Sociocultural implications for assessment i: Classroom assessment

Assessment, Equity, and Opportunity to Learn

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 222-258

  Moss, Pamela A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84923423120     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511802157.010     Document Type: Chapter

References (25)

1. American Education Research Association, American Psychological Association & National Council on Measurement in Education. 1999. Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington DC: American Educational Research Association.
2. Barton, D. and K. Tusting. 2006. Beyond communities of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Delandshere, G. 2002. Assessment as inquiry. Teachers College Record 104: 1461-84.
4. Engeström, Y. 1993. Developmental studies of work as a testbench of activity theory: The case of primary care medical practice. In Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context, edited by S. Chaiklin and J. Lave, 64-103. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Engeström, Y. 1987. Learning by expanding: An activity theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
6. Engeström, Y. 1999. Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Perspectives on Activity Theory, edited by Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, and R. Punämaki, 19-38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Engeström, Y. 2001. Expansive learning at work: toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work 14: 134-56.
8. Erickson, F. 2007. Some thoughts on “proximal” formative assessment of student learning. In Evidence and decision making (Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education), issue 1, edited by P. A. Moss. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishing.
9. Gibson, J. J. 1977. The theory of affordances. In Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing: Toward an Ecological Psychology, edited by Shaw, R., and Bransford, J., 67-82. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10. Gibson, J. J. 1979. The ecological approach to visual preception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
11. Gipps, C. V. 1999. Socio-cultural aspects of assessment. In Review of Research in Education, edited by A. Iran-Nejad and P.D. Pearson, 355-92. Washington, D.C.: American Educational Research Association.
12. Gipps, C. V. 2002. Sociocultural perspectives on assessment. In Learning for Life in the 21st Century, edited by G. Wells and G. Claxton, 73-83. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishing.
13. Greeno, J. G. 2002. Students with competence, authority and accountability: Affording intellective identities in the classroom. The College Board.
14. Hickey, D. T. and S. J. Zuiker 2003. A new perspective for evaluating innovative science programs. Science Education 87: 539-63.
15. Johnston, P. H. 1992. Constructive evaluation of literate activity. New York: Longman.
16. Jordan, B. and P. Putz. 2004. Assessment as practice: Notes on measures, tests, and targets. Human Organization 63: 346-58.
17. Lampert, M. 2001. Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. New Haven: Yale University Press.
18. Lave, J. 1993. The practice of learning. In Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context, edited by S. Chaiklin and J. Lave, 3-32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Lave, J. 1996. Teaching, as learning, in practice. Mind, Culture, and Activity 3: 149-64.
20. Lave, J. and E. Wenger. 1991. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21. Mislevy, R J., J. P. Gee, and P. A. Moss. In press. On qualitative and quantitative reasoning about assessment validity. In generalizing from educational research: Beyond the quantitative-qualitative opposition, edited by K. Ercikan and W. -M. Roth. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.
22. Moss, P. A. 2004. The meaning and consequences of reliability. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 29: 241-5.
23. Moss, P. A., B. J. Girard, and L. C. Haniford. 2006. Validity in educational assessment. Review of Research in Education 30: 109-62.
24. Shepard, L. A. 2006. Classroom assessment. In Educational Measurement, 4th ed, edited by R. L. Brennan, 623-46.Westport, Conn.: American Council on Education/Praeger Publishers.
25. Wertsch, J. V. 1998. Mind as Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.