The puzzling reliability of the Force Concept Inventory

American Journal of Physics

Volumn 79, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 909-912

  Lasry, Nathaniel ^a,b   Rosenfield, Steven ^a,c   Dedic, Helena ^a,c   Dahan, Ariel ^a,d   Reshef, Orad ^e  

^a Systematic Reviews Project Manager Centre for the Study of Learning and Performance   (Canada)

^b JOHN ABBOTT COLLEGE   (Canada)

^c CEGEP Vanier College   (Canada)

^d MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^e HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80051814865     PISSN: 00029505     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1119/1.3602073     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Hestenes D. Wells M. Swackhamer G. Force concept inventory. Phys. Teach. 1992, 30:141-158. 10.1119/1.2343497, and ",".
2. Halloun I.A. Hestenes D. The initial knowledge state of college physics students. Am. J. Phys. 1985, 53:1043-1055. 10.1119/1.14030, and ",".
3. Halloun I.A. Hestenes D. Common-sense concepts about motion. Am. J. Phys. 1985, 53:1056-1065. 10.1119/1.14031, and ",".
4. Mazur E. Peer Instruction: A User's Manual 1997, (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, ).
5. McDermott L.C. Redish E.F. Resource letter: PER-1: Physics education research. Am. J. Phys. 1999, 67:755-767. 10.1119/1.19122, and ",".
6. Hake R.R. Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. Am. J. Phys. 1998, 66:64-74. 10.1119/1.18809, ",".
7. The order of magnitude of the FCI data at Arizona State University is at least 50000 cases. Through the Interactive Learning Toolkit test module, the Mazur group at Harvard University has close to 10000 cases. There are several hundreds of undocumented FCI administrations each semester worldwide. We would not be surprised if the order of magnitude of FCI administrations was close to one million since its initial publication in 1992.
8. McDonald R.P. Test Theory: A Unified Treatment 1999, (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, ).
9. Thornton R.K. Sokoloff D.R. Assessing student learning of Newton's laws: The force and motion conceptual evaluation and the evaluation of active learning laboratory and lecture curricula. Am. J. Phys. 1998, 66:338-351. 10.1119/1.18863, and ",".
10. Thornton R.K. Kuhl D. Cummings K. Marx J. Comparing the force and motion conceptual evaluation and the force concept inventory. Phys. Rev. STPhys. Educ. Res. 2009, 5:010105. 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.5.010105, and ",".
11. Bland J.M. Altman D.G. Cronbach's alpha. Br. Med. J. 1997, 314:572. and ",".
12. Sprinthall R.C. Basic Statistical Analysis 2003, 7th ed. (Allyn and Bacon, Boston, ). Also see .
13. Hammer D. Elby A. Scherr R.E. Redish E.F. Resources, framing, and transfer. Transfer of Learning from a Modern Multidisciplinary Perspective 2005, J. Mestre, and "," in edited by (Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, CT, ).
14. Redish E.F. A theoretical framework for physics education research: Modeling student thinking. Proceedings of the 2004 Enrico Fermi Summer School 1-63. E. Redish, C. Tarsitani, M. Vicentini, "," in Course CLVI, Italian Physical Society, edited by and pp.
15. Sabella M.S. Redish E.F. Knowledge organization and activation in physics problem solving. Am. J. Phys. 2007, 75:1017-1029. 10.1119/1.2746359, and ",".
16. Huffman D. Heller P. What does the force concept inventory actually measure?. Phys. Teach. 1995, 33:138-143. 10.1119/1.2344171, and ",".
17. Hestenes D. Halloun I. Interpreting the Force Concept Inventory: A response to March 1995 Critique by Huffman and Heller. Phys. Teach. 1995, 33:502-504. 10.1119/1.2344278, and ",".
18. Dedic H. Rosenfield S. Lasry N. Are all wrong FCI answers equivalent?. AIP Conf. Proc. 2010, 1289:125-128. and ",".
19. Vosniadou S. Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learn. Instr. 1994, 4:45-69. 10.1016/0959-4752(94)90018-3, ",".