Assessing the effects of UTAUT and self-determination predictor on students continuance intention to use student portal

World Applied Sciences Journal

Volumn 21, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 1484-1489

  Bakar, Azlina Abu ^a   Razak, Fahmi Zaidi Abdul ^a   Abdullah, Wan Salihin Wong ^a  

^a UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA TERENGGANU   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Continuance intention; E learning; Structural equation modeling

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876010179     PISSN: 18184952     EISSN: 19916426     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.21.10.2920     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Selim, H.M., 2007. Critical Succsess factor for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models. Computer and Education, pp: 396-413.
2. Brmgula, R.P. and R.S. Basa, 2011. Factors Affecting Faculty Web Portal Usability. Educational Technology and Society, 14(4): 253-265.
3. Chen, J.L., 2011. The Effects of Education Compatibility and Technological Expectancy on e-Learning Acceptance. Computers and Education, (57): 1501-1511.
4. Chm, CM. and E.T.G. Wang, 2008. Understanding Web-Based Learning Continuance Intention: The Role Of Subjective Task value. Information and management, 45: 194-201.
5. Schauppa, L.C. and M.E.M. Lemuria Carter, 2010. E-fileadoption: Astudy of U.S. taxpayers' intentions. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4): 636-644.
6. Yi-Shun Wang, H.H.L. and Y.W. Liao, 2010. Investigating the individual difference antecedents of perceived enjoyment in the acceptance of Blogging. in World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, pp: 67.
7. Chen, K.C. and S.J. Jang, 2010. Motivation in online learning: Testing a model of self-determination theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 26: 741-752.
8. Matthew, K.O., C.M.K.C. Lee and Z. Chen, 2005. Acceptance of Internet-based learning medium: the role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Information and Management, 42(8): 1095-1104.
9. Liu, Y., S. Han and H. Li, 2010. Understanding the factors driving m-learning adoption a literature review. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 27(4): 210-226.
10. Bostjan Sumak, G.P. and M. Hencko, 2010. An Empirical Study of Virtual Learning Environment Adoption Using UTAUT. in Second International Conference on Mobile, Hybrid and On-Line Learning. St. Maarten: CPS Publications.
11. Islam, A.K.M.N., 2011. Understanding Continued Usage Intention in Intention in e-Learning Context, in 24th Bled eConference eFuture: Creating Solutions for the Individual, Organisations and Society. 2011. Bled, Slovenia.
12. Jong, D., 2009. The Acceptance and Use of the Learning Management System. in Fourth International Conference on Innovative Computing, Information and Control.
13. I Gusti, Nyoman Sedana, S.W.W., 2010. UTAUT Model for Understanding Learning Management System. Internetworking Indonesia Journal, 2(2): 27-32.
14. Mohamed Yamin, Y.L., 2010. Level of Acceptance and Factors Influencing Students' Intention to Use UCSI University's E-Mail System. International Conference on User Science Engineering (i-USERr), pp: 26-31.
15. Omar F, El-Gayar and M M College, 2006. Students Acceptance of Tablet PCs: An Application of UTAUT Model, pp: 2845-2850.
16. Ismail, S., Students Acceptance in 2009. Using Blog as Learning Tool in an International Private University, in ICI9-International Conference on Information. 2009. Kuala Lumpur.
17. Chen, C, J.P. Wu and S.C. Yang, 2008. Accelerating the use of Weblogs as an Alternative Method to deliver Case-Based Learning. International JI. one-Learning, 7(2): 331-349.
18. Santromx Computers, 2012. in SANTRONIX Computers Web site.
19. Venkatesh, V., M.G. Morris and G.B. Davis, 2003. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3): 425-478.
20. Ryan R.M and E.L. Deci, 2000. Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25: 54-67.
21. Roca, J.C. and M.N. Gagne, 2008. Understanding e-learning continuance intention in the workplace: A self-determination theory perspective. Human Behavior, 24: 1585-1604.
22. Davis, F.D., R.P. Bagozzi and P.R. Warshaw, 1992. Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14): 1111-1132.
23. Bhattacherjee, A., 2001. Understanding information systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3): 351-370.
24. Pai, J.C. and F.M. Tu, 2011. The acceptance and use of customer relationship management (CRM): An empirical study of distribution service industry in Taiwan. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(1): 579-584.
25. Hu, L.T. and P.M. Bentler, 1999. Cutoff cntena for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling, 6(1): 1-55.
26. Kline, R.B., 2011. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modelling. New York: The Guilford Press.
27. Schmitt, N, 1996. Uses and Abuses of Coefficient alpha. Psychological Assessment, 8: 350-353.
28. Segars, A., 1997. Assessing the Umdimensionality of Measurement: a Paradigm and Illustration Within the Context of Information Systems Research. Omega, 25(1): 107-121.
29. Fornell, C. and D.F. Larcker, 1981. Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1): 39-50.
30. Hair, J.F., et al, 2010. Multivariate Data Analysis. Pearson Prentice Hall.
31. Anderson, J.C. and D.W. Gerbing, 1988. Sructural Equation Modelling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two Step Approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3): 411-423.
32. Øystein Sørebø, H.H. and R.K. Vebjørn Flaata Gulli, 2009. The role of self-determination theory in explaining teachers' motivation to continue to use e-learning technology. Computers and Education, pp: 1177-1187.
33. Liua, C. and K.P. Arnett, 2000. Exploring the factors associated with Web site success in the context of electronic commerce. Information and Management, 38:23-33.
34. I-Fan Liu, M.C.C., D.W. Yeah, S. Sun and Chin-Hwa Kuo, 2010. Extending the TAM Model to Explore the Factors that Affect Intention to Use an Online Learning Community, Computer and Education, (54): 600-610.
35. Chang, S.J., A.V. Witteloostuijn and L. Eden, 2010. From the Editors: Common method variance in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 41: 178-184.