Categorization of Alternative Conceptions in Electricity and Magnetism: The Case of Ethiopian Undergraduate Students

Research in Science Education

Volumn 43, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 1891-1915

  Dega, Bekele Gashe ^a,b   Kriek, Jeanne ^b   Mogese, Temesgen Fereja ^c  

^a AMBO UNIVERSITY   (Ethiopia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA   (South Africa)

^c ADDIS ABABA UNIVERSITY   (Ethiopia)

Author keywords

Alternative conception; Categories of alternative conceptions; Conceptual change; Electricity and magnetism; Ethiopia; Framework thematic analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884530858     PISSN: 0157244X     EISSN: 15731898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11165-012-9332-z     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Bao, L., & Redish, E. F. (2001). Concentration analysis: a quantitative assessment of student states. American Journal of Physics, 69(7), S45-S53.
2. Bao, L., & Redish, E. F. (2006). Model analysis: representing and assessing the dynamics of student learning. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 2, 010103.
3. Baser, M. (2006). Effects of conceptual change and traditional confirmatory simulations on pre-service teachers' understanding of direct current circuits. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(5), 367-381.
4. Baser, M., & Durmus, S. (2010). The effectiveness of computer supported versus real laboratory inquiry learning environments on the understanding of direct current electricity among pre-service elementary school teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 6(1), 47-61.
5. Baser, M., & Geban, O. (2007). Effect of instruction based on conceptual change activities on students' understandings of static electricity concepts. Research in Science & Technological Education, 25(2), 243-267.
6. Bilal, E., & Erol, M. (2009). Investigating students' conceptions of some electricity concepts. Latin American Journal of Physics Education, 3(2), 193-201.
7. Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge: MIT.
8. Chabay, R., & Sherwood, B. (2006). Restructuring the introductory electricity & magnetism course. American Journal of Physics, 74(4), 329-336.
9. Chi, M. T. H. (2008). Three types of conceptual change: belief revision, mental model transformation and categorical shift. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), Handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 61-82). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
10. Chi, M. T. H., & Roscoe, R. D. (2002). The processes and challenges of conceptual change. In M. Limon & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change: issues in theory and practice (pp. 3-27). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
11. Chi, M. T. H., & Slotta, J. D. (1993). The ontological coherence of intuitive physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10(2&3), 249-260.
12. Chi, M. T. H., Slotta, J. D., & de Leeuw, J. (1994). From thins to processes: a theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 27-43.
13. Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: a theoretical framework and implications for science education. Review of Educational Research, 63(1), 1-49.
14. Clark, D. B., D'Angelo, C. M., & Schleigh, S. P. (2011). Comparison of students' knowledge structure coherence and understanding of force in the Philippines, Turkey, China, Mexico, and the United States. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(2), 207-261.
15. Clement, J. (1982). Students' preconceptions in introductory mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 50, 66-71.
16. Ding, L., Chabay, R., Sheewood, B., & Beichner, R. (2006). Evaluating an electricity and magnetism assessment tool: brief electricity & magnetism assessment. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 2, 1-7.
17. diSessa, A. A. (1982). Unlearning Aristotelian physics: a study of knowledge-based learning. Cognitive Science, 6(1), 37-75.
18. diSessa, A. A. (1993). Towards an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10(2-3), 105-225.
19. diSessa, A. A., Gillespie, N., & Esterly, J. (2004). Coherence versus fragmentation in the development of the concept of force. Cognitive Science, 28(6), 843-900.
20. Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5-12.
21. Duit, R. (2009). Students' and teachers' conceptions and science education. Kiel: Institute for Science Education (IPN) (Distributed electronically).
22. Duit, R., & Treagust, D. (2003). Conceptual change: a powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671-688.
23. Duschl, R. A., & Gitomer, D. H. (1991). Epistemological perspectives on conceptual change: implications for educational practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 839-858.
24. Dykstra, D. I., Boyle, C. F., & Monach, I. A. (1992). Studying conceptual change in learning physics. Science Education, 76(6), 615-652.
25. Elby, A. (2010). Coherence vs. fragmentation in student epistemologies: a reply to Smith & Wenk. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 14(1), 1-22.
26. Engelhadt, P. V., & Beichner, R. J. (2004). Students' understanding of current resistive electrical circuits. American Journal of Physics, 72(1), 98-115.
27. Finkelstein, N. (2005). Learning physics in context: a study of student learning about electricity and magnetism. International Journal of Science Education, 27(10), 1187-109.
28. Fosnot, C. T. (Ed.) (1996) Constructivism: theory, perspectives and practice. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
29. Fredette, N., & Lochhead, J. (1980). Student conceptions of simple circuits. Physics Teacher, 18(3), 194-198.
30. Galili, I. (1995). Mechanics background influences students' conceptions in electromagnetism. International Journal of Science Education, 17(3), 371-387.
31. Grayson, D. J. (1994). Concept substitution: an instructional strategy for promoting conceptual change. Research in Science Education, 24, 102-111.
32. Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: a six-thousand student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64-74.
33. Hammer, D. (1996). Misconceptions or p-prims: how may alternative perspectives of cognitive structure influence instructional perceptions and intentions? The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5(2), 97-127.
34. Hewson, P. W. (1981). A conceptual change approach to learning science. European Journal of Science Education, 3, 383-396.
35. Hewson, P. W., & Hewson, M. G. (1984). The role of conceptual conflict in conceptual change and the design of science instruction. Instructional Science, 13, 1-13.
36. Ioannides, C., & Vosniadou, S. (2002). The changing meaning of force. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 2(1), 5-61.
37. Leppävirta, J. (2012). The effect of naïve ideas on students' reasoning about electricity and magnetism. Research in Science Education, 42(4), 753-767.
38. Li, S. C., Law, N., & Lui, K. F. A. (2006). Cognitive perturbation through dynamic modeling: a pedagogical approach to conceptual change in science. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(6), 405-422.
39. Linder, C. J. (1993). A challenge to conceptual change. Science Education, 77, 293-300.
40. Maloney, D. P., O'Kuma, T. L., Hieggelke, C. J., & Heuvelen, A. V. (2001). Surveying students' conceptual knowledge of electricity & magnetism. American Journal of Physics, S69(7), 12-23.
41. Marx, J. D. (1998). Creation of a Diagnostic Exam for Introductory, Undergraduate Electricity and Magnetism (Doctoral dissertation, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute). Retrieved from http://www. compadre. org/Repository/document/ServeFile. cfm?ID=3786&DocID=114. Accessed 5 December 2010.
42. McCloskey, M. (1983). Intuitive physics. Scientific American, 248(4), 122-130.
43. McDermott, L. C., & Redish, E. F. (1999). Resource letter: PER-1: physics education research. American Journal of Physics, 67(9), 755-767.
44. Minstrell, J. (1982). Explaining 'at rest' condition of an object. Physics Teacher, 20(1), 10-14.
45. MOE. (2009). Harmonized curriculum for BSc Degree program in Physics. Addis Ababa: Ethiopia.
46. Morgan, D. L. (1996). Focus groups. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 129-152.
47. Osborne, R. (1981). Children's ideas about electric current. New Zealand Science Teacher, 29, 12-19.
48. Osborne, R. (1983). Towards modifying children's ideas about electric current. Research in Science and Technological Education, 1(1), 73-83.
49. Parker, A., & Tritter, J. (2006). Focus group method and methodology: current practice and recent debate. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 29(1), 23-37.
50. Planinic, M. (2006). Assessment of difficulties of some conceptual areas from electricity & magnetism using the Conceptual survey of Electricity and Magnetism. American Journal of Physics, 73(12), 1143-1148.
51. Planinic, M., Boone, W. J., Krsnik, R., & Beilfuss, M. L. (2006). Exploring alternative conceptions from Newtonian dynamics and simple DC circuits: links between item difficulty and item confidence. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(2), 150-171.
52. Pollock, S. (2008, July 23-24). Comparing student learning with multiple research-based conceptual surveys: CSEM and BEMA. Paper presented at Physics Education Research Conference 2008, Edmonton, Canada. Retrieved from http://www. compadre. org/Repository/document/ServeFile. cfm?ID=8109&DocID=742. Accessed 5 January 2011.
53. Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211-227.
54. Rabiee, F. (2004). Focus-group interview and data analysis. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 63, 655-660.
55. Ramadas, J., Barve, S., & Kumar, A. (1996). Alternative conceptions in Galilean relativity: inertial and non-inertial observers. International Journal of Science Education, 18(5), 615-629.
56. Ritchie, J., & Spencer, L. (1994). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In A. Bryman & R. G. Burgess (Eds.), Analyzing qualitative data (pp. 173-194). London: Routledge.
57. Rosenthal, A. S., & Henderson, C. (2006). Teaching about circuits at the introductory level: an emphasis on potential difference. American Journal of Physics, 74(4), 324-328.
58. Saglam, M., & Millar, R. (2004). Diagnostic test of students' ideas in electromagnetism. Retrieved from http://www. york. ac. uk/depts/educ/research/ResearchPaperSeries/index. htm. Accessed 29 October 2010.
59. Saglam, M., & Millar, R. (2006). Upper high school students' understanding of electromagnetism. International Journal of Science Education, 28(5), 543-566.
60. Shipstone, D. M. (1984). A study of children's understanding of electricity in simple D. C. circuits. European Journal of Science Education, 6, 185-198.
61. Slotta, J. D., Chi, M. T. H., & Joram, E. (1995). Assessing students' misclassifications of physics concepts: an ontological basis for conceptual change. Cognition and Instruction, 13, 373-400.
62. Smith, C. L., & Wenk, L. (2006). Relations among three aspects of first-year college students' epistemologies of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(8), 747-785.
63. Stavy, R. (1998). Special issue: conceptual development in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 20(10), 1151-1154.
64. Tao, P. K., & Gunstone, R. F. (1999). The process of conceptual change in force and motion during computer-supported physics instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(7), 859-882.
65. Thagard, P. (1990). Concepts and conceptual change. Syntheses, 82, 255-274.
66. Treagust, D., & Duit, R. (2008). Conceptual change: a discussion of theoretical, methodological and practical challenges for science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3(2), 297-328.
67. Valerie, V. (1997). 'Focus groups: a useful qualitative method for educational research?'. British Educational Research Journal, 23(2), 209-224.
68. Venville, G. J., Louisell, R. D., & Wilhelm, J. A. (2012). Young children's knowledge about the moon: a complex dynamic system. Research in Science Education, 42(4), 729-752.
69. Von Glasersfeld, E., & Steffe, L. P. (1991). Conceptual models in educational research and practice. Journal of Educational Thought, 25(2), 91-103.
70. Vosniadou, S. (2002). On the nature of naïve physics. In M. Limon & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change. Issues in theory and practice (pp. 61-76). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
71. Vosniadou, S. (2007). Conceptual change and education. Human Development, 50, 47-54.
72. Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1987). Theories of knowledge restructuring in development. Review of Educational Research, 57(1), 51-67.
73. Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1992). Mental models of the earth. A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 535-585.
74. Zavala, G., & Alarcon, H. (2008, July 23-24). Evaluation of Instruction Using the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism in Mexico. Paper presented at Physics Education Research Conference 2008, Edmonton, Canada. Retrieved from http://www. compadre. org/Repository/document/ServeFile. cfm?ID=8126&DocID=759. Accessed 1 December 2010.