The effects of aging and hearing loss on distortion product otoacoustic emissions

Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

Volumn 129, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 382-389

  Cilento, Benjamin W ^a   Norton, Susan J ^a   Gates, George A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; AGING; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE; COCHLEA; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; FEMALE; FREQUENCY MODULATION; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MALE; NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; SCREENING TEST; SEX DIFFERENCE; SPEECH AUDIOMETRY; TYMPANOMETRY;

EID: 0141992867     PISSN: 01945998     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0194-5998(03)00637-5     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Kemp DT. Evidence of mechanical nonlinearity and frequency selective wave amplification in the cochlea. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1979;224:37-45.
2. Lonsbury-Martin BL, McCoy MJ, Whitehead ML, et al. Clinical testing of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1993;14:11-22.
3. Probst R, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK. A review of otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1991;89:2027-67.
4. Kimberley BP. Applications of distortion-product emissions to an otological practice. Laryngoscope 1999;109:1908-18.
5. Norton SJ, Widen JE. Evoked otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing infants and children: emerging data and issues. Ear Hear 1990;11:121-7.
6. Gorga MP, Stover L, Bergman BM, et al. The application of otoacoustic emissions in the assessment of developmentally delayed patients. Scand Audiol Suppl 1995;41:8-17.
7. Karzon RK, Garcia P, Peterein JL, et al. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the elderly. Am J Otol 1994;15:596-605.
8. Kemp DT. Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 1978;64:1386-91.
9. Mills DM. Differential responses to acoustic damage and furosemide in auditory brainstem and otoacoustic emission measures. J Acoust Soc Am 2003;113:914-24.
10. Heitmann J, Waldmann B, Plinkert PK. Limitations in the use of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in objective audiometry as the result of fine structure. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1996;253:167-71.
11. Gates GA, Mills DM, Rubel EW, et al. Effects of age on the distortion-product otoacoustic emission growth functions. Hear Res 2002;163:53-60.
12. Engdahl B, Woxen O, Arnesen AR, et al. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions as screening for hearing losses at the school for military training. Scand Audiol 1996;25:71-8.
13. Ress BD, Sridhar KS, Balkany TJ, et al. Effects of cis-platinum chemotherapy on otoacoustic emissions: the development of an objective screening protocol. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999;121:693-701.
14. Brown AM, McDowell B, Forge A. Acoustic distortion products can be used to monitor the effects of chronic gentamicin treatment. Hear Res 1989;42:143-56.
15. Marshall L, Heller LM. Reliability of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1996;17:237-54.
16. McFadden D. A speculation about the parallel ear asymmetries and sex differences in hearing sensitivity and otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 1993;68:143-51.
17. Martin GK, Ohlms LA, Franklin DJ, et al. Distortion product emissions in humans. III. Influence of sensorineural hearing loss. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1990;147:30-42.
18. Murray M, LePage E. Age dependence of otoacoustic emissions and apparent rates of aging of inner ear in an Australian population. Austral J Audiol 1993;15:59-70.
19. Gorga MP, Neely ST, Ohlrich B, et al. From laboratory to clinic: a large scale study of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in ears with normal hearing and ears with hearing loss. Ear Hear 1997;18:440-55.
20. Stover L, Norton SJ. The effects of aging on otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1993;94:2670-81.
21. Dorn PA, Piskorski P, Keefe DH, et al. On the existence of an age/threshold/frequency interaction in distortion product otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1998;104:964-71.
22. Dawber TR. The Framingham Study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1980.
23. Gates GA, Schmid P, Blinne WB, et al. High-frequency audiometric notches in older people. J Occup Hear Loss 1999;1.
24. Dorn PA, Piskorski P, Keefe DH, et al. On the existence of an age/threshold/frequency interaction in distortion product otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1998;104:964-71.
25. Gates GA, Mills DM, Rubel EW, et al. Effects of age on the distortion-product otoacoustic emission growth functions. Hear Res 2002;163:53-60.
26. Gates GA, Couropmitree NN, Myers RH. Genetic associations in age-related hearing thresholds. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999;125:654-9.