|
Volumn 54, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 369-378
|
Complying with a corporate global noise health surveillance procedure--do the benefits outweigh the costs?
a a a |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ABSENTEEISM;
ARTICLE;
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
COST OF ILLNESS;
ECONOMICS;
EVALUATION;
HEALTH;
HEALTH SURVEY;
HUMAN;
INDUSTRIAL NOISE;
INFORMATION PROCESSING;
MASS SCREENING;
METHODOLOGY;
NOISE INJURY;
NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH;
OCCUPATIONAL DISEASE;
OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH NURSING;
OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE;
ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT;
PRACTICE GUIDELINE;
STATISTICS;
TASK PERFORMANCE;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
UNITED STATES;
ABSENTEEISM;
COST OF ILLNESS;
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
DATA COLLECTION;
GUIDELINE ADHERENCE;
GUIDELINES;
HEARING LOSS, NOISE-INDUCED;
HUMANS;
MASS SCREENING;
NOISE, OCCUPATIONAL;
NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH;
OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES;
OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH NURSING;
OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SERVICES;
OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE);
POPULATION SURVEILLANCE;
TIME AND MOTION STUDIES;
UNITED STATES;
WORLD HEALTH;
MLCS;
MLOWN;
|
EID: 33749080308
PISSN: 08910162
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1177/216507990605400805 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (6)
|
References (0)
|