Hearing loss prevention for carpenters: Part 1 - Using health communication and health promotion models to develop training that works

Noise and Health

Volumn 13, Issue 51, 2011, Pages 113-121

  Stephenson, Carol Merry ^a   Stephenson, Mark R ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Health communication; health promotion; hearing conservation; training

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; INDUSTRIAL NOISE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERVIEW; NOISE INJURY; OCCUPATIONAL DISEASE; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT;

FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FOCUS GROUPS; HEALTH PROMOTION; HEARING LOSS, NOISE-INDUCED; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; NOISE, OCCUPATIONAL; OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE;

EID: 79957640902     PISSN: 14631741     EISSN: 19984030     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/1463-1741.77207     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Dobie RA. Medical-Legal Evaluation of Hearing Loss. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold; 1993. p. 1-3.
2. Hager L. BLS Occupational Hearing Loss Report for 2007. CAOHC Update 2009;27:1.
3. Sweeney MH, Fosbroke D, Goldenhar L, Jackson L, Linch K, Lushniak B, et al. In: Coble RJ, Hinze J, Haupt TC, editors. Construction Safety and Health Management. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; 2000. p. 211-34.
4. Berger EH, Franks JR, Lindgren F. International review of field studies of hearing protection attenuation. In: Axelsson A, Brchgrevink H, Hamernik RP, Hellstrom PA, Henderson D, Salvi RJ, editors. Scientific Basis of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss. New York: Thieme; 1996. p. 361-77.
5. Berger EH, Franks JR, Behar A, Casali JG, Dixon-Ernst C, Kieper RW, et al. Development of a new standard laboratory protocol for estimating the field attenuation of hearing protection devices. Part III. The validity of using subject-fit data. J Acoust Soc Am 1998;103:665-72. (Pubitemid 28087534)
6. Franks JR, Murphy WJ, Johnson JL, Harris DA. Four earplugs in search of a rating system. Ear Hear 2000;21:218-26. (Pubitemid 30447885)
7. Murphy WJ, Davis RR, Byrne DC, Franks JR. Advanced Hearing Protector Study, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, U. S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, EPHB Report 312-11a, Cincinnati OH; 2006.
8. Neitzel R, Seixas N. The effectiveness of hearing protection among construction workers. J Occup Environ Hyg 2005;2:227-38. (Pubitemid 40594039)
9. Dib RP, Verbeek J, Atallah AN, Andriolo RB, Soares BG. Interventions to promote the wearing of hearing protection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;2:CD005234.
10. Tsukada T, Sakakibara H. A trial of individual education for hearing protection with an instrument that measures the noise attenuation effect of wearing earplugs. Ind Health 2008;46:393-6.
11. Web ref: Available from: http://www.osha.gov/Publications/OSHA3074/ osha3074.html [last accessed on 2010 May 25].
12. Robson L, Stephenson C, Schulte P, Amick B, Chan S, Bielecky A, et al. A systematic review of the effectiveness of training and education for the protection of workers. Toronto: Institute for Work and Health, 2010; Cincinnati, OH: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. This publication can also be tracked as DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2010. p. 127.
13. National Institutes of Health. Theories at a Glance: A guide for health promotion, 2nd edition. U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington D. C., 2005.
14. Myerowitz BE, Chaiken S. The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol 1987;52:500-10.
15. Rothman AJ, Salovey P, Antone C, Keough K, Martin CD. The influence of message framing on intentions to perform health behaviors. J Exp Soc Psychol 1993;29:408-33.
16. Borchgrevink HM. Does health promotion work in relation to noise? Noise Health 2003;5:25-30.
17. Lusk SL, Ronis DL, Kazanis AS, Eakin BL, Hong O, Raymond DM. Effectiveness of a tailored intervention to increase factory workers use of hearing protection. Nurs Res 2003;52:289-95.
18. Lusk SL, Ronis DL, Baer LM. A comparison of multiple indicators: Observations, supervisor report, and self-report as measures of workers' hearing protection use. Eval Health Prof 1995;18:51-63.
19. Kerr MJ, Lusk SL, Ronis DL. Explaining Mexican-American workers' hearing protection use with the Health Promotion Model. Nurs Res 2002;61:100-9.
20. Williams W, Purdy SC, Storey L, Nakhla M, Boon G. Towards more effective methods for changing perceptions of noise in the workplace. Saf Sci 2007;45:431-47. (Pubitemid 46216051)
21. Rosenstock IM. The health belief model and preventive health behavior. Health Educ Monogr 1974;2:354-86.
22. Lusk SL, Ronis DL, Kerr MJ, Atwood JR. Test of the health promotion model as a causal model of workers' use of hearing protection. Nurs Res 1994;43:151-7.
23. Thompson NJ, McClintock HO. Demonstrating Your Program Worth, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National center for Injury Prevention Control, Atlanta, GA, 1998.
24. Witte K, Vaught C, Stephenson M. A Project to Evaluate the Role Positive and Negative Emotion Plays in Promoting Hearing Conservation Behaviors Among Coal Miners. Intl. Comm. Occ. Health. 2002 Oct:81-82.
25. Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychol Bull 1977;84:888-918.
26. Aherin RA, Murphy DJ, Westaby JD. Agricultural injuries; issues and methods. St. Joseph, Michigan: ASAE; 1992. p. 58.
27. Marriner TA, Raile AM. Nursing theorists and their work. In: Sakraida T, Pender NJ, editors. The Health Promotion Model. 5th ed. St Louis: Mosby; 2005.
28. Pender NJ. Health Promotion in Nursing Practice. 2nd ed. Norwalk, Connecticut: Appleton, Century, Crofts; 1987.
29. Bandura A. Exercise of personal agency through the self-efficacy mechanism. In: Schwarzer, editor. Self-Efficacy: Thought Control of Action. London: Hemisphere Publishing; 1992.
30. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Norcross JC. In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors. Am Psychol 1992;47:1102-14.
31. Maibach EW, Cotton D. Moving people to behavior change: A staged social cognitive approach to message design. In: Maibach E, Parrott RL, editors. Designing Health Messages-Approaches From Communication Theory and Public Health Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1995. p. 41-64.
32. Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. Misinterpretations and misapplications of the transtheoretical model. Am J Health Promot 1997;12:11-2.
33. McDaniels M. The Development of a Hearing Conservation Attitude Survey - Final Report. Prepared under NIOSH Contract 211-93-0006, August 27, 1994.
34. Stephenson MR. Noise Exposure Characterization via Task Based Analysis, in Proceedings Hearing Conservation Conference III/XX, edited by J. Franks and J. Casali, Natl. Hearing Conservation Association.
35. Stephenson MR. Hearing Protectors in the 21st Century: They're Not Your Father's Earplugs. Seminars in Hearing. January 2009, p. 56-61.