Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing

Psychological Bulletin

Volumn 121, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 3-19

  Rothman, Alexander J ^a   Salovey, Peter ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DECISION MAKING; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH PROMOTION; HIGH RISK BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; MOTIVATION; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; REVIEW;

DECISION MAKING; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; MOTIVATION; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; RISK-TAKING;

EID: 0030641104     PISSN: 00332909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.3     Document Type: Article

References (115)

1. Baker, S. M., & Petty, R. E. (1994). Majority and minority influence: Source-position imbalance as a determinant of message scrutiny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 5-19.
2. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
3. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
4. Banks, S. M., Salovey, P., Greener, S., Rothman, A. J., Moyer, A., Beauvais, J., & Epel, E. (1995). The effects of message framing on mammography utilization. Health Psychology, 14, 178-184.
5. Baumann, L. J., & Leventhal, H. (1985). "I can tell when my blood pressure is up, can't I?" Health Psychology, 4, 203-218.
6. Beggan, J. K. (1994). The preference for gain frames in consumer decision making. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1407-1427.
7. Block, L. G., & Keller, P. A. (1995). When to accentuate the negative: The effects of perceived efficacy and message framing on intentions to perform a health-related behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 32, 192-203.
8. Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36, 129-148.
9. Brendl, C. M., Higgins, E. T., & Lemm, K. M. (1995). Sensitivity to varying gains and losses: The role of self-discrepancies and event framing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1028-1051.
10. Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116-131.
11. Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 212-252). New York: Guilford Press.
12. Christensen, C., Heckerling, P. S., Mackesy, M. E., Bernstein, L. M., & Elstein, A. S. (1991). Framing biases among expert and novice physicians. Academic Medicine, 9, S76-S78.
13. Christensen, C., Heckerling, P. S., Mackesy-Amiti, M. E., Bernstein, L. M., & Elstein, A. S. (1995). Pervasiveness of framing effects among physicians and medical students. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 8, 169-180.
14. Christophersen, E. R., & Gyulay, J. E. (1981). Parental compliance with car seat usage: A positive approach with long term follow-up. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 6, 301-312.
15. Cioffi, D. (1991a). Asymmetry of doubt in medical self-diagnosis: The ambiguity of "uncertain wellness." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 969-980.
16. Cioffi, D. (1991b). Beyond attentional strategies: A cognitive-perceptual model of somatic interpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 25-41.
17. Cioffi, D. (1994). When good news is bad news: Medical wellness as a nonevent in undergraduates. Health Psychology, 13, 63-72.
18. Clark, L. F. (1994). Social cognition and health psychology. In R. S. Wyer, Jr., & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 239-288). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Dunegan, K. J. (1993). Framing, cognitive modes, and image theory: Toward an understanding of a glass half full. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 491-503.
20. Elliott, C. S., & Archibald, R. B. (1989). Subjective framing and attitudes towards risk. Journal of Economic Psychology, 10, 321-328.
21. Fagley, N. S. (1993). A note concerning reflection effects versus framing effects. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 451-452.
22. Fagley, N. S., & Miller, P. M. (1987). The effects of decision framing on choice of risky and certain options. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, 264-277.
23. Fagley, N. S., & Miller, P. M. (1990). The effect of framing on choice: Interactions with risk-taking propensity, cognitive style, and sex. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 496-510.
24. Fielding, J. (1978). Successes of prevention. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 56, 274-302.
25. Frisch, D. (1993). Reasons for framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54, 399-429.
26. Gerrard, M., Gibbons, F. X., & Bushman, B. J. (1996). Relation between perceived vulnerability to HIV and precautionary sexual behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 390-409.
27. Gibbons, F. X., McGovern, P. G., & Lando, H. A. (1991). Relapse and risk perception among members of a smoking cessation clinic. Health Psychology, 10, 42-45.
28. Gleicher, F., & Petty, R. E. (1992). Expectations of reassurance influence the nature of fear-stimulated attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 86-100.
29. Herrnstein, R. J. (1990). Rationale choice theory: Necessary but not sufficient. American Psychologist, 45, 356-367.
30. Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319-340.
31. Hill, D., Gardner, G., & Rassaby, J. (1985). Factors predisposing women to take precautions against breast and cervix cancer. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15, 59-79.
32. Huys, J., Evers-Kiebooms, G., & d'Ydewalle, G. (1990). Framing biases in genetic risk perception. In J. P. Caverni, J. M. Fabre, & M. Gonzales (Eds.), Cognitive biases (pp. 59-68). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
33. Isen, A. M., Nygren, T. E., & Ashby, F. G. (1988). Influence of positive affect on the subjective utility of gains and losses: It is just not worth the risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 710-717.
34. Johnson, E., & Tversky, A. (1983). Affect, generalization, and the perception of risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 20-31.
35. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
36. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). The psychology of preferences. Scientific American, 247, 160-173.
37. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341-350.
38. Kalichman, S. C., & Coley, B. (1995). Context framing to enhance HIV-antibody-testing messages targeted to African American women. Health Psychology, 14, 247-254.
39. Kasl, S. V., & Cobb, S. (1966). Health behavior, illness behavior, and sick role behavior. Archives of Environmental Health, 12, 246-266.
40. Kelly, P. T. (1979). Breast self-examination: Who does them and why. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 2, 31-38.
41. Kirscht, J. P. (1983). Preventive health behavior: A review of research and issues. Health Psychology, 2, 277-301.
42. Kuhberger, A. (1995). The framing of decisions: A new look at old problems. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62, 230-240.
43. Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480-498.
44. Lauver, D., & Rubin, M. (1990). Message framing, dispositional optimism, and follow-up for abnormal Papanicolaou tests. Research in Nursing and Health, 13, 199-207.
45. Lerman, C., Ross, E., Boyce, A., Gorchov, P. M., McLauglin, R., Rimer, B., & Engstrom, P. (1992). The impact of mailing psychoeducational materials to women with abnormal mammograms. American Journal of Public Health, 82, 729-730.
46. Lerman, C., Trock, B., Rimer, B., Jepson, C., Brody, D., & Boyce, A. (1991). Psychological side effects of breast cancer screening. Health Psychology, 10, 259-267.
47. Leventhal, H. (1970). Findings and theory in the study of fear communications. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 119-186). New York: Academic Press.
48. Leventhal, H., & Diefenbach, M. (1991). The active side of illness cognition. In J. A. Skelton & R. T. Croyle (Eds.), Mental representations in health and illness (pp. 247-272). New York: Springer-Verlag.
49. Leventhal, H., Nerenz, D. R., & Steele, D. J. (1984). Illness representations and coping with health threats. In A. Baum, S. E. Taylor, & J. E. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of psychology and health (Vol. 4, pp. 219-252). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
50. Levin, I. P. (1987). Associative effects on information framing. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 25, 85-86.
51. Levin, I. P., & Chapman, D. P. (1990). Risk taking, frame of reference, and characterization of victim groups in AIDS treatment decisions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 421-434.
52. Levin, I. P., & Chapman, D. P. (1993). Risk decision making and allocation of resources for leukemia and AIDS programs. Health Psychology, 12, 110-117.
53. Levin, I. P., & Gaeth, G. J. (1988). How consumers are affected by the framing of attribute information before and after consuming the product. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 374-378.
54. Levin, I. P., Schnittjer, S. K., & Thee, S. L. (1988). Information framing effects in social and personal decisions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 520-529.
55. Li, S., & Adams, A. S. (1995). Is there something more important behind framing? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62, 216-219.
56. Liberman, A., & Chaiken, S. (1992). Defensive processing of personally relevant health messages. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 669-679.
57. Linville, P. W., Fischer, G. W., & Fischhoff, B. (1993). AIDS risk perceptions and decision biases. In J. B. Pryor & G. D. Reeder (Eds.), The social psychology of HIV infection (pp. 5-38). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
58. Lopes, L. (1987). Between hope and fear: The psychology of risk. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 20, pp. 255-295). New York: Academic Press.
59. Maddux, J. E., & Rogers, R. W. (1983). Protection motivation and self-efficacy: A revised theory of fear appeals and attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 469-479.
60. Maheswaran, D., & Chaiken, S. (1991). Promoting systematic processing in low motivation settings: Effect of incongruent information on processing and judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 13-25.
61. Maheswaran, D., & Meyers-Levy, J. (1990). The influence of message framing and issue involvement. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 361-367.
62. Mano, H. (1994). Risk-taking, framing effects, and affect. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Making Processes, 57, 38-58.
63. Marteau, T. M. (1989). Framing of information: Its influence upon decisions of doctors and patients. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 89-94.
64. Mayer, J. A., & Solomon, L. (1992). Breast self-examination skill and frequency: A review. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 14, 189-196.
65. Mayer, J. D., Gaschke, Y. N., Braverman, D. L., & Evans, T. W. (1992). Mood-congruent recall is a general effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 119-132.
66. McFarland, C., & Miller, D. T. (1994). The framing of relative performance feedback: Seeing the glass as half empty or half full. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 1061-1073.
67. McNeil, B. J., Pauker, S. G., Sox, H. C., & Tversky, A. (1982). On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. New England Journal of Medicine, 306, 1259-1262.
68. Meyer, D., Leventhal, H., & Guttman, M. (1985). Commonsense models of illness: The example of hypertension. Health Psychology, 4, 115-135.
69. Meyerowitz, B. E., & Chaiken, S. (1987). The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 500-510.
70. Meyerowitz, B. E., Wilson, D. K., & Chaiken, S. (1991, June). Loss-framed messages increase breast self-examination for women who perceive risk. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Psychological Society, Washington, DC.
71. Miller, P. M., & Fagley, N. S. (1991). The effects of framing, problem variations, and providing rationale on choice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 517-522.
72. Neale, M. A., Huber, V. L., & Northcraft, G. B. (1987). The framing of negotiations: Contextual versus task frames. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, 228-241.
73. Nisbett, R., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
74. O'Connor, A. M. C., Boyd, N. F., Tritchler, D. L., Kriukov, Y., Sutherland, H., & Till, J. E. (1985). Eliciting preferences for alternative cancer drug therapies. Medical Decision Making, 5, 453-463.
75. Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1992). Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 87-131.
76. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123-205). New York: Academic Press.
77. Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1991). Thought systems, argument quality, and persuasion. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 4, pp. 147-161). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
78. Puto, C. P. (1987). The framing of buying decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 301-315.
79. Reyna, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (1991). Fuzzy-trace theory and framing effects in choice: Gist extraction, truncation, and conversion. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 4, 249-262.
80. Ritov, I., & Baron, J. (1990). Reluctance to vaccinate: Omission bias and ambiguity. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 3, 263-277.
81. Robberson, M. R., & Rogers, R. W. (1988). Beyond fear appeals: Negative and positive persuasive appeals to health and self-esteem. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 13, 277-287.
82. Robbertson, L. S. (1975). Behavioral research and strategies in public health: A demur. Social Science and Medicine, 9, 165-170.
83. Rogers, R. W. (1983). Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation. In J. T. Cacioppo & R. E. Petty (Eds.), Social psychophysiology (pp. 153-176). New York: Guilford Press.
84. Rothman, A. J., Salovey, P., Antone, C., Keough, K., & Martin, C. D. (1993). The influence of message framing on intentions to perform health behaviors. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 408-433.
85. Rothman, A. J., Salovey, P., Pronin, E., Zullo, J., & Lefell, D. (1996). [Prior health beliefs moderate the persuasiveness of gain and loss-framed messages]. Unpublished raw data, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, Department of Psychology, Minneapolis.
86. Rybash, J. M., & Roodin, P. A. (1989). The framing heuristic influences judgments about younger and older adults' decisions to refuse medical treatment. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 3, 171-180.
87. Salovey, P., & Birnbaum, D. (1989). Influence of mood on health-relevant cognitions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 539-551.
88. Salovey, P., Rothman, A. J., & Rodin, J. (in press). Social psychology and health behavior. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
89. Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1985). Optimism, coping, and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychology, 4, 219-247.
90. Schwarz, N. (1990). Feelings as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. In E. T. Higgins & R. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 527-561). New York: Guilford.
91. Schwarz, N. (1994). Judgment in a social context: Biases, shortcomings, and the logic of conversation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 26, pp. 123-162). New York: Academic Press.
92. Schwarz, N., Bless, H., & Bohner, G. (1991). Mood and persuasion: Affective states influence the processing of persuasive communications. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 161-199). New York: Academic Press.
93. Siminoff, L. A., & Fettig, J. H. (1989). Effects of outcome framing on treatment decisions in the real world: Impact of framing on adjuvant breast cancer decisions. Medical Decision Making, 9, 262-271.
94. Singer, J. A., & Salovey, P. (1988). Mood and memory: Evaluating the network theory of affect. Clinical Psychology Review, 8, 211-251.
95. Skelton, J. A., & Croyle, R. T. (1991). Mental representations in health and illness. New York: Springer-Verlag.
96. Smith, S. M., & Petty, R. E. (1996). Message framing and persuasion: A message processing analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 257-268.
97. Sutton, S. R. (1982). Fsar-arousing communications: A critical examination of theory and research. In J. R. Eiser (Ed.), Social psychology and behavioral medicine (pp. 303-337). New York: Wiley.
98. Takemura, K. (1992). Effect of decision time on framing of decision: A case of risky choice behavior. Psychologia, 35, 180-185.
99. Takemura, K. (1993). The effect of decision frame and decision justification on risky choice. Japanese Psychological Research, 35, 36-40.
100. Takemura, K. (1994). Influence of elaboration on the framing of decision. Journal of Psychology, 128, 33-39.
101. Treiber, F. A. (1986). A comparison of positive and negative consequences approaches upon car restraint usage. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 11, 15-24.
102. Tversky, A., & Fox, C. R. (1995). Weighing risk and uncertainty. Psychological Review, 102, 269-283.
103. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981, January 30). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.
104. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297-323.
105. Tykocinski, O., Chaiken, S., & Higgins, E. T. (1994). Message framing, self-discrepancies, and yielding to persuasive messages: The motivational significance of psychological situations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 107-115.
106. van der Pligt, J., & van Schie, E. C. M. (1990). Frames of reference, judgment and preference. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 61-80). London: Wiley.
107. Vaughn, E., & Seifert, M. (1992). Variability in the framing of risk issues. Journal of Social Issues, 48, 119-135.
108. Wegener, D. T., Petty, R. E., & Klein, D. J. (1994). Effects of mood on high elaboration attitude change: The mediating role of likelihood judgments. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 25-43.
109. Weinstein, N. D. (1988). The precaution adoption process. Health Psychology, 7, 355-386.
110. Weinstein, N. D. (1993). Testing four competing theories of health-protective behavior. Health Psychology, 12, 324-333.
111. Weinstein, N. D., Rothman, A. J., & Nicolich, M. (1996). Use of correlational data to examine the effects of risk perceptions on precautionary behavior. Manuscript submitted for publication, Rutgers University, Department of Human Ecology, New Brunswick, NJ.
112. Wilson, D. K., Kaplan, R. M., & Schneiderman, L. (1987). Framing of decisions and selections of alternatives in health care. Social Behavior, 2, 51-59.
113. Wilson, D. K., Purdon, S. E., & Wallston, K. A. (1988). Compliance to health recommendations: A theoretical overview of message framing. Health Education Research: Theory and Practice, 3, 161-171.
114. Wilson, D. K., Wallston, K. A., & King, J. E. (1990). Effect of contract framing, motivation to quit, and self-efficacy on smoking reduction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 531-547.
115. Yates, J. F., & Stone, E. R. (1992). The risk construct. In J. F. Yates (Ed.), Risk-taking behavior (pp. 1-25). Chichester, England: Wiley.