. Available at: http://www.audiology.org/resources/documentlibrary/Documents/niohlprevention. pdf. Accessed July 18, 2013
73. Kujawa S. G., Liberman M. C. Adding insult to injury: cochlear nerve degeneration after "temporaryo" noise-induced hearing loss. J Neurosci: 2009; 29 14077 14085
74. Franks J. R., Engel D. P. III, Themann C. L. Real ear attenuation at threshold for three audiometric headphone devices: implications for maximum permissible ambient noise level standards. Ear Hear: 1992; 13 2 10
75. Lankford J. E., Perrone D. C., Thunder T. D. Ambient noise levels in mobile audiometric testing facilities. Am Assoc Occup Health Nurses J: 1999; 47 163 167
76. Frank T., Williams D. L. Ambient noise levels in industrial audiometric test rooms. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J: 1994; 55 433 437 (Pubitemid 24135762)
77. Stephenson M. R. Is testing 500 Hz necessary when monitoring for occupational hearing loss? In: Proceedings of the National Hearing Conservation Association Annual Conference. Westminster, CO National Hearing Conservation Association: 2004
78. Bell-Lehmkuhler B., Meinke D. K., Sedey A., Tuell C. Audiometric reliability of insert earphones when used by certified audiometric technicians. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hearing Conservation Conference, Portland, OR; 2008. Available at: http://www.hearingconservation.org/displaycommon.cfm?an= 1&subarticlenbr=34. Accessed July 18, 2013
79. Rabinowitz P. M., Galusha D., Ernst C. D., Slade M. D. Audiometric "early flagso" for occupational hearing loss. J Occup Environ Med: 2007; 49 1310 1316 (Pubitemid 351339827)
80. Anderson G. F., Hussey P. S. Population aging: a comparison among industrialized countries. Health Aff (Millwood): 2000; 19 191 203
81. Hoffman H., Themann C. L. Hearing examination of adults (20 to 69 years old) in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 1999-2004. In: Proceedings of the Meeting of the National Hearing Conservation Association. Westminster, CO National Hearing Conservation Association: 2005
82. NIOSH NIOSH Criteria for a Recommended Standard: Occupational Exposure to Noise. Cincinnati, OH U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health: 1972;. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. HSM 73-11001
83. Hoffman H. J., Dobie R. A., Ko C-W, Themann C. L., Murphy W. J. Americans hear as well or better today compared to 40 years ago: hearing threshold levels in the unscreened adult population of the United States, 1959-62 and 1999-2004. Ear Hear: 2010; 31 151 154
84. Pearson J. D., Morrell C. H., Gordon-Salant S., et al. Gender differences in a longitudinal study of age-associated hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am: 1995; 97 1196 1205
85. OSHA Occupational Injury and Illness Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements; final rule. 67 Fed. Reg. 44124-7. Washington, DC U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration: 2002
86. Plinkert P. K., Hemmert W., Wagner W., Just K., Zenner H. P. Monitoring noise susceptibility: sensitivity of otoacoustic emissions and subjective audiometry. Br J Audiol: 1999; 33 367 382 (Pubitemid 30047546)
87. Lapsley Miller J. A., Marshall L., Heller L. M., Hughes L. M. Low-level otoacoustic emissions may predict susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am: 2006; 120 280 296 (Pubitemid 44014167)
88. Seixas N. S., Goldman B., Sheppard L., Neitzel R., Norton S., Kujawa S. G. Prospective noise induced changes to hearing among construction industry apprentices. Occup Environ Med: 2005; 62 309 317 (Pubitemid 40592490)
89. Lapsley Miller J. A., Marshall L., Heller L. M. A longitudinal study of changes in evoked otoacoustic emissions and pure-tone thresholds as measured in a hearing conservation program. Int J Audiol: 2004; 43 307 322 (Pubitemid 38821608)
90. O-Uchi T., Kanzaki J., Satoh Y., et al. Age-related changes in evoked otoacoustic emission in normal-hearing ears. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl: 1994; 514 89 94 (Pubitemid 24201669)
91. Cilento B. W., Norton S. J., Gates G. A. The effects of aging and hearing loss on distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg: 2003; 129 382 389 (Pubitemid 37248952)
92. Dunckley K. T., Dreisbach L. E. Gender effects on high frequency distortion product otoacoustic emissions in humans. Ear Hear: 2004; 25 554 564 (Pubitemid 39602243)
93. Sliwinska-Kowalska M., Kotylo P. Otoacoustic emissions in industrial hearing loss assessment. Noise Health: 2001; 3 75 84
94. Gorga M. P., Stelmachowicz P. G. Temporal characteristics of the acoustic reflex. Audiology: 1983; 22 120 127 (Pubitemid 13159235)
95. Sallustio V., Portalatini P., Soleo L., et al. Auditory dysfunction in occupational noise exposed workers. Scand Audiol: 1998; 27 48 95 110 (Pubitemid 28064136)
96. Fausti S. A., Frey R. H., Henry J. A., Olson D. J., Schaffer H. I. High-frequency testing techniques and instrumentation for early detection of ototoxicity. J Rehabil Res Dev: 1993; 30 333 341 (Pubitemid 24045651)
97. Mitchell C. R., Ellingson R. M., Henry J. A., Fausti S. A. Use of auditory brainstem responses for the early detection of ototoxicity from aminoglycosides or chemotherapeutic drugs. J Rehabil Res Dev: 2004; 41 3A 373 382 (Pubitemid 39014773)
98. Killion M. C., Niquette P. A., Gudmundsen G. I., Revit L. J., Banerjee S. Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am: 2004; 116 4 Pt 1 2395 2405 (Pubitemid 39391641)
99. Coles R. R., Lutman M. E., Buffin J. T. Guidelines on the diagnosis of noise-induced hearing loss for medicolegal purposes. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci: 2000; 25 264 273
100. Niskar A. S., Kieszak S. M., Holmes A. E., Esteban E., Rubin C., Brody D. J. Estimated prevalence of noise-induced hearing threshold shifts among children 6 to 19 years of age: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994, United States. Pediatrics: 2001; 108 40 43 (Pubitemid 32592003)
101. Rabinowitz P. M., Galusha D., Slade M. D., Dixon-Ernst C., Sircar K. D., Dobie R. A. Audiogram notches in noise-exposed workers. Ear Hear: 2006; 27 742 750 (Pubitemid 44691234)
102. Hoffman H. J., Ko C-W, Theman C. L., et al. Reducing noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) to achieve U.S. Healthy People 2010 goals. Am J Epidemiol: 2006; 163 (Suppl): S122
103. Nondahl D. M., Shi X., Cruickshanks K. J., et al. Notched audiograms and noise exposure history in older adults. Ear Hear: 2009; 30 696 703
104. Schneider E. J., Mutchler J. E., Hoyle H. R., Ode E. H., Holder B. B. The progression of hearing loss from industrial noise exposures. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J: 1970; 31 368 376
105. Borchgrevink H. M. Does health promotion work in relation to noise? Noise Health: 2003; 5 25 30
106. Robinson D. W., Shipton M. S., Hinchcliffe R. Audiometric zero for air conduction. A verification and critique of international standards. Audiology: 1981; 20 409 431 (Pubitemid 11087352)
107. Cohen A., Colligan M. J. Assessing Occupational Safety and Health Training: A Literature Review. Cincinnati, OH U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health: 1998;. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication 98:145
108. Lusk S. L., Kelemen M. J. Predicting use of hearing protection: a preliminary study. Public Health Nurs: 1993; 10 189 196
109. Winett R. A. A framework for health promotion and disease prevention programs. Am Psychol: 1995; 50 341 350
110. Cheung C. K. Organizational influence on working people's occupational noise protection in Hong Kong. J Safety Res: 2004; 35 465 475
111. Rosenstock I. The health belief model and preventive health behavior. In: Becker M. H., ed. The Health Belief Model and Personal Health Behavior. Thorofare, NJ Charles B. Slack, Inc.: 1974; 27 59
112. Lusk S. L., Ronis D. L., Kerr M. J., Atwood J. R. Test of the Health Promotion Model as a causal model of workers' use of hearing protection. Nurs Res: 1994; 43 151 157
113. Fishbein M. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA Addison-Wesley: 1975
114. Raymond D. M. III, Lusk S. L. Testing decisional balance and self-efficacy applied to workers' use of hearing protection. Nurs Res: 2006; 55 328 335 (Pubitemid 44412905)
115. Stokols D. Translating social ecological theory into guidelines for community health promotion. Am J Health Promot: 1996; 10 282 298 (Pubitemid 26081505)
116. Goetzel R. Z., Shechter D., Ozminkowski R. J., Marmet P. F., Tabrizi M. J., Roemer E. C. Promising practices in employer health and productivity management efforts: findings from a benchmarking study. J Occup Environ Med: 2007; 49 111 130
117. Merry C. J. The role of expectancies in workers' compliance with a hearing loss prevention program. In: Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the National Hearing Conservation Association. Westminster, CO National Hearing Conservation Association: 1996
118. Stephenson C. M., Stephenson M. R. Hearing loss prevention for carpenters: part 1-using health communication and health promotion models to develop training that works. Noise Health: 2011; 13 113 121
119. Stephenson M. R., Shaw P. B., Stephenson C. M., Graydon P. S. Hearing loss prevention for carpenters: part 2-demonstration projects using individualized and group training. Noise Health: 2011; 13 122 131
120. Stephenson M. R. Empowering the worker to prevent hearing loss: the role of education and training. In: Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the National Hearing Conservation Association. Westminster, CO National Hearing Conservation Association: 1996
121. Rothman A. J., Salovey P. Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: the role of message framing. Psychol Bull: 1997; 121 3 19 (Pubitemid 127705282)
122. Latimer A. E., Salovey P., Rothman A. J. The effectiveness of gain-framed messages for encouraging disease prevention behavior: is all hope lost? J Health Commun: 2007; 12 645 649 (Pubitemid 47575072)
123. Crandell C., Mills T. L., Gauthier R. Knowledge, behaviors, and attitudes about hearing loss and hearing protection among racial/ethnically diverse young adults. J Natl Med Assoc: 2004; 96 176 186 (Pubitemid 38174796)
124. Hong O., Lusk S. L., Ronis D. L. Ethnic differences in predictors of hearing protection behavior between black and white workers. Res Theory Nurs Pract: 2005; 19 63 76
125. Raymond D. M. III, Hong O., Lusk S. L., Ronis D. L. Predictors of hearing protection use for Hispanic and non-Hispanic White factory workers. Res Theory Nurs Pract: 2006; 20 127 140
126. Neitzel R., Meischke H., Daniell W. E., Trabeau M., Somers S., Seixas N. S. Development and pilot test of hearing conservation training for construction workers. Am J Ind Med: 2008; 51 120 129 (Pubitemid 351157078)
127. Royster J. D., Royster L. H. Hearing Conservation Programs: Practical Guidelines for Success. Chelsea, MI Lewis Publishers, Inc.: 1990
128. Cole H. P. Cognitive-behavioral approaches to farm community safety education: a conceptual analysis. J Agric Saf Health: 2002; 8 145 159 (Pubitemid 34720707)
129. Walters G. C., Grusec J. E. Punishment. San Francisco, CA WH Freeman: 1977
130. Deci E. L., Ryan R. M. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York, NY Plenum Press: 1985
131. Bandura A. Swimming against the mainstream: the early years from chilly tributary to transformative mainstream. Behav Res Ther: 2004; 42 613 630 (Pubitemid 38479519)
132. Kurtz J. R., Robins T. G., Schork M. A. An evaluation of peer and professional trainers in a union-based occupational health and safety training program. J Occup Environ Med: 1997; 39 661 671 (Pubitemid 27327250)
133. Lusk S. L., Ronis D. L., Kerr M. J. Predictors of hearing protection use among workers: implications for training programs. Hum Factors: 1995; 37 635 640 (Pubitemid 26012125)
134. Melamed S., Rabinowitz S., Feiner M., Weisberg E., Ribak J. Usefulness of the protection motivation theory in explaining hearing protection device use among male industrial workers. Health Psychol: 1996; 15 209 215 (Pubitemid 126467432)
135. Levenstein S. Is there health in wellness? J Clin Gastroenterol: 1996; 23 94 96
136. Frank A. L. Ethical and practical aspects of human studies. Mutat Res: 2001; 480-481 333 336 (Pubitemid 32744839)
137. Bem D. J. Self-perception theory. In: Berkowitz L., ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Vol. 6. New York, NY Academic Press: 1972
138. Folmer R. L., Griest S. E., Martin W. H. Hearing conservation education programs for children: a review. J Sch Health: 2002; 72 51 57
139. Martin W. H., Sobel J. L., Griest S. E., Howarth L., Shi Y-B. Noise induced hearing loss in children: preventing the silent epidemic. J Otology: 2006; 1 11 21
140. Martin W. H., Meinke D., Howarth L., Sobel J. Dangerous Decibels® Educator Training Manual. Portland, OR Oregon Health & Science University: 2007
141. Griest S. Evaluation of a hearing-loss prevention program. Semin Hear: 2008; 29 122 130
142. Martin W. H. Dangerous decibels: partnership for preventing noise-induced hearing loss and tinnitus in children. Semin Hear: 2008; 29 102 110 (Pubitemid 351273075)
143. Meinke D. K., Martin W. H., Griest S. E., Howarth L., Sobel J. L., Scarlotta T. Dangerous decibels I: noise-induced hearing loss and tinnitus prevention in children. Noise exposures, epidemiology, detection, interventions and resources. In: Abstracts of the 9th International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem; Foxwoods, CT; July 2008:26
144. Sobel J., Meikle M. Applying health behavior theory to hearing-conservation interventions. Semin Hear: 2008; 29 81 89 (Pubitemid 351273072)
145. Dell S. M., Holmes A. E. The effect of a hearing conservation program on adolescents' attitudes towards noise. Noise Health: 2012; 14 39 44
146. Stephenson M. T., Witte K., Vaught C., et al. Using persuasive messages to encourage voluntary hearing protection among coal miners. J Safety Res: 2005; 36 9 17 (Pubitemid 40304491)
147. El Dib R. P., Verbeek J., Attallah A. N., Andriolo R. B., Soares B. G. Interventions to Promote the Wearing of Hearing Protection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev: 2006; 19 2 CD005234
148. Morata T. C. Safe-in-Sound Excellence and Innovation in Hearing Loss Prevention Awards. Presentation at the National Hearing Conservation Association Annual Meeting. Westminster, CO National Hearing Conservation Association: 2009
149. National Hearing Conservation Association Safe In Sound Excellence in Hearing Loss Prevention Award. Winners. Available at: http://www.safeinsound.us/ winners.html. Accessed July 18, 2013
150. Esler A. Attitude change in an industrial hearing conservation program: comparative effects of directives, educational presentations and individual explanations as persuasive communications. Occup Health Nurs: 1978; 26 15 20
151. Zohar D., Cohen A., Azar N. Promoting increased use of ear protectors in noise through information feedback. Hum Factors: 1980; 22 69 79 (Pubitemid 10041337)
152. Purdy S., Williams W. Development of the Noise at Work questionnaire to assess perceptions of noise in the workplace. J Occup Health Safety: 2002; 18 77 83 (Pubitemid 34228918)
153. Williams W., Purdy S. C., Murray N., et al. Does the presentation of audiometric test data have a positive effect on the perceptions of workplace noise and noise exposure avoidance? Noise Health: 2004; 6 75 84 (Pubitemid 39409931)
154. Lusk S. L., Eakin B. L., Kazanis A. S., McCullagh M. C. Effects of booster interventions on factory workers' use of hearing protection. Nurs Res: 2004; 53 53 58 (Pubitemid 40268499)
155. Burke M. J., Sarpy S. A., Smith-Crowe K., Chan-Serafin S., Salvador R. O., Islam G. Relative effectiveness of worker safety and health training methods. Am J Public Health: 2006; 96 315 324 (Pubitemid 43167132)
156. Kerr M. J., Savik K., Monsen K. A., Lusk S. L. Effectiveness of computer-based tailoring versus targeting to promote use of hearing protection. Can J Nurs Res: 2007; 39 80 97
157. Dijkstra A., De Vries H., Roijackers J. Targeting smokers with low readiness to change with tailored and nontailored self-help materials. Prev Med: 1999; 28 203 211 (Pubitemid 29372479)
158. Bull F. C., Jamrozik K., Blanksby B. A. Tailored advice on exercise-does it make a difference? Am J Prev Med: 1999; 16 230 239 (Pubitemid 29152573)
159. Riva G. Applications of virtual environments in medicine. Methods Inf Med: 2003; 42 524 534 (Pubitemid 38055492)
160. Light A.. High school employment: National Longitudinal Survey discussion paper. Report No. NLS 95-25. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor; 1995
161. Steinberg L., Cauffman E. The impact of employment on adolescent development. Ann Child Dev: 1995; 11 131 166
162. NIOSH Preventing Deaths, Injuries, and Illnesses of Young Workers. Cincinnati, OH U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health: 2003;. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2003-128
163. Smith S. Protecting vulnerable workers. Occup Hazards: 2004; 66 25 28
164. Perry M. J., May J. J. Noise and chemical induced hearing loss: special considerations for farm youth. J Agromed: 2005; 10 49 55 (Pubitemid 43072511)
165. Rytzner B., Rytzner C. Schoolchildren and noise. The 4 kHz dip-tone screening in 14391 schoolchildren. Scand Audiol: 1981; 10 213 216 (Pubitemid 12248681)
166. Broste S. K., Hansen D. A., Strand R. L., Stueland D. T. Hearing loss among high school farm students. Am J Public Health: 1989; 79 619 622 (Pubitemid 19112762)
167. Knobloch M. J., Broste S. K. A hearing conservation program for Wisconsin youth working in agriculture. J Sch Health: 1998; 68 313 318 (Pubitemid 128454206)
168. Roeser R. J. Industrial hearing conservation programs in the high schools (Protect the Ear Before the 12th Year). Ear Hear: 1980; 1 119 120 (Pubitemid 11172111)
169. Allonen-Allie N., Florentine M. Hearing conservation programs in Massachusetts' vocational/technical schools. Ear Hear: 1990; 11 237 240
170. Lukes E., Johnson M. Hearing conservation: an industry-school partnership. J Sch Nurs: 1999; 15 22 25
171. Madison T. K. Personal communication to Deanna Meinke. In: Protecting Children's Hearing. Westminster, CO: National Hearing Conservation Association.: 2004;. Available at: http://nhca.affiniscape.com/associations/10915/files/3M- HPD-for-Children.pdf. Accessed July 18, 2013
172. Berger E. H. Recommended hearing protectors for children, toddlers, infants, and newborns. E•A•RCAL Laboratory memo. 2006. Available at: http://www.e-a-r.com/pdf/hearingcons/FAQ%20Kids%20HPDs.pdf. Accessed July 18, 2013
173. BLS Spotlight on statistics: older workers. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2008. Available at: http://www.bls.gov/spotlight/2008/ older-workers/. Accessed July 18, 2013
174. Silverstein M. Meeting the challenges of an aging workforce. Am J Ind Med: 2008; 51 269 280 (Pubitemid 351415339)
175. Zwerling C., Whitten P. S., Davis C. S., Sprince N. L. Occupational injuries among older workers with visual, auditory, and other impairments. A validation study. J Occup Environ Med: 1998; 40 720 723 (Pubitemid 28385153)
176. Shin H. B., Bruno R. Language Use and English-Speaking Ability: 2000. Census 2000 Brief. 2003;. Available at: http://www.census.gov/prod/2003pubs/ c2kbr-29.pdf. Accessed July 18, 2013
177. BLS The Editor's Desk: Occupations of Foreign-Born Workers. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2002. Available at: http://www.bls.gov/ opub/ted/2002/jul/wk5/art05.htm. Accessed July 18, 2013
178. Mosisa A. T. The role of foreign-born workers in the U.S. economy. Mon Labor Rev: 2002; 125 3 14
179. Robertson C., Kerr M., Garcia C., Halterman E. Noise and hearing protection: Latino construction workers' experiences. AAOHN J: 2007; 55 153 160
180. Rabinowitz P. M., Duran R. Is acculturation related to use of hearing protection? AIHA J: 2001; 62 611 614
181. National Center for Health Statistics Prevalence and Characteristics of Persons with Hearing Trouble: United States, 1990-1991. Vital and Health Statistics, Series 10, Publication No. 188. Hyattsville, MD U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics: 1994
182. Rösler G. Progression of hearing loss caused by occupational noise. Scand Audiol: 1994; 23 13 37 (Pubitemid 24074700)
183. Ward W. D., Royster J. D., Royster L. H. Auditory and non-auditory effects of noise. In: Berger E. H., Royster L. H., Royster J. D., Driscoll D. P., Layne M., eds. The Noise Manual. 5th ed. Fairfax, VA American Industrial Hygiene Association: 2003; 123 147
184. Abel S. M., Armstrong N. M., Giguère C. Auditory perception with level-dependent hearing protectors. The effects of age and hearing loss. Scand Audiol: 1993; 22 71 85 (Pubitemid 23139821)
185. Abel S. M., Spencer D. L. Active noise reduction versus conventional hearing protection. Relative benefits for normal-hearing and impaired listeners. Scand Audiol: 1997; 26 155 167 (Pubitemid 27395373)
186. Reeves E. R. Development of a speech intelligibility-based method of hearing protector selection [dissertation]. University Park, PA The Pennsylvania State University: 1998
187. Viljoen D. A., Nie V., Guest M. Is there a risk to safety when working in the New South Wales underground coal-mining industry while having binaural noise-induced hearing loss? Intern Med J: 2006; 36 180 184
188. Picard M., Girard S. A., Simard M., Larocque R., Leroux T., Turcotte F. Association of work-related accidents with noise exposure in the workplace and noise-induced hearing loss based on the experience of some 240,000 person-years of observation. Accid Anal Prev: 2008; 40 1644 1652
189. Morata T. C., Themann C. L., Randolph R. F., Verbsky B. L., Byrne D. C., Reeves E. R. Working in noise with a hearing loss: perceptions from workers, supervisors, and hearing conservation program managers. Ear Hear: 2005; 26 529 545 (Pubitemid 44378671)
190. OSHA Innovative Workplace Safety Accommodations for Hearing-Impaired Workers. Safety and Health Information Bulletin: SHIB 07-22-2005; 2005. Available at: http://www.osha.gov/dts/shib/shib072205.html. Accessed July 18, 2013
191. OSHA Hearing Conservation for the Hearing-Impaired Worker. Safety and Health Information Bulletin: SHIB 12-27-2005; 2005. Available at: http://www.osha.gov/dts/shib/shib122705.html. Accessed July 18, 2013
192. Verbsky B. L. Effects of conventional passive earmuffs, uniformly attenuating passive earmuffs, and hearing aids on speech intelligibility in noise [doctoral dissertation]. Columbus, OH The Ohio State University: 2002
193. ANSI/ASSE A10.46-2007: American National Standard for Construction and Demolition Operations: Hearing Loss Prevention for Construction and Demolition Workers. Des Plaines, IL American Society of Safety Engineers: 2007
194. Suter A. H. Standards and regulations. In: Berger E. H., Royster L. H., Royster J. D., Driscoll D. P., Layne M., eds. The Noise Manual. 5th ed. Fairfax, VA American Industrial Hygiene Association: 2003; 639 668
195. Gasaway D. C. Documentation: the weak link in audiometric monitoring programs. Occup Health Saf: 1985; 54 28 33
196. Ehrenberg R. L., Sniezek J. E. III. Development of a standard questionnaire for occupational health research. Am J Public Health: 1989; 79 (Suppl): 15 17 (Pubitemid 19282092)
197. Lippmann M., Gomez M. R., Rawls G. M. Data elements for occupational exposure databases: guidelines and recommendations for airborne hazards and noise. Appl Occup Environ Hyg: 1996; 11 1294 1311 (Pubitemid 26375163)
198. AHIMA-AMIA The value of personal health records: a joint position statement for consumers of health care. American Health Information Management Association and American Medical Informatics Association. J AHIMA: 2007; 78 22 24
199. Daniell W. E., Swan S. S., McDaniel M. M., Camp J. E., Cohen M. A., Stebbins J. G. Noise exposure and hearing loss prevention programmes after 20 years of regulations in the United States. Occup Environ Med: 2006; 63 343 351 [Erratum 2006;63:436]
200. Wolgemuth K. S., Luttrell W. E., Kamhi A. G., Wark D. J. The effectiveness of the Navy's hearing conservation program. Mil Med: 1995; 160 219 222
201. Rabinowitz P. M., Galusha D., Dixon-Ernst C., Slade M. D., Cullen M. R. Do ambient noise exposure levels predict hearing loss in a modern industrial cohort? Occup Environ Med: 2007; 64 53 59 (Pubitemid 46101826)
202. Simpson T. H., Stewart M., Kaltenbach J. A. Early indicators of hearing conservation program performance. J Am Acad Audiol: 1994; 5 300 306
203. Lee-Feldstein A. Five-year follow-up study of hearing loss at several locations within a large automobile company. Am J Ind Med: 1993; 24 41 54 (Pubitemid 23196751)
204. Franks J. R., Davis R. R., Kreig E. F. Jr. Analysis of a hearing conservation program data base: factors other than workplace noise. Ear Hear: 1989; 10 273 280 (Pubitemid 19264402)
205. Pell S. An evaluation of a hearing conservation program-a five-year longitudinal study. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J: 1973; 34 82 91
206. Simpson T. H. Short term audiometric variability as a predictor of long term hearing conservation program performance. In: Proceedings of the 18th Annual Meeting of the National Hearing Conservation Association. Westminster, CO: National Hearing Conservation Association; 1993
207. Simpson T. H., Stewart M., Kaltenbach J. A. Effects of audiometric threshold step size on proposed ANSI S12.13 outcomes for characterizing hearing conservation program effectiveness. J Am Acad Audiol: 1993; 4 258 263
208. Simpson T. H., Amos N., Rintelmann W. F. Effects of pre-existing hearing loss on proposed ANSI S12.13 outcomes for characterizing hearing conservation program effectiveness: follow-up investigation. J Am Acad Audiol: 1998; 9 112 120
209. Adera T., Donahue A. M., Malit B. D., Gaydos J. C. Assessment of the proposed Draft American National Standard method for evaluating the effectiveness of hearing conservation programs. J Occup Med: 1993; 35 568 573 (Pubitemid 23170085)
210. Adera T., Donahue A. M., Malit B. D., Gaydos J. C. An epidemiologic method for assessing the effectiveness of hearing conservation programs using audiometric data. Mil Med: 1993; 158 698 701 (Pubitemid 23337297)
211. Adera T., Gullickson G. M., Helfer T., Wang L., Gardner J. W. Should the audiometric database analysis method (draft ANSI S12.13-1991) for evaluating the effectiveness of hearing conservation programs be accepted as a US national standard? J Am Acad Audiol: 1995; 6 302 310
212. ANSI. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Hearing Conservation Programs through Audiometric Data Base Analysis. ANSI S12.13 TR-2002. New York, NY: American National Standards Institute, Inc.; 2002
213. Adera T., Amir C., Anderson L. Use of comparison populations for evaluating the effectiveness of hearing loss prevention programs. AIHA J: 2000; 61 11 15 (Pubitemid 30152324)
214. NIOSH Industrial Audiometric Data. NTIS Order No. PB88-117916. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; 1987
215. ANSI Determination of Occupational Noise Exposure and Estimation of Noise-Induced Hearing Impairment. ANSI S3.44-1996(R2006). New York, NY: American National Standards Institute, Inc.; 1996
216. Prince M. M., Colligan M. J., Stephenson C. M., Bischoff B. J. The contribution of focus groups in the evaluation of hearing conservation program (HCP) effectiveness. J Safety Res: 2004; 35 91 106
217. Simpson T. H., Stewart M., Hecksel M. R. Performance evaluation of hearing conservation program data in small companies. In: Proceedings of the 1992 Hearing Conservation Conference. Lexington, KY University of Kentucky, OES Publications: 1992; 25 32
218. Verbeek J. H., Kateman E., Morata T. C., Dreschler W., Sorgdrager B. Interventions to prevent occupational noise induced hearing loss. Cochrane Database Syst Rev: 2009; 3 CD006396. Available at: www.mrw.interscience.wiley. com/cochrane/clsysrev/articles/CD006396/frame.html. Accessed July 18, 2013
219. Bertsche P. K., Mensah E., Stevens T. Complying with a corporate global noise health surveillance procedure-do the benefits outweigh the costs? AAOHN J: 2006; 54 369 378
220. Lalande N. M., Lambert J., Riverin L. Quantification of the psychosocial disadvantages experienced by workers in a noisy industry and their nearest relatives: perspectives for rehabilitation. Audiology: 1988; 27 196 206
221. Lalande N. M., Riverin L., Lambert J. Occupational hearing loss: an aural rehabilitation program for workers and their spouses, characteristics of the program and target group (participants and nonparticipants). Ear Hear: 1988; 9 248 255
222. Northern J. L., Zarnoch J. M. Aural rehabilitation in noise induced hearing loss. Otolaryngol Clin North Am: 1979; 12 693 703 (Pubitemid 10221939)
223. Sedge R. K. Aural rehabilitation for individuals with high frequency hearing loss. J Acad Rehabil: 1979; 12 47 61
224. Getty L., Hétu R. Development of a rehabilitation program for people affected with occupational hearing loss. 2. Results from group intervention with 48 workers and their spouses. Audiology: 1991; 30 317 329
225. Hallberg L. RM, Barrenäs M. L. Group rehabilitation of middle-aged males with noise-induced hearing loss and their spouses: evaluation of short- and long-term effects. Br J Audiol: 1994; 28 71 79 (Pubitemid 24330105)
226. Hallberg L. RM, Barrenäs M. L. Coping with noise-induced hearing loss: experiences from the perspective of middle-aged male victims. Br J Audiol: 1995; 29 219 230
227. Westbrook M. T., Hogan A., Pennay M., Legge V. Workers' reactions to their noise-induced hearing loss: acknowledgement versus avoidance. J Occup Health Safety Aust NZ: 1992; 8 237 242
228. Getty L., Hétu R.. Développement d'un programme de réadaptation á l'intention des personnes atteintes de surdité professionnelle et de leur conjointe ou conjoint: Guide de formation. Québec: Conseil Québécois de la Recherche Sociale; 1990
229. Kopke R. D., Jackson R. L., Coleman J. KM, Liu J., Bielefeld E. C., Balough B. J. NAC for noise: from the bench top to the clinic. Hear Res: 2007; 226 114 125 (Pubitemid 46437291)
230. Ohlemiller K. K. Oxidative cochlear injury and the limitations of anti-oxidant therapy. Semin Hear: 2003; 24 123 133 (Pubitemid 36576974)
231. Henderson D., Bielefeld E. C., Harris K. C., Hu B. H. The role of oxidative stress in noise-induced hearing loss. Ear Hear: 2006; 27 1 19 (Pubitemid 44378662)
232. Canlon B., Henderson D., Salvi R. Pharmacological strategies for prevention and treatment of hearing loss and tinnitus. Hear Res: 2007; 226 1 2 (Pubitemid 46428039)
233. Le Prell C. G., Yamashita D., Minami S. B., Yamasoba T., Miller J. M. Mechanisms of noise-induced hearing loss indicate multiple methods of prevention. Hear Res: 2007; 226 22 43 (Pubitemid 46428035)
234. Le Prell C. G., Hughes L. F., Miller J. M. Free radical scavengers vitamins A, C, and E plus magnesium reduce noise trauma. Free Radic Biol Med: 2007; 42 1454 1463 (Pubitemid 46467279)
235. Hawkins J. E., Schacht J. Sketches of otohistory. Part 10: noise-induced hearing loss. Audiol Neurootol: 2005; 10 305 309 (Pubitemid 41527610)
236. Zheng J. L., Keller G., Gao W. Q. Immunocytochemical and morphological evidence for intracellular self-repair as an important contributor to mammalian hair cell recovery. J Neurosci: 1999; 19 2161 2170 (Pubitemid 29133394)
237. Izumikawa M., Minoda R., Kawamoto K., et al. Auditory hair cell replacement and hearing improvement by Atoh1 gene therapy in deaf mammals. Nat Med: 2005; 11 271 276 (Pubitemid 40460554)
238. Ryals B. M., Cunningham L. A primer on biology of hair cell regeneration, rescue, and repair. Semin Hear: 2003; 24 99 110 (Pubitemid 36576971)
239. Hildebrand M. S., Newton S. S., Gubbels S. P., et al. Advances in molecular and cellular therapies for hearing loss. Mol Ther: 2008; 16 224 236 (Pubitemid 351168030)
240. Berger E. H. Noise control and hearing conservation: why do it? In: Berger E. H., Royster L. H., Royster J. D., Driscoll D. P., Layne M., eds. The Noise Manual. 5th ed. Fairfax, VA American Industrial Hygiene Association: 2003; 1 17
241. Niskar A. S., Kieszak S. M., Holmes A., Esteban E., Rubin C., Brody D. J. Prevalence of hearing loss among children 6 to 19 years of age: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. JAMA: 1998; 279 1071 1075 (Pubitemid 28177814)
242. Weichbold V., Zorowka P. Effects of a hearing protection campaign on the discotheque attendance habits of high-school students. Int J Audiol: 2003; 42 489 493 (Pubitemid 37466052)
243. Weichbold V., Zorowka P. Can a hearing education campaign for adolescents change their music listening behavior? Int J Audiol: 2007; 46 128 133 (Pubitemid 46439732)
244. Randolph R. F., Hudak R. L., Vaught C. Communicating hearing loss information to young children effectiveness of lecture and printed materials. AAOHN J: 2003; 51 433 438
245. Karlsmose B., Lauritzen T., Engberg M., Parving A. A randomised controlled trial of screening for adult hearing loss during preventive health checks. Br J Gen Pract: 2001; 51 351 355 (Pubitemid 32421777)
246. King R. L., Barry B., Brooks D. N. Effectiveness of publicity campaign encouraging earlier referral of hearing loss in adults. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed): 1987; 294 1342 1343 (Pubitemid 17072144)
247. ASHA Media donates millions in public service announcements to ASHA campaign. Assoc Manage: 2001; 53 32
248. Wallack L., Dorfman L., Woodruff K. Communications and public health. In: Scutchfield F. D., Keck C. W., eds. Principles of Public Health Practice. Albany, NY Delmar Publishers: 1997
249. Daniel E. Noise and hearing loss: a review. J Sch Health: 2007; 77 225 231
250. CDC Cigarette smoking among adults: United States, 1990. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep: 1992; 41 361 362
251. Joy G. J., Middendorf P. J. Noise exposure and hearing conservation in U.S. coal mines-a surveillance report. J Occup Environ Hyg: 2007; 4 26 35 (Pubitemid 44948153)
252. Svensson EB, Morata TC, Nylén P, Krieg EF, Johnson A-C. Beliefs and attitudes among Swedish workers regarding the risk of hearing loss. Int J Audiol 2004;43:585593 (Pubitemid 40179570)