Student behavioural intentions to use desktop video conferencing in a distance course: Integration of autonomy to the UTAUT model

Journal of Computing in Higher Education

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 93-121

  Lakhal, Sawsen ^a   Khechine, Hager ^a   Pascot, Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Autonomy; Business education; Desktop video conferencing; Distance course; Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT)

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879435058     PISSN: 10421726     EISSN: 18671233     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12528-013-9069-3     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Abdous, M., & Yen, C. J. (2010). A predictive study of learner satisfaction and outcomes in face-to-face, satellite broadcast, and live video-streaming learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 248-257.
2. Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Bures, E. M., Borokhovski, E., & Tamim, R. M. (2011). Interaction in distance education and online learning: Using evidence and theory to improve practice. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 23(2-3), 82-103.
3. AbuShanab, E., Pearson, J. M., & Setterstrom, A. (2010). Internet banking and customers' acceptance in Jordan: The unified model's perspective. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 26(1), 493-524.
4. Adler, R. W., Milne, M. J., & Stablein, R. (2001). Situated motivation: An empirical test in an accounting class. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 18(2), 101-116.
5. Agnes, W. S. K. (2012). Relationship between participation in the webinar and students' behaviours and engagement in online learning. Un-edited master thesis, University of Toronto, Canada.
6. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
7. Alavi, M., Wheeler, B. C., & Valacich, J. S. (1995). Using IT to reengineer business education: An exploratory investigation of collaborative telelearning. MIS Quarterly, 19(3), 293-312.
8. Al-Gahtani, S. S., Hubona, G. S., & Wang, J. (2007). Information technology (IT) in Saudi Arabia: Culture and the acceptance and use of IT. Information and Management, 44(8), 681-691.
9. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2004). Entering the mainstream: The quality and extent of online education in the United States, 2003 and 2004. Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium. Retrieved June 6, 2012, from http://sloanconsortium. org/resources/entering_mainstream. pdf.
10. Bakar, A. A., Razak, F. Z. A., & Abdullah, W. S. W. (2013). Assessing the effects of UTAUT and self-determination predictor on students continuance intention to use student portal. World Applied Sciences Journal, 21(10), 1484-1489.
11. Bandyopadhyay, K., & Fraccastoro, K. (2007). The effect of culture on user acceptance of information technology. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 19(1), 522-543.
12. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
13. Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., et al. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 379-439.
14. Biggs, J. B. (1979). Individual differences in study processes and the quality of learning outcomes. Higher Education, 8(4), 381-394.
15. Bilodeau, H. (1995). Enseignement à distance à l'aide de tableaux électroniques. Report prepared for the Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue, Abitibi-Témiscamingue, Canada.
16. Birch, A., & Irvine, V. (2009). Preservice teachers' acceptance of ICT integration in the classroom: Applying the UTAUT model. Educational Media International, 46(4), 295-315.
17. Bolliger, D., & Martindale, T. (2004). Key factors for determining student satisfaction in online courses. International Journal on E-Learning, 3(1), 61-67.
18. Bourbon, I., & Hollet-Haudebert, S. (2009). Pourquoi contribuer à des bases de connaissances? Une exploration des facteurs explicatifs à la lumière du modèle UTAUT. Systèmes d'Information et Management, 14(1), 9-36.
19. Bower, M., Kennedy, G. E., Dalgarno, B., & Lee, M. J. (2011). Uniting on-campus and distributed learners through media-rich synchronous tools: A national project. Changing demands, changing directions. Proceedings Ascilite Hobart, 2011, 150-155.
20. Brown, S. A., Dennis, A. R., & Venkatesh, V. (2010). Predicting collaboration technology use: Integrating technology adoption and collaboration research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(2), 9-53.
21. Chen, C., Wu, J., & Yang, S. C. (2008). Accelerating the use of weblogs as an alternative method to deliver case-based learning. International Journal on E-Learning, 7(2), 331-349.
22. Cheng, Y. K., Cheng, K. W. E., Kwok, K. F., & Cheung, T. K. (2004). New medium teaching method for power electronics. In Proceedings of thefirst international conference on power electronics systems and applications, pp. 278-283.
23. Cheng, Y. S., Yu, T. F., Huang, C. F., Yu, C., & Yu, C. C. (2011). The comparison of three major occupations for user acceptance of information technology: Applying the UTAUT model. iBusiness, 3(2), 147-158.
24. Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research: Methodology for business and management. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
25. Chin, W. W. (2001). PLS-Graph User's Guide, Version 3. 0. C. T. Bauer College of Business, University of Houston, USA. Retrieved August 7, 2012, from http://carma. wayne. edu//Documents/OCT1405/PLSGRAPH3. 0Manual. hubona. pdf.
26. Chin, W. W., & Dibbern, J. (2010). An introduction to a permutation based procedure for multi-group PLS analysis: Results of tests of differences on simulated data and a cross cultural analysis of the sourcing of information system services between Germany and the USA. In Handbook of partial least squares (pp. 171-193). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
27. Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189-211.
28. Costa, P. T., & McCrea, R. R. (1992a). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO personality inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 5-13.
29. Costa, P. T., & McCrea, R. R. (1992b). Manual for the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
30. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-339.
31. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
32. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111-1132.
33. de Gara, C., & Boora, R. (2006). Using Elluminate as a simple solution for telehealth initiatives for continuing medical education. In T. Reeves & S. Yamashita (Eds.), Proceedings of world conference on e-learning in corporate, government, healthcare, and higher education 2006 (pp. 476-480). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
34. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1995). Human autonomy: The basis for true self-esteem. In M. Kemis (Ed.), Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem. New York: Plenum.
35. Eckhardt, A., Laumer, S., & Weitzel, T. (2009). Who influences whom? Analyzing workplace referents' social influence on IT adoption and non-adoption. Journal of Information Technology, 24(1), 11-24.
36. Fabry, D. L. (2012). Using student online course evaluations to inform pedagogy. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching, 5(1), 45-52.
37. Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
38. Fillion G. (2005). L'intégration des TIC dans la formation universitaire: Une étude des résultats éducationnels des étudiants dans les contextes de présence et de non présence en classe. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Université Laval, Canada.
39. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
40. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
41. Gefen, D., & Straub, D. W. (2005). A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-graph: Tutorial and annotated example. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16(1), 91-109.
42. Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1988). An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(2), 186-192.
43. Giesbrecht, T., Pfister, J. & Schwabe, G. (2012). A self-determination perspective on IT-based citizen advisory support. In 45th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Hawaii, USA.
44. Gosmire, D., Morrison, M., & van Osdel, J. (2009). Perceptions of interactions in online courses. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 5(4), 609-617.
45. Guichon, N. (2010). Preparatory study for the design of a desktop videoconferencing platform for synchronous language teaching. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(2), 169-182.
46. Harms, P. D., Roberts, B. W., & Wood, D. (2006). Who shall lead? An integrative personality approach to the study of the antecedents of status in informal social organizations. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(3), 689-699.
47. Hiltz, S. R., & Turoff, M. (1994). Virtual classroom plus video: Technology for educational excellence. In Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 94 word conference on educational multimedia and hypermedia, Vancouver, Canada.
48. Karabulut, A., & Correia, A. (2008, March). Skype, Elluminate, Adobe Connect, Ivisit: A comparison of web-based video conferencing systems for learning and teaching. In Society for information technology & teacher education international conference (Vol. 2008, No. 1, pp. 481-484).
49. Lakhal, S., Frenette, É., Sévigny, S., & Khechine, H. (2012). Influence of personality on choice of business major. International Journal of Management Education, 10(2), 88-100.
50. Lawson, T., Comber, C., Gage, J., & Cullum-Hanshaw, A. (2010). Images of the future for education? Videoconferencing: A literature review. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19(3), 295-314.
51. Lin, J., Chan, H. C., & Jin, Y. (2004). Instant messaging acceptance and use among college students. In: Proceedings of the eighth Pacific Asia conference on information systems, pp. 181-194.
52. Lin, P. C., Lu, H. K., & Liu, C. (2013). Towards an education behavioral intention model for e-learning systems: An extension of UTAUT. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 47(3), 1120-1127.
53. Lounsbury, J. W., Smith, R. M., Levy, J. J., Leon, F. T., & Gibson, L. W. (2009). Personality characteristics of business majors as defined by the Big Five and narrow personality traits. Journal of Education for Business, 84(4), 200-206.
54. Lu, J., Yu, C. S., & Liu, C. (2009). Mobile data service demographics in urban China. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 50(2), 117-126.
55. Martins, L. L., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2004). A model of business school students' acceptance of a Web-based course management system. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 3(1), 7-26.
56. Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192-222.
57. Myers, M. P., & Schiltz, P. M. (2012). Use of Elluminate in online teaching of statistics in the health sciences. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching, 5(1), 53-62.
58. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw Hill.
59. Ouédraogo, B. (2011). Les déterminants de l'intégration pédagogique des Technologies de l'Information et de la Communication (TIC) par les enseignants à l'Université de Ouagadougou (Burkina Faso). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
60. Pitcher, N., Davidson, K., & Napier, J. G. (2000). Videoconferencing in higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 37(3), 199-209.
61. Roca, J. C., & Gagné, M. (2008). Understanding e-learning continuance intention in the workplace: A self-determination theory perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(4), 1585-1604.
62. San Martin, H., & Herrero, A. (2012). Influence of the user's psychological factors on the online purchase intention in rural tourism: Integrating innovativeness to the UTAUT framework. Tourism Management, 33(2), 341-350.
63. Schifter, D. B., & Ajzen, I. (1985). Intention, perceived control, and weight loss: An application of the theory of planned behaviour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 842-851.
64. Schubert-Irastorza, C., & Fabry, D. (2011). Improving student satisfaction with online faculty performance. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching, 4(1), 168-179.
65. Skylar, A. A. (2009). A comparison of asynchronous online text-based lectures and synchronous interactive web conferencing lectures. Issues in Teacher Education, 18(2), 69-84.
66. Sorebo, O., Halvari, H., Gulli, V. F., & Kristiansen, R. (2009). The role of self-determination theory in explaining teachers' motivation to continue to use e-learning technology. Computers & Education, 53, 1177-1187.
67. Stein, G. H., Shibata, A., Bautista, M. K., & Tokuda, Y. (2010). Webinar: An initial experience with web-based real time interactive clinical seminars for Japanese medical students. General Medicine, 11(2), 87-90.
68. Tan, P. J. B. (2013). Students' adoptions and attitudes towards electronic placement tests: A UTAUT analysis. American Journal of Computer Technology and Application, 1(1), 14-23.
69. Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144-176.
70. Teo, T., & Wong, S. L. (2013). Modeling key drivers of E-learning satisfaction among student teachers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 48(1), 71-95.
71. Thompson, R., Higgins, C., & Howell, J. (1991). Personal computing: Toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Quarterly, 15(1), 125-143.
72. Urban-Lurain, M., & Weinshank, D. (2000). Computing Concepts and Competencies. In D. G. Brown (Ed.), Interactive learning: Vignette from America's most wired campus. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing Company Inc.
73. U. S. Department of Education (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Retrieved June 6, 2012, from http://www2. ed. gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport. pdf.
74. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.
75. Venkatesh, V., & Morris, M. (2000). Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 115-139.
76. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
77. Wang, S.-K., & Hsu, H.-Y. (2008). Use of the webinar tool to support training: The effects of webinar-learning implementation from trainers' perspective. Journal of Online Interactive Learning, 7(3), 175-194.
78. Wang, R., Mattick, K., & Dunne, E. (2010). Medical students' perceptions of video-linked lectures and video-streaming. Research in Learning Technology, 18(1), 19-27.
79. Wilson, B. (1990). Student's assessment of distance learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association.