Epistemological sensitisation causes deeper elaboration during self-regulated learning

Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL

Volumn , Issue PART 2, 2008, Pages 213-220

  Pieschl, Stephanie ^a   Bromme, Rainer ^a   Porsch, Torsten ^a   Stahl, Elmar ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOMAIN KNOWLEDGE; EPISTEMOLOGICAL BELIEFS; GENETIC FINGERPRINTING; LEARNING PROCESS; METACOGNITIVES; PLANNING STAGES; SELF-REGULATED LEARNING; TASK COMPLEXITY;

HYPERTEXT SYSTEMS;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84880431364     PISSN: 15734552     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., et al. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing. A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York, Longman.
2. Bendixen, L. D. & Hartley, K. (2003). Successful learning with hypermedia: The role of epistemological beliefs and metacognitive awareness. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 28(1): 15-30.
3. Buehl, M. M. & Alexander, P. A. (2001). Beliefs about academic knowledge. Educational Psychology Review, 13(4): 385-418.
4. Elby, A. & Hammer, D. (2001). On the substance of a sophisticated epistemology. Science Education, 85(5): 554-567.
5. Ford, N. & Chen, S. Y. (2000). Individual differences, hypermedia navigation and learning: an empirical study. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9(4): 281-311.
6. Glenberg, A. M. & Epstein, W. (1987). Inexpert calibration of comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 15(1): 84-93.
7. Greene, J. A. & Azevedo, R. (2007). A Theoretical Review of Winne and Hadwin's Model of Self-Regulated Learning: New Perspectives and Directions. Review of Educational Research, 77(3): 334-372.
8. Hammer, D. & Elby, A. (2003). Tapping epistemological resources for learning physics. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12 (1), 53-90.
9. Hofer, B. K. (2004). Epistemological understanding as a metacognitive process: thinking aloud during online-searching. Educational Psychologist, 39(1): 43-55.
10. Hofer, B. K. & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1): 88-140.
11. Jacobson, M. J. & Spiro, R. J. (1995). Hypertext learning environments, cognitive flexibility, and the transfer of complex knowledge: An empirical investigation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12(4): 301-333.
12. Jamieson-Noel, D. & Winne, P. H. (2003). Comparing self-reports to traces of studying behavior as representations of students' studying and achievement. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 17(3/4): 159-171.
13. Kardash, C. M. & Howell, K. L. (2000). Effects of epistemological beliefs and topic-specific beliefs on undergraduates' cognitive and strategic processing of dual-positional text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3): 524-535.
14. Kitchener, K. S. (1983). Cognition, metacognition, and epistemic cognition: A three-level model of cognitive processing. Human Development, 26: 106-116.
15. Kuhn, D. (2000). Metacognitive development. Current Directions in Psychological Sciences, 9(5): 178-181.
16. Lawless, K. A., Brown, S. W., Mills, R. & Mayall, H. J. (2003). Knowledge, interest, recall and navigation: A look at hypertext processing. Journal of Literacy Research, 35(3): 911-934.
17. Mason, L. & Boscolo, P. (2004). Role of epistemological understanding and interest in interpreting a controversy and in topic-specific belief change. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29: 103-128.
18. Murray, T. (2003). MetaLinks: Authoring and affordances for conceptual and narrative flow in adaptive hyperbooks. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Education, Vol. 13 (Special Issue on Adaptive and Intelligent Web-Based Systems).
19. Nelson, T. O. & J. Dunlosky (1991). When people's judgements of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: the delayed-JOL effect. Psychological Science, 2(4): 267-270.
20. Rouet, J.-F., M. Favart, Britt, M. A. & Perfetti, C. A. (1997). Studying and using multiple documents in history: effects of discipline expertise. Cognition and Instruction, 15(1): 85-106.
21. Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3): 498-504.
22. Schommer, M. (1993). Epistemological development and academic performance among secondary students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3): 406-411.
23. Stahl, E. and R. Bromme (in press). CAEB. An instrument to measure connotative aspects of epistemological beliefs. Learning and Instruction.
24. Stahl, E., Bromme R., Stadtler, M. & Jaron, R. (2006). Learning by hypertext writing: effects of considering a single audience versus multiple audiences on knowledge acquisition. Recent developments in writing process research. In D. Galbraith, L. van Waes and M. Torrance. Dordrecht, Kluwer. 2: Methods and applications: 307-321.
25. Stahl, E., Pieschl S., Bromme R. (2006). Task complexity, epistemological beliefs and metacognitive calibration: An exploratory study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35(4): 319-338.
26. Trautwein, U. & O. Lüdke (in press). Predicting global and topic-specific certaint beliefs: Domain-specificity and the role of academic environment. British Journal of Educational Psychology.
27. Winne, P. H. & A. F. Hadwin (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. Metacognition in educational theory and practice. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky and A. C. Graesser. Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: 277-304.