Students' conceptual change in electricity and magnetism using simulations: A comparison of cognitive perturbation and cognitive conflict

Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Volumn 50, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 677-698

  Dega, Bekele Gashe ^a   Kriek, Jeanne ^b   Mogese, Temesgen Fereja ^c  

^a AMBO UNIVERSITY   (Ethiopia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA   (South Africa)

^c ADDIS ABABA UNIVERSITY   (Ethiopia)

Author keywords

alternative conception; cognitive conflict; cognitive perturbation; conceptual change; conceptual knowledge; electric potential and energy; electricity and magnetism; electromagnetic induction; simulation

Indexed keywords

ALTERNATIVE CONCEPTION; COGNITIVE CONFLICT; COGNITIVE PERTURBATION; CONCEPTUAL CHANGE; CONCEPTUAL KNOWLEDGE; SIMULATION;

ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ELECTRICITY; ELECTROMAGNETIC INDUCTION;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84880569786     PISSN: 00224308     EISSN: 10982736     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tea.21096     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Adams, W. K., (2010). Student engagement and learning with PhET interactive simulations. Teaching Learning Proceedings. doi: 10.1393/ncc/i2010-10623-0
2. Akpan, J., &, Strayer, J., (2010). Which comes first the use of computer simulation of frog dissection or conventional dissection as academic exercise ? Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 29 (2), 113-138.
3. Albe, V., Venturini, P., &, Lascours, J., (2001). Electromagnetic concepts in mathematical representation of physics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10 (2), 197-203. (Pubitemid 33809426)
4. Bao, L., &, Redish, E. F., (2001). Concentration analysis: A quantitative assessment of student states. American Journal of Physics, 69 (7), S45-S53.
5. Bao, L., &, Redish, E. F., (2006). Model analysis: Representing and assessing the dynamics of student learning. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 2 (1), 010103.
6. Baser, M., (2006). Effects of conceptual change and traditional confirmatory simulations on pre-service teachers' understanding of direct current circuits. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15 (5), 367-381. (Pubitemid 44877253)
7. Baser, M., &, Durmus, S., (2010). The effectiveness of computer supported versus real laboratory inquiry learning environments on the understanding of direct current electricity among pre-service elementary school teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science & Technology Education, 6 (1), 47-61.
8. Baser, M., &, Geban, O., (2007). Effect of instruction based on conceptual change activities on students' understandings of static electricity concepts. Research in Science & Technological Education, 25 (2), 243-267.
9. Bayraktar, S., (2002). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction in science education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34 (2), 173-188.
10. Bell, R. L., &, Trundle, K. C., (2008). The use of a computer simulation to promote scientific conceptions of moon phases. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45 (3), 346-372. (Pubitemid 351456613)
11. Chabay, R., &, Sherwood, B., (2006). Restructuring the introductory electricity and magnetism course. American Journal of Physics, 74 (4), 329-336. (Pubitemid 43534002)
12. Chan, C., Burtis, J., &, Bereiter, C., (1997). Knowledge building as a mediator of conflict in conceptual change. Cognition and Instruction, 15 (1), 1-40. (Pubitemid 127360695)
13. Chi, M. T. H., (2005). Commonsense conceptions of emergent processes: Why some misconceptions are robust. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14 (2), 161-199. (Pubitemid 40551444)
14. Chinn, C. A., &, Brewer, W. F., (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science education. Review of Educational Research, 63 (1), 1-49.
15. Chinn, C. A., &, Samarapungavan, A., (2009). Conceptual change-multiple routes, multiple mechanisms: A commentary on Ohlsson (2009). Educational Psychologist, 44 (1), 48-57.
16. Clark, D. B., (2006). Longitudinal conceptual change in students' understanding of thermal equilibrium: An examination of the process of conceptual restructuring. Cognition and Instruction, 24 (4), 467-563. (Pubitemid 44878245)
17. Cohen, J., (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
18. Coletta, V. P., Phillips, J. A., &, Steinert, J. J., (2007). Interpreting force concept inventory scores: Normalized gain and SAT scores. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 3 (1), 010106.
19. Dega, B. G., Kriek, J., &, Mogese, T. F., (2012). Categorization of alternative conceptions in electricity and magnetism: The case of Ethiopian undergraduate students. Research in Science Education. doi: 10.1007/s11165-012- 9332-z
20. Demastes, S., Settlage, J., &, Good, R., (1995). Students' conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution: Cases of replication and comparison. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32 (5), 535-550.
21. Ding, L., &, Beichner, R., (2009). Approaches to data analysis of multiple-choice questions. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 5, 1-17.
22. diSessa, A. A., Gillespie, N., &, Esterly, J., (2004). Coherence versus fragmentation in the development of the concept of force. Cognitive Science, 28 (6), 843-900. (Pubitemid 39620371)
23. Dreyfus, A., Jungwirth, E., &, Eliovitch, R., (1990). Applying the cognitive conflict strategy for conceptual change-Some implications, difficulties, and problems. Science Education, 74 (5), 555-569.
24. Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., &, Scott, P., (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23 (7), 5-12.
25. Duit, R., &, Treagust, D., (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science education, 25 (6), 671-688. (Pubitemid 37496925)
26. Dykstra, D. I., Boyle, C. F., &, Monach, I. A., (1992). Studying conceptual change in learning physics. Science Education, 76 (6), 615-652.
27. Finkelstein, N., (2005). Learning physics in context: A study of student learning about electricity and magnetism. International Journal of Science Education, 27 (10), 1109-1187.
28. Finkelstein, N. D., Adams, W. K., Keller, C. J., Kohl, P. B., Perkins, K. K., Podolefsky, N. S.,., LeMaster, R., (2005). When learning about the real world is better done virtually: A study of substituting computer simulations for laboratory equipment. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 1 (1), 010103.
29. Fosnot, C. T., (1993). Science education revisited: A defense of Piagetian constructivism. Journal for Research in Science Education, 30 (9), 1120-1189.
30. Foti, S., &, Ring, G., (2008). Using a simulation-based learning environment to enhance learning and instruction in a middle school science classroom. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 27 (1), 103-120.
31. Grayson, D. J., (1994). Concept substitution: An instructional strategy for promoting conceptual change. Research in Science Education, 24, 102-111.
32. Greca, I., &, Moreira, M. A., (1997). The kind of mental representation-Models, propositions, and images-used by college physics students regarding the concept of field. International Journal of Science Education, 19 (6), 711-724. (Pubitemid 127717528)
33. Hake, R. R., (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66 (1), 64-74.
34. Hand, B., &, Treagust, D. F., (1991). Student achievement and science curriculum development using a constructive framework. School Science and Mathematics, 91 (4), 172-176.
35. Harrison, A. G., Grayson, D. J., &, Treagust, D. F., (1999). Investigating a grade 11 student's evolving conceptions of heat and temperature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36 (1), 55-87. (Pubitemid 129534708)
36. Hewson, M. G., &, Hewson, P. W., (1983). Effect of instruction using students' prior knowledge and conceptual change strategies on science learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 731-743.
37. Hewson, P. W., &, Hewson, M. G., (1984). The role of conceptual conflict in conceptual change and the design of science instruction. Instructional Science, 13, 1-13.
38. Hewson, P. W., &, Thorley, R., (1989). The conditions of conceptual change in the classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 541-553.
39. Howe, A., Keogh-Brown, M., Miles, S., &, Bachmann, M., (2007). Expert consensus on contamination in educational trials elicited by a Delphi exercise. Medical Education, 41 (2), 196-204. (Pubitemid 46213700)
40. Hsu, Y. S., (2008). Learning about seasons in a technologically enhanced environment: The impact of teacher-guided and student-centered instructional approaches on the process of students' conceptual change. Science Education, 92 (2), 320-344.
41. Huppert, J., Lomask, S. M., &, Lazarowitz, R., (2002). Computer simulations in the high school: Students' cognitive stages, science process skills and academic achievement in microbiology. International Journal of Science Education, 24 (8), 803-821.
42. Ioannides, C., &, Vosniadou, S., (2002). The changing meaning of force. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 2 (1), 5-61.
43. İpek, H., &, Çalik, M., (2008). Combining different conceptual change methods within four-step constructivist teaching model: A sample teaching of series and parallel circuits. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 3 (3), 143-153.
44. Jaakkola, T., Nurmi, S., &, Veermans, K., (2011). A comparison of students' conceptual understanding of electric circuits in simulation only and simulation-laboratory contexts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48 (1), 71-93.
45. Jimoyiannis, A., &, Komis, V., (2001). Computer simulations in physics teaching and learning: A case study on students' understanding of trajectory motion. Computers & Education, 36 (2), 183-204. (Pubitemid 33673517)
46. Keiny, S., (2008). Conceptual change as both revolutionary and evolutionary process. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 14 (1), 61-72.
47. Keogh-Brown, M. R., Bachmann, M. O., Shepstone, L., Hewitt, C., Howe, A., Ramsay, C.R.,., Campbell, M.J., (2007). Contamination in trials of educational interventions. Health Technology Assessment, 11 (43), iii-ix.
48. Lasry, N., Rosenfield, S., Dedic, H., Dahan, A., &, Reshef, O., (2011). The puzzling reliability of the force concept inventory. American Journal of Physics, 79, 909-912.
49. Lee, G., &, Byun, T., (2012). An explanation for the difficulty of leading conceptual change using a counterintuitive demonstration: The relationship between cognitive conflict and responses. Research in Science Education, 42 (5), 943-965.
50. Li, S. C., (2011). Cognitive perturbation and conceptual change in learning about marine ecology with dynamic modeling. International Journal of Instructional Media, 38 (4), 359-367.
51. Li, S. C., Law, N., &, Lui, K. F. A., (2006). Cognitive perturbation through dynamic modeling: A pedagogical approach to conceptual change in science. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22 (6), 405-422. (Pubitemid 44721204)
52. Limon, M., (2001). On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual changes: A critical appraisal. Learning and Instruction, 36 (4-5), 357-380. (Pubitemid 33631296)
53. Linder, C. J., (1993). A challenge to conceptual change. Science Education, 77, 293-300.
54. Maloney, D. P., O'Kuma, T. L., Hieggelke, C. J., &, Heuvelen, A. V., (2001). Surveying students' conceptual knowledge of electricity & magnetism. American Journal of Physics, S69 (7), 12-23.
55. Maloney, D. P., &, Siegler, R. S., (1993). Conceptual competition in physics learning. International Journal of Science Education, 15, 283-295.
56. Marx, J. D., (1998). Creation of a diagnostic exam for introductory, udergraduate electricity and magnetism (Doctoral dissertation, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute). Retrieved from http://www.compadre.org/Repository/ document/ServeFile.cfm?ID=3786&DocID=114. Accessed 5 December 2010.
57. Ministry of Education [MOE], (2008). Annual intake and enrollment growth and professional and program mix of Ethiopian public higher education: Strategy and conversion plan, 2001-2005 E.C. Ministry of Education, Addis Ababa, April 2008.
58. Moore, J. L., &, Thomas, F. H., (1983). Computer simulation of experiments: A valuable alternative to traditional laboratory work for secondary school science teaching. School Science Review, 64 (229), 641-655.
59. Nussbaum, J., &, Novice, S., (1982). Alternative frameworks, conceptual conflict and accommodation: Toward a principled teaching strategy. Instructional Science, 11 (3), 183-200.
60. Özdemir, G., &, Clark, D. B., (2007). An overview of conceptual change theories. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science & Technology Education, 3 (4), 351-361.
61. Pallant, J., (2007). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for windows (3rd ed.). Sydney: Open University.
62. Pepper, R. E., Chasteen, S. V., Pollock, S. J., &, Perkins, K. K., (2010). Our best juniors still struggle with Gauss's law: Characterizing their difficulties. PERC Proceedings, 1289 (245).
63. Pinarbasi, T., Canpolat, N., &, Bayrakceken, S., (2006). An investigation of effectiveness of conceptual change text-oriented instruction on students' understanding of solution concepts. Research in Science Education, 36, 313-335. (Pubitemid 44057426)
64. Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., &, Boyle, R. A., (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 6, 167-199.
65. Planinic, M., (2006). Assessment of difficulties of some conceptual areas from electricity and magnetism using the conceptual survey of electricity and magnetism. American Journal of Physics, 73 (12), 1143-1148.
66. Planinic, M., (2007). Conceptual change requires insight and intervention. Physics Education, 42 (2), 222-223.
67. Planinic, M., Krsnik, R., Pecina, P., &, Susac, A., (2005) Overview and comparison of basic teaching techniques that promote conceptual change in students. A paper presented at the first European physics education conference. Bad Honnef, July 4-7, 2005, Germany.
68. Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., &, Gertzog, W. A., (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211-227.
69. Punch, K. F., (2009). Introduction to research methods in education. London: SAGE.
70. Pyatt, K., &, Sims, R., (2012). Virtual and physical experimentation in inquiry-based science labs: Attitudes, performance and access. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21 (1), 133-147.
71. Rosen, Y., &, Salomon, G., (2007). The differential learning achievements of constructivist technology-intensive learning environments as compared with traditional ones: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 36 (1), 1-14.
72. Rosenthal, A. S., &, Henderson, C., (2006). Teaching about circuits at the introductory level: An emphasis on potential difference. American Journal of Physics, 74 (4), 324-328. (Pubitemid 43534001)
73. Rutten, N., van Joolingen, W. R., &, van der Veen, J. T., (2012). The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Computers & Education, 58 (1), 136-153.
74. Saglam, M., &, Millar, R., (2004). Diagnostic test of students' ideas in electromagnetism. Retrieved from http://www.york.ac.uk/depts/educ/research/ ResearchPaperSeries/index.htm. Accessed 29 October 2010.
75. Saglam, M., &, Millar, R., (2006). Upper high school students' understanding of electromagnetism. International Journal of Science Education, 28 (5), 543-566. (Pubitemid 43435984)
76. Semela, T., (2010). Who is joining physics and why? Factors influencing the choice of physics among Ethiopian university students. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 5 (3), 319-340.
77. Sink, C. A., &, Stroh, H. R., (2006). Practical significance: The use of effect sizes in school counseling research. Professional School Counseling, 9 (4), 401-411.
78. Stocklmayer, S., (2010). Teaching direct current theory using a field model. International Journal of Science Education, 32 (13), 1802-1828.
79. Stofflett, R. T., &, Stoddart, T., (1994). The ability to understand and use conceptual change pedagogy as a function of prior content learning experience. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31 (1), 31-51.
80. Stone, D. C., (2007). Teaching chromatography using virtual laboratory exercises. Journal of Chemical Education, 84, 1488.
81. Tao, P. K., &, Gunstone, R. F., (1999). The process of conceptual change in force and motion during computer-supported physics instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36 (7), 859-882. (Pubitemid 129542162)
82. Treagust, D., &, Duit, R., (2008). Conceptual change: A discussion of theoretical, methodological and practical challenges for science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3 (2), 297-328.
83. Urban-Woldron, H., (2009). Interactive simulations for the effective learning of physics. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 28 (2), 163-176.
84. Vosniadou, S., (1999). Conceptual change research: State of the art and future directions. In, W. Schnotz, S. Vosniadou, &, M. Carretero, (Eds.), new perspectives in conceptual change (pp. 3-13). New York: Pergamon.
85. Vosniadou, S., (2007). Conceptual change and education. Human Development, 50, 47-54. (Pubitemid 46221018)
86. Vosniadou, S., &, Brewer, W. F., (1992). Mental models of the earth. A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 535-585.
87. Wellman, H. M., &, Gelman, S., (1992). Cognitive development: Foundational theories of core domains. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 337-375.
88. Wieman, C. E., Adams, W. K., &, Perkins, K. K., (2008). PhET: Simulations that enhance learning. Science, 322 (5902), 682-683.
89. Winn, W., Stahr, F., Sarason, C., Fruland, R., Oppenheimer, P., &, Lee, Y. L., (2006). Learning oceanography from a computer simulation compared with direct experience at sea. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43 (1), 25-42.
90. Zacharia, Z. C., (2005). The impact of interactive computer simulations on the nature and quality of postgraduate science teachers' explanations in physics. International Journal of Science Education, 27 (14), 1741-1767. (Pubitemid 43123752)
91. Zacharia, Z. C., (2007). Comparing and combining real and virtual experimentation: An effort to enhance students' conceptual understanding of electric circuits. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23 (2), 120-132.
92. Zacharia, Z., &, Anderson, O. R., (2003). The effects of an interactive computer-based simulation prior to performing a laboratory inquiry-based experiment on students' conceptual understanding of physics. American Journal of Physics, 71 (6), 618-629. (Pubitemid 36743008)
93. Zohar, A., &, Aharon-Kravetsky, S., (2005). Exploring the effects of cognitive conflict and direct teaching for students of different academic levels. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42 (7), 829-855. (Pubitemid 41639011)