Dreams, strategies and systems: Portraits of assessment past, present and future

Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 65-85

  Black, Paul ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0011108812     PISSN: 0969594X     EISSN: 1465329X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09695940120033261     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. ATKIN, J.M., and BLACK, P.J., 1997. Policy perils of international comparisons: the TIMSS case. Phi Delta Kappan, 79(1): 22–28.
2. ASE KEY STAGE 3 MONITORING GROUP. September 1992. Report on the monitoring of Key Stage 3, Education in Science September, 18–19.
3. BLACK, H. D., 1986. “ Assessment for learning ”. In Assessing Educational Achievement, Edited by: NUTTALL, D. L., 7–18. London: Falmer.
4. BLACK, H. D., and DOCKRELL, W. B., 1984. Criterion Referenced Assessment in the Classroom, Edinburgh: Scottish Council for Research in Education.
5. BLACK, P., 1998. Learning, league tables and national assessment: opportunity lost or hope deferred?. Oxford Review of Education, 24(1): 57–68.
6. BLACK, P., and WlLIAM, D., 1998a. Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1): 7–74.
7. BLACK, P., and WlLIAM, D., 1998b. Inside the Black Box: raising standards through classroom assessment (London, King's College). Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2) October: 139–148. [Also published in 1998.]
8. BLACK, P., HARRISON, C., LEE, C., and WILIAM, D., The King's Medway Oxfordshire Formative Assessment Project. paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Conference. September2000, Cardiff.
9. BLACK, P. J., 1993a. Formative and summative assessment by teachers. Studies in Science Education, 21: 49–97.
10. BLACK, P. J., 1993b. “ The shifting scenery of the National Curriculum ”. In Assessing the National Curriculum, Edited by: O'HEAR, P., and WHITE, J., 57–69. London: Paul Chapman.
11. BLACK, P. J., 1997. “ Whatever happened to TGAT? ”. In Assessment vs. Evaluation, Edited by: CULLINGFORD, C., 24–50. London: Cassell.
12. BOALER, J., 1997. Experiencing School Mathematics: teaching styles, sex and setting, Buckingham: Open University Press.
13. BOND, L., 1989. “ The effects of special preparation on measures of scholastic ability ”. In Educational Measurement, 3rd Edn, Edited by: LlNN, R. L., 429–444. New York, NY: Macmillan.
14. BREDO, E., 1994. Reconstructing educational psychology. Educational Psychologist, 29(1): 23–45.
15. BROADFOOT, P. M., 1996. Education, Assessment and Society. A sociological analysis, Buckingham: Open University Press.
16. CHOPPIN, B., and ORR, L., 1976. Aptitude Testing at 18+, Windsor: NFER Publishing.
17. CHRISTIE, T., 1995. “ Defining the reading domain ”. In Children Learning to Read: international concerns, Vol. 2, Curriculum and Assessment Issues: messages for teachers, Edited by: OWEN, P., and PUMFREY, P., 107–120. London: Palmer.
18. COLE, N. S., and MOSS, P. A., 1989. “ Bias in test use ”. In Educational Measurement, 3rd Edn, Edited by: LINN, R. L., 201–219. New York, NY: Macmillan.
19. CRONBACH, L. J., 1957. The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12: 671–684.
20. CROUSE, J., and TRUSHELM, D., 1988. The Case Against the SAT, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21. DAWS, N., and SINGH, B., 1996. Formative assessment; to what extent is its potential to enhance pupils' science being realised?. School Science Review, 77: 93–100.
22. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE. 1988a. National Curriculum: Task Group on Assessment and Testing: a report, London: Department of Education and Science and Welsh Office.
23. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE. 1988b. National Curriculum: Task Group on Assessment and Testing: three supplementary reports, London: Department of Education and Science and Welsh Office.
24. GARDNER, H., 1993. Multiple Intelligences: the theory in practice, New York, NY: Basic Books.
25. GlFFORD, B. R., and O'CONNOR, M. C., eds. 1992. Changing Assessments: alternative views of aptitude, achievement and instruction, Boston, MA: Kluwer.
26. GLASER, R., 1963. Instructional technology and the measurement of learning outcomes: some questions. American Psychologist, 18: 519–521.
27. GLASER, R., 1991. “ Expertise and assessment ”. In Testing and Cognition, Edited by: WlTTROCK, M. C., and BAKER, E. L., 17–30. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
28. GREENO, J. G., PEARSON, P. D., and SCHOENFELD, A. H., 1996. Implications for NAEP of Research on Learning and Cognition. Report of a study commissioned by the National Academy of Education Panel on the NAEP trial state assessment, Stanford, CA: National Academy of Education.
29. HACKER, D. J., DUNLOSKY, J., and GRAESSER, A. C., eds. 1998. Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30. HANSON, F. A., 1993. Testing Testing: social consequences of the examined life, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
31. HEUBERT, J. P., and HAUSER, R. M., eds. 1999. High Stakes; testing for tracking, promotion and graduation, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
32. HOLMES, E., 1911. What Is And What Might Be, London: Constable.
33. JOHNSTON, P., GUICE, S., BAKER, K., MALONE, J., and MICHELSON, N., 1995. Assessment of teaching and learning in literature-based classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11: 359–371.
34. LEMANN, N., 1999. The Big Test, New York, NY: Farrar, Strauss & Giroux.
35. LINN, R. L., 1994. Assessment Based Reform: challenges to educational measurement, Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
36. LINN, R. L., 2000. Assessments and accountability. Educational Researcher, 29(2): 4–16.
37. LINN, R. L., GRAUE, E., and SANDERS, N. M., 1990. Comparing state and district test results to national norms: the validity of claims 'That everyone is above average'. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 9(3): 5–14.
38. MACLEOD, R., ed. 1982. Days of Judgement: science examinations and the organisation of knowledge in late Victorian England, Driffield: Nafferton Books.
39. MADAUS, G. F., and RACZEK, A. E., 1996. “ The extent and growth of educational testing in the United States: 1956-1994 ”. In Assessment: problems, developments and statistical issues, Edited by: GOLDSTEIN, H., and LEWIS, T., 145–165. Chichester: John Wiley.
40. MCBRIDE, J. R., 1998. “ Innovations in computer-based ability testing: promise, problems and perils ”. In Beyond Multiple Choice: evaluating alternatives to traditional testing for selection, Edited by: HAKEL, M. D., 23–40. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41. MISLEVY, R. J., 1993. “ Foundations of a new test theory ”. In Test Theory for a New Generation of Tests, Edited by: FREDERIKSEN, N., MISLEVY, R. J., and BEJAR, I. I., 19–39. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
42. MISLEVY, R. J., 1996. Test theory reconceived. Journal of Educational Measurement, 33: 379–416.
43. MORGAN, R., 1989. Analyses of the Predictive Validity of the SAT and High School Grades From 1976 to 1985, College Board Report no. 89-7, New York, NY: College Entrance Examination Board.
44. NOAH, H. J., and ECKSTEIN, M. A., 1990. “ Trade-offs in examination policies: an international comparative perspective ”. In Changing Educational Assessment: international perspectives and trends, Edited by: BROADFOOT, P., MURPHY, R., and TORRANCE, H., 84–97. London: Routledge.
45. NUTHALL, G., and ALTON-LEE, A., 1995. Assessing classroom learning; how students use their knowledge and experience to answer classroom achievement test questions in science and social studies. American Educational Research Journal, 32(1): 185–223.
46. PELLEGRINO, J. W., BAXTER, G. P., and GLASER, R., 1999. Addressing the 'two disciplines' problem: linking theories of cognition with assessment and instructional practice. Review of Research in Education, 24: 307–353.
47. RUSSELL, T. A., QUALTER, A., and MCGUIGAN, L., 1995. Reflections on the implementation of National Curriculum science policy for the 5-14 age range: findings and interpretations from a national evaluation study in England. International Journal of Science Education, 17: 481–492.
48. SADLER, R., 1989. Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18: 119–144.
49. SELDEN, S., 1999. Inheriting Shame: the story of eugenics and racism in America, New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
50. SLAVIN, R. E., 1996. Reforming state and federal policies to support adoption of proven practice. Educational Researcher, 25(9): 4–5.
51. SNOW, R. E., and LOHMAN, D. F., 1989. “ Implications of cognitive psychology for educational measurement ”. In Educational Measurement, 3rd Edn, Edited by: LlNN, R. E., 263–331. New York, NY: American Council on Education/Macmillan.
52. STERNBERG, R. J., 1997. Thinking Styles, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53. SUTHERLAND, G., 1973. Policy-Making in Elementary Eductaion 1870-1895, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54. WOOD, D., BRUNER, J. S., and ROSS, G., 1976. The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 17: 89–100.
55. WOOD, R., 1991. Assessment and Testing: a survey of research, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56. YOUNG, M., 1959. The Rise of the Meritocracy, 1870-2033: the new élite of our social revolution, New York, NY: Random House.