Variability of real-world hearing protector attenuation measurements

Annals of Occupational Hygiene

Volumn 50, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 679-691

  Neitzel, Richard ^a   Somers, Sebrina ^a   Seixas, Noah ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Attenuation measurement; Hearing protection; Individual fit test; Noise exposure; Noise induced hearing loss; Variance components

Indexed keywords

HEARING PROTECTION; INDIVIDUAL FIT TEST; NOISE EXPOSURE; NOISE-INDUCED HEARING LOSS; VARIANCE COMPONENTS;

EARPHONES; HEALTH RISKS; HEARING AIDS; NOISE ABATEMENT;

ATTENUATION;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; DEVICE; EAR PROTECTION; EARPLUG; EVALUATION; FOAM; HEARING DISORDER; HEARING PROTECTION DEVICE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LABORATORY TEST; MATERIALS TESTING; MEASUREMENT; MICROPHONE; MICROPHONE IN REAL EAR SYSTEM; NOISE REDUCTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT; REAL EAR AT THRESHOLD SYSTEM;

EAR PROTECTIVE DEVICES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HEARING LOSS, NOISE-INDUCED; HUMANS; NOISE, OCCUPATIONAL; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 33749541503     PISSN: 00034878     EISSN: 14753162     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/mel025     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. ANSI S3.19-1974. (1974) American National Standard: method for the measurement of real-ear protection of hearing protectors and physical attenuation of ear muffs. New York, NY: American National Standards Institute, Inc.
2. ANSI S3.1-1999. (1999) American National Standard: maximum permissible ambient noise levels for audiometric test rooms. New York, NY: American National Standards Institute, Inc.
3. Arezes P, Miguel A. (2002) Hearing protectors acceptability in noisy environments. Ann Occup Hyg; 46: 531-6.
4. Behar A. (1985) Field evaluation of hearing protectors. Noise Control Eng J; 24: 13-8.
5. Berger E. (2005) Preferred methods to measuring hearing protection attenuation. In: 2005 congress and exposition on noise control engineering; August 7-10, 2005. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: International Institute of Noise Control Engineering. p. 10.
6. Berger EH. (1986) Methods of measuring the attenuation of hearing protection devices. J Acoust Soc Am; 79: 1655-87.
7. Berger EH. (2000) Chapter 10: Hearing protection devices. In: Berger EH, Royster LH, Royster JD, Driscoll DP, Layne ML, editors. The noise manual. 5th edn. US: American Industrial Hygiene Association. pp. 379-454.
8. Berger EH, Kerivan JE. (1983) Influence of physiological noise and the occlusion effect on the measurement of real-ear attenuation at threshold. J Acoust Soc Am; 74: 81-94.
9. Berger EH, Franks JR, Lindgren F. (1996) International review of field studies of hearing protector attenuation. In: Axlesson A, Borchgrevink H, Hamernik RP, Hellstrom P, Henderson D, Salvi RJ, editors. Scientific basis of noise-induced hearing loss. New York, NY: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. pp. 361-77.
10. Bruhl P, Ivarsson A. (1994) Noise-exposed male sheet-metal workers using hearing protectors. A longitudinal study of hearing threshold shifts covering fifteen years. Scand Audiol; 23: 123-8.
11. Campbell DL, Coffey CC, Lenhart SW. (2001) Respiratory protection as a function of respirator fitting characteristics and fit-test accuracy. AIHAJ; 62: 36-44.
12. Campbell DL, Coffey CC, Jensen PA et al. (2005) Reducing respirator fit test errors: a multi-donning approach. J Occup Environ Hyg; 2: 391-9.
13. Casali J, Park M. (1991) Laboratory versus field attenuation of selected hearing protectors. J Sound Vib; 25: 28-38.
14. Casali J, Mauney D, Burks JA. (1995) Physical vs. psychophysical measurement of hearing protector attenuation-a.k.a. MIRE vs. REAT. J Sound Vib; 29: 20-7.
15. Coffey CC, Campbell DL, Myers WR et al. (1998) Comparison of six respirator fit-test methods with an actual measurement of exposure in a simulated health care environment: Part II-method comparison testing. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 59: 862-70.
16. Crutchfield CD, Fairbank EO, Greenstein SL. (1999) Effect of test exercises and mask donning on measured respirator fit. Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 14: 827-37.
17. Edwards R, Green W. (1987) Effect of an improved hearing conservation program on earplug performance in the workplace. Noise Control Eng J; 28: 55-65.
18. EPA. (1979) Noise labeling requirements for hearing protectors. In: Fed Regist 44(190). Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency. pp. 130-56, 147.
19. Franks JR, Murphy WJ, Johnson JL et al. (2000) Four earplugs in search of a rating system. Ear Hear; 21: 218-26.
20. Franks JR, Murphy WJ, Harris DA et al. (2003) Alternative field methods for measuring hearing protector performance. AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 64: 501-9.
21. Hager WL, Hoyle ER, Hermann ER. (1982) Efficacy of enforcement in an industrial hearing conservation program. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 43: 455-65.
22. Hsu Y, Huang C, Yo C et al. (2004) Comfort evaluation of hearing protection. Ind Ergo; 33: 543-51.
23. ISO. (2002) ISO Standard 11904-1:2002(E), Acoustics-determination of sound immission from sound sources placed close to the ear. Part 1: technique using a microphone in a real ear (MIRE technique). Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
24. Janssen LL, Luinenburg DM, Mullins HE et al. (2002) Comparison of three commercially available fit-test methods. AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 63: 762-7.
25. Lee SA, Grinshpun SA, Adhikari A et al. (2005) Laboratory and field evaluation of a new personal sampling system for assessing the protection provided by the N95 filtering facepiece respirators against particles. Ann Occup Hyg; 49: 245-57.
26. Lempert BL, Edwards RG. (1983) Field investigations of noise reduction afforded by insert-type hearing protectors. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 44: 894-902.
27. Lusk SL, Ronis DL, Kerr MJ et al. (1994) Test of the health promotion model as a causal model of workers' use of hearing protection. Nurs Res; 43: 151-7.
28. Lusk SL, Ronis DL, Kerr MJ. (1995) Predictors of hearing protection use among workers: implications for training programs. Hum Factors; 37: 635-40.
29. Nicas M, Neuhaus J. (2004) Variability in respiratory protection and the assigned protection factor. J Occup Environ Hyg; 1: 99-109.
30. NIOSH. (1998) Criteria for a recommended standard: occupational noise exposure, revised criteria 1998. Cincinnati, OH: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. June 1998. Report No.: DHHS (NIOSH). pp. 98-126.
31. OSHA. (1983) Occupational noise exposure: hearing conservation amendment; final rule. Washington, DC: US Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
32. Savell JF, Toothman EH. (1987) Group mean hearing threshold changes in a noise-exposed industrial population using personal hearing protectors. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 48: 23-7.
33. Sreenath A, Weed J, Church T. (2001) A modified protocol for quantitative fit testing using the PortaCount. Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 16: 979-88.
34. Stewart A. (2000) Chapter 6: Program overview and administration. In: Berger EH, Royster LH, Royster JD, Driscoll DP, Layne ML, editors. The noise manual. 5th edn. US: American Industrial Hygiene Association. pp. 150-64.
35. Toivonen M, Paakkonen R, Savolainen S et al. (2002) Noise attenuation and proper insertion of earplugs into ear canals. Ann Occup Hyg; 46: 527-30.
36. WISHA. (2003) Hearing loss prevention (noise), WAC 296-817. Olympia, WA: Washington Department of Labor and Industries, Washington Industrial Safety and Health Administration.
37. Xu M, Han D, Hangal S et al. (1991) Respirator fit and protection through determination of air and particle leakage. Ann Occup Hyg; 35: 13-24.
38. Zhuang Z, Coffey CC, Jensen PA et al. (2003) Correlation between quantitative fit factors and workplace protection factors measured in actual workplace environments at a steel foundry. AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 64: 730-8.
39. Zohar D, Cohen A, Azar N. (1980) Promoting increased use of ear protectors in noise through information feedback. Hum Factors; 22: 69-79.